Some of the clouds and the blast damage makes the claim of the Guangxi police that the devices had been “parcel bombs” hard to believe to say the least.
Targets seem incoherent.
The blasts yesterday targeted a broad and bizarre array of targets that make the motive of the attackers hard to discern.
The targets are listed as including “a shopping mall, a prison, a county government office, a supermarket, a transport station, a hospital, a staff dormitory of animal husbandry, a vegetable market, and a disease control center.” (Source)
Earlier this week a Russian politician, Igor Morozov,and an unnamed Syrian official claimed that China was following the Russian lead and would be offering more overt support to Syria with the first step being a Naval vessel currently traveling to the Eastern Mediterranean.
Igor Morozov stated that- “It is known, that China has joined our military operation in Syria, the Chinese cruiser has already entered the Mediterranean, aircraft carrier follows it,”
The Israeli Debkafile claimed that a Chinese Aircraft Carrier the Liaoning-CV-16 was already in the Port of Tartus along with a cruiser. The idea that a Chinese Aircraft Carrier could somehow sneak into a Syrian port without anyone noticing is hard to believe.
There is actually very little evidence of a Chinese intention to do anything in Syria at all beyond the word of Igor Morozov, who is at least in a position to know.
China’s actions in Syria might easily inspire attacks by proxy forces upon China but these attacks do not really fit the pattern of attacks from the Uighur separatists who are understood to have been co-opted by Western intelligence agencies as a tool to use against China both on the political and military level.
Until a better idea has emerged as to the claims against Mr. Wei (described as a local resident) and his affiliations it is not possible to offer even an educated guess as to what might have been behind this.
The images of the damage appear to indicate a series of fairly large scale attacks.
13 deadly explosions hit China’s Guangxi
Explosions in southwest China
Fresh explosion in Liucheng, China, day after series of deadly blasts
This story is not about Roman Catholicism, Christianity or religion. This is the story about a small group of venal and self-serving corrupt individuals whose commitment to the institution they were a part of completely destroyed their capacity to live up to the tenets of either the Christian faith nor common decency. The very simple idea that the Church should serve the congregation is completely alien to these men who have nothing but derision and contempt for their congregation and the many victims within.
This a story of power and corruption and the names of the institutions are almost immaterial, the deplorable and low conduct described has been exhibited across a wide variety of Western institutions, in Washington DC, in London, in Northern Ireland, Nebraska and Queensland, to name a few very obvious cases.
To state, as Adam Brereton did in the Guardian in July 2014 that “child abuse in Australia has a distinctly Catholic character” is simply an indication of the profound ignorance of the writer.
The Guardian piece is grounded in two patently incorrect assumptions.
One is the obvious point that many, indeed apparently all major religious institutions located in Australia have harbored child abusers within their ranks at one time or another. To single out the Catholic Church is to by implication exonerate all the others. Why anyone would want to do that or how anyone could possibly be so simple-minded and infantile is a mystery beyond contemplation.
The other tremendously foolish assumption is that WE KNOW what has taken place. What has taken place in the past is still in the process of emerging. Only some of the parties involved have been identified.
The tactic of attacking one specific group serves only to obscure the real issues these cases present.
The truth is that power in Australia has a character of corruption. The cover up of child abuse is merely one consequence of that corruption and the Australian Catholic Church is but one of many prominent Australian institutions that have behaved in a despicable and contemptible manner towards the people of Australia, whom they apparently view with nothing but disdain, judging by their actions.
The Venal, Morally Corrupt and Wicked Career of Cardinal George Pell
Cardinal George Pell was born in 1941, in 1960 he began his “priestly studies” and was ordained as a priest of the Australian Roman Catholic Church in 1966. Pell was elevated to the position of Archbishop of Melbourne in 1996, three years after accompanying Ridsdale, the notorious paedophile he had protected for decades, to court.
The career of Cardinal George Pell, behind the grandiloquent titles, stands as a grotesque and hideous caricature of the spiritual leader. For decades Pell expended the maximum possible effort to protect known paedophile priests from justice and to ensure that their victims were silenced and marginalised.
The career of Cardinal Pell has been one of the assiduous devotion to the protection of evil. Because of his actions, hundreds of children have been raped by known child abusers in his employ and under the protection of his formerly respected institution. In person Cardinal Pell is almost the parody of the pompous and self-important hypocrite. He poses to this day as a well intentioned and unsuspecting victim of circumstance. This is laughable.
The actions of Cardinal Pell have enabled and strengthened evil in Australia. This is the Pell contribution, and the extraordinary case of Gerald Ridsdale and the protection he was offered by the church over a period of decades makes this completely clear.
Protectors of Evil- the Case of Gerald Ridsdale.
Gerald Ridsdale was born in 1934, he is a defrocked Catholic priest and one of Australia’s most prolific convicted child rapists. Ridsdale has been convicted of more than one hundred counts of child sexual abuse over several decades. Allegations of child rape against Ridsdale date back to the mid 1950s. Ridsdale’s wikipedia page gives an account of the moves that were made well after his criminal activities were known to the leaders of the church.
“the bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Ballarat, Ronald Mulkearns, claimed that he had no idea of Ridsdale’s actions until 1975, when the priest was in Inglewood police officer involved with the case spoke to Mulkearns; the latter promised to handle Ridsdale, but moved him on instead. In 1976, Ridsdale was moved to Edenhope. Operation Arcadia, a three-month police investigation into what Mulkearns knew about Ridsdale, concluded that he knew about Ridsdale’s crimes earlier than he admitted. Subsequent revelations in 2013 claimed that Risdale, aged 21, allegedly sexually abused boys as early as 1955.”
