It has seemed clear for several years that the consensus in Empire HQ is that Russia will have to be destroyed using an engineered colour revolution because Russia is far too well armed to risk an open military attack. So the NGO’s were sent out with their CIA cash laundered by the “democracy” promoting “philanthropist” George Soros and they failed in 2011, but the struggle goes on and even if it takes them another twenty years, destroying Russia will remain a key goal until the task is complete. Russia is too powerful and prone to bouts of independent action to be tolerable to the New World Order it seems.
The murder yesterday of the well credentialed but mid ranking Russian opposition figure Boris Nemtsov should be seen in this context. Logic suggests that Nemtsov was a “disposable hero” murdered by Western backed elements in the hope of breathing life into a faltering Russian “democratic revolution”.
Writing in 2012, the Saker had a number of interesting observations about a number of the leading figures embroiled in this event especially the unbelievably dubious pair of Ilya Yashin and Kseniya Sobchak both of whom were apparently present at the murder scene. This is his very unkind description of the former lovers Yashin and Sobchak “one nutcase (Yashin) and one “career tart”, literally (Sobchak)”
“Boris was the most outspoken critic of Putin and the most charismatic leader of the opposition and his dead body found 100 yards from the Kremlin is a clear message to all the opposition activists and all people who do not support the Kremlin This act of political terror is clearly aimed to stun and horrify the opposition to the Putin regime on the eve of the march we will now hold as a mourning march as originally planned on Sunday.”
(Interestingly, despite his very public presence at the murder scene, Ilya Yashin claimed that he had not seen Nemtsov for two days.)
This is the description of Nemtsov from the same 2012 article.
“The main guy in all this drama is Boris Nemtsov. He is a very good speaker, he is charming, charismatic and has a great sense of humor. By far the smartest of all of these dissidents and the most valuable to the CIA. He is also the only one who was tipped off and managed to hide from the authorities “
Later in the same article we learn that in 2012
“According to official Russian sources, the cops found over 1’000’000 Euros (one million!) in spread out in about 100 envelopes in the apartments of Yashin and Sobchak.”
The Vineyard of the Saker: Interesting developments in Moscow
In the short term the killing of Nemtsov will probably achieve very little for the plotters but it is all part of building their narrative about Putin and Russia. The more mud that can be thrown the better. All doubt in my mind regarding the intent and source of this crime was removed by this comment from the Ukraine President, a reliable barometer.
“Petro Poroshenko, the Ukrainian president, said that Mr Nemtsov had been killed because he was planning to disclose evidence of Russia’s involvement in the war in east Ukraine.
“He said he would reveal persuasive evidence of the involvement of Russian armed forces in Ukraine. Someone was very afraid of this … They killed him,” Mr Poroshenko said.
There are some pretty obvious logical fallacies here along with the speaker’s track record of consistent lies. The whole idea that the Russian assistance to the Novorussian rebels is a big dirty secret that Moscow fears will be discovered is a complete joke on several different levels.
For starters people in Russia know full well that Russia has been supporting the Novorussian rebels in their successful defensive military campaign in defence of the people of the Donbass. They know about it and they support it. That’s why Putin’s approval levels run as high as 85%, people in Russia support the policies. So this whole idea that the Kremlin is running around desperately trying to suppress news of what has been for them a low cost military and political triumph is actually farcical. Poroshenko tells some of the silliest lies I have ever heard. It is very helpful really. They had to juice up their rally and their movement. They can’t really do anything militarily so they had to show their rage in other ways, they are pretty obvious.
In possibly related news, a key official of the former Yanukovych government Mykhalo Chechetov fell to his death from his 17th floor Kiev balcony today.
“Mr Nemtsov’s killing was one of two suspicious deaths on Friday that have been linked to the ongoing Ukraine crisis. Mykhalo Chechetov, a leading ally of Viktor Yanukovych, the pro-Russian former president, was found dead after falling from his 17th floor flat in Kiev in an apparent suicide. He was facing charges of abuse of power for his role in attempts to crush the protests that eventually toppled the former president.”
The events in the Donbass region of Ukraine have clearly caused a great deal of consternation within the Empire. The pathetic, truly pathetic article “Save the New Ukraine.” penned by NWO paragons Bernard Henri Levy and George Soros make the level of commitment to the Ukraine junta and their total incomprehension of what has happened in the Donbass over the past eight or nine months completely clear. This is only one small provocation on the road to regime change in Russia. Many more disposable heroes will presumably share the unfortunate fate of Boris Nemtsov in the psychopathic pursuit of “victory” over Russia.
Nemtsov murder: Putin warned about exactly this type of “false flag” two years ago | The Vineyard of the Saker
Russian opposition leader Ilya Yashin, center, reacts as police investigate the the body of Boris Nemtsov, a former Russian deputy prime minister and opposition leader at Red Square in Moscow, Russia, Saturday, Feb. 28, 2015. Russia’s Interior Ministry says Boris Nemtsov, a leading opposition figure and former deputy prime minister, has been shot and killed near the Kremlin. Nemtsov, a sharp critic of President Vladimir Putin, was killed early Saturday. His death comes just a day before a major opposition rally in Moscow. (AP Photo/Pavel Golovkin) | View photo – Yahoo News http://news.yahoo.com/photos/russian-opposition-leader-ilya-yashin-center-reacts-police-photo-235127222.html
Indonesia: “FUCK ABBOTT” protest hits Australian embassy
February 25th, 2015. Updated March 11th.
To Know Him is To Despise Him. The ” Love” Spreads to Australia’s Northern Neighbour!
The execution process for the condemned Australians Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran is turning into quite a protracted saga. Apparently the men cannot be executed until as many Australians as possible believe there is a chance they will be saved from execution and as many Indonesians as possible cheer the execution as an affirmation of patriotic and independent Indonesia.
It is not hard to see that the protests in Indonesia are state approved if not sponsored. It is also clear that the size of the crowds is growing and by the time the executions actually take place there may be tens of thousands of sincere people on the streets of Jakarta all to wave a fist in the face of the Abbott.
The CIA and cohorts have known for a long time that manufactured social movements can under the right circumstances take on a life of their own. The entire hippie movement is a classic and well documented example. CIA provided the drugs, the leadership and the philosophy that enabled a large and apparently authentic movement to form. One more idiotic statement from Abbott between now and the execution and this whole event could turn out to be very damaging to the Indonesia/Australia relationship.
Given the fact that the poor wretched Prime Minister cannot help but make idiotic comments, as they are an honest expression of his character, chances are high that Australians will be asked to recoil in horror at the sight of Indonesians loudly celebrating the deaths of the Australians and not understand that it has nothing to do with them, nor Chan and Sukumaran. This is all about a chronically misfiring hapless clown, the Abbott .
