The attack was the largest terror attack to strike the United States in the 20th century, leaving 168 people dead 500 wounded and destroying large sections of the building.
After more than two decades it is clear that as well as being an horrific massacre, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing was a key milestone in the infiltration and destruction of the United States, along with the Kennedy assassination and 911 it stands as a signpost marking the triumph of tyranny and lies in the “land of the free.”
This operation was the culmination of an effort over decades to infiltrate, discredit and destroy the patriot and militia movements and like the Kennedy assassination earlier and the later 911 event enabled the Shadow Government to show the reach of their power and their ability to shape reality towards their ends, regardless of the facts.
The attack is attributed to a 4800 pound ANFO based bomb built by Terry Nichols and Timothy McVeigh and placed in a Ryder truck rented by McVeigh. The men were supposedly motivated by ‘radical right anti- Government sentiments” and also by a desire to avenge the Waco incident of April 19th, 1993. To this day that story is widely believed.
Many facts have emerged in the twenty years since the attack that make it clear that the whole narrative of an extremist plot run by anti-Government militia types was completely untrue.
The attack was a false flag classic; in order to discredit a political enemy, the US government and other allied parties infiltrated the groups with agents and then helped and augmented the attack by providing the bomb that blew up the building as well as facilitating the patsies in their shadow operation.
There are literally dozens of facts that prove the US government account of the Oklahoma City bombing is incomplete and untrue. Before attempting to chart what really happened and discover the identity of the perpetrators the most powerful and easily understood of the impossible contradictions will be explored briefly so that the credulous will understand the need for an investigation.
Fact No.1- John Doe 2 and the Missing CCTV footage of the attackers.
We know without a shadow of a doubt that the Government story is a lie because there are dozens of eyewitnesses and video footage of another man leaving the Ryder truck along with the Timothy McVeigh character. John Doe 2 was sought for several weeks before the FBI edited this individual from the story entirely and asserted that this individual and his presence at the scene were a figment of the imagination.
In order to achieve this the FBI had to sequester and suppress the CCTV footage from dozens of cameras positioned near the site of the blast.
FBI documents released to Kenneth Trentadue include FBI references to two individuals exiting the vehicle.
Members of the media were able to view some of the CCTV footage and were able to report the fact that there was a second man in the Ryder truck, John Doe 2 was a real person and not only was John Doe 2 present but the man was the final person to leave the Ryder truck and had sat inside the truck for several minutes after the “McVeigh” figure left the vehicle.
Oklahoma City Bombing Federal Surveillance Tapes Cover-up
The logical conclusion to this is that John Doe 2 was the person who actually armed the device and set it to detonate.
Not only does John Doe 2 exist beyond a shadow of doubt but this individual appears to be the prime mover behind the Ryder truck attack.
The brazen excision of John Doe 2, from the story is on its own rock solid proof that the US Government, the Justice Department and the FBI specifically have been involved in a cover up of the truth behind the attack.
Fact No.2- Foreknowledge.
Another fact that disqualifies the Official account relates to the revelations of BATF informant Carol Howe and the proven foreknowledge of the ATF and other Government agencies prior to the attack.
This foreknowledge related to the specific date and target of the attack leaving zero doubt that elements of the US Government knew the attack was coming and chose or were ordered to allow the attack to happen.
Carol Howe was an informant for the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms. Carol Howe was sent by the ATF to infiltrate an enclave of “white separatists” operating out of an Eastern Oklahoma property named Elohim City. Elohim is Hebrew for Gods.
With the black swastika tattoo on her upper arm Carol Howe was able to establish herself within Elohim City and became the trusted confidant of many of the people there.
In February 1995 Carol Howe reported to her handlers that a man named Andreas Strassmeir, the FBI/German and possibly Israeli intelligence operative serving as security chief at Elohim City was speaking openly of his desire to attack Government buildings, conduct assassinations and generally go to war with the US government. Carol Howe even drove with Strassmeir to Oklahoma City to conduct reconnaissance of potential targets.
The ATF made plans to arrest Strassmeir based on Howe’s information but they were ordered to stand down by other elements of the Department of Justice. After the bombing Strassmeir was spirited out of the US by an FBI informant/fake member of the “radical right” like Strassmeir named Kirk Lyons. Strassmeir appears to be at the core of the attack more than McVeigh and eyewitness Jane Graham states that she saw Strassmeir apparently wiring the Murrah building with c4 and detonation cord in the days prior to the attack.
When Carol Howe came forward with this information after the attack, she was arrested and prosecuted. When ABC tried to broadcast her story the story was canned and the Producer of the story, Roger Charles, was sacked.
Another informant named Cary Gagan tells a similar story to Carol Howe with the added detail that Gagan apparently played a minor role in facilitating the attack under the direction of US government agents. Gagan, who was involved in the drug trade, received immunity in late 1994 after his drug contacts began using him to transport detonators and timers from Mexico into the US. On April 10th, 1995 Gagan was asked to transport a locked trailer containing ammonium nitrate and an electric farm mixer and leave it in an area in Kansas close to Terry Nichols house.
The Gagan account and the role of Andreas Starssmeir will be revisited in greater depth in part three which will focus on what happened and who did it.
Government terror: Government informant warned of attack (Oklahoma bombing)
The Proven Foreknowledge of the ATF.
Foreknowledge of the attack went beyond information received. The ATF were warned to stay away from the Murrah building on the morning of April 19th, one eyewitness states that an ATF agent told him in the hours after the attack that he had received a pager message not to come to work on the morning of the 19th. No ATF agents died despite them being among the primary targets of an attack that was supposed to be revenge for Waco and to remove all doubt as to their foreknowledge and their complicity in the cover-up elements of the ATF told elaborate and easily proven lies about being in the building on the day of the attack.
“ATF’s resident Agent in charge Alex McCauley was with a DEA agent in the elevator when the bomb exploded. The elevator dropped free fall from the eighth floor to the third. The two men were trapped in the smoke-filled elevator…they managed to break through the doors…The agents made their way to the stairwell and brought with them 10 or 15 people they found along the way….”Unknown to Martz, the Midwestern elevator Company had been scheduled to perform routine inspections at the Murrah building on the day of the bombing. Within minutes of the bombing several inspectors were at the building. The ATF’s story was quickly exposed as a total fabrication by elevator technician Duane James, who described the story as “pure fantasy.” First of all the cables weren’t cut, so it was impossible for the elevators to of “free fallen.” None of the doors were forced open and safety switches to prevent excessive speed remained in place. Another important point is that the agents would have sustained serious injuries from a five-story free fall. They wouldn’t have been able to help any other people anyway.” SIGHTINGS: The Oklahoma City Bombing
Fact No.3 -The Impossible ANFO damage.
Brigadier General Ben Partin was a 31 year US military veteran who spent 25 of those years researching explosives and munitions. Brigadier General Partin immediately knew that the damage to the Alfred P. Murrah building could not possibly have been caused by an external Truck bomb alone. Partin states unequivocally that the properties of an ANFO, an Ammonium Nitrate Fuel Oil device, detonated by McVeigh and the unidentified other person who disappeared from the narrative could not possibly have caused the massive devastation that was visited upon the Murrah building in the attack.
“When I first saw the picture of the truck bomb’s asymmetrical damage to the Federal building in Oklahoma, my immediate reaction was that the pattern of damage would have been technically impossible without supplementary demolition charges at some of the reinforced concrete bases inside the building, a standard demolition technique.” Partin further explained that “reinforced concrete targets in large buildings are hard targets to blast. I know of no way possible to reproduce the apparent building damage through simply a truck bomb effort.” General Partin’s request to have the bomb site preserved in order to examine the possibility of a second explosion was ignored by the government. And in fact, when the request was made by General Partin, the government moved up the demolition by two weeks.”
Other explosives experts made statements to the same effect.
Sam Gronning, a professional blaster for more than thirty years, stated;
“I have been a blaster for over thirty years and there is no doubt in my mind that ANFO could not of been by itself the medium for that powerful an explosion….even enhanced at that distance, I doubt that an external explosion could have created that extensive damage at the reported weight of the bomb.”
“My knowledge comes from practical handling of explosives,” added Gronning. “And my belief is that 4800 lbs of ANFO wouldn’t have scuffed the paint on the building.”
“No truck bomb of ANFO out in the open is going to cause that kind of damage we had there…In thirty years of blasting, using everything from 100 percent nitrogel to ANFO, I’ve not seen anything to support that story…I have set off 16000 pounds of ANFO and was standing upright just 1,000 feet away from the blast.”
Dr. Roger Raubach, who has a Ph.D in physical chemistry and is now the technical director of a chemical company has this to say;
“I don’t care if they pulled up a semi-trailoer with twenty tons of ammonium nitrate; it wouldn’t do the damage we saw there.”
Brig Gen Ben Partin Lecture; Oklahoma City / Part 1 of 2
Brig Gen Ben Partin Lecture; Oklahoma City / Part 2 of 2
Partin even wrote to members of Congress asking them to forestall the building’s demolition.
“It is easy to determine whether a column was failed by contact demolition charges or by blast loading (such as a truck bomb),” Partin wrote in his letter to Congress. “It is also easy to cover up crucial evidence as was apparently done in Waco. I understand that the building is to be demolished by May 23rd or 24th. Why the rush to destroy the evidence?”
Fact No.4 the Missing Bombs found Inside the building.
That extra explosive devices were found inside the Alfred P. Murrah building is beyond dispute and the evidence goes well beyond the initial detailed media reports of extra devices and also the testimony of eyewitnesses such as volunteer medic Tonie Garrett who states that at least four different well-informed sources on the scene told her on April 19th, 1995 that extra bombs had been found.
There is a memo from the Department of Defense dated April 20th, 1995 that states unequivocally that in addition to the Ryder truck bomb “One bomb was disarmed another was evacuated.”
Later as part of the damage control effort, a story was put out that the bombs that were found were merely dummies used for training. This is obvious nonsense when you consider that the bombs were located by bomb sniffer dogs along with the detail from the DOD memo that one device was disarmed inside the building whilst another was evacuated. Tonie Garrett provides the interesting added details that she was told that one of the bombs had been on a timer and was due to explode ten minutes after the first attack but she had been told that the first blast damaged the timing device and caused it to fail.
In light of those facts the media reports are merely icing on the cake and prove how controlled the US media were even in 1995 and their casual contempt for their audience as they simply pretended the whole episode never happened despite their own numerous detailed reports
Oklahoma City Bombing News Reports: Unexploded bombs found in the Murrah building!
Fact No.5 The Overwhelming evidence of two explosions.
Two Audio Recordings of the Oklahoma City Bombing.
Audio recordings of the event, seismic records and numerous eyewitnesses all indicate that Brigadier General Partin and the other experts were correct and that there were two separate explosive events in Oklahoma City on April 19th, 1995 and the truck bomb was accompanied by another larger explosion that some witnesses describe as creating a mushroom cloud.