“Ridsdale was moved in 1980 to the National Pastoral Institute in Elsternwick, in Melbourne. In 1981 he was moved to Sydney. He was moved to Horsham in 1986; there, two people made complaints about him in 1988. In 1990, Ridsdale was sent to New Mexico. He was appointed chaplain at St. John of God hospital in Richmond on the northwestern outskirts of Sydney. While he was working there, a victim phoned Victoria Police, leading to Risdale’s arrest three months later.”
Following decades of protection from the Australian Catholic Church, who simply moved the predator to another parish when he committed crimes in a certain area (NINE TIMES!) and a compliant police force apparently repeatedly willing to abrogate their responsibility and allow the church to deal with the matter, Ridsdale was finally prosecuted for 30 child sex offenses in 1993.
At subsequent trials Ridsdale was convicted of a further 81 child sex offenses making a grand total of 111 child sex abuse convictions against the long protected priest who will be eligible for parole in the year 2019.
Ridsdale is merely the most prolific and notorious example of the common practice of simply shipping child raping priests onto another unsuspecting parish to harvest new victims. The church acted as a co-perpetrator, it is that simple, they were accessories both before and after the fact. They conspired to pervert the course of justice as a standard operating procedure.
”In May 1993, Ridsdale was charged on summons in the Melbourne Magistrates Court with thirty counts of indecent assault against nine boys aged between 12 and 16 between 1974 and 1980. Cardinal George Pell, a former Archbishop of Melbourne, testified before the 1993 hearing that Pell, while an assistant priest at St Alipius’ Church with Ridsdale in the 1970s, shared a house together. Pell denied knowing about any of Ridsdale’s ways. Ridsdale pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 12 months’ jail with a non-parole period of three months. A few weeks later, Ridsdale was first put on trial on charges of sexually abusing children. He was jailed in 1994 after pleading guilty to 46 charges of abusing 20 boys and one girl between 1961 and 1982. He was sentenced to 18 years’ imprisonment with a minimum of 15 years, to be served cumulatively with the previous sentence.
“In 2006, he pleaded guilty to 35 charges relating to indecent assault against 10 boys between 1970 and 1987. He was sentenced in 2006 to 13 years’ imprisonment and with a minimum of seven years, three years of which was ordered to be served concurrently.”
The Ridsdale case also involves the allegation that Ridsdale raped a young girl in the 1970s at the home he shared with Pell, and the crime was actually heard by another priest, (not Pell), who did nothing.
“The inquiry heard the defrocked priest abused the girl at the Ballarat East presbytery in the 1970s, where he was living with a number of other priests, including Australia’s now most senior Catholic leader (Cardinal George Pell)
The inquiry heard the girl went to look at the rock collection in Ridsdale’s bedroom, but saw a pornographic magazine and ran away. When Ridsdale caught up to her, he raped her.”
The girl was eleven years old.
When Gerald Ridsdale attended court in 1993 to plead guilty to the initial batch of 30 child abuse charges, his old housemate George Pell there to offer comfort and support and to act as an advocate.
How Do Pedophiles Choose The Institutional Cover They Will Use?
The Catholic church is but one of many religious and secualar institutions that have harbored and protected child rapists. The perpetrators of these offenses are often “low opportunists” who will place themselves in positions where they have access to and power over potential victims. It doesn’t mean all scout leaders are like that because one or two are and the same goes for all the other groups represented. Make no mistake ALL other groups of the Australian community are represented.
One of the most recent horrific and proven serial child rapists in the US was a highly respected and well liked American Football (gridiron) coach named Jerry Sandusky. It’s not about being a football coach or a scout leader or a Catholic priest is about gaining a position of trust and power with access to children.
The more trusted and venerated the institution the abuser hides behind the more attractive the institution will be to potential abusers. That’s one reason for all the priests. It was one of the best covers available, because it would sound crazy, the victim would sound crazy, and the more devout the community the crazier it would sound.
Imagine what it would be like in Ireland or Italy , a place where the Roman Catholic Church has historically been highly venerated. The child would try to tell the parents or someone and the response would be “What the hell are you saying he’s a holy man!”
So it seems infantile and unfair to blame the institutions on the basis of them being used as a cover by child rapists, because if you understand their psychology a little, they will always try to target the best covers, the most respected institutions, as this will provide the best chance at successful evasion of the law and the continuing ability to offend.
The response that institutions make to the unhappy discovery that they have in their employ a child rapist, on the other hand, is very telling.
In the case of the Catholic Church in Australia there has clearly been a long established pattern of protecting the institution-and the abuser before the victims or the congregation of the Church.
It is not disputed that the church knew that Ridsdale was a predator and protected him from prosecution and scrutiny by simply moving him on repeatedly when he abused children. The identities of Ridsdale’s assistants in evil are the only thing in dispute. Ridsdale crimes against children became known to the church by 1975 at the very latest, Ridsdale continued to be employed by the church for at least another decade and a half, the depraved crime spree was only halted when finally one of the victims went directly to the police and the entire cover up began to collapse.
The case of David Ridsdale raped by his Uncle Gerald and allegedly offered a bribe to keep quiet about it by Pell exemplifies the moral corruption of both the institution and many senior individuals within it.
David Ridsdale is the nephew of Gerald Risdale. After being sexually abused by Gerald, David sought assistance from George Pell. David Ridsdale alleges, and there is no reason to doubt the claim, that Pell responded by asking
“What would it take to make you keep quiet about this?”
Pell is therefore personally responsible, without any doubt in my opinion, for protecting Gerald Ridsdale and all the known facts corroborate this version of events.
Stunning Attack on Cardinal Pell from Vatican Child Abuse Reformer Peter Saunders.