“Angry Indonesians have compared Tony Abbott to Shylock, the moneylender in The Merchant of Venice who demanded a pound of flesh when his rival defaulted on a loan.
“Australians need a prime minister, not a Shylock and drug dealer’s cousin,” a banner said at a protest held on car-free Sunday at Jakarta’s famous Hotel Indonesia roundabout.”
Bali nine executions: Tony Abbott compared to Shylock in campaign to repay tsunami aid
“Senior government figures expressed concerns Mr Abbott had derailed efforts to save the Bali Nine duo from execution, after linking the men’s fate to Australia’s aid donation following the 2004 Boxing Day tsunami that killed more than 200,000 in Indonesia.” the Daily Mail.
The One Man Diplomatic Catastrophe.
Two Australian citizens Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukuraman are awaiting execution in Indonesia. The Australian Federal Police supplied the Indonesian police with the information that led to the arrests knowing that if convicted the men would face the death penalty. The Australian convicted drug smugglers were always going to be executed.
If you look at the situation from the point of view of the new Indonesian President Widodo this is an easy way for him to build credibility. By simply doing nothing, President Widodo gets to look strong and independent and help mollify the security establishment. If he intervened and stopped the executions he would gain nothing. This Australian government has made it’s status as the dedicated slave of the United States, Britain and Israel perfectly clear. Sparing the two condemned men will have no material benefit to Indonesia and would see the new President lose a lot of credibility. The idea that public hectoring would help in this situation is just ridiculous. You wonder how anyone could possibly be so stupid, but it is just the view from “Australia world”.
The typically disastrous statement from the Australian Prime Minister, where he bitterly remarked that since Indonesia was going to go through with the executions perhaps they should return the money Australia donated following the 2004 Tsunami means that now many Indonesians will probably cheer the executions as a way to poke Abbott in the eye.
The Prime Minister truly has that effect on people right across the board. He has a remarkable talent for generating disdain and loathing.
The whole furore in Australia about the impending executions of Myuran Sukumaren and Andrew Chan is typically vapid and hypocritical for several reasons..
The Australian Federal Police Put them on Death Row.
The drug smugglers are on Death row in Indonesia awaiting execution because the Australian Federal Police specifically chose to arrange for the smuggling syndicate to be arrested in Indonesia.
The information that led to the arrests came from the Australian Federal Police, there was no need to have them arrested prior to their return to Australia. The Australian Federal Police have never sought to offer a reasonable explanation for their decision to choose to cause the arrests to happen in Indonesia where the Death penalty is in place for such crimes. All the AFP have ever offered was some self-serving nonsense about “It was a successful operation.”
Australian Officials chose to put them in the Death Row position for unknown and unexplained reasons. So Australia complaining about the results of an Australian policy decision is obviously a joke.
The other thing is that when a couple of Australians face execution suddenly we see a great deal of supposedly “principled” opposition to the death penalty. It is all rather laudable in it’s way but is also rather a joke in it’s provincialism and inconsistency.
When Indonesia executed the “Bali bombers” no one in Australia offered a word of protest. If you want to oppose the death penalty on principle, a perfectly decent position, surely that opposition has to demonstrate it’s principled nature by extending to all cases, even when the suspect is deeply unpopular?
US Drone Killings Don’t Count?
The bigger example is the United States extrajudicial killings in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia. In Pakistan the United States sentenced people to death by drone on the basis that from the air they looked like the person might be a supposed “militant.” This is in a region of Pakistan where men go armed so anyone could be accused and killed at any time by the US on this basis.
“McClatchy’s April review of drone strikes revealed that at least 265 of up to 482 people that the CIA killed during a 12-month period ending in September 2011 were not senior al-Qaeda leaders, but were instead “assessed” as Afghan, Pakistani and “unknown extremists.” Corroborating media accounts show that US drones killed only six top al-Qaeda leaders during the same period.”
Classified documents reveal CIA drone strikes often killed unknown people — RT USA
US Drones Executed Two Australians in Yemen in November 2013 without trial.
A US drone attack killed two Australian citizens Christopher Harvard and Daryl Jones (New Zealand dual citizen) on November 19th, 2013 in Yemen. This fact did not even emerge until April 2014 at which point it was largely ignored. The Australian Government did not offer a word of comment. How can it possibly be that when Indonesia is going to execute two Australian citizens after a trial and many appeals this is cataclysmic yet when the USA executed two Australian citizens without trial it was not worthy of comment?
The men were alleged to be members of the al Qaeda Yemen branch, al Qaeda in the Arabian peninsula, a known and rather obvious CIA, Mossad (and the rest) front with their underwear bomber ushered onto a plane without a passport or ticket by a handler who videotaped him the whole flight . With their “iconic martyred leader” Anwar al Awlaki of the previous Pentagon visits and extensive contacts with the US government and not forgetting the Kouachi brothers, the classic patsies in Paris last month in the “Clash of Civilisations cartoonist” attack number one on Charlie Hebdo.
In addition to sentencing Australians to death without trial it is also clear that part of the “information grid” that is used to find, provide and deliver attacks on drone targets is based in the Pine Gap US spy base in Central Australia.
So a US facility based on Australian soil was used to help execute without trial or evidence an Australian citizen and no -one has a problem with that? Apparently not in “Australia world”.
The drone program initially was supposed to be an assassination program aimed at “important militant leaders” They began in Yemen in 2002 and Pakistan in 2004. The program degenerated to the point of these “signature strikes” when people and nearby civilians were killed on the vague and meaningless suspicion from camera footage from the sky. Thousands of civilians have been killed by this program which peaked in 2010-11 under Obama.
If you had principled opposition to the death penalty surely you might have an issue with those techniques?
There will be no candles in Sydney for the innocent civilians of Waziristan slain by our “Dear friend” and “great ally” the United States. No candles even for the Australians killed in Yemen without trial. But of course, they are “other’ people aren’t they? Their deaths are not worth mentioning or even considering to the casual Western supremacist living in”Australia world’.
Indonesia: Protesters throw ‘druggie’ Tony Abbott BEHIND BARS at Jakarta protest
Indonesians on Twitter hit back at Tony Abbott’s Tsunami aid comments by taking to the streets | Daily Mail Online
Say it Isn’t So Sir Malcolm!
The British Establishment has been rocked by fresh allegations of Influence peddling after Channel 4 and the London Daily Telegraph conducted a sting operation where they posed as the representatives of a fictitious “Chinese business interest” and met two Senior figures former Labour Foreign Secretary and Iraq war accomplice Jack Straw and the formidable Tory former Foreign and Defence Secretary and current Chair of the Intelligence Committee, Sir Malcolm Rifkind.
Well, the pro forma denials have been issued. But it is hard to see how they tally with what is on film.