One of the audio recordings, taken at a local government meeting, records explosive incidents over a period of eight seconds, the second audio tape, from a local law office, records one large blast followed by two dull pops around four seconds later.
One explosion can create two sounds and be experienced twice, as an air and ground blast, but there is no way that these sounds could be experienced eight seconds apart nor that this audio illusion could explain the twin seismic spikes recorded at several nearby stations.
End of Part one.
Having established that the Nichols/McVeigh “lone nut(s)” explanation for the attack cannot possibly be the truth and given the immense complexity of this case I have chosen to break this into three parts.
Part Two will look into the background of and the long-term infiltration of the patriot/militia movement looking at the death of Gordon Kahl, Ruby Ridge, the Montana 7, the Waco tragedy and in part three it is hoped to outline some of the details of how the Oklahoma City operation was achieved and the persons of interest should the US Government ever decide to reform itself and come clean about the crimes committed from within its own agencies at some point in future.
In the several months since this piece was written it has become clear that the hypothesis presented here-of a false flag terror attack- is incorrect. In fact the Paris events were merely a larger and more complex psyop, just as fake as the Boston bombings, the Woolwich incident and the San Bernardino attack that followed weeks later.
Since the year 2012 almost all of the supposed terror attacks in Western nations are confirmed and proven hoax events. This is the new model.
Gladio was the cold war synthetic terror/ strategy of tension, Gladio B as coined by Sibel Edmonds was similar to the original but with Muslims replacing communists as the enemy.
Gladio C is very similar to Gladio B but instead of false flag terror attacks such as 911, Bali and London 7/7 the events are entirely staged. These are drills enacted filmed and sold to the public as authentic terror attacks.
Whether or not it is tactically intelligent to make the hoax argument when people are likely to be more receptive to a false flag narrative is a completely separate issue. The false flag attack narrative is no longer the truth and those who cling to the false flag narrative and pretend that these events are real, are not telling the truth.
I tried to tell the truth here but came up short for which I apologise.
November 18th, 2015.
Like a Nightmare.
The West sits under a dark cloud of grief, fear , angst and rage in the wake of the series of terror attacks that left at least 129 dead in Paris on Friday the 13th of November.
The French authorities have stated that they intend to extend the twelve day State of Emergency for a further three months and they have bombed the IS capital in Syria Raqqa each of the past two days in an attempt to present the public with a fait a compli about who was responsible for these outrages before they have even determined the facts let alone the perpetrators.
It was completely right that people questioned whether these attacks had even happened given the recent history of manufactured events that have taken place in Ottawa, Boston, Sydney and in France itself earlier this year and I retain an open mind but this event does not seem to have been a faux incident and I have not seen any good evidence to that effect.
A Perfect Storm of Fear and Division.
These attacks combined with the mass influx of Middle Eastern refugees in recent months create a dangerous confluence in Europe and one of the many stories that has been swept aside in the wake of the Paris atrocity was a large fire in the Calais “jungle” refugee camp on the night of the attacks.
Yesterday a friendly football match between the Netherlands and Germany was abandoned and the Hanover stadium was evacuated after a suspicious package was found and there are rumours that a truck bomb disguised as an ambulance was also found.
The level of fear in Paris was made clear when hundreds of people panicked and stampeded in the Place de Republique where a crowd had gathered to commemorate the dead and persons unknown set off fireworks that were mistaken for gunfire.
Moment crowd bursts into panic run caused by false alarm at Paris attacks memorial
The investigation into these events is only at it’s beginning yet a number of startling anomalies have emerged and it has become clear that the version of events presented by the French Government and the controlled media is incorrect in fundamental ways.
The most obvious thing that people are too stunned to assimilate is that at least one and possibly two of the terror cells responsible for the massacre escaped and yet the French Government pretended that all the attackers had been killed until an abandoned Seat Leon containing a number of assault rifles and full and expended magazines was found in the early hours of November 15th.
The initial Wikipedia entry on the attack clarifies that the Paris Prosecutor and the corporate media initially claimed that all the attackers had died on the night.
It has now emerged that French police stopped the vehicle containing this fellow no fewer than three times as the man was driven from Paris back to Belgium where he has inexplicably disappeared after it was widely reported he had been arrested.
“A major operation is currently under way in the Moleenbeek district of Brussels with Belgian broadcaster RTL suggesting the 26-year-old was captured alive by Belgian special forces during a raid.He was reportedly seen at a window of an address with his arms up in the air, before police used tear gas to neutralise him.”
“It seems that one individual has been arrested by special forces in that particular part of Belgium using tear gas – throwing it through a roof window, and then seemingly according to reports there, pulling one individual out of an apartment.” Sky News.
Belgian police later stated that no arrests had been made.
These major anomalies in the investigation combined with the passport left on the ground near to the site of one of the attacks is another classic sign that someone is engaged in framing a group of patsies for these horrific crimes.
A picture is beginning to emerge of what appears to be a “twin track” highly sophisticated false flag terror attack where a group of patsies are used to mask the crimes of professional killers who are shielded by corrupt local authorities across several European nations.
Operation Gladio the History of Synthetic and Managed terror in Europe
We know that these operations are in the tradition of the synthetic terror that saw Western intelligence in combination with a dark elite utilise and infiltrate political extremes of left and right during the Cold War in order to promote a “Strategy of Tension” that would see a frightened public turn to the security state for protection.
Gladio Veteran Tells the Truth about False Flag Terrorism and the NWO
IS/ISIL/ISIS/Daesh are a Western proxy, they are a false flag group, every attack they conduct is therefore a false flag to a lesser or greater extent and this is expressed eloquently here.
While insiders or initiates understand that all these attacks historically have been acts of synthetic terror facilitated and conducted by black ops cut outs run by Western intelligence agencies and the rogue networks that infiltrate these agencies but outsiders do not understand this so it is incumbent upon us to attempt to unmask the specific deceptions that have taken place in Paris.
Merely stating that all major world changing terror attacks have been false flags will not convince the credulous without supporting evidence related to these specific events.
The Official Story of the Paris attacks.
Paris Attacks: watch Paris prosecutor full press conference on ongoing investigation
A preliminary version of events has been provided by a French prosecutor Francois Molins who delivered a brief summary of the facts at a press conference on November 14th.
There is no consistent version of what has taken place with varying accounts persistent as to how many people attacked the Bataclan Concert, how many attacks at the Stade de France were suicide attacks and other basic elements of the event.
Given that the Paris prosecutor has made the only substantive statement regarding what has happened from the French Government, his words must stand as the Official account of these events at this time although it is so lacking in detail that media accounts of what has taken place are also reuired in order to construct a coherent timeline of events.
The version of events that Francois Molins related has proven to be incorrect about fundamental aspects of the event, the most obvious example of this is that the Paris prosecutor claimed that all the attackers had died.
It has since emerged that at least one and possibly two cells involved in these attacks escaped alive and it is now admitted that at least two attackers escaped.
We are told that Salah Abdeslam is one of these men, the other has not been identified.
The French Government has dealt with this situation, the wholesale collapse of the narrative they propagated about the attackers all being dead by issuing anonymous clarifications through friendly media outlets.
This tactic enables them to continue to shape the narrative without the risk of going on the record and revealing their deception and/or incompetence as the Paris prosecutor did in the only official outline of the attacks.
Provisional timeline of the Paris attacks from the Mail Online.
Summary of events.
The best understanding of the event is that there were three teams at least involved in the attacks.
In order to piece together what has happened the operations of each of the attack teams and the various narratives surrounding each will be considered one at a time.
Attack Team 1. Stade de France.
One team attacked the Stade de France in a a largely symbolic series of implausibly ineffective suicide attacks. the attacks at the Stade de France are claimed to have killed only one person beyond the attackers yet this attack was of immense symbolic importance to the overall event and to the subsequent psyop to cash in on it.
This attack team showed extraordinary, inexplicable incompetence, they allowed massive crowds to walk in to the stadium together then conducted three explosions that in total killed only one person other than themselves in an area where 80,000 had walked earlier and would soon return.
The story of the Stade de France attacks is currently undergoing significant revision. There is a dispute as to whether there were two or three suicide attacks or two suicide attacks and one planted bomb with different “official sources” offering differing accounts.
It appears that in total three people died in the three bombings near the Stadium.
The first attack according to the Paris prosecutor, took place at 9.20pm near Gate D, one civilian or security person died along with the bomber.
Mr. Molins stated the bombs were made from the hydrogen peroxide based explosive mixture known as T.A.T.P and the bombers all had hand held buttons to trigger the devices.
This attack appeared to provide one of the first strong leads as to the truth behind these attacks after the passports of a Syrian and an Egyptian appeared to have been planted at the scene.
The passport or passports that have been found we are told, on the bodies of the attackers are a straightforward signal that someone is being framed.
Clear as a bell.
“The single most intriguing fact is that the passport was there at all,” one French official source said. “It was not actually on the terrorist’s body, or what remained of it. It was lying nearby, as if meant to be found.” The holder of the passport was named as Ahmed Almuhamed, aged 25. A man of this name entered the European Union on a Syrian passport with 69 other refugees after their boat sank off the Greek island of Leros on 3 October.”
Logically there is only one reason to frame people for a crime they did not commit, that being to obscure the guilt of another party. The Paris prosecutor Francois Molins stated clearly that there were three suicide attacks in the stadium area.
The media are reporting that there were two and a bomb was left at a McDonalds.
There has also been a radical shift in the story regarding the Egyptian passport.
The passport holder is now being reported to be an innocent football fan named Waleed Abdel-Razzak severely wounded in one of the blasts at the stadium.
The passport of the Syrian found at the scene of one of these blasts remains a powerful pointer to the fact that people are being framed for these attacks and this is a classic marker of a false flag deception that was seen earlier this year in the Charlie Hebdo false flag attack when a masked gunman supposedly left his id card in a getaway car and even more infamously in the wake of the 911 attacks when a passport was supposed to have survived being inside a jet that exploded into a massive fireball only to be found in a pristine condition on a New York street by a member of the US security services.
One small fact that slipped out in the Paris prosecutor’s press conference was that the attackers at the Stade de France were captured on CCTV. It is highly likely that the attackers here were driven to the site by someone else, after all a suicide belt is probably not something that you would want to carry onto public transport unless it is the target.
Someone, such as a handler has driven the bombers to the scene and it is overwhelmingly likely that person or their vehicle were caught on CCTV. At this point no mention has been made about how the Stade de France attack team travelled to the Stadium. If there turns out to be a startling lack of CCTV footage of the attackers on their way to the stadium that will reinforce the justified suspicion that the story of the Stade de france attacks is a crudely constructed concoction.
Attack Team 2.
The Seat Leon Team Escaped!!!
A black Seat Leon was used in a series of shooting attacks in Paris that caused 39 deaths in a series of shootings at restaurants.