On Sunday May 31st, the Australian version of the Sixty Minutes program broadcast a most extraordinary interview with a member of the Vatican appointed anti-child abuse commission Peter Saunders.
It comes more than 20 years too late but the wicked and self-serving Cardinal Pell has finally been publicly destroyed. It was very cathartic viewing..
On Cardinal Pell,
“cold hearted, callous and almost sociopathic” a man who displayed a “lack of care”
“quite a dangerous individual”
Saunders added that
“I see not a shred of evidence that Pell has any sympathy, empathy or any kind of understanding or concern for victims and survivors.”
On Ridsdale having been moved nine times Saunders stated.
“It is inconceivable that they (the hierarchy of the Catholic Church in Victoria, including Pell) would not have known.”
Adding the blistering…
“These are the people who should be facing criminal charges. These are people who have allowed theabuse of children to continue. And that is an unforgivable crime.”
Every word that Saunders spoke could have been applied to the current British Home Secretary Theresa May and Prime Minister David Cameron amongst many other notables of the British establishment over decades only to name one obvious example.
These statements of truth were met by Cardinal Pell, typically, with threats of legal action, as if the deluded clown actually believes he will benefit from further scrutiny of his actions in a courtroom!
What on earth did Australian Catholics do to deserve such arrogant, brutish, despicable protectors of evil as “spiritual leaders”?
This is what Pell has been doing for decades of course, reaching into the large church pot of cash in order to make the problem go away by splashing as much of it around as was required to make a problem go away.
The Catholic Church the “Christian” Church that Makes Hundreds of Millions of Tax Free Dollars a Year from its Extensive Gambling Interests!
Religious organisations in Australia are exempt from paying company tax.The rationale behind this policy seems obvious, the Government did not want to be seen to be taking their cut from the donations boxes of churches.
This loophole is exploited in order to run tax free businesses with no religious connection by a wide variety of Australian religious groups.
The most successful products that the tax exempt status has inspired are probably the line of breakfast cereals and other foods run by the Seventh Day Adventist church under the Sanitarium brand name. Clearly the tax free loophole is being exploited here.
The products that the Seventh Day Adventist sell are at least healthy and positive.
The Australian Catholic Church on the other hand is the owner/shareholder of a number of gaming venues in Australia and according to the lone article the major Australian media have ever written on this subject,
In 2012, the profit from the Catholic holdings in Australian Gaming Venues was more than $130 million dollars
This is a purportedly Christian organisation that is so venal, so greedy, so morally bankrupt that they think it is perfectly okay for them to sell addictive and destructive products (gambling and alcohol) that destroy the lives and families of countless Australians every year!
According to the Australian Catholic Church it is ok for them to do this because after the person loses their home and their family due to their alcohol and gambling addiction the church will chip in to help them out!
The church owns venues that contain hundreds of the hypnotic, mind numbing and completely rigged poker machines (the machines are set to simply pay out around 85% of the money that is put into them,literally all players will lose over time) that see victims sit in a trance for hours as they waste all money on an addictive and unwinnable wager,
For the Catholic Church to be an active participant in this industry indicates that they simply do not care what anyone thinks of them. This is one of those in your face, “go f.. yourself” type of organisations in the level of it’s venality and arrogance.
The appearance even of human decency and moral behavior is a thousand miles beyond them. That ship apparently sailed in the deep distant past. All that remains is the hollowed out carcass produced by these modern day Pharisees.on their very own highway to hell.
These are the actions of people with nothing but contempt for the people of their congregation and for the most basic tenets of the Christian faith.
In it’s way this story is even more shocking than the protection of paedophiles by the Australian Catholic Church because whilst those actions came in response to something unexpected and aberrant, The paedophile protection is what they do when things go wrong, the drinking and gambling venues, these are the brazen everyday reality of the functionally satanic Australian Catholic Church.
Why stop at gaming, why not get into brothels also? After all, running a Licensed brothel is not against the Law any more than running a Licensed Gaming venue so why not go all the way and get into the whorehouse game? Just think how many people the church might help with the funds raised!
The Modern Day Pharisees,
“They taught the law but did not practice some of the most important parts of the law — justice, mercy, faithfulness to God. They obeyed the minutiae of the law such as tithing spices but not the weightier matters of the law. (Matt 23:23-24”
“They presented an appearance of being ‘clean’ (self-restrained, not involved in carnal matters), yet they were dirty inside: they seethed with hidden worldly desires, carnality. They were full of greed and self-indulgence.” (Matt 23:25-26)
“They exhibited themselves as righteous on account of being scrupulous keepers of the law, but were in fact not righteous: their mask of righteousness hid a secret inner world of ungodly thoughts and feelings. They were full of wickedness. They were like whitewashed tombs, beautiful on the outside, but full of dead men’s bones.” (Matt 23:27-28)
“They professed a high regard for the dead prophets of old, and claimed that they would never have persecuted and murdered prophets, when in fact they were cut from the same cloth as the persecutors and murderers: they too had murderous blood in their veins.” (Matt 23:29-36
The Pharisees were the corrupt ruling religious elite in Jerusalem at the time of the life of the Christ figure. Anyone who wants to interpret the story of the Pharisees in the Bible as being intended to demonstrate the unique corruption of Jewish religious leadership, whether in Roman ruled Jerusalem or more generally is completely missing the point of the story in my opinion.
One need only look at the leadership of Australian Catholic Church to understand that the story of the Pharisees could be applied to any hypocritical, self-serving and corrupt religious institution in any place at any time. These are the people whom, seduced by power and status, betray their professed ideals and beliefs in exchange for power in this world.