“Rifkind reportedly claimed to be able to gain “useful access” to every British ambassador in the world. Journalists recorded him describing himself as self-employed, even though he earns a salary of £67,000 for being MP for Kensington: “I am self-employed – so nobody pays me a salary. I have to earn my income.” He said his usual fee for half a day’s work was “somewhere in the region of £5,000 to £8,000″.
Politicians Jack Straw and Malcolm Rifkind stung by Channel 4 ‘cash for access’ investigation – v
Straw is about to leave politics but Rifkind is the Head of the Parliamentary Intelligence Committee that oversees British Intelligence Agencies.
Rifkind, astonishingly stated that he had no salary and no employer, apparently regarding his US $100 000 salary from the British taxpayer to represent the people of Kensington as both negligible and requiring no work for the constituents whatsoever on his part. Talk about an “entitlement mentality.”
“The salary entitlement of a Select Committee Chair is £81,936 (this figure comprises of MP’s salary of £67,060 and additional salary for Select Committee Chairs of £14,876) from 1 April 2014.”
Malcolm Rifkind – “Nobody Pays Me A Salary” | theneedleblog
Rifkind is undoubtedly a powerful individual and a formidable figure. Allegations have been made of his complicity in the cover up of the Westminster child abuse scandal, a reasonable assertion but not one for which it is clear that there is direct incontrovertible evidence.
Many perceive Rifkind to be the “grey eminence” of the British Intelligence Establishment. This description is from TruthNews (via the Coleman Experience.)
” Sir Malcolm Rifkind is chairman of the British parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC), which oversees MI5, MI6 and GCHQ – the most important position in the UK intelligence community. The ISC reports first to the prime minister, who retains – and uses – the right to censor material in ISC reports before parliament views them”. Rifkind is an arch Zionist, and a staunch advocate of the incipient police state. Rifkind was employed by the Military Contractor ArmorGroup who made millions of dollars in Iraq from British Government contracts. Rifkind’s cousin was the recently deceased protected child abuser Sir Leon Brittan. Sir Malcolm Rifkind is known to have lived at the Dolphin Square housing complex in Pimlico, London. Dolphin Square has very strong connections to British intelligence and is also understood to have been repeatedly used as a site for child abuse parties with elite guests apparently being entrapped and filmed by the intelligence agencies in order to “protect their future interests”.
This is a short description of Dolphin Square from the Daily Mail.
“The vast complex of 1,250 flats on a 7.5-acre plot close to the Thames was built in 1937 to provide homes for individuals its developers described as ‘notable in public life or society’.
Past tenants include the Far-Right political leader Oswald Mosley, Harold Wilson, Christine Keeler and Princess Anne, who (after moving out) allegedly claimed to be tired of ‘nosy neighbours, noisy traffic and the sight of hookers plying their trade nearby’.
By the late 1980s, it housed 51 MPs, 16 peers, 12 generals and six admirals. More recently, such noted Parliamentarians as William Hague, Alastair Darling, Malcolm Rifkind, Menzies Campbell and Mo Mowlam called it home.”
The abuse at Dolphin Square involved children trafficked from a children’s institution, Bryn Estyn in North Wales. This passage from the Coleman Experience details the evidence Scallywag magazine accumulated from speaking to a dozen witnesses/victims, ten of whom were prepared to make sworn statements. Leon Brittan, Nick Clegg, Malcolm Rifkind, William Hague, Dolphin Square, Missing Dossiers and the VIP Child-Abuse connection | thecolemanexperience
“A notorious boy-brothel was in operation at the sordid address (Dolphin Square) and vulnerable boys were trafficked from care homes to satisfy VIP filth.”
According to the brilliant Scallywag paper:
” In the early nineties, in the now defunct Scallywag magazine, which I founded, we interviewed in some depth twelve former inmates at Bryn Estyn who had all been involved in the Wrexham paedophile ring, which the tribunal acknowledges existed. Most of these interviews were extremely harrowing and disturbing, but were gently and sensitively conducted over pub lunches where the victim could relax. We subsequently persuaded ten of them to make sworn affidavits which we proposed to use as back up to half a dozen paedophile stories we later published.”
” Two of these young men, who had been 14-years-old at the time, swore they had been not only introduced to the paedophile ring operating in the Crest Hotel in Wrexham but had later been escorted on three or four occasions to an address in Pimlico where they were further abused.
We took them separately to Pimlico and asked them to point out the building where this had taken place. They were both positive in their identification. It turned out to be the private flat of a well known, and since highly discredited lobbyist who later went into obscurity in some disgrace because of his involvement with Mohammed al-Fayed and the ‘cash for questions’ scandal. At the time we ran a story entitled ‘Boys for Questions’ and named several prominent members of the then Thatcher government. These allegations went to the very top of the Tory party, yet there was a curious and almost ominous lack of writs.”
It is entirely possible that Sir Malcolm Rifkind has no links to or knowledge of either the crimes of Leon Brittan his cousin, nor the other VIP child abusers of Dolphin Square and all the other sites that were used for the same purpose. Others have not perceived it that way and time will presumably reveal all.
Because the approaches were made by a Chinese company, I would suggest that Sir Malcolm’s presence inside the intelligence committee, let alone as it’s leader, is now completely untenable.
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that this sting was a targeted attack directed specifically at Rifkind and his destruction. This is an intelligence operation with the media groups acting as cut outs on their behalf. There is an overwhelming likelihood in my opinion that this has been organised by an opposing faction within British intelligence.
There are presumably hundreds of MP’s who might prove “vulnerable” to such approaches.The media people didn’t just stumble upon this accidentally in my opinion.
Jack Straw is perhaps the “straw man” there to make it look less obvious. It is pretty clear that someone has chosen to at least withhold assistance to Rifkind because GCHQ and other “monitoring’ agencies would have known this sting was underway, this would be of intense interest to them, which means they presumably had the opportunity to warn Rifkind of what was happening, but chose not to do so.
The evidence to support that claim will in all likelihood never emerge, Commentators on the Guardian are suggesting that Rifkind will be stripped of his honours, the Knighthood etc. It is looking grim for Sir Malcolm Rifkind.
Post script. Sir Malcolm Rifkind has resigned from his position on the Intelligence and Security Committee and will leave the House of Commons at the next election which is in the next several months. This is Sir Malcolm Rifkind’s statement regarding his decision.
None one of the current controversy with which I am associated is relevant to my work as chairman of the intelligence and security committee of parliament.
However, I have today informed my colleagues that while I will remain a member of the committee, I will step down from the chairmanship.
The committee is due to be dissolved in little over a month with the prorogation of parliament for the forthcoming general election. The main substantive work which needs to be completed will be the publication of our privacy and security report during March.