The Seat Leon Team team seem to have conducted all of the attacks other than the Bataclan Theater attack and the Stade de France attacks.
This team began with twin attacks on two restaurants Le Ca Rillon and Le Petit Cambodge (Little Cambodia) that are located only metres apart, the attacks on these two restaurants are reported to have left at least 15 people dead.
The Seat Leon team are then reported to have moved 500 yards to Rue de Fontaine au Roi, where the oddly named La Casa Nostra restaurant was attacked leaving five dead.
The team then moved onto a venue named La Belle Equipe and murdered a further 19 people there.
This team was also possibly responsible for the futile suicide attack on Comptoir Voltaire on Boulevard Voltaire at 9.40pm, after the series of shooting attacks.
The suicide bombing, like those at the Stade de France was completely ineffective, leaving the bomber alone dead.
The Seat Leon team then seemingly drove to Montriul in Eastern Paris and abandoned the car leaving behind the three AK47 assault rifles five magazines and 11 expended magazines.
As many as two attack cells may have escaped as there are indications that at least one member of another cell escaped, after Europe’s now most wanted man Salah Abdeslam was questioned by French police near the Belgian border and released. There were two other people with Salem in the car when he was stopped.
These may well have been the same team who had earlier abandoned the Seat Leon in Montriul, Eastern Paris.
Police officer searches car linked to the Paris attacks
France: Paris attackers getaway car discovered in Montreuil district of Paris
The Seat Leon find was followed on Tuesday with the discovery of a Renault Clio also alleged to have been rented by Salah Abselam. The car was dumped at the site it was found yesterday.
Theposition of the car, parked on a pedestrian crossing meant that it cannot possibly have been sitting at that place in the three or four days since the attacks.
Paris Attacks: second car found thought to have been rented by prime suspect
Bataclan Concert Hall.
The Bataclan Concert Hall was the site of more than tow thirds of the fatalities in the massacre, comprising 89 of the 129 people to have died.
A small number of amateur videos depicting the attack in the Bataclan venue have now emerged.
The first ten or twelve seconds show a conventional rock show, a series of pops begin to ring out and the bass player leaves the stage very quickly while the guitarist and drummer seem confused.
It doesn’t prove anything really but it does strongly suggest that the band thought the event was real.
The Moment Terrorists Started Shooting At The Bataclan Music Theatre In Paris Filmed From Inside
There is agreement on the fact that numerous gunmen entered the hall and began massacring the crowd as they watched the Eagles of Death Metal. There are many descriptions of a massacre lasting 10 to 15 minutes beginning at around 9.40pm as people escaped and played dead while the murderers ran amok.
On the night it was widely reported that one of the attackers had been captured alive and stated that he was “From ISIL/IS?ISIS/Daesh.”
This story may have been invented as a way to inject the group into the narrative but I did find some imagery of an apparently wounded mystery man in a mask being led from the Bataclan scene by a seemingly senior police officer.
Bataclan Video depicts gunman in the building next door.
As well as the video from inside the Bataclan Hall as the shooting began a video was released that it was claimed both on YouTube and in the major media showed a confrontation between the attackers and the French police at the Bataclan Concert Hall.
French Police Engage Armed Suspects Outside Of The Bataclan Music Theater, Paris
During the video we see gunfire exchanged between a gunman who seems to be inside the building the police are trying to enter. A bullet seems to strike the vehicle in front of the camera.
The footage seems to be real from limited analysis but the building seems different from the Bataclan Theater in the photos I accessed.
Further research revealed that the gunmen logically must be inside the building at 52 Boulevarde Voltaire, next door to the Bataclan Theater which is located at number 50, to it’s left across a side-street.
The building houses a Real Estate agent as far as I can tell.
A detailed account of events at the Bataclan Concert Hall has been provided to the French Newspaper Le Monde by police involved in the incident.
The Guardian reprinted the police version of events here.
The entire account is reprinted at the end of this piece.
The police version of events provided to Le Monde and reprinted in the Western media cannot possibly be correct because it claims that the police first entered the Bataclan Theater at 10pm, makes no reference to them coming under fire outside the venue and makes no reference at all to 52 Boulevard Voltaire.
Therefore either the footage was manufactured or the police are lying about what happened at the Bataclan Concert Hall.
This is the second concrete and incontrovertible example of deception and dishonesty in relation to these attacks along with the fact that the Paris prosecutor stated plainly that all the attackers were dead when this was untrue and Francois Molins certainly knew this to be untrue.
The Seat Leon team had not been accounted for, it could not have been a one man cell conducting drive by shootings so there must have been survivors from that cell and there is no rational explanation other than Francois Molins was acting to protect a manufactured, predetermined and deceptive narrative.
In the days following the Paris attacks a man named Patrick Pelloux, a former Charlie Hebdo writer and an employee of the Paris emergency medical services, SAMU gave an interview to French Radio during which he mentioned that there had been an emergency services drill on Friday the 13th.
These screenshots contain Pelloux’s words.
Security and emergency drills are a key historical indicator of deception, both of the false flag and hoax variety and this is interesting in it’s own right if not necessarily evidence,
Patrick Pelloux is certainly a person who has suffered a series of unbelievable coincidences related to these cases and it is more than a little puzzling to discover that not only was Patrick Pelloux
“An emergency doctor who treated the wounded in both January’s Charlie Hebdo attack and Friday night’s massacre.”
“At the time of Friday’s attacks, Pelloux had been promoting his new book, published the day before, in which he attempts to draw a line under the Charlie Hebdo attacks”
So Patrick Pellloux’s book had been published the previous day and at the time of the attacks he was publicising his new book AND participating in a major emergency services drill.
Given the fact that the core narrative collapsed this is secondary stuff but worthy of mention.
The investigation into these attacks appears to proceed along two tracks.
There seems to be one group within the French power structure that are devoted to hiding the truth about the attacks and they are putting their energy into framing a group of patsies that are overwhelmingly located in France.
These people are quite simply the usual suspects being framed in the most cynical and transparent manner imaginable.
On the other hand there also appears to be a group who are actually investigating the crimes and attempting to track the people behind these atrocities which appear to have been used Belgium, the home of NATO headquarters in Europe as an operational and planning base.
One of the key roles of group one is to prevent the second group ever getting a live suspect of any import in custody.
The goal is to present the world with a fait a compli, maintaining the fear and moving on to war with the millions of dead Iraqis and thousands of dead Americans forgotten as the ‘victim status” of the West is instantly rehabilitated.
There appear to have been two separate attacks in Paris on Friday the 13th, 2015. The attack of the dupes and the attack of the killers. When Francois Molins stood before the people of France and the world and stated that all the attackers were dead and only accomplices were being sought, he cannot possibly have been acting in an honest manner.
The position of the Paris prosecutor Francois Molins in untenable.
Molins must resign and should face investigation for complicity in these attacks.
Francois Molins lied to the people of France and the world in a way that assisted the members of at least one terror cell to escape.
The only logical explanation of Molins behavior is that he was seeking corruptly to protect a number of the real perpetrators of these attacks with and until the Seat Leon was found in Montriul in the early hours of Sunday the 15th, more than 24 hours after the attacks were over, they were intent on pretending that the perpetrators of the shooting massacres in the Seat Leon were all dead when there was no reasonable explanation to believe this, it was completely absurd.
Moilins could not account for the three attack teams that he himself described without pretending that the Seat Leon attacks, which included drive by shootings, were conducted by only one person.
Paris terror attacks: video confirms involvement of ninth assailant
Francois Molins position is untenable and he must resign immediately and then face criminal investigation for complicity in these attacks.
The evidence is very clear and no amount of “stirring” renditions of Le Marseille or the works of John Lennon or the bouquets of flowers or the bombs on Raqqa or the tears of the survivors will obscure that unpleasant fact that this was a false flag attack conducted by professionals and the passports are a means to frame some patsies.
No other explanation makes sense.
Friday the 13th, like September 11th, October 12th and many of the other dates that have seen major false flag atrocities has immense occult significance.
Friday the 13th attained it’s “black Friday” statys because on Friday the 13th of October 1307 the Knights Templar group were all arrested under the orders of the French King Phillippe.
The legendary death of the Templar leader Jacques De Molay who was burned at the stake took place in March 1314 seven years later.
The cultural movement that the Templars were engaged in was never extinguished and their progeny are understood to have taken their revenge against the French monarchy centuries later by engineering the French Revolution in the 1780s.
“The Lodge Les Neuf Sœurs was a prominent lodge attached to the Grand Orient de France that was particularly influential in organising French support for the American Revolution and later in the intellectual ferment that preceded the French Revolution.”
The organisational heirs of the Templar tradition in France include the Grand Orient Masonic Lodge.
Therefore, along with NATO and it’s corporate allies in Belgium the signature of the Grand Orient de France seems to be subtly imprinted on this attack.
Fresh details have emerged of the police operation against the terrorists who stormed the Bataclan concert hall in Paris, with one officer likening the scene on the ground floor to “something from Dante’s hell”.
10pm: first police enter Bataclan
According to Le Monde newspaper, the first officer entered the building towards 10pm on Friday. Ten minutes earlier, three gunmen had burst into a rock concert by the US group Eagles of Death Metal and begun shooting people in the main auditorium. The three terrorists were Omar Ismaïl Mostefai, 29, Samy Amimour, 28, and a third man who has not yet been identified.
Footage shows moment shooting starts in Bataclan theatre
The officer immediately came “nose to nose” with one of the terrorists, Le Monde reported. He shot at him and the terrorist’s belt exploded. It was unclear whether the gunman had blown himself up or whether the officer’s bullet ignited the belt.
More police followed. “When we entered it was dark,” a member of the first armed response unit, identified as Jean, told MYTF1 news. “There were dozens of bodies tangled all over the floor, dead and wounded. And survivors who were pretending to be dead, fearing that we were also terrorists.
“Everybody was asking for help. People were whispering, fearful the shooting might resume. For us, the priority was to secure the area. We carried on. It was unclear if the two terrorists were still there, and if they were there, where they were.”
While the first unit secured the ground floor, an elite squad of heavily armed reinforcements arrived from France’s rapid intervention brigade. One officer told Le Monde he had found “a scene from Dante’s hell”. He said the smell was unbearable, the silence appalling. The only sound came from the ringing of mobile phones as relatives and friends tried to contact their loved ones.
10.15pm: pincer movement to balcony
At 10.15pm two groups of 20 armed elite officers went up on to the balcony in a pincer movement, via two staircases. The two surviving gunmen were holed up in a room upstairs.
Working in two columns, the police checked every room on the first floor, and every corner, one by one. Several hostages had been hiding there – in cupboards and false ceilings. “We pulled out the hostages. They were walking like zombies. They were in a stunned state,” Jean told MYTF1 news. “They were struggling to move forward.”