Make no mistake that if George Pell had been a religious leader in Roman Jerusalem in early AD, he would have been the first in the queue calling for the execution of the Christ figure. He may even have helped out with the nails because Cardinal Pell is the very mirror image of the Pharisees, a corrupt self-serving hypocrite of the lowest and most despicable type. If the people at Vatican headquarters do not relieve him of his commission in the near future it will be clear that the once venerated Roman Catholic Church is beyond reform or repair.
Pope’s top advisor says callous Cardinal Pell should step down
THE LIES OF GEORGE PELL: Loss of Faith – 60 minutes
Cardinal George Pell was himself accused of child sex offenses relating to the alleged rape of a 12 year old boy at a Catholic summer camp in 1960.The matter was investigated by a church appointed commission of inquiry and in 2002 it was found that the complainant was a credible witness but that given Pell’s vehement denials, the passage of time and attendant lack of corroboration, the claims could not be proven.
Nor disproven. The truth was unclear. I chose not to make mention of this because the facts are not known and therefore all associated assertions must by necessity and fairness, be equivocal.
The case against Gerald Ridsdale is unequivocal. Beyond doubt. The protection the church offered Ridsdale is also unequivocal and without doubt. The fact that Ridsdale continued to rape children for more than a decade after his criminal predilections were known to the church hierarchy is also beyond all doubt.
With so much irrefutable evidence of these misdeeds and crimes the neither proven nor disproven allegations against Pell seemed redundant.
Former Yeshivah centre students tell of sex abuse and ostracism | Australia news | The Guardian
This quote from the US Government Accountability Office describes how it was done.
“ One of DOE’s unique capabilities is the ability to conduct aerial background radiation surveys. These surveys are conducted by using helicopters or planes equipped with radiation detectors to fly over an area and collect information on existing background radiation sources, such as granite statues in a city or medical isotopes located at hospitals. This can help DOE establish baseline radiation levels against which future radiation levels can be compared in order to more easily detect new radiation sources that may pose a security or public health threat. DOE is not the only federal agency responsible for detecting nuclear and radiological materials.”
The purpose of the survey was principally to provide a background radiation map of New York so that future surveys could then identify any “extra” radiation signals and therefore prevent any future Nuclear terrorist attack on the city.
In September 2006, the GAO released their report, which found that the mapping techniques were effective and that the process should be extended across the US.
In October 2006, an article was printed in the Cleveland Indy Media that claimed.
“One alleged radiation hot spot on Manhattan’s east side has the potential for becoming a political hot spot: A strong radiation spike from the area of the Israeli Embassy. Officials would not comment on why they thought that particular area allegedly showed such a stunning peak in radiation.”
The Rense article is itself based on the Cleveland Indy Media story. The Cleveland story makes a small error in that it refers to the Israeli Embassy, there is no Israeli Embassy in New York, the Embassy is in Washington DC, but Israel has a Diplomatic Consulate in New York, along with it’s UN mission based there There are also Israeli Consulate Generals in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Houston, Miami, Philadelphia and San Francisco.
The rest of the story reads like a conventional news story and even the radiation spike, the claim is treated very lightly and quickly passed over.
It is a single source story, as the GAO does not list the hotspot sites although it seems that a graph originally accompanied the story showing the hot spot areas, the graph has disappeared very soon after the report was released.
It is still an extremely interesting story because it does tend to corroborate a number of claims made about the way the 911 atrocity was conducted.
911-Israeli Foreknowledge is Proven by at Least Two Different Pieces of Evidence.
In fairness it should be acknowledged that foreknowledge of 911 was surprisingly widespread. Different people exhibited different degrees of knowledge.
It can be inferred for example that elements of the US financial services industry had foreknowledge of the fact that something was going to happen involving passenger aircraft due to the massive surge in the “Shorting”, betting against the price of the stocks of United and American Airlines and only those two airlines. The two airlines “used” in the 911 operation.
As this quote from “Insider Trading and 911 the Facts laid bare” by Lars Schall elucidates.
“The atypical volumes, which are very rare for specific stocks lead to the suspicion of insider trading.” Six years after the attacks on the World Trade Center this is the disturbing results of a recent study by Marc Chesney and Loriano Mancini, professors at the University of Zurich. The authors, one of them a specialist in derivative products, the other a specialist in econometrics, worked on the sales options that were used to speculate on the decline in the prices of 20 large American companies, particularly in the aerospace and financial sector.”
“Their analysis refers to the execution of transactions between the 6th and 10th of September 2001 compared to the average volumes, which were collected over a long period (10 years for most of the companies). In addition, the two specialists calculated the probability that different options within the same sector in significant volumes would be traded within a few days. “We have tried to see if the movements of specific stocks shortly before the attacks were normal.” We show that the movements for certain companies such as American Airlines, United Airlines, Merrill Lynch, Bank of America, Citigroup, Marsh & McLehnan are rare from a statistical point of view, especially when compared to the quantities that have been observed for other assets like Coca-Cola or HP,” explains Marc Chesney, a former Professor at the HEC and co-author of Blanchiment et financement du terrorisme (Money laundering and financing of terrorism), published by Editions Ellipses. “For example 1,535 put option contracts on American Airlines with a strike of $30 and expiry in October 2001 were traded on September 10th, in contrast to a daily average of around 24 contracts over the previous three weeks. The fact that the market was currently in a bear market is not sufficient to explain these surprising volumes.”
“The authors also examined the profitability of the put options and trades for an investor who acquired such a product between the 6th and 10th September. “For specific titles, the profits were enormous.” “For example, the investors who acquired put options on Citigroup with an expiry in October 2001 could have made more than $15 million profit,” he said. On the basis of the connection of data between volumes and profitability, the two authors conclude that “the probability that crimes by Insiders (Insider trading) occurred , is very strong in the cases of American Airlines, United Airlines, Merrill Lynch, Bank of America, Citigroup and JP Morgan. “There is no legal evidence, but these are the results of statistical methods, confirming the signs of irregularities.”