I do not want the work of the committee and the publication of the report to be, in any way, distracted or affected by controversy as to my personal position. I have concluded, therefore, that it is better that this important work should be presided over by a new chairman. “
Malcolm Rifkind discusses ‘Intelligence Agencies in the Internet Age’
Malcolm Rifkind – “Nobody Pays Me A Salary” | theneedleblog
February 23rd 2015.
“Today is memorial Sunday, but on this day terrorist scum revealed its predatory nature,” Ukraine’s president, Petro Poroshenko, in a rare moment of honesty (albeit unintentional).
Blast hits rally in Kharkov, Ukraine – at least 2 killed
A bomb went off during a march in Kharkov, central Ukraine yesterday. The attack took place during a march.to celebrate the Anniversary of the Ukraine Maidan coup and left three people dead and more than a dozen injured.
The President of the Ukraine rather gave the game away when he immediately claimed that ‘Kharkov attack a blatant attempt to expand terrorism’ By which he intended to blame the attack on the Novorussian rebels, still in the midst of completing a major conventional military victory in Debalstseve.
[eng cc subs] Media expert A. Shariy “puzzled” about SSU info about arrest of “Kharkov partizans”
Context. The context of the attack is that the Ukraine military have just suffered a stunning and massive military defeat that saw up to half the Ukraine military active units destroyed.
It would seem therefore that finding themselves with no viable military options and increasing controversy about the conduct of the Donbass war, dark elements within the Ukraine government decided to revert to the other tactic that has helped them achieve short term gains in the immediate past. The False Flag provocation. The most notable and successful recent example of course were the Maidan sniper killings of a year ago when opposition snipers clearly targeted both protesters and police and generated the mass outrage required for the revolution to succeed.
The Maidan False Flag Snipers.
There are many lengthy and scholarly examinations of the Maidan sniper killings, I will post them in the sources. Ultimately there were several opposition snipers in several different perches working on February 21st 2014.
The best documented and easiest to prove example is that of the Ukraine Hotel sniper(s). The reason for this is that the snipers in the Ukraine hotel were filmed by many major news outlets such as the BBC. The existence of the snipers was mentioned over loudspeakers in the Maidan. The snipers in the Ukraine hotel filmed themselves while they worked and some of that footage leaked.
The thing that really makes the Ukraine Hotel opposition snipers extra easy to prove is the fact that they not only conducted the killings, they filmed the killings from the same location. It is the 9th floor, second from the top. The window is the fifth from the left. The footage filmed from this position was what provided the “iconic” images of protesters cruelly being shot down in the street.
There is no doubt that there was intense “legitimate” that is to say not false flag, violence in the Maidan between the police anf the protesters. On the first day of extreme violent street clashes, about a dozen of both the police and the protesters were killed. The police did fire their weapons and presumably hit some of the protesters, although no footage of those casualties actually exists as far as I can tell and if it did exist the controlled media would have played the footage over and over. Instead the footage that was played was the footage of the Ukraine Hotel sniper attacks.
The police seem to have been completely confused by the sniper fire and armed police can be seen retreating under the barrage. All the shootings that we can see were the opposition snipers firing upon the opposition protesters.
Ukraine Protests: ‘Sniper’ fires from Ukraine media hotel – BBC News
The BBC report at the time from the Maidan was quite honest about these facts. It told the truth about the fact that the opposition were using snipers and identified the precise perch and filmed even a shot coming from the perch towards the reporter and the Maidan protesters. The one thing the BBC journalist omitted to mention was that all the footage of people being killed was by gunfire from the same source, the Ukraine Hotel.
Неудобная правда о майдане 2 Разбор стрельбы по безоружным
It is not in dispute that the Ukraine Hotel was under the control of the opposition at the time of the shootings. The BBC journalist even identified the people in the Hotel Ukraine sniper post as belonging to the opposition.
The Kiev government that came to power on the back of the killings has of course never attempted to investigate the killings. The Western officials who try and push for the former Ukraine president Yanukovich to be tried for war crimes at the IIC never mention the Hotel Ukraine snipers, not the complete lack of an investigation into the Odessa massacre of may 2015 that saw more than 40 protesters in Odessa murdered by thugs with strong and proven links to the Ukraine government.
The shamelessness of the dishonesty certainly grows tiresome.
Victoria Nuland’s Admits Washington Has Spent $5 Billion to “Subvert Ukraine”
‘Behind snipers not Yanukovich but somebody from new coalition’ – Ashton’s leaked phone tape
Hampstead, the Finders, Belgium and the Franklin Scandal: the Pattern of Child Abuse Cover Ups.
Hampstead is an apparently very wealthy area of Inner London. The Wikipedia entry reads:
”Part of the London Borough of Camden in Inner London, it is known for its intellectual, liberal, artistic, musical and literary associations It has some of the most expensive housing in the London area. The village of Hampstead has more millionaires within its boundaries than any other area of the United Kingdom “ So there is a lot of extreme wealth in the area.
Several weeks ago a series of gut wrenching videos emerged of two young children describing in detail their sexual abuse, by a number of individuals including their father and staff at the school they attended, including the head teacher.
The videos also detail their involvement in Satanic rituals that on a number of occasions involved the murder of infants. The title of this piece may be slightly hyperbolic given the suppression of the evidence, but all the signs are of a cover up, none are of a hoax and to claim so is to show a terrible ignorance of recent Western history.
If the allegations are properly investigated and turn out not to be true I will be pleased but I know that it is impossible. We have seen this happen too many times before the pattern is clear and there are unmistakeable signs of a cover up of the Hampstead allegations.
Once you get past the troubling initial shock of the extremity of the claims and the fact that the interviews were conducted by an “interested party” in a custody dispute the allegations made in the footage appear to be sincerely believed by the children of their own volition.
I hope these matters are dealt with by the Courts and would not seek to offer pre-judgement. However, after reading the documents, reading excerpts of the police interview with the children that supposedly “resolved” a “misunderstanding”, having read about these cases and the cover-ups from several places in the West in recent decades. I have no doubt that the original horrendous allegations the children made before the September 17th “debunk” interview are based in fact.
The stories the children tell of satanic blood orgies in churches that included murdered babies, are sadly familiar. These cults of evil are actually rather predominant in certain Western societies, it seems.
Given that many people seem to be having trouble coming to terms with these claims of cover up it seemed a good idea to recount some of the more famous and well documented cover ups of similar behaviour in recent times against the Hampstead story and to see whether these new allegations fit into a well established pattern of cover up, not just of child abuse, but more specifically these apparently elite satanic networks of procurers, abusers and blackmailers (influence peddlers may be a more accurate term). For some reason these type of groups have the ability to achieve very aggressive and complete cover-ups for their crimes.
Obvious Cover Ups that Show the Same pattern as Hampstead.
No.1. The “Finders” group members arrested in Tallahasee on February 4th, 1987.