11.15pm: terrorists’ hostage
At 11.15pm, the police reached a door. They heard a voice. The voice came from a hostage, Sébastien, whom the Isis cell had been using as a guide. “He cried out and said that the terrorists were with them, and said that if the police were to open the door they would blow everything up,” Jean explained.
Sébastien told RTL radio that the terrorists seemed pleased with their carnage but keen to justify their acts. He said: “They gave us their sermon, their speech, the why they were there. They explained to us that the bombs being dropped on Syria were the reason why they were there. They said they were doing to us westerners what we were doing to them over there.”
Sébastien said he was with the gunmen for almost two and a half hours. “They took us in the hall where the injured were still dying. They told us that it was just the start and the war was now beginning. They told us they were there in the name of Islamic State and they asked if we agreed with them. I’ll leave you to imagine the painful silence there was at that moment. The more timid nodded their head and those more brave said yes.”
11.20pm – 12.20am: tense standoff between gunmen and police
Between 11.20pm and 12.20am, there was a standoff between the gunmen and police. One of the terrorists agreed to give a mobile number. The police called five times but there were no negotiations. The terrorists said that if the police did not leave they would shoot and decapitate their hostages and toss their bodies over the balcony. They added that they wanted to talk to the media.
“The only real demand they made during the four or five calls they had was that the police pulled back and did not come near in any circumstances,” Sébastien said. “They asked us to look out of the window and say where the police were and tell them to keep away. We were intermediaries, but more than that … we were human shields.”
Sébastien said one of the terrorists gave him a wad of money and asked him to get out a lighter and set it on fire. “They wanted to see if money was important to me. I felt like Gainsbourg [Serge Gainsbourg set light to a banknote on live television] at that moment, except that I was forced to do it. So you see there was a kind of exchange. At the end, the hostages thanked me.”
The officers inside the theatre had all taken part in tackling the siege in January at the Jewish supermarket where Amédy Coulibaly had taken customers hostage. He was eventually killed.
12.20 : order to end siege
At 12.20am the order was given to end the siege. Behind the door was a narrow corridor about 12 metres long, with the two terrorists at one end and several hostages in the middle. A medical team was on standby.
The first two officers opened the door, crouching behind a Kevlar shield. The goal was to move forward as quickly as possible to rescue the hostages. “As soon as the door opened, the terrorists opened fire. It was very violent, very noisy,” Jean said. Thirty bullets hit the shield. The hostages screamed, and lay flat on the ground. The column moved forward, leading freed hostages back to safety. Sébastien pulled a pregnant woman, who was dangling from a window, back into the building.
All hostages scrambled clear. The officers then set off half a dozen stun grenades, followed by a second round of defensive grenades. They opened fire and, according to Le Monde, saw “a shadow falling”. It turned out to be one of the terrorists. There was then an explosion as the last terrorist blew himself up. The assault lasted three minutes. One officer was
wounded from a bullet that ricocheted off a wall and hit his right hand.
Sébastien said he had jumped on to the stage when the shooting started and tried to hide. The terrorists found him. He said he was aware that one wrong word could cost him his life.
“From the moment they started speaking, I began to tell myself that perhaps I was destined to live, because it would have been so easy to kill me at that moment. I was at his mercy and that image remains engraved [in my head], but it was also the beginning of hope, strange as it may seem, because I had fled, I wanted to hide, and when they found me they didn’t kill me. That was my luck.”
At face value, every IS propaganda video is a joke. These videos tend to be crude and often obviously fraudulent anti-propaganda, but the contents of this latest video “We Will Burn America” may point towards a real threat. The content and timing of this release combined with the fact that this ultra-violent video is being hosted by the Neoconservative PJ media site who include on their staff an individual named Michael Ledeen with strong historical links to false flag terror atrocities and the manufacture of intelligence designed to start wars and a genuinely disturbing picture emerges of terrorism that is being pre-engineered, possibly as revenge and/or leverage against the Iran nuke deal.
“We Will Burn America”
The video begins with IS trying to claim the mantle of bin Laden and al Qaeda and threatening another 911.
The first shot is of New York city.
This is followed by a very old, authentic picture of Osama bin Laden, the film cuts to stock footage of New York prior to 911 and the Twin Towers of the WTC are shown along with the strange caption that refers to the bombing of the World Trade Centre.
This is followed by a series of shots of “planes” striking the South tower on September 11th, many obviously fake.
The demolitions are not depicted.
Ottawa Yes, Sydney No, Sydney fraudsters are Presumably Enraged!
The English throughout seems almost deliberately wretched and there are basic factual errors such as stating two gunman attacked the Canadian Parliament building last October, a bizarre claim not supported by anyone,The group celebrates the laughable Ottawa hoax as a triumph of jihad! Unbelievably, they describe the attack on the Parliament, a hoax that officially caused zero casualties, wounded or killed in the Canadian Parliament as a triumphant raid conducted by two fighters. It was hilarious to note that the fake event in Sydney did not merit a mention. Presumably the target was too silly to be included in their narrative.
The Charlie Hebdo and subsequent French attacks are also mentioned and Almedy Coulibaly is briefly depicted, looking to his handler for instructions as he makes his own propaganda video.
IS Propaganda Timeline.
August 19th, 2014. James Foley.
There was a high degree of public interest when the James Foley beheading video was released in August, 2014. The beheading was not depicted on video and the dead body of Foley also seemed to be a CPR doll. The other strange thing was that the man in the video did not seem to be James Foley.
September 2nd, 2014. Steven Sotloff.
Possibly even more obvious and pathetic than the Foley video, the near identical Sotloff video tried to fix some of the mistakes of the Foley video, adding the sound of wind in order to promote the idea that it was not filmed in a studio. Sotloff’s demeanour was absolutely ridiculous and in his eagerness to deliver the propaganda message Sotloff forgot to mention or say goodbye to his family or anyone else.Also received saturation coverage. Clearly amother green screen fake.
September 13th, 2014. David Haines.
David Haines was the first British victim after the two Americans Foley and Sotloff, Haines video was an improvement in that he managed to loo more grave and serious than Sotloff, who was practically giggling right upp to his faux execution. The impact was fading quickly at this point. The bombing of IS fighters in Iraq was already underway and not especially controversial. The psyop was redundant at this point.
The standout element of the Haines execution was the hilarious crisis actor that was sent out to play Haines daughter, she giggled her way through interviews during which she called for another major ground invasion by the West of the Middle East, pointing to the intent of the ongoing psyop.
October 3rd 2014. Alan Henning.
By the time the Alan Henning video was released interest was low. The video was completely forgettable. The only interesting thing was that by contrast with the four members of Foley’s family and Haines daughter, Hennings family seemed to be real people. By this time the bombing campaign had extended to Syria as well as Iraq and there was little point to this at all.
These first four videos were all filmed by the same crew in the same basic style. Two cameras in a style that was identical to that used to film the only public appearance by the supposed Caliph of the “Islamic stat” Baghdadi at a Mosul mosque. All the executions were seemingly fake and all were conducted by the so called Jihad John character.
A Switch to Real Horror?
Mid November, 2014.
At this stage the formula was changed. The footage of the execution of the next Western victim of the IS Pater Kassig was not released. Instead Kassigs supposedly decapitated head was depicted briefly at the end of a 16 minute video history of the group and those that preceded it since the Western invasion of Iraq in 2003 that seems to be titled “although the disbelievers dislike it.”.
After recounting their version of the Iraq war, there is depicted an extremely strangely filmed and seemingly authentic mass execution of supposed captured Syrian soldiers.
The previously lone and masked Jihad John character is depicted along with more than a dozen unmasked IS fighters, identically dressed in clean uniforms that are nothing like what the actual IS guerrillas look like, who appear to each decapitate one soldier each.
This video was astonishing because it was shot and cut in a far more cinematic and highly edited style than the previous simple two camera one shot videos and yet it is extremely gruesome and bloody, the opposite of the previous style and the killings seem to be real.
This video also appeared to be actually shot outdoors, there were real trees and scrub that indicated that they were either out of the studio or in a much larger and better equipped studio.
There are bizarre things like long lingering shots of IS fighters slowly almost fondling their knives
The killings could be fake, but if so they were multimillion dollar productions, we are shown severed necks, every possible gruesome thing that can be shown is shown. The final shot of all the heads lined up on the chests in a row, looks fake, it could have been fake but tremendous effort has gone into making this a very realistic and bloody nightmare. The complete opposite of the first wave of easily discerned psyop beheadings.
The only common denominator between the two.is the Jihad John character.
This video also received almost no attention.
Haruna Yukawa and Kenji Goto
I only watched one of these two supposed executions, that of Haruna Yakawa, interest was raised somewhat by the novelty of a Japanese victim and the dramatic IS demand for 200 million US dollars to spare the men. The video returned to the earlier style of the first four videos and was completely unbelievable, one of the worst.
The captured Jordanian pilot Muath al-Kasasbeh is depicted being burned alive in a video. I have not seen the whole video. It does not appear to be authentic but may be. This was filmed using the same equipment and same crew as the November mass execution of Syrian soldiers video.
February 15, 2015
Mass execution of Coptic Christians in Libya.
This video is very interesting because it appears to be fraudulent, the mainstream media even admitted the video was ridiculous due to the disproportionate size of the supposed IS fighters compared to their victims meaning that all the IS fighters would need to be 7 feet tall and their victims five feet tall.
Does ISIS really have an army of seven-foot executioners? Experts say footage of beheading of Christians in Libya was FAKE | Daily Mail Online
This video is shot in the same cinematic style as the other mass execution “real horror and gore” video.
April 11th, 2015
IS release new propaganda video called “We Will Burn America”
Strangely the gory compilation video that appears to show numerous bloody human decapitations, is posted and hosted by a Neoconservative source named PJ media whose writers include the self confessed fascist and warmonger Nichael Ledeen an individual with profound links to past false flag terror atrocities.
This is a compilation video that features excerpts of many of the previous videos along with fairly stock war footage.
That does not mean that the latest IS video is the empty threat and joke that it appears at face value however. The IS myth has been created and means that if someone else wants to conduct an attack on the US they will use the IS group as the anointed patsy, and there is a real threat of a large false flag in the US and elsewhere so this video of empty hype has real meaning and is connected to a real threat.
April 10th, 2015.
The Strange 911 Call in Ohio.
On Friday April 10th, police in Ohio received a bizarre 911 emergency line call from a man named Guru Dhimal, a Hindu sounding rather than Muslim name. Dhimal who stated his name and location during the call, claimed to be a member of al Qaeda and that he was aware of a group that had made a bomb and was planning to use the bomb to destroy the White House on May the 1st, the fourth anniversary of the Bin Laden “death.”
The full 911 call can be heard in this Dahboo video although the thick accent makes it rather hard to understand.
CRAZY! 911 Audio of White House Bomb Threat Reveals Date of May 1st
This Cleveland news source reports the basic facts.