“In a new version of their study that was published on September 7, 2011, the authors stuck to their findings from April 2010. They added the emphasis that in no way the profits gained with the put options to which they point could have been achieved due to sheer fortunate coincidence, but that in fact they were based on prior knowledge which had been exploited.”
So it can be inferred foreknowledge of an attack involving these specific carriers but there is no sign that there was foreknowledge of the actual targets, the exact time or any of those other details.
These elements of the US financial services industry, trading in Chicago and New York, may have had total foreknowledge, but all that can be reasonably inferred from their actions is that they knew something would happen and these carriers would be affected.
That is a fairly compelling, but rather low level of foreknowledge.
If the foreknowledge of the five “Dancing Israelis” is examined by contrast, the knowledge appears to be far more detailed.
The Dancing Israelis, arrested on September 11th, appear to know the specific target buildings and the exact timing of the attack to within hours at the least.
The Dancing Israelis were observed filming the “aircraft strikes” on the World Trade Centre from the top of a building that required them to drive for ten minutes after learning of the attacks. The building the Dancing Israelis worked “Urban Moving Systems” had a good view of the North Tower,the first tower attacked but a poor view of the South tower.
The Dancing Israelis had no reason to travel unless they knew the other tower would be hit and needed to view that, and they are alleged to have arrived at their filming post within minutes of the first attack according to one eyewitness,
The Israelis were celebrating and filmed themselves with the burning towers in the background.
When arrested the Dancing Israelis did not offer a credible or honest account of their movements on the morning, When the five Israeli terrorists were removed from their van, they helpfully explained the purpose of the attacks and the mindset behind them also. “We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems, the Palestinians are the problem.” also, apropos of nothing, as leaving the vehicle, “We were on the West Side Highway at the time of the incident.” an unprompted and dishonest attempt to create an alibi, In the afternoon there were five members of the group in the van, in the morning, the witnesses had seen only three.
Odigo Message the Other Indicator of Israeli Foreknowledge.
It is also worth remembering the other solid example of foreknowledge in Israel, the Odigo messaging service warning sent out in Hebrew in the hours before the attack. This was not a Jewish warning in the slightest, everyday Jewish people were in the same category as anyone else, there was a small scale warning sent out to certain Israelis prior to the attacks. The warning referred to an incident that day in New York, the foreknowledge was not detailed. It is also completely unclear who sent the warning beyond the fact that it was a user of that messaging service based in Israel but sent out to members, almost all Israeli, across the world..
There were many other better examples of foreknowledge than the Odigo example. There was one story told by a man named Randy Glass of meeting with a Pakistani arms dealer connected to the Pakistani intelligence outfit the ISI (Inter Services intelligence) who stated during a meal in a restaurant more than two years prior to the attacks. “ those towers, will soon be gone”” or words to that effect. There is no suggestion the man was involved, but he knew it was going to happen and the target.
The foreknowledge of the Dancing Israelis extends into probable involvement in the attack.
There have been many allegations made about the use of Nuclear weapons, small nuclear weapons in the demolition of the World Trade Center. Wayne Madsen wrote that 911 was a nuclear event several years ago. Veteran’s Today editor Gordon Duff has repeatedly claimed that Israel smuggled nuclear weapons into New York City prior to the attack and that the weapons were hidden in the Israeli New York Consulate. Gordon Duff has also repeatedly claimed that Israeli intelligence officers placed small nuclear weapons in vehicles in the car park of certain WTC buildings prior to the attack. Duff also claims to have a copy of a secret US government report by the Department of Energy into the fact that 911 was a nuclear attack.. The narrative presented corroborates all the known facts although the specific details cannot be confirmed due to the fact that it is a single source story . The details are so corroborative as to make the account compelling nonetheless.
It is possible that the 2005 Radiation survey was actually a sly attempt to gather intelligence on 911 and that the radiation spike at the Israeli Consulate building, which is just a large office space rented to numerous businesses and other organisations may have been due to the residual radiation that the weapons stored there prior to the attack. left behind or it could indicate a Samson option type of scenario.
It actually seems like a rather cute coincidence that the one city that the DOE surveyed was also the one city that people within the DOE apparently conclude was attacked with Nuclear weapons on September 11thso the probability must be that they were intent on collecting evidence relating to the 911 atrocity and overall it is becoming increasingly obvious that the attack was conducted in large part by the agents and assets of Israeli intelligence, Although it remains unclear what specific entity gave the instructions to these officers.
(with many thanks to Evelyn for providing the main insight upon which this piece is founded.)
The Hampstead Judgement Contains Proven Falsehoods and Cannot Therefore be Valid.
As seasoned cover up merchants have long known, the best way to conduct a cover up is to get on the front foot, seize the initiative and present an essentially inverted narrative, where the perpetrators are the victims and the victims are perpetrators. As the Americans might put it, the best form of defense is offense. And so it was that Justice Pauffley announced grandly and unequivocally on the first page of her Judgement that:
“I am able to state with complete conviction that none of the allegations are true. I am entirely certain that everything Ms Draper, her partner Abraham Christie and the children said about those matters was fabricated. The claims are baseless. Those who have sought to perpetuate them are evil and / or foolish “ Justice Pauffley, Hampstead Judgement Page One.
These sentences quite simply cannot possibly be true.
A Profound and Simple Problem:
The Judgement is Not Factually Correct and Should Be Considered Invalid on this Basis.
The Judgement is not factually accurate. It makes claims that are provably false and must therefore surely be perceived to be entirely invalid because the foundational assumptions that underlie Justice Pauffley’s interpretation of events are not factual in basis and this can be simply and quickly proven.