Right at the start of the “Franklin Scandal” by Nick Bryant is a sub-story about a Cult called the “Finders” who were caught with a van-load of very young and severely abused children in Tallahassee during February 1987. Six children aged 3 to 6 were noticed behaving strangely by a concerned citizen who called the police. The children were malnourished and showed clear signs of sexual abuse. It turned out that the children were also not allowed to live inside and only fed as a reward. The group of eight people were living in a white 1979 Dodge van with Virginia plates.
Two well dressed men were arrested and charged with Felony child abuse. Special Agent Ramon Martinez of the US Customs Service was an investigator assigned to the case. Initially he and a Washington DC Police officer James Bradley made strong progress, receiving a tip off that referred specifically to ” ”blood rituals” sexual orgies involving children and an as yet unsolved murder in which the Finders may be involved.” (Franklin Scandal, Bryant Page 22) and also to two Washington DC warehouses the Finders used.
The warehouses were raided by the police and it seemed that the police had stumbled upon an industrial scale child kidnapping, abuse and trafficking operation. The Finders collected intelligence on babysitters from the local papers. They collected intelligence on child care centres. Photos showed the children and adults together dressed in sheets. The photos depicted the slaughter, disembowelment, skinning and dismemberment of a goat by the children. Police also found jars where human waste was stored, both kinds, it seems they saved it to use in their “ceremonies”.
Special Agent Martinez was set to meet his DC colleague Bradley about one month into the investigation. Upon arrival at the meeting he was told it was cancelled, not the meeting, but the entire investigation! Martinez was “further advised… of circumstances that indicated that the Investigation into the activities of the Finders had become an internal CIA matter.”
Meanwhile in Tallahassee an identical scenario unfolded. “The Tallahassee Police dropped the case like a hot rock!” complained one Tallahassee Officer with knowledge of the case.The media coverage reveals an identical pattern to that seen in Hampstead and so many other places. The first wave of Law enforcement are honest, they take the claims seriously and begin to gather evidence, then magically days or weeks later a new policeman will take charge of the case and will completely backtrack, downplay and sabotage the investigation. On other occasions the same police will have an inexplicable mid-investigation “change of mind.”
In the case of the Finders, initial reports from the Tallahassee Police made mention of “clear signs of sexual abuse”, and “apparent satanism” connected to the abuse, a recurring combination. Six days after the original arrests, a new policeman arrived and now described the child kidnapping and rape cult as a “communal” group. There are “no signs” of sexual abuse suddenly nor of Satanism. Initially the felony charges were downgraded to misdemeanors. The men were released and all charges were quietly dropped six weeks later and incredibly the original six tiny, obviously abused children were returned to their tormentors!
The Finders was a protected CIA front and the whole thing became a total no go area immediately. This was a group acting with the approval of a US intelligence agency. They had approval for what they were doing, which was kidnapping and raping children…at best!! The allegations get much worse than mere child abduction and rape.
All these elements of satanism, child abuse and intelligence agency and media protection are recurring across nations and continents over decades.
Obvious and proven child abuse cover up No.2. Belgium in the 1990’s. The so called Dutroux affair.
The same type of thing was discovered in Belgium during the 1990’s. The child rapist and sadistic murderer Marc Dutroux, was apparently supported by and consorting with “Secret state” elements in Belgian society and strenuous effort was made by the Belgian authorities to protect the paragon of evil Dutroux and the procurement operations he was running so that unnamed agencies could maintain their “leverage” over various “senior figures.”
When protecting Dutroux was no longer possible, he was hung out to dry and all the efforts, extremely intense efforts were made to protect the men who ran Dutroux, his employers, men like Michel Nihoul who once boasted that,”my influence is as long as the Danube” implying that he was protected by very senior figures within the Belgian power structure.
This passage from Richard Cottrell’s “Gladio NATO’s Dagger at the Heart of Europe” explains how the limited hangout is used to mask these operations when all else fails and someone must be punished. Often the procurer is punished while the broad network remains protected.
“When he (Dutroux) was in trouble once again in 1996, it transpired key police officers knew he was snatching young female victims to order, who were then subjected to sadistic horrors practised in the dungeons of his slum dwellings scattered around Charleroi, or dragged around the vice circuit. But no one moved against him. As many later reports clearly established, his largely accidental exposure tipped the Belgian establishment into a tailspin. At all costs it was essential to divert the public gaze away from the paedophile network organised around Nihoul, the ringmaster, and beam the spotlight instead on Dutroux, who would act the sacrificial scapegoat. This much became blatantly obvious as the glacial Belgian
legal system dragged its heels ever more slowly. The trial was a grotesque charade. Vital evidence, especially any that pointed to Nihoul, was lost or stifled before it came to court. The initial investigating magistrate, Jean-Marc Connerotte, was feted as a national hero when he personally rescued two more kidnapped victims from Dutroux’s cellars. Then, on the specious grounds of taking an informal meal with some of the victims’ families, he was dismissed from the case as ‘biased.’ When the trial finally began and Connerotte was summoned as a material witness, he railed against the bullet-proof cars required to protect him from the vengeance of the secret state.” (Gladio,Cottrell Page 320).
Of special relevance to the Hampstead matter is the story of Regina Louf, a young Belgian abuse victim who the authorities desperately tried to debunk after she made claims of being witness to horrendous acts during elite child abuse parties. Regina Louf was written off as a fantasist but was proven to be telling the truth after the body of a murder victim was found in identical circumstances to her description of the place and manner of death.
The account of the case from “Gladio-NATO’s Dagger at the Heart of Europe” (page 320) is also worth quoting:
“Regina Louf who came forward to testify she had seen her closest girlfriend murdered at one of Nihoul’s wretched parties, was traduced by official spinners and investigating magistrates as an insane liar. The police interrogating team was sacked and replaced by another, which tossed out all her charges. Another side of the same force raided a decrepit mushroom farm specified by Louf and found the dead girl’s remains in exactly the circumstances she described, roped and tied so that she asphyxiated herself during excruciating torture for the amusement of onlookers. It is hard to credit a political system with the slightest perception of civilisation when it refuses to bring the perpetrators of such a horror to justice, particularly when they are known to the authorities”
The account of the investigation of the Regina Louf claims mirrors the Hampstead and Finders pattern almost identically, It is eerie. When the first group of police do their job and get the “wrong answers’ new police must be brought in to get the “right answers”. Whenever these type of allegations are unveiled, they are absolutely “red hot” and every attempt is always made to at least get a “limited hang’ if worst comes to worst and the cover up can no longer proceed.
Belgium’s X-Files – An Olenka Frenkiel Investigation
Example No.3 of the obvious Cover up of Elite Child Abuse
The Franklin Scandal, the USA in the 1980s. Covered up into the 1990s.
Witness testimonies and Blanket denials standard tactics. Evidence and witnesses are destroyed.