Men accused of calling in bomb threat aboard Greyhound Bus appear in court | cleveland.com http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2015/04/men_accused_of_calling_in_bomb.html
“ Two men accused of calling in a bomb threat from a Greyhound Bus traveling in Lake County Friday pleaded not guilty at their initial court appearance.
Guru Dhimal, 28, of Rochester, New York, and Bhagirath Koirala, 67, of Reynoldsburg, Ohio, appeared in Painesville Municipal Court Monday.
Dhimal, charged with inducing panic, received a $20,000 cash or surety bond. Koirala received a personal bond and has been released, according to court records.
The threat was called in about 5:30 p.m. Friday, as the bus was traveling from New York state to Cleveland. Dhimal and Koirala were both passengers on the bus, Ohio State Highway Patrol Lt. Brant Zemelka said.
The men claimed they were affiliated with Al-Qaeda, and had a bomb that would destroy the White House, according to a 911 call obtained by WEWS.
Authorities shut the highway in both directions and evacuated passengers as a bomb squad swept the bus. No explosives were found, Zamelka said.”
There was never any claim that the man had a bomb or that there were any explosives on the bus, the caller stated that “others’ had come from Asia and built a bomb so the lack of explosives on the Greyhound bus is meaningless.
The charges the men face indicate that authorities believe the men were simply lying hoaxers, they may well be right. The whole thing makes no sense. It is possible the caller was paid to “send a message.” but that is just speculation.
Pre Engineering is Taking Place.
I am not pretending to know that something is going to happen, I do not. What I do know is that if something happens the men of the black flag will be blamed and it will be a lie. This group completely lacks the resources to be able to operate inside the US in a significant way. The IS group are actually rather hard pressed to detonate even a car bomb in Baghdad or Damascus, the idea that they are going to turn up and conduct a major attack in the US can be dismissed as more hype from the liars club behind the ridiculous War on Terror.
Over time it became harder to access the IS fake beheading videos. Liveleak stopped posting them, leaksource stopped posting them. In fact it seems that the only places that still host these videos are Neoconservative outles such as Pamela Geller.com, the only place I could find the fake Coptic Christian video in entirety, and PJ media, who posted “We Will Burn America” on their site despite the fact that it seems to show several gruesome beheadings, unlike the original four Jihad John videos that were bloodless.
PJ Media includes Michael Ledeen.
Interestingly, one of the writers at PJ media is an individual named Michael Ledeen, a Neoconservative, war monger and self professed fascist with a strong historical connection to terrorism in Italy during the Cold war. Along with the role in Iran Contra, fixing the US 1980 election with a disinformation campaign, manufacturing intelligence to help start the Iraq war, working for Italian intelligence agency SISMI, complete with funds paid into Bermuda Island bank account deposits, There was also the nasty episode at the Pentagon in the early 80s when Ledeen was accused of spying against the USA for Israel and had his security clearance severely downgraded. Pal Richard Perle found him another job at the National Security Council.
Michael Ledeen: a Public Face of the Criminal Deep State. The Ledeen credo.
“”Creative destruction is our middle name. We do it automatically…. It is time once again to export the democratic revolution.”
Michael Ledeen was born on August 1st, 1941. Wikipedia describes Ledeen as
“an American historian, philosopher, neoconservative foreign policy analyst, and writer.”
Wikispooks says Ledeen is : “Washington’s neoconservative guru”. He was part of the neocon ‘cabal’ that manufactured the defective intelligence in the lead up to the war against Iraq, and has since been active in making the case for the bombing of Iran.”
Ledeen is an extremely committed and tenacious pro- war activist and Zionist asset.
Prior to the Illegal Invasion of Iraq, Several Million Violent Deaths Ago.
“One can only hope that we turn the region into a cauldron, and faster, please. If ever there were a region that richly deserved being cauldronized, it is the Middle East today. If we wage the war effectively, we will bring down the terror regimes in Iraq, Iran, and Syria, and either bring down the Saudi monarchy or force it to abandon its global assembly line to indoctrinate young terrorists. That’s our mission in the war against terror.”
“So it’s good news when Scowcroft comes out against the desperately needed and long overdue war against Saddam Hussein and the rest of the terror masters.”
“Question #2: Okay, well if we are all so certain about the dire need to invade Iraq, then when do we do so?
Ledeen is such a conspicuously low quality individual that even Wikipedia reveals his profound and shameless dishonesty. As this short quote makes patently clear.
“Ledeen’s statements prior to the start of the Iraq war such as “desperately needed and long overdue war against Saddam Hussein” and “dire need to invade Iraq” caused Glenn Greenwald to label his later statement that he “opposed the military invasion of Iraq before it took place” to be an “outright lie”. However, Ledeen maintains these statements are consistent since: “I advocated—as I still do—support for political revolution in Iran as the logical and necessary first step in the war against the terror masters.”
Just to clarify, Ledeen described the Iraq war as both “ the desperately needed and long overdue war against Saddam Hussein” and stated that Iraq should be invaded “yesterday” in the prelude to the war and had the temerity to turn around afterwards and try and pretend that he was advocating the removal of Hussein through an engineeered “political revolution”!
Prior to al Qaeda and the War on terror fraud, the war party were forced to rely upon communists and leftist extremists as the patsies in their false flag attacks.
Between the late 1960s and the end of the Cold War, Europe was struck by numerous terror attacks. In the wake of the Cold War it emerged that many of the terror attacks conducted in Europe during the Cold war had been false flag provocations conducted by Western intelligence agencies and their cut-outs in order to blacken the name of communism in the eyes of the European public and also to promote the psychological dependence on the state of the citizenry.
Strategy of Tension.
This ploy of engineering synthetic terror in order to frighten the public and cause them to feel insecure and afraid and to therefore support the internal security state was named the “Strategy of Tension”
The formation of a Gladio secret army was a condition that the US made contingent on NATO membership, although non NATO members also hosted Gladio secret armies. The secret armies would operate beyond the reach and sometimes even the knowledge of the elected Government of the nation.
It is claimed by the Swiss Historian and Academic Daniele Ganser that of the fifteen shadow armies that were created in Europe during the Cold war, that nine went “rogue” and started conducting terror attacks against the people they were supposedly set up to protect.
The existence of Operation Gladio was admitted briefly at the end of the Cold War, the subject was then permanently consigned too the ever burgeoning “things we do not like talking about list” and is never ever mentioned in the controlled media. Ever. There were a number of Gladio terror attacks exposed in that brief window at the end of the Cold War, and the BBC’s Time watch program made a 3 part documentary called “Operation Gladio” about the Gladio terror and murder, with a special emphasis on the crimes in Belgium and Italy, where the networks had been thoroughly exposed and the connection to major crimes was undeniable.
The Bologna Massacre.
On August 2nd, 1980 the day after Michael Ledeen’s 39th birthday. a massive blast tore through the Second class waiting room of the Bologna rail station. Eighty five people were killed and 200 wounded.
The explosives used in the Bologna attack had been procured from the Operation Gladio arms and explosives caches supplied to the Italian stay behind army by the CIA. The attack was the deadliest of the black history of Operation Gladio false flag terror in Europe by far and until the Madrid attacks was the most deadly single act of terrorism in Europe since the Second World war other than Lockerbie
The Bologna massacre was not really a classic false flag attack, as only a very half hearted attemt was made to frame leftists. This was more of a straight out “deep message” from the P2 dark elite, a punishment operation conducted by the fascist cut outs of P2 with the Italian intelligence agency SIMSI clearly involved due to their attempts to subvert the investigation. Michael ledeen was an employee of the SIMSI in this time as reported in the Wall Street Journal in 1985 when a journalist managed to track down a payment of $120,000 US dollars to Ledeen from SIMSI into a Ledeen Bermuda Islands bank account. .
“There were several episodes of screening, organized to end the investigation, the most serious of which is hatched by some leaders of the military secret services (SISMI), including generals Pietro Musumeci and Giuseppe Belmonte, which had a police sergeant put in a train in Bologna a suitcase full of explosives, of the same type that blew up the station, containing personal items of two right-wing extremists, a Frenchman and a German. Musumeci also produced a phony dossier, called “Terror on trains,” which reported the terror intents of international terrorists in connection with two other members of neofascist subversion, all linked to “armed spontaneism”, without political ties, thus at the same time material authors and masterminds of the massacre. General Pietro Musumeci, n°2 of SISMI and revealed in 1981 to be a member of Propaganda Due (P2) masonic lodge, was charged with having created falsified evidence to charge Roberto Fiore and Gabriele Andinolfi, two leaders of Terza Posizione who had fled in exile to London, of the bombing. Both Terza Posizione leaders claimed that Musumeci was trying to divert attention from Licio Gelli, head of P2.[1″
Licio Gelli and Propaganda Due.(P2)
Propaganda Due is quite simply the absolutely classic ”Shadow Government” or “Dark elite” fascist clique. The grandmaster was a man named Licio Gelli,a fascist who had served in the Mussolini Security forces and graduated to become a very important criminal.This Metapedia piece is illuminating.
“Propaganda Due or P2 was an irregular or “black” Masonic lodge that operated in Italy from 1877-1981, headed in its final decades by Licio Gelli. P2 was implicated in numerous Italian crimes and mysteries, including the nationwide bribe scandal Tangentopoli, the collapse of the Vatican-affiliated Banco Ambrosiano, and the murders of journalist Mino Pecorelli, Prime Minister Aldo Moro, and banker Roberto Calvi. P2 came to light through the Banco Ambrosiano scandal. P2 was also involved in Gladio’s strategy of tension (Gladio being the name of Italy’s secret “stay-behind” North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) paramilitary organization). Between 1965 and 1981, the P2 lodge entered the Italian political process by sending its members into the judiciary, the Parliament, the army and the press.”
“P2 was sometimes referred to as a “state within a state” or a “shadow government”. The lodge was peopled by prominent journalists, parliamentarians, industrialists, and military leaders — including the then-future Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi; the Savoy pretender to the Italian throne Victor Emmanuel; and the heads of all three Italian intelligence services.
When searching Licio Gelli’s villa, the police found a document called the “Plan for Democratic Rebirth”, which called for a consolidation of the media, suppression of trade unions, and the rewriting of the Italian Constitution.
Beside Italy, P2 was also active in Uruguay, Brazil and especially in Argentina’s “Dirty War” (with Raúl Alberto Lastiri, Argentina’s interim president from July 13, 1973 until October 12, 1973; Emilio Massera, who was part from 1976 to 1978 of the military junta led by Jorge Rafael Videla; José López Rega, minister of Social Welfare in Perón’s government and founder of the Argentine Anticommunist Alliance (“Triple A”), and Guillermo Suárez Mason, in charge of the Batallón de Inteligencia 601 as members). “
So, this is the “Illuminati”. Criminal bankers, “black” Masons, fascists,Intelligence Chiefs, Mafia Dons, missing billions and terrorist mass murders, not to forget the “Occult” rituals and widespread police protection. It is quite the heady brew. Bologna made things hard for them in Italy, the organisation was formally banned by both the Italian state and expelled by mainstream Italian freemasonsry, but Berluscini still made it to Prime Minister and this points to the fact that these elements were not purged as clearly they needed to be.