The Factual Error that Proves the Judgement is Without Validity.
On page 21 of the Judgement, in reference to the police interviews Justice Pauffley writes that
” Fact No. “142. “As emerges from the interviews themselves, both P and Q did indeed withdraw their claims, all of them.”
The Justice states this without equivocation, yet when the recording of the police interviews are re-examined it emerges that Witness G in fact never did retract his claim to have been sexually abused in the disabled toilet of a local swimming pool. Please note that the Judgement is very specific and definitive, “withdraw their claims, all of them.”
The record of the police interview actually indicates that contrary to the Judgement’s claims, witness G never did retract his claim relating to the sexual abuse at the swimming pool. It did not happen, so the claim that the judgement makes and one of it’s underlying foundations is factually incorrect.
The exchange from the September 17th Police interview The context.
This is at the 9 minute 38 second mark of the September 17th interview of the male complainant/victim. Several retractions, important retractions have already been extracted from the child,
It is both a reasonable and inescapable conclusion that the police officer was “tasked” by persons unknown to deliver the retraction, due to the officer’s behaviour in the interview.
Regardless of those unproven allegations, if we imagine for the sake of argument that the Officer was tasked with extracting retractions, the Interviewing Officer would have felt that he had already succeeded at this point, because the witnesses were no longer going to be of any use in a courtroom. The witness has been discredited, because he has told two contradictory accounts of the same event on the record. So a retraction of the swimming pool allegations did not apparently assume the same priority as the achievement of the previously bullied retractions.
This is the final interview in a series that spanned over two hours of interviews with the male witness.
This portion and the fact that the subject was simply dropped apropos of nothing and never again raised, prove that the “Swimming pool “claims were never retracted. The clock shows 11.18 at the time this exchange begins. The Swimming Poll Affirmations.
Interviewing Officer”Tell me about the swimming pool, you told me lots of people in this disabled toilet ? (sexually abused you-unstated)”
Male witness starts nodding his head as the policeman is speaking despite the officers subtly mocking tone. He nods repeatedly. “Yeah Yeah Yeah” he says nodding vigorously and stammering “Yeah that that that..”before plainly stating “That’s true.” remember he is in”retraction mode” he has made several retractions so he is clearly not under the spell of the mother’s partner yet he is absolutely unequivocal.
“That’s true” Nodding vigorously repeatedly. Repeats it, “That is true yeah.”
I make it at five affirmations right there between the stammered yeahs and the “That’s true” repeated twice unequivocally, while nodding.
So the Officer, in line with his tactics throughout the interview of September 17th, tried to talk the victim out of the allegation for whatever reason, stating incredulously
”Even though you said you was (sic) only four and hadn’t been to that school (as a student-unstated)?”
“No” indicating his disagreement with the officer’s assertion, he is not saying it did not happen, this is another affirmation as the boy’s words indicate.
“No, they had like…they were friends”
It is a bit garbled, “Teacher I knew a (name garbled and excised) from my sister. Who was in the school when I was four years old.”
Meaning he was not there with the school but with his friends, including his older sister who it seems was at the school. He is clearly affirming the veracity of the claim even in “retraction mode”.
“Interviewing Officer. ”So alright what we’ll try and do is sort out what’s true and what’s not”
At which point the subject is simply dropped.
Six Affirmations and A Lone Victory for Witness G Over His Bullying Interviewer.
At this point, the child achieves a lone victory in this interview, he actually wins the argument, he has the final say, the Interviewing Officer is defeated and so returns simply to the safe ground of the previous retractions. The topic is dropped at this point, and never raised again. The claim was quite simply never retracted and there is no possible valid reason for the police officer completely dropping the subject upon his failure to elicit the quick retraction he was transparently seeking and for which there can not possibly be an innocent or honourable explanation. It is really that simple.
The Repeated Mantra of Intimidation.
Prior to the witness breaking and offering a non-specific blanket retraction. The Interviewing Officer repeated his mantra of intimidation.
“Look if you haven’t been telling the truth, if you have been telling lies, it is ok, everything will be all right as long as you just tell the truth now ok?”
The implication of this is unmissable. The message is quite simply, “change your story now or you are in big trouble.”So the child on numerous occasions accedes to the intimidation as is completely natural given the maturity and power difference between the protaganists. It is worth mentioning that the children had been living in Foster care for six days at this point, there was an intense vulnerability, the father was still allowed Skype contact which given the gravity of the allegations certainly seems extraordinary,
Blanket Retraction Coerced and Therefore Legally Worthless.
Although Witness G did allow himself to be bullied into a semi blanket retraction, “None of it was true.” after repeated bouts of obvious and inexplicable intimidation from the previously empathetic Interviewing Officer. The context in which the blanket retraction was made combined with the bizarre manner in which the Interviewing Officer simply dropped the subject of the “Swimming pool” sexual abuse entirely when he was unable to bully and coerce a retraction from Witness G (and it never resurfaced in the witness G interview, his final police interview) mean that the blanket retraction is meaningless. It was extracted through unethical and transparent intimidation and can be safely and completely discounted on that basis.
The only rational conclusion that can be drawn from this pattern of behaviour is that “person’s unknown” tasked the Interviewing Officer to achieve retractions from the witnesses. Nothing else can possibly account for the complete lack of interest in the “swimming pool” allegations once the quick and easy retraction. was not forthcoming from Witness G.
Anatomy of A Transparent Cover Up.
Attack a Straw Man-Justice Pauffley’s Transparent Tactic.
This is a classic obfuscation tactic. Problems with your story?
Mask all the evidence behind the “helpful parts” of the story you are promoting.