If we look to the very well documented Franklin Scandal, one of the truly striking things is the extent to which the Nebraska and Federal Law Enforcement authorities went to intimidate the victims. Several victims were actually imprisoned for making allegations that were complete and proven truth and corroborated by more than a dozen other victims and witnesses.
Shamelessness, along with evil is a key characteristic of these people. When caught red handed for totally heinous crimes, most people would fold, would be ashamed, these people are completely the opposite. No matter how obvious their crimes, they deny and deny and deny and use their agents inside Law enforcement to meld reality to their lies. Alisha Owen was sexually abused as a minor by several prominent citizens of Franklin, Nebraska. Alisha Owen served almost half a decade in prison having received a 25 year sentence for perjury for refusing to retract her allegations of having been trafficked by Lawrence E. King and abused by prominent members of the Franklin community, including the local Chief of Police.
Gary Caradori was a prominent investigator employed by the Nebraska Legislature to investigate the claims. He conducted a series of detailed, lengthy and formal interviews with a series of victims. Caradori was former Law Enforcement, a trained Investigator and interviewer with such a high degree of credibility that he was employed by the Nebraska legislature. He was a prominent successful and respected member of the community. The interviews were rock solid, he never coached a witness ever, he was an honest former cop doing an interview cop style. Gary Caradori did such a good job interviewing all the victims of the elite pedophile ring that dark elements in US Law Enforcement apparently chose to assassinate him, sabotaging his plane in Chicago was allegedly a task delegated to the Chicago FBI by their Nebraska brethren. Caradori’s young son also died in the “engineered” mid-air accident.
It was a very obvious assassination. Complete with the obligatory “disappearing briefcase” full of “knock out photographic evidence” according to Nick Bryant who is extremely meticulous. After they killed Gary Caradori the media went to work on his character, tried to paint the man as a “crank” who “badgered witnesses” towards a “predestined conclusion”. GQ magazine wrote a story after he was dead that described him as a “delusional investigator.” a claim of extraordinary mendacity even from the routinely evil commercial Western media.
The interviews Caradori conducted survived and it is absolutely clear that Caradori was the total opposite. He had never heard of this type of thing before and was astonished at what he discovered. Caradori’s interviews with Alisha Owen, Troy Boner and Paul Bonacci are embedded here. Even a brief look at any one of the interviews will make it absolutely clear that the man was completely down to earth and the nonsense spouted by (do they even still exist?) GQ was a deliberate attempt to discredit the overwhelming evidence Caradori accumulated.
Gary Caradori’s Interview with Alisha Owen
Gary Caradori’s Interview with Troy Boner
The destroy Caradori routine really did give new meaning to wickedness. But it worked, or at least delayed justice other than in history. The head pimp to the elite in Nebraska at that time was a fellow named Lawrence E King Jr. he procured children for the other local notables essentially and was also prolific in his personal abuse of young boys. He spent almost a decade in prison for embezzling money from the local Credit Union he ran. King was never prosecuted for his many well documented sex crimes against children.
King was kind of a big deal, supplying children to child abusers in several different areas in the United States. Singing the National Anthem at the yearly Republican party convention. Some of the children he pimped serviced clients in California, Colorado and Washington DC among other spots. King had connections in the prestigious Nebraska boys institution called “Boys-town” he recruited many boys from there and when complaints were made to the Boys-town counselor, he not only covered them up but also proceeded to abuse the victims himself.
Paul Bonacci won against Lawrence King in a Civil Court.
Paul Bonacci was one of the younger children that Larry King trafficked and abused, he was only eight years old when it started and was therefore a more highly sought after “product “ than the fourteen and fifteen years olds who were the majority of King’s stable of child prostitutes. This saw Bonacci for example as the only Franklin victim trafficked in Washington DC. Bonacci thus saw more of the network and a more extreme end than the other Franklin victims.
Only Bonacci of the major Franklin witnesses/victims actually managed to achieve a legal victory in a US court when in 1999 a Civil Court found that King had trafficked and abused him, he was a truthful witness and awarded Bonacci a million dollars in damages, none of which he actually received. Lawrence King was a depraved abuser of young boys and girls himself in addition to his procurement role. (There are “beyond credible’ allegations from the 100% no doubt murdered witness and victim Troy Boner, that King violently raped a boy of around ten who was seen to be bleeding afterwards)
Paul Bonacci: THE MURDER -- GRAPHIC!–!WARNING![![p.4 -subtitled]
Investigator Gary Caradori’s Interview of Child Sex Slave Victim Paul Bonacci
Paul Bonacci has told the story of the time he was present at a child sex abuse party where a young boy was murdered. The video depicts a clearly honest and severely traumatised young man and is very upsetting. It’s almost like you have to harden your heart to even be able to look upon these crimes, to hear the stories. This is not uncommon. Because the major media are either in denial or complicit in the cover up of these operations and often sensationalise the claims when they air them, people have no idea it is actually true.
Hampstead Allegations Sound All Too Familiar.
History Shows a Clear Pattern of Outright Lies.
The History of the Dutroux affair and of Franklin,Tallahassee, Washington DC, Westminster, Portugal; and many other places tells us that every possible attempt will be made to deny and cover up these crimes. A small industry of people exist in order to tell people that “these sort of things don’t happen, it was a false memory” etc. Yet when you look at the known facts in Belgium, in Franklin, in Westminster, it is perfectly clear that there has been a consistent pattern of cover up and massive attempts to discredit honest victims for decades.
If you read the Pedocracy by Dave McGowan, he painstakingly goes through these cases and looks at the evidence, in the Presidio case, in cases where the cover up supposedly succeeded. It is perfectly clear that there is no pattern of fabricated claims on this matter, entirely the opposite. The cover-up is the rule. At certain times people will be convicted of their crimes in relation to these incidents, such as Dutroux, but the existence of the network is never, ever admitted.
If we look at the dark history of the West, in Dolphin Square, in Washington DC, in Belgium with the studied disinterest in Law enforcement in Dutroux for years as he murdered and tortured minors. If the recent history of the West is examined, the Hampstead allegations do not sound outlandish at all, in fact these cases are sadly familiar to even a relative novice in this area such as myself.
The Gulf speaks the silent truth.
One of the ways to try and understand whether a cover up is taking place is to examine the investigation that has taken place and then compare that with what a sincere investigation would look like and the gap between the two, in this case a vast yawning gulf, speaks the truth.
If the children’s video interviews were troubling somewhat due to their being conducted by a party to a custody battle, all doubt was erased by the way the police interview of September 17th proceeded. The police officer conducting the interview appeared to find the allegations so unbelievable that he set out to debunk them as quickly as possible. That is the innocent explanation.