They had effective control of both the Italian military and intelligence services. Henry Kissinger is alleged to be an associate, and Michael Ledeen was a known close associate and confidant of Licio Gelli and also known to have attempted to buy the P2 membership list when it was seized in a police raid on Licio Gelli’s property. In 1981.
From Barbara Honegger’s October Surprise:
“When the Italian police raided (P2 Lodge founder) Gelli’s home in March 1981, it was Michael Ledeen who, at the instigation of Alexander Haig and Henry Kissinger, offered to buy the list of 953 P2 members in an apparent attempt to keep it from becoming public. Henry Kissinger had also reportedly sent Ledeen to Italy to try to squash an investigation into his and Haig’s involvement in the founding of P2.”
Gelli Evades Italian Justice and Eventually is Sentenced for financial Crimes After Years of protection in Switzerland.
“In 1992 Gelli was sentenced to 18 years and six months of prison after being found guilty of fraud concerning the collapse of Banco Ambrosiano in 1982 (a “black hole” of $1.4 billion was found). The Vatican bank, Istituto per le Opere di Religione, main share-holder of the Banco Ambrosiano, consequently had a “black hole” of $250 million. This sentence was reduced by the Court of Appeal to 12 years. The year 1992 also saw the beginning of the trial of 16 members of the P2 Masonic Lodge, which included charges of conspiracy against the state, espionage, and the revelation of state secrets. In April 1994 Gelli received a 17-year sentence for divulging state secrets and slandering the investigation, while the court threw out the charge that P2 members conspired against the state; Gelli’s sentence was reduced, and he was placed under house arrest two years later.”
“In April 1998 the Court of Cassation confirmed a 12-year sentence for the Ambrosiano crash. Gelli then disappeared on the eve of being imprisoned, in May 1998, while being under house arrest in his mansion near Arezzo. His disappearance was strongly suspected to be the result of being forewarned. Then, finally, he was arrested in the French Riviera in Cannes. Two motions of no confidence were made by the right-wing opposition (the Northern League and the ex-Christian Democratic splinter groups CDU-CDR), against the Justice Minister, Giovanni Maria Flick, and the Interior Minister, Giorgio Napolitano, stating that Gelli had benefited from accomplices helping him in his escape. They also made reference to secret negotiations which would have allowed him to reappear without going to prison. But the two ministers won the confidence vote. Police found $2M worth of gold ingots in Gelli’s villa.”
Gelli is still alive and so is the Plot.
The UK Column reports that Senior British Civil and Military officials are warning of the intent to take the next step towards open “Oligarchical Collectivist Fascism” in Britain.The intent has been so clear for so long and so many of the necessary preparatory steps have clearly been taken, that this may be correct.
(with many thanks to Evelyn for providing the main insight upon which this piece is founded.)
The Hampstead Judgement Contains Proven Falsehoods and Cannot Therefore be Valid.
As seasoned cover up merchants have long known, the best way to conduct a cover up is to get on the front foot, seize the initiative and present an essentially inverted narrative, where the perpetrators are the victims and the victims are perpetrators. As the Americans might put it, the best form of defense is offense. And so it was that Justice Pauffley announced grandly and unequivocally on the first page of her Judgement that:
“I am able to state with complete conviction that none of the allegations are true. I am entirely certain that everything Ms Draper, her partner Abraham Christie and the children said about those matters was fabricated. The claims are baseless. Those who have sought to perpetuate them are evil and / or foolish “ Justice Pauffley, Hampstead Judgement Page One.
These sentences quite simply cannot possibly be true.
A Profound and Simple Problem:
The Judgement is Not Factually Correct and Should Be Considered Invalid on this Basis.
The Judgement is not factually accurate. It makes claims that are provably false and must therefore surely be perceived to be entirely invalid because the foundational assumptions that underlie Justice Pauffley’s interpretation of events are not factual in basis and this can be simply and quickly proven.
The Factual Error that Proves the Judgement is Without Validity.
On page 21 of the Judgement, in reference to the police interviews Justice Pauffley writes that
” Fact No. “142. “As emerges from the interviews themselves, both P and Q did indeed withdraw their claims, all of them.”
The Justice states this without equivocation, yet when the recording of the police interviews are re-examined it emerges that Witness G in fact never did retract his claim to have been sexually abused in the disabled toilet of a local swimming pool. Please note that the Judgement is very specific and definitive, “withdraw their claims, all of them.”
The record of the police interview actually indicates that contrary to the Judgement’s claims, witness G never did retract his claim relating to the sexual abuse at the swimming pool. It did not happen, so the claim that the judgement makes and one of it’s underlying foundations is factually incorrect.
The exchange from the September 17th Police interview The context.
This is at the 9 minute 38 second mark of the September 17th interview of the male complainant/victim. Several retractions, important retractions have already been extracted from the child,
It is both a reasonable and inescapable conclusion that the police officer was “tasked” by persons unknown to deliver the retraction, due to the officer’s behaviour in the interview.
Regardless of those unproven allegations, if we imagine for the sake of argument that the Officer was tasked with extracting retractions, the Interviewing Officer would have felt that he had already succeeded at this point, because the witnesses were no longer going to be of any use in a courtroom. The witness has been discredited, because he has told two contradictory accounts of the same event on the record. So a retraction of the swimming pool allegations did not apparently assume the same priority as the achievement of the previously bullied retractions.
This is the final interview in a series that spanned over two hours of interviews with the male witness.
This portion and the fact that the subject was simply dropped apropos of nothing and never again raised, prove that the “Swimming pool “claims were never retracted. The clock shows 11.18 at the time this exchange begins. The Swimming Poll Affirmations.
Interviewing Officer”Tell me about the swimming pool, you told me lots of people in this disabled toilet ? (sexually abused you-unstated)”
Male witness starts nodding his head as the policeman is speaking despite the officers subtly mocking tone. He nods repeatedly. “Yeah Yeah Yeah” he says nodding vigorously and stammering “Yeah that that that..”before plainly stating “That’s true.” remember he is in”retraction mode” he has made several retractions so he is clearly not under the spell of the mother’s partner yet he is absolutely unequivocal.
“That’s true” Nodding vigorously repeatedly. Repeats it, “That is true yeah.”
I make it at five affirmations right there between the stammered yeahs and the “That’s true” repeated twice unequivocally, while nodding.
So the Officer, in line with his tactics throughout the interview of September 17th, tried to talk the victim out of the allegation for whatever reason, stating incredulously
”Even though you said you was (sic) only four and hadn’t been to that school (as a student-unstated)?”
“No” indicating his disagreement with the officer’s assertion, he is not saying it did not happen, this is another affirmation as the boy’s words indicate.
“No, they had like…they were friends”
It is a bit garbled, “Teacher I knew a (name garbled and excised) from my sister. Who was in the school when I was four years old.”
Meaning he was not there with the school but with his friends, including his older sister who it seems was at the school. He is clearly affirming the veracity of the claim even in “retraction mode”.
“Interviewing Officer. ”So alright what we’ll try and do is sort out what’s true and what’s not”
At which point the subject is simply dropped.
Six Affirmations and A Lone Victory for Witness G Over His Bullying Interviewer.
At this point, the child achieves a lone victory in this interview, he actually wins the argument, he has the final say, the Interviewing Officer is defeated and so returns simply to the safe ground of the previous retractions. The topic is dropped at this point, and never raised again. The claim was quite simply never retracted and there is no possible valid reason for the police officer completely dropping the subject upon his failure to elicit the quick retraction he was transparently seeking and for which there can not possibly be an innocent or honourable explanation. It is really that simple.
The Repeated Mantra of Intimidation.
Prior to the witness breaking and offering a non-specific blanket retraction. The Interviewing Officer repeated his mantra of intimidation.
“Look if you haven’t been telling the truth, if you have been telling lies, it is ok, everything will be all right as long as you just tell the truth now ok?”
The implication of this is unmissable. The message is quite simply, “change your story now or you are in big trouble.”So the child on numerous occasions accedes to the intimidation as is completely natural given the maturity and power difference between the protaganists. It is worth mentioning that the children had been living in Foster care for six days at this point, there was an intense vulnerability, the father was still allowed Skype contact which given the gravity of the allegations certainly seems extraordinary,
Blanket Retraction Coerced and Therefore Legally Worthless.
Although Witness G did allow himself to be bullied into a semi blanket retraction, “None of it was true.” after repeated bouts of obvious and inexplicable intimidation from the previously empathetic Interviewing Officer. The context in which the blanket retraction was made combined with the bizarre manner in which the Interviewing Officer simply dropped the subject of the “Swimming pool” sexual abuse entirely when he was unable to bully and coerce a retraction from Witness G (and it never resurfaced in the witness G interview, his final police interview) mean that the blanket retraction is meaningless. It was extracted through unethical and transparent intimidation and can be safely and completely discounted on that basis.
The only rational conclusion that can be drawn from this pattern of behaviour is that “person’s unknown” tasked the Interviewing Officer to achieve retractions from the witnesses. Nothing else can possibly account for the complete lack of interest in the “swimming pool” allegations once the quick and easy retraction. was not forthcoming from Witness G.
Anatomy of A Transparent Cover Up.
Attack a Straw Man-Justice Pauffley’s Transparent Tactic.
This is a classic obfuscation tactic. Problems with your story?
Mask all the evidence behind the “helpful parts” of the story you are promoting.
Speak Only the “Good Parts” of the Narrative and obscure the truth with sustained misdirection.
In order to avoid addressing or investigating the actual credible and professionally confirmed child abuse claims, and the police cover up that the Judgement is intended to augment and complete, the Justice chooses to place at the core of the narrative the more indiscreet aspects of the Internet coverage of this case and the unintended victims of that indiscretion replace the actual child abuse victims as the victims in the Justice’s utterly flawed and almost completely fictitious Judgement. A strange mixture of psychosis and naked cynicism.
The One Strong Part of the Establishment Narrative
The Justice chose well in the sense that the indiscretion of certain information released and the small number of unfortunate consequences of these indiscretions are actually the only parts of her judgement that bear even a passing resemblance to reality. So the “strong”; part of the Establishment narrative is deployed in order to mask the real story with an unfortunate sideshow that quite simply has no bearing on the veracity of the claims of abuse one way or the other.
This is an elementary fact that utterly eludes the apparently “beyond’ mediocre Judge in her pursuit of obfuscation, any obfuscation no matter how infantile. At the same time the actual sexual abuse claims and the multiple strands of evidence that support them are only even mentioned as an afterthought, whereupon they are subjected to an intense, inexplicable and completely irrational attack. The unavoidable conclusion that at the very least without doubt these children were interfered with in a disgusting manner and no-one has been prosecuted for it is simply not addressed.