Speak Only the “Good Parts” of the Narrative and obscure the truth with sustained misdirection.
In order to avoid addressing or investigating the actual credible and professionally confirmed child abuse claims, and the police cover up that the Judgement is intended to augment and complete, the Justice chooses to place at the core of the narrative the more indiscreet aspects of the Internet coverage of this case and the unintended victims of that indiscretion replace the actual child abuse victims as the victims in the Justice’s utterly flawed and almost completely fictitious Judgement. A strange mixture of psychosis and naked cynicism.
The One Strong Part of the Establishment Narrative
The Justice chose well in the sense that the indiscretion of certain information released and the small number of unfortunate consequences of these indiscretions are actually the only parts of her judgement that bear even a passing resemblance to reality. So the “strong”; part of the Establishment narrative is deployed in order to mask the real story with an unfortunate sideshow that quite simply has no bearing on the veracity of the claims of abuse one way or the other.
This is an elementary fact that utterly eludes the apparently “beyond’ mediocre Judge in her pursuit of obfuscation, any obfuscation no matter how infantile. At the same time the actual sexual abuse claims and the multiple strands of evidence that support them are only even mentioned as an afterthought, whereupon they are subjected to an intense, inexplicable and completely irrational attack. The unavoidable conclusion that at the very least without doubt these children were interfered with in a disgusting manner and no-one has been prosecuted for it is simply not addressed.
The broad entirety of the claims are perhaps beyond my ken but the Medical Reports were unequivocal, there can be no other reading no matter how hard or how desperately Justice Pauffley grasps for one. It thus becomes clear that the Pauffley Judgement was just the Crowning touch to another rather typical and despicable British Establishment cover up. No-one should be surprised as the cover ups number in the dozens and continue in the present day, not just in this story but many others.
History Will Condemn the Purveyors of Brazen Injustice.
There is literally no doubt in my mind that in time the completely fallacious nature of Justice Pauffley’s Judgement will be thoroughly exposed and she will be subjected to the ignominy of history’s assessment if nothing else.
The Judge brazenly tries to obfuscate the truth by concentrating on certain outlandish sounding claims and the indiscreet nature of some of the information released, in order to avoid investigating what is truly at the core of this story which is the children’s allegations, the police investigation and the results of the Medical examinations.. A Completely One Sided and Dishonest Account.
The specific claims the children made are never addressed in their own right in the Judgement, all evidence that indicates that sexual abuse has taken place is simply dismissed. On the other hand, all information that leans the other way is eagerly embraced even if the claims were made simultaneously by the same witness. You can’t do that and expect to be viewed as an honest or impartial adjudicator. Very simple.
All in all this is a ridiculous judgement full of claims that are beneath contempt and which the adjectives despicable and worthless do not even begin to describe. The Judge chose to attempt to defame any and all who had the temerity to notice the fact that the claims had veracity claiming without one scintilla of evidence these people had some kind of prurient interest, a claim for which the learned Justice did not see fit to provide any evidence to support! I found it particularly amusing because it was the police interview and the Medical reports that made me realise that “hang on, there is a cover up taking place here.” and neither the police interviews nor the Medical reports could ever conceivably be of prurient interest to anyone. Not even in the depraved parallel universe Justice Pauffley apparently inhabits
Cover Ups Are Rather Obvious and Easy to Spot.
Cover ups, logically only occur when there is a core of truth to the allegations being covered up.
Allegations without foundation do not by definition require a cover up, only the true allegations require that so there is no other rational interpretation, based on the content of the September 17th Police interview with the male child that this is a cover up.
The Original Medical Reports, upon which Justice Pauffley launches a sustained and fallacious attack, for no known reason all speak to the same horrific truth. Many of the claims must have been true. Because nothing else can rationally explain either the nature of that September 17th interview, during which the witness is openly hounded into retractions, on one occasion having made seven successive affirmations of the claim, nor the wounds and symptoms found by Dr. Hodes during her two Medical examinations, nor this appalling Judgement..Justice Pauffley’s openly biased and fallacious Judgement is grounded in basic and key errors of fact. The Judgement will not stand the test of time because it’s aims were neither in intent or outcome the dissemination of truth, quite the opposite.
The core underlying assumptions Justice Pauffley brought to the case were based upon falsehoods. The Justice has clearly not achieved an adequate grasp of the case upon which to base her claims among which nclude the unmistakeable untruth at Fact No. 142 that ” “As emerges from the interviews themselves, both P and Q did indeed withdraw their claims, all of them.” as proven by the partial transcript provided earlier.. The Interview continues for approximately another ten minutes, there was ample opportunity, but the Interviewing Officer chose never to raise the claims again. They were never retracted.
A Credible Legal Definition of Error and the Possible Consequences.
“The nature of the error dictates the availability of a legal remedy. Generally speaking, mistaken or erroneous application of law will void or reverse a judgment in the matter. Conversely, errors or mistakes in facts, upon which a judge or jury relied in rendering a judgment or verdict, may or may not warrant reversal, depending upon other factors involved in the error. However, appellate decisions make a distinction—not so much between fact and law, but rather, between harmless error and reversible error—in deciding whether to let stand or vitiate a judgment or verdict.”
Despite the grandiloquent title, a High Court Justice such as Dame Pauffley is actually at the third tier of the English Judiciary. According to Wikipedia “A Justice of the High Court, commonly known as a ‘High Court judge’, is a judge of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, and represents the third highest level of judge in the courts of England and Wales. High Court judges are referred to as puisne (pronounced puny) judges. High Court Judges wear red and black robes.”