The problem with the interview is very profound and revealing. The police officer showed no intent whatsoever to discover the truth, quite the opposite. The interviewing officer behaved identically to a man sent out to ‘end it and make it all go away, get them to retract”. He actually coached them that they were coached, in an awesome display of hypocrisy and dishonesty.This was quite outrageous in my opinion. It ended all doubt for me. Here is a short excerpt from
“When asked by Steve “we talked in two other interviews…was what you told me the truth?” Gabriel responds “yeah” Steve replies “so all that stuff about the babies, and the church and all that” Gabriel replies “no, well the babies, the babies…there is some of the babies killed yeah” are you sure “yeah, but not much, not every single day…”
This passage is completely transparent. The interviewing officer asks the child if the allegations previously made were correct. The child answers yes, so instead of further questioning to elicit corroborating details, the police officer straight out badgers the child, and being a child he half relents at the first attempt to badger him, stating, “well not every day.” sticking to his story but attempting to please the police officer. So when the badgering continues and the child folds it is completely predictable and has no bearing on the truth of the allegations. It is evidence of a cover-up, pure and simple.
A person seeking the truth would question in a completely different manner.You don’t even ask them about the allegations. They should be asked a series of very easy open questions at the start and not pushed to even talk about the allegations at all.
Once the abuse is mentioned, then you have to ask specific questions. about the details of the event.
This is how you get people to tell you what they know and then test how much of their story fits with the known and corroborated facts.
If these allegations were properly investigated there is a strong likelihood that further forensic evidence can be collected that would corroborate the children’s claims.
The obvious example of this relates to the allegations of murder. Where did these crimes take place? It has to be in London, if this happened it happened inside a room in London and it should be possible to identify the room. It should be possible to search the scene for microscopic blood remnants and other indications of violence at the scene. If the area has been subjected to an inexplicable industrial cleaning recently, the evidence may have been destroyed but there would still be a degree of corroboration there.
There are multiple investigative streams that have not been pursued and after all the known and proven cover ups of these matters in Britain and elsewhere, that is really unforgivable.
You don’t get a young child in the room and then immediately start suggesting the story they previously told was made up. It is simply not how it’s done, unless you are conducting a cover up.
My understanding is that there is abundant physical evidence that proves that the children have been abused by someone, so the whole line of questioning and approach appear to be fraudulent. I also considered that there would be no need or purpose to make such extreme allegations in order to win a custody battle. These allegations do not help win a custody battle, quite the opposite. More importantly, you would not coach someone to tell a story like that to win a custody battle, serious criminal allegations such as murder only complicate things. The same goes for all the allegations about the school. There are too many details that can be checked that appear not to have been checked.
One of the things people may find the most unbelievable are the stories of the murders. I would not comment specifically other than to say they have a high degree of veracity in my opinion and this deserves a serious large scale police investigation right now. A Major Task Force, dozens of Detectives working thousands of hours if necessary. If these stories turn out to be somehow confused or incorrect, let the world know, show the world the exonerating evidence, not some “instant debunk” travesty as we appear to have seen in the Police interview of September 17th. 2014.
We know that horrendous crimes committed against children in the past, in the fairly recent past in the UK, have been covered up. This is the whole point of the Investigation that was set up by the British Home Secretary that has reached it’s third incarnation and gone nowhere in more than a year. It is worth remembering that the police unit investigating the historical Westminster claims are investigating at least three homicides related to protected child abusers during the 1980s. Not that the two very different cases should be conflated.
Therefore, given the gravity and apparent credibility of the allegations one troubling police interview is simply not going to suffice. The specific allegations need to be investigated in detail and prosecuted if they (as seems almost completely certain) turn out to be true.
The effort to expose the crimes in Hampstead has been an heroic one and the personal cost to several people involved in this case has already been immense.
The interviews Caradori conducted in a completely professional manner were alleged to have been entirely coached. This is a common place tactic in these cases, no matter how ridiculous. It was a complete lie but they said it. This points to the problem with the Hampstead videos, they appear to convey and contain the truth but because of the relatively informal nature of the interviews, and more importantly the personal connection of the interviewer to the case, from a legal standpoint they are going to be very easily discounted.
These interviews, regardless of the truth of the allegations therein are not going to be particularly helpful in a criminal prosecution.This is not intended to criticise the interviewer but merely as a statement of fact. The perpetrators will deny to the last so the accounts need to be recorded by a neutral third party who cannot be accused of bias or coaching as soon as possible.
Ideally there should be fresh police interviews of the victims in order to get as detailed an account as possible to check against the known facts. If the police are unwilling to conduct fresh interviews, another neutral party should have the opportunity to ask the children what has happened in detail so that the allegations can be detailed in a neutral environment to an independent third party and corroborative background facts can be properly checked.
Someone needs to get these children on tape at length telling their stories and checking that against the known facts such as the medical reports and action must be taken. Someone has committed a crime here and the police are not going to be able to simply walk away from these allegations on the basis of the inexplicably unprofessional approach taken in the September 17th interview. The days of the simple one step “fob off” cover up are well and truly over.
Conspiracy Of Silence (Banned Discovery Channel Documentary)
Jeb Bush and the Murder of CIA Drug Smuggler Barry Seal in 1986: Wayne Madsen: the FBI murdered Franklin pedophile ring investigator Gary Caradori on July 11, 1990 by putting a Bomb on Caradori’s plane
Google translation of the French Michel Nihoul Wikipedia page.
:Michel Nihoul (Verviers, April 23, 1941) is a Belgian businessman and swindler from Brussels. In 2004 he has been tried as an alleged member of the gang of Marc Dutroux.
In the seventies and eighties is Nihoul in Brussels known as a frequent visitor to sex parties. He seems to know many senior figures in politics and business. He is also active as a radio producer, DJ and presenter at the free radio “Radio Activités”. In between, he was sentenced several times in fraud cases.
About his part in the activities of Dutroux is far from clear. Initially, he is seen as a gang leader. Later, his role minimized by both researchers and media. It also will not change as Regina Louf makes incriminating statements against him.
At the start of the Dutroux trial is whether Nihoul only a swindler and drug trafficker who “accidentally” did with Dutroux affairs, or that he was the central figure in a pedophile network. He is on trial for conspiracy, kidnapping and drug trafficking. He always boasted that “his arm was as long as the Danube”, referring to its relations to the highest circles of the country.
Nihoul denies any involvement in the kidnappings. He would indeed have sold drugs to Dutroux and Michel Lelievre, but would have done on behalf of the state police to infiltrate the gang – something he denied earlier though.
Nihoul was eventually acquitted of involvement in the kidnapping and only convicted of drug offenses and conspiracy. It earned him five years of imprisonment. In the spring of 2006, he was released early. He settled in Zeebrugge, where he still resides. Three years after the process creates a stir when he is playing in the reconstruction of scenes from the Dutroux case in the TV program Dossier noir of February 18, 2007 at the French-speaking channel RTBF. 