The broad entirety of the claims are perhaps beyond my ken but the Medical Reports were unequivocal, there can be no other reading no matter how hard or how desperately Justice Pauffley grasps for one. It thus becomes clear that the Pauffley Judgement was just the Crowning touch to another rather typical and despicable British Establishment cover up. No-one should be surprised as the cover ups number in the dozens and continue in the present day, not just in this story but many others.
History Will Condemn the Purveyors of Brazen Injustice.
There is literally no doubt in my mind that in time the completely fallacious nature of Justice Pauffley’s Judgement will be thoroughly exposed and she will be subjected to the ignominy of history’s assessment if nothing else.
The Judge brazenly tries to obfuscate the truth by concentrating on certain outlandish sounding claims and the indiscreet nature of some of the information released, in order to avoid investigating what is truly at the core of this story which is the children’s allegations, the police investigation and the results of the Medical examinations.. A Completely One Sided and Dishonest Account.
The specific claims the children made are never addressed in their own right in the Judgement, all evidence that indicates that sexual abuse has taken place is simply dismissed. On the other hand, all information that leans the other way is eagerly embraced even if the claims were made simultaneously by the same witness. You can’t do that and expect to be viewed as an honest or impartial adjudicator. Very simple.
All in all this is a ridiculous judgement full of claims that are beneath contempt and which the adjectives despicable and worthless do not even begin to describe. The Judge chose to attempt to defame any and all who had the temerity to notice the fact that the claims had veracity claiming without one scintilla of evidence these people had some kind of prurient interest, a claim for which the learned Justice did not see fit to provide any evidence to support! I found it particularly amusing because it was the police interview and the Medical reports that made me realise that “hang on, there is a cover up taking place here.” and neither the police interviews nor the Medical reports could ever conceivably be of prurient interest to anyone. Not even in the depraved parallel universe Justice Pauffley apparently inhabits
Cover Ups Are Rather Obvious and Easy to Spot.
Cover ups, logically only occur when there is a core of truth to the allegations being covered up.
Allegations without foundation do not by definition require a cover up, only the true allegations require that so there is no other rational interpretation, based on the content of the September 17th Police interview with the male child that this is a cover up.
The Original Medical Reports, upon which Justice Pauffley launches a sustained and fallacious attack, for no known reason all speak to the same horrific truth. Many of the claims must have been true. Because nothing else can rationally explain either the nature of that September 17th interview, during which the witness is openly hounded into retractions, on one occasion having made seven successive affirmations of the claim, nor the wounds and symptoms found by Dr. Hodes during her two Medical examinations, nor this appalling Judgement..Justice Pauffley’s openly biased and fallacious Judgement is grounded in basic and key errors of fact. The Judgement will not stand the test of time because it’s aims were neither in intent or outcome the dissemination of truth, quite the opposite.
The core underlying assumptions Justice Pauffley brought to the case were based upon falsehoods. The Justice has clearly not achieved an adequate grasp of the case upon which to base her claims among which nclude the unmistakeable untruth at Fact No. 142 that ” “As emerges from the interviews themselves, both P and Q did indeed withdraw their claims, all of them.” as proven by the partial transcript provided earlier.. The Interview continues for approximately another ten minutes, there was ample opportunity, but the Interviewing Officer chose never to raise the claims again. They were never retracted.
A Credible Legal Definition of Error and the Possible Consequences.
“The nature of the error dictates the availability of a legal remedy. Generally speaking, mistaken or erroneous application of law will void or reverse a judgment in the matter. Conversely, errors or mistakes in facts, upon which a judge or jury relied in rendering a judgment or verdict, may or may not warrant reversal, depending upon other factors involved in the error. However, appellate decisions make a distinction—not so much between fact and law, but rather, between harmless error and reversible error—in deciding whether to let stand or vitiate a judgment or verdict.”
Despite the grandiloquent title, a High Court Justice such as Dame Pauffley is actually at the third tier of the English Judiciary. According to Wikipedia “A Justice of the High Court, commonly known as a ‘High Court judge’, is a judge of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, and represents the third highest level of judge in the courts of England and Wales. High Court judges are referred to as puisne (pronounced puny) judges. High Court Judges wear red and black robes.”
It is not uncommon for the senior Courts of Appeal to overturn in part or whole the flawed findings of High Court Judgements such as Justice Pauffley’s Family Court Hampstead Judgement.There are still multiple avenues of appeal in this case, and the words of a Veteran former British Detective Sergeant recently prove that there are presumably many similar individuals, quality individuals with courage, decency and intelligence, who work inside British Law Enforcement and know that this is wrong.
The Rule Of Evil.
The aggressive and even belligerent cover up is par for the course. We have seen the work of the likes of Justice Pauffley many times before. In Nebraska, in Washington DC, in Belgium the Netherlands and of course in Westminster. The cover up has achieved huge successes in the Hampstead case, but the facts are still there, staring any in the face who dare to look. It is really a shameful and distressing situation all around and it has certainly been nauseating to see alleged perpetrators prancing around in the controlled media proclaiming their victim-hood. Britain is sadly a grotesque and wicked parody of what it perceives itself to be .
According to the highly credible source the UK Column, members of the London Metropolitan Police were threatened to stay away from the Hampstead matter. I cannot prove that this happened but it fits perfectly with everything else we have seen in this case, it comes from a credible source and it speaks to what is really at the heart of the engineered social and moral breakdown of Western societies so that the “iconoclasts” may rebuild the world in their evil image.The infiltration and even subversion of the institutions of the British state by what appears to be a satanic death cult, as extreme as that sounds is apparently highly advanced. What other conclusion can be drawn from all this?
The rule of evil can either be accepted or opposed, but it cannot credibly be denied. The power and aggression and success of the Hampstead cover up all bellow the same unspeakable truth.
Former Detective Sergeant Speaks Out On SRA Christ Church, Hampstead, London
Hampstead Satanic Abuse Case: UK Column, 20 March, 2015.
Hampstead: Questions for Mrs Justice Pauffley
March 21st, 2015.
Brief Hampstead Update.
I am still reading the judgement and working on my analysis. I intend to examine both the case history of the Justice and this judgement in detail as I believe they deserve.
In the interim. I would state the obvious and suggest readers watch Brian Gerrish’s brilliant denunciation of the judgement and Deborah Mahmoudieh’s excellent video also. Enjoy Aangirfan and the Tap while they last as it seems that a massive establishment attack is about to begin against these heroic sites. You can see it coming from a mile away. The rulers are not amused and they want to “see something done” about those (please note quotation marks!) “awful little people” with their terribly truthful and indiscreet websites pointing out the bleeding obvious and undeniable fact that the British elite are collectively complicit in the cover up of Establishment child abuse in Britain and have been for decades and this is a sad, but known and proven fact.
It is Time for the Cover Up to End Right Now
On some profound level the British ruling class apparently do not the view the “commoners’ as fully human. I honestly do not see what other conclusion can be drawn from their behaviour. Their loyalty to their class seems to have destroyed their collective humanity long ago. They actually believe that they should have the right to rape and murder the children of “commoners” and expect the chaps from MI5 or Special Branch or whomever to step in and protect them if any honest police happen to come across one of their atrocities..As it happens, historically, the chaps from MI5 or Special Branch HAVE protected the abusers in order to “maintain the prestige of the British Establishment” which by some immaculate corruption they managed to conflate with the Security of the British State.
Key institutions of the British State appear to have been heavily involved in serious crimes against children with almost complete impunity for decades.
This is an intolerable situation clearly. If the institutions of the state are not reformed radically, logic dictates that eventually the mass of the people will understand what is happening and what they have been doing and seek to destroy the very institutions of the state.
As an outsider I would suggest that perhaps some type of “clear the decks” process is urgently required. Perhaps there should be an amnesty for certain people, Law Enforcement and Intelligence Officials perhaps, and other perpetrators of the cover up might be offered an amnesty. A more widespread amnesty may be a positive idea but that should be at the discretion of the victims rather than any outsider, obviously these are merely constructive suggestions. Perhaps a Truth and Reconciliation style process might be beneficial.
The idea that when the Establishment commit a crime, whether the Iraq war or the child rape at the Elm Guest House, they will just conduct an inquiry of whatever length and futility required to make the problem go away and expect people to be grateful and actually equate this process of obfuscation and delay with justice is no longer sustainable. The contempt of the rulers for the people is completely unmistakeable and nauseating.
The more I observe it almost seems like a “class” apartheid society, as hyperbolic as that must sound. The way the ruling class believe they have the right under some preposterous national security cover to get a free pass for crimes against children of a sexual and violent nature. Now they want to blame the internet. Pretend that some prurient interest is being served. Which truly shows how low they are.
In order to preserve the positive ideas and people within British institutions the cover up has to end now. The obfuscation and denial must end right now. The persecution of victims and whistle blowers and honest police must end right now.
It is time to admit the bleeding obvious. it is time to renovate the house in order to preserve the underlying structure. Historically we know that reform or revolution are the only options. Revolutions are destructive and disastrous and only lead to even worse people in power generally so I am urging a rethink. A restoration of the Rule of Law, hardly a subversive idea is it?
The world will not end. The walls will not fall down. People will not be hunted or strung up or any of that vile mob nonsense. Just tell the truth and apologise and hopefully the psyche of this deeply divided, wounded and utterly dysfunctional nation can return to balance and a semblance of normalcy and the rule of Law. The choice is yours.
The Mysterious Death of the Prosecutor, the Missing Car Bombs and the Truth.
The mysterious death of Argentine prosecutor Alberto Nisman of a gunshot wound on January 18th, 2015 has been the source of much controversy. In order to understand the death of Alberto Nisman it is necessary to understand the case he was working on at the time of his death relating to the massive bombing attacks against the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires in 1992 and the AMIA Jewish community centre in 1994.
The attacks of 1992 and 1994.
The attack is blamed on a suicide car (or van) bomber ramming his vehicle into the target on both occasions. Hezbollah backed by Iran and Syria supposedly the guilty parties. The problem with this narrative is very simple and fundamental,
There is no evidence that the sites were attacked with any car bomb, indeed multiple witnesses attest to the building exploding from within, no one saw the supposed Renault van used in the AMIA attack, on the street, blowing up, driving up or anything. The Argentine Academy of Engineers Certified that the Israel Embassy was attacked from within.
Argentine Journalist Adrian Salbuchi has done high quality work looking at both attacks.
“Notably, in both cases, the government and the media immediately placed the blame squarely on alleged “Islamic Fundamentalist Terror Groups” who were supposed to have used car bombs to blow up both buildings. As the years went by, however, any “Islamic Terror Group” links became weaker and increasingly ambiguous. Neither of the alleged car-bomb vehicles were ever found.”
The Embassy Attack of March 17th, 1992 left 29 dead.