Nihoul was on May 20, 2010 from prosecution stated in the by-file of the Dutroux case, after which he immediately 250,000 compensation demanded by Marc Verwilghen, the chairman of the parliamentary inquiry Dutroux.   The final judgment on this claim was in December 2011, with the requirement of Nihoul was rejected. 
Nihoul’s ex-partner and second wife, Annie Bouty, also long been suspected of involvement in criminal activities. Nihoul and Bouty met each other in 1975. She had a private law firm and was co-founder of Cadreco, a firm legal assistance granted to an arms dealer who supplied the Iranian ayatollahs for $ 83 million missiles. [Source?] She also gave false passports to illegal Nigerian prostitutes in Belgium. [Source ?] Bouty was also suspected of involvement in the Dutroux case, but was eventually acquitted.”
The 911 Towering Inferno Myth Destroyed by Dubai Fire.
This is the real effect massive “towering inferno” style building fires have on the structure of a steel and concrete skyscraper. Nothing. This fire took place in Dubai yesterday, the building is the 88 storey (79 above the ground) 336 metre Marina Torch Hotel. and the structure is still completely intact following the massive fires. Once again the pure silliness of the Official 911 story is made abundantly clear to all with eyes.
I am reminded of the time I took “Fire training” a year or so ago. It was a very short course, only around two hours, but it was conducted by a former member of the Australian military, an Engineer. The instructor clearly seemed to accept the myths of the War on Terror because he kept referring to “Islamic extremists” as a threat.
It was funny because during the training he also mentioned specifically that as a sapper in the military they were taught that in order to destroy a large building, the underlying structure must be attacked. He stated that it was not enough even to place explosives inside a building to destroy it but the explosives had to be specifically placed inside or next to the key supporting elements of the building. Many more know the truth about 911 than have actually realised it at this point and the former Engineer seems an example of that.
The idea that setting fire to a steel and concrete skyscraper will destroy it is pure Hollywood fantasy, simply a joke.
This excellent video provides a history of “Towering Inferno” high rise fires of recent history underlining the farcicial nature of the official narrative.
9/11 In Perspective
UAE: Aftermath of colossal INFERNO at Dubai’s Torch skyscraper
UAE: Huge FIRE engulfs one of the world’s tallest residential buildings
UAE: Raging fire envelops luxury skyscraper
9/11 WTC 7 Demolition – Deep Audible Explosion Before The Penthouse Collapse
9/11: South Tower Collapse video compilation
9/11 North Tower Demolition – Profile With Good Audio
9/11/01: FDNY FLIR Footage of Twin Towers Shows Explosion Below Impact Point In the North Tower
9/11. FLIR Infrared Camera proves NIST and 9 11 Commission Lies
The reaction of the Western media says it all. There is nothing but denial from them regarding the outcome of the War in the Donbass along with the fervent hope that the ceasefire fails and that the Ukraine military will be sent back to face yet another pointless defeat as has happened since the failure of the September ceasefire.Still, if things don’t work out, well they can just make stuff up.
The encircled Ukraine troops in Debalstseve have either withdrawn or surrendered en masse today in what the Ukraine President Poroshenko predictably described as a “planned withdrawal”. A lie so silly and childish that to even call it a lie is redundant. Dishonesty is the rule when it comes to Ukraine government communications.
Debaltseve is a key transport hub inside the Donetsk Oblast that sits almost halfway between Donetsk and Luhansk, the other surviving Novorussian “Republic” The large force of Ukraine troops in Debaltseve, as many as 9000 have been slowly surrounded over a series of weeks. A deal regarding their fate could not be made in Minsk, as part of the overall peace deal because the Ukraine leadership would not ever admit that a large formation of their troops had been surrounded. The whole situation is a replay of the Ilovaisk nightmare of August 2014. The Novorussians had taken it and were poised to deliver the coup de grace and the Ukraine leadership would not make a deal for their people because of their pride and many died as a direct result.
The latest catastrophic defeat for the Ukraine Government forces means that the Novorussian Republics have achieved their objectives and their hold on the Donbass has survived everything that the Western backed Kiev puppet government has been able to throw at them since the Donbass conflict began in the first half of 2014. The people of the Donbass region and the Ukraine military have each paid a high human price for the futile Kiev attempts to dislodge them and it can only be hoped that the illusions will be wiped from the eyes of the Kiev government and their Western backers and they will assimilate the fact that Russia has chosen to impose neutrality upon the Ukraine and that Russia has the military and political assets to achieve this and there is nothing the likes of Samantha Power, Victoria Nuland or any of the other deluded ideologues of the State Department nor the warmongers John McCain and Lindsay Graham in the US Senate can do about it.
Massive Suffering in the Donbass region.
The Official death toll from the War is listed as more than 5500 dead. The official refugee tally is at around one million people. The majority of whom have fled to Russia, which says a lot about their perceptions of the war and the Ukrainian state under junta control. The extent of the Military casualties on each side in the war are rather unclear, but it is very clear that since August 2014 the Novorussian forces have defeated the Ukraine Government forces at every turn.
Ukraine Government threw their men away in the hope of NATO rescue.
The treatment of the Ukraine forces by the Kiev junta has been quite disgraceful. Once it became clear that large scale NATO support would not be forthcoming, that Ukraine was powerless to stop the transferral of weapons from Russia to the Donbass region and the Ukraine military were facing a better trained and equipped force than the Ukraine government forces the Kiev government needed to accept this and call a halt to hostilities. Instead they continued throwing their people away in the futile hope that if the Ukraine Government and their Western handlers complained long enough about the Russian support for the Eastern Republics the West would deliver the Ukraine the support required for them to prevail militarily. Poroshenko literally seems to have been sending his soldiers out to get killed in the hope that their deaths would push the propaganda effort over the line and the West would magically step in and save the situation.
The hubristic and deluded actions of the US State Department and their lackeys bear overwhelming responsibility for this war and the suffering of the people of the Donbass region. The engineered coup in February 2014 that sought to violently drag the Ukraine into the Western orbit and on the path to NATO membership has backfired, badly. The US officials who are the real authors of the Donbass war will of course never for a second admit responsibility nor acknowledge the consequences of their actions. It is not their way.
The Americans will all walk away from the catastrophe they engineered but the fates will not be so kind to the Ukraine leadership. In the days and months to come there will be a terrible reckoning I expect for the likes of Poroshenko and Yatseniuk and no Medals will ever compensate for the losses they have inflicted on their own Military so needlessly.
Footage of Ukrainian troops surrender in Debaltsevo
RAW: Kiev troops withdrawing from Debaltsevo, E.Ukraine
[eng subs] “Fear and Loathing in Debaltsevo” report by Steshin & Kots