“The case for a car bomb melted away when the State Prosecutor and the Court hearing on this case invited technical specialist surveyors from the Argentine National Engineers Academy to determine what caused the Israeli Embassy building to collapse. Their conclusion was that the explosion took place from inside the building and was not caused by an alleged car-bomb. To make matters worse for Zionist pressure groups, a passer-by had filmed from several blocks away the mushroom cloud that rose from that explosion, a characteristic effect that also pointed to an internal explosion.”
“The embassy building was in a very densely populated part of Buenos Aires and, although the shock wave broke glass windows and plaster of practically all the buildings across the street from the Embassy – even blowing-in a vitreaux of a church across the street, which sadly fell on a priest and killed him – the only building structurally affected was the Embassy itself. Clearly, we either had a car bomb with an unrealistically selective shock wave or the explosion took place inside the building and there was no car bomb.”
“There are many other signs that point to this conclusion. Probably, for this reason, the case of the Embassy was mentioned less and less frequently by the media, especially after strong rumours surfaced that what actually blew up was an arsenal that the Israelis apparently had housed in the building’s basement. At the time of the explosion, a group of Israeli Labour Government officers were meeting to discuss matters pertaining to the recently initiated Madrid Peace Conference process, but “luckily” left the building just before the explosion. The same occurred with the Ambassador himself who, fortuitously, also happened to depart the premises before the blast.”
A Leader of the Israel Lobby in Argentina was allowed to pay US 400,000 to a Witness in the Frame up.
“For a number of years, the case was heard in the District Court presided by a Federal Judge by the name of Juan Galeano, who was so weak – if not downright stupid – that he allowed himself to be coaxed and pressured by local Zionist organizations – the AMIA and DAIA themselves – into authorizing payment of a 400,000 USD kickback to a shady used-car dealer by the name of Carlos Telleldín, who had sold the alleged car bomb van to alleged Hizbollah operatives in return for his formally accusing three Buenos Aires Police officers of being the “local connection” that would lead first to Syria, then to Hizbollah, and finally to Iran.”
“The money for that 400,000 USD kickback was provided by the then-president of the DAIA, Rubén Beraja through his (now defunct) bank Banco Mayo. Beraja recently spent several years in jail because of the fraudulent collapse of that bank.”
It can be stated with a high degree of confidence that the Embassy was attacked from within and that the attack logically must have been conducted by the enemies of Iran and Hezbollah. Friends after all are not in the habit of framing one another for sectarian mass murder.
Gareth Porter has also investigated the AMIA attack and his conclusions mirror those of Salbuchi, although when it comes to identifying the perpetrators of the attack his work seems rather weak by comparison. Porter suggests that fascist elements of the Argentine police may have been responsible. On the actual attacks, his work is very strong.
“ATF explosives expert Charles Hunter quickly identified major discrepancies between the car-bomb thesis and the blast pattern recorded in photos. He wrote a report two weeks later noting that in the wake of the bombing, merchandise in a store immediately to the right of the AMIA was tightly packed against its front windows and merchandise in another shop had been blown out onto the street–suggesting that the blast came from inside rather than outside. Hunter also said he did not understand how the building across the street could still be standing if the bomb had exploded in front of the AMIA, as suggested by the car-bomb thesis.”
“The lack of eyewitness evidence supporting the thesis was just as striking. Of some 200 witnesses on the scene, only one claimed to have seen a white Renault Trafic. Several testified they were looking at the spot where the Trafic should have been when the explosion occurred and saw nothing. Nicolasa Romero, the wife of a Buenos Aires policeman, was that lone witness. She said she saw a white Renault Trafic approach the corner where she was standing with her sister and her 4-year-old son. But Romero’s sister testified that the vehicle that passed them was not a white Trafic but rather a black-and-yellow taxi. Other witnesses reported seeing a black-and-yellow taxi seconds before the explosion.”
“Argentine prosecutors argued that pieces of a white Trafic imbedded in the flesh of many of the victims of the explosion proved their case for a suicide bomb. But that evidence was discredited by Gabriel Levinas, a researcher for AMIA’s own legal team. Levinas is a member of a leading Jewish family in Buenos Aires who had published a human rights magazine during the dictatorship (his uncle’s car was used to kidnap war criminal Adolf Eichmann and spirit him off to Israel for trial in 1961.)”
“He discovered that the manufacturer of the white Trafic had been sent fragments of the vehicle recovered by the police for analysis and had found that none of the pieces had ever been put under high temperature. That meant that these car fragments could not have come from the particular white Trafic that police had identified as the suicide bomb car–since that vehicle was known to have once caught fire before having been recycled and repaired.”
“Yet despite the lack of eyewitness testimony and the weakness of the forensic evidence, the State Department publicly embraced the suicide-bomb story in 1994 and 1995.”
“In the case of the AMIA, the Court asked a Border Police (Gendarmería) surveyor to give an “official opinion” about the alleged car-bomb van and this person, by the name of Commander Osvaldo Laborda, officially said that no more parts were found “because the explosion buried it deep under the entrance to the former AMIA building”.
How Nisman Became Involved and the Indiscreet Words of Rabbi Israel Singer.
“President Kirchner, Christina Kirchner (now president) and Foreign Minister (then and now) Jorge Taiana, held a secret meeting in the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel in New York City on 21 September 2006, with eight major Zionist pro-Israel organizations, including The American Jewish Congress, B’Nai B’Rith, ADL and others.”
“We don’t know what they discussed because, as I say, it was held in secret; but, one month later, the Kirchners dispatched special prosecutor Alberto Nisman to the US, where he met with CIA and Mossad agents and, upon his return, launched a formal accusation against the former Iranian government of Ali Rafsanjani. The judge hearing this case at the time, Dr. Rodolfo Canicoba Corral, immediately obliged by accepting it.”
“This was headline news and prompted Rabbi Israel Singer, the political director of the World Jewish Congress, to “congratulate the Argentine government” as Argentina’s accusation against Iran “confirmed the commitment the Kirchners undertook during that secret meeting”. Commitment? To do what? Why? In exchange for what? ”
Nisman Apparent Employee of the State of Israel and Participant in the Cover Up.
“Dr. Labaké (defence lawyer) recently asked Special State Prosecutor Alberto Nisman to dig four meters under the entrance to the former AMIA building in order to determine, once and for all, if the remains of that vehicle exist. Prosecutor Nisman refused to do so, which is not surprising when you consider that he tours the world spreading a fanatically pro-Israel and anti-Arab message regarding the AMIA attack.”
“At the end of 2007, for example, Mr. Nisman was a special guest at the Annual Meeting of the American Jewish Congress. In March 2009, he gave a presentation at the Queensborough Holocaust Library in New York City. At the end of 2008 he personally submitted a full report on the status of this case to the Supreme Court – not of Argentina, as you might expect, but of Israel in Tel Aviv. Clearly, Mr Nisman acts as Special Prosecutor not on behalf of Argentina but of the State of Israel!”
The Political Context in Israel in the Early 1990s and how it may relate to the Argentine attacks.
“Look at the timeline: on 14 July 1994, right smack in the middle of the unfolding of this insidious internal fighting amongst Zionists and inside Israel, the AMIA building was blown up. AMIA’s leadership at that time was pro-Labour, so it was clearly a “warning shot” from the ultra-right Nazi-Zionist wing for Rabin and his Labour government to stop negotiating “Land for Peace” with the Palestinians. It now appears that prime minister Rabin, who was a tough guy, did not “get the message”. So, when does this whole sequence come to a head? On 4 November 1995 – just 16 months after the AMIA attack – Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin was gunned down, JFK-like, on the streets of Tel-Aviv, not by a Neo-Nazi nor by an Islamic Fundamentalist, but by one Ygal Amir, a young ultra-right-wing student member of the settler’s movement linked to the internal security service Shin Beth, which was being vigorously reshuffled by Rabin. he in-fighting among Zionists had as one of its bloody episodes the bombing of the Israeli Embassy and later the AMIA building in Argentina, which was perceived by the Zionist Nazis at the time as a symbol of Labour’s stronghold. Why Buenos Aires, you might ask? Simple – because Argentine public security has always been, and still is, very weak, thus making both terror operations relatively easy with Argentine targets.”
The Familiar Trademarks.
“Nevertheless, and similar to 9/11, although they have shown the technical capability to carry out false flag attacks with (almost) technical perfection – using bombs, controlled demolitions, and all – they still are extremely sloppy in that they have left their fingerprints all over the place when perpetrating these attacks which have been revealed by inconsistencies that have proven impossible to explain away.”
The Argentine Government Had Nothing to Fear from the NIsman Affidavit and No Motive to Kill Nisman.
“The central accusation in his affidavit, made 96 times, according to press accounts, was that Kirchner and Timerman had sought to revoke the Interpol arrest warrants against the former Iranian officials.
“But Ronald K. Noble, the secretary general of Interpol for 15 years until last November, denied Nisman’s accusation. Noble declared, “I can say with 100 percent certainty, not a scintilla of doubt, that Foreign Minister Timerman and the Argentine government have been steadfast, persistent and unwavering that the Interpol’s red notices be issued, remain in effect and not be suspend or removed.”
“Noble’s denial raises an obvious question: Why would the Kirchner government, knowing that Nisman’s main claim could be easily refuted, have any reason to kill him on the eve of the presentation of his case? Why give those seeking to discredit the government’s policy on the AMIA bombing the opportunity to shift the issue from the facts of the case to the presumption of officially sponsored assassination?”
“Nisman’s suggestion that former Iranian president Abolhassen Banisadr had “direct knowledge” related to the AMIA bombings was a stunningly brazen falsehood. Banisadr had been impeached by the Iranian legislature in June 1981 and had fled to Paris the following month – 13 years before the bombing.”
“Nisman also cited the testimony of Abolghassem Mesbahi, who called himself a “defector” from the Iranian intelligence service, that Iranian officials had made such a decision sometime in August 1993. But Mesbahi was known by U.S. intelligence analysts as a “serial fabricator”, who had also told an obviously false story about Iranian involvement in the 9/11 attacks.”
The Recurring Cabal Modus Operandi
When Cornered Lash Out. When Caught in a Lie Tell another Bigger Lie.
Nisman was on holiday in Europe when he was directed to return home after a meeting in Amsterdam, a notorious stronghold of Israeli intelligence in Europe. Nisman had been given a thankless and impossible task. The framing of Iran and Hezbollah for an horrific attack they cannot possibly have conducted due to the central lie about there being a car bombing.
The lack of the car bombing was an impossible hurdle for Nisman to clear and when this became completely obvious, Nisman’s handlers decided that he was worth more to them dead than alive. In the wake of his murder there have been many shenanigans but in time the truth will out and the Argentine massacres will be seen in their true context as the beginning of a series of spectacular and deadly attacks conducted by the same group, using captured members of Law enforcement, and murdering police who don’t cooperate with the frame up or cover up that False Flag terror always requires.