It is not uncommon for the senior Courts of Appeal to overturn in part or whole the flawed findings of High Court Judgements such as Justice Pauffley’s Family Court Hampstead Judgement.There are still multiple avenues of appeal in this case, and the words of a Veteran former British Detective Sergeant recently prove that there are presumably many similar individuals, quality individuals with courage, decency and intelligence, who work inside British Law Enforcement and know that this is wrong.
The Rule Of Evil.
The aggressive and even belligerent cover up is par for the course. We have seen the work of the likes of Justice Pauffley many times before. In Nebraska, in Washington DC, in Belgium the Netherlands and of course in Westminster. The cover up has achieved huge successes in the Hampstead case, but the facts are still there, staring any in the face who dare to look. It is really a shameful and distressing situation all around and it has certainly been nauseating to see alleged perpetrators prancing around in the controlled media proclaiming their victim-hood. Britain is sadly a grotesque and wicked parody of what it perceives itself to be .
According to the highly credible source the UK Column, members of the London Metropolitan Police were threatened to stay away from the Hampstead matter. I cannot prove that this happened but it fits perfectly with everything else we have seen in this case, it comes from a credible source and it speaks to what is really at the heart of the engineered social and moral breakdown of Western societies so that the “iconoclasts” may rebuild the world in their evil image.The infiltration and even subversion of the institutions of the British state by what appears to be a satanic death cult, as extreme as that sounds is apparently highly advanced. What other conclusion can be drawn from all this?
The rule of evil can either be accepted or opposed, but it cannot credibly be denied. The power and aggression and success of the Hampstead cover up all bellow the same unspeakable truth.
Former Detective Sergeant Speaks Out On SRA Christ Church, Hampstead, London
German Wings is the Lufthansa budget carrier established in 2002.
On March 24th, 2015. The German Wings flight 4U9525 was destroyed after falling to earth in the Alpine region of South Eastern France en route from Barcelona to Dusseldorf. All 150 people on board are dead.
The Muslim Convert Nonsense ID’s the Perpetrators.
The “mentally dead’ segments of the Internet were thunderstruck by the lie that the German copilot of German Wings 4U9525. Andreas Lubitz, was a “Muslim convert” on an “operation”. The perpetrators really know no bounds when it comes to despicable and insulting lies.
This is the actual text written by an apparent Israeli operative named Michael Mannheim translated from the original German. Not a word of it is true.
“All evidence indicates that the copilot of Airbus machine in his six-months break during his training as a pilot in Germanwings, converted to Islam and subsequently either by the order of “radical”, ie. devout Muslims , or received the order from the book of terror, the Quran, on his own accord decided to carry out this mass murder. As a radical mosque in Bremen is in the center of the investigation, in which the convert was staying often, it can be assumed that he – as Mohammed Atta, in the attack against New York – received his instructions directly from the immediate vicinity of the mosque.”
“Converts are the most important weapon of Islam. Because their resume do not suggests that they often are particularly violent Muslims. Thus Germany now has its own 9/11, but in a reduced form. And so it is clear that Islam is a terrorist organization that are in accordance with §129a of the Criminal Code to prohibit it and to investigate its followers. But nothing will happen. One can bet that the apologists (media, politics, “Islamic Scholars”) will agree to assign this an act of a “mentally unstable” man, and you can bet that now, once again the mantra of how supposedly peaceful Islam is will continue. And worse still, the attacks by the left against those who have always warned against Islam, will be angrier and merciless.”
For now the German Islam supporters like never before have their backs against the wall.”
Michael Mannheimer, 26.3.2015
I do enjoy the neat little touch of psychological warfare at the end,but seriously? Is that the best you can do?
This is so ridiculous it feels almost like this is some type of “Revelation of the Method’ exercise where the perpetrators find it amusing to make their identity obvious to those who are switched on to their pattern of actions and style of lying,.(In your face insulting!They love it!)
The Ridiculous Nature of the “Psychiatric ” Explanation.
The crash is being blamed on the Co-pilot of the flight a 28 year old German man named Andreas Lubitz.
We are told that Lubitz chose to commit suicide and murder on a massive scale because he was depressed that his girlfriend broke up with him.
Presumably almost everyone who has had more than one relationship has been on the wrong side of the ledger at the finish.
I wonder, out of the tens of millions, if not billions of men who experience the female initiated relationship ending attempt suicide?
It is probably quite high, it might even be one percent. Almost all of the people who go through this unhappy experience do not attempt suicide, they get on with their lives after a period of possibly acute sadness and hurt.
I wonder out of that tiny proportion of men who cannot cope with the heartache of rejection and attempt or commit suicide, how many also murder or attempt to murder the other man or the former partner?
At this point things would be getting infinitesimal, but those type of acts are not uncommon. They are often described specifically as “crimes of passion.”
I wonder out of that tiny, infinitesimal proportion of depressed men who try and kill themselves, the other man or the former partner after the relationship breakdown how many men choose to commit random mass murder after the pain of relationship rejection?
I wonder how many men react to rejection and depression with random acts of mass murder?
Has it ever happened? Ever? Probably not. One obvious little rule the Cabal seem to have forgotten due to their own psychopathy, is that people ALMOST NEVER want to murder people they do not know. Only psychopaths do that. Being a psychopath of course makes one extremely averse to suicide for reasons that should be obvious. If you believe that you are the only person who matters in the world, you will never sacrifice or choose to end yourself unless through fear of something worse.
Psychopaths believe in their personal survival above almost all else. Suicide is not part of the worldview except as a final option to end the pain when all is obviously lost.
Anyone who has experienced even moderate depression knows that the symptoms are invariably at their worst when alone and unoccupied. The acute depression is always alone, in the room, trapped inside the negative thought patterns.
Having a job to escape to, especially a good one such as a pilot is the best thing besides actual human relationships. The pilot suicide will always, always take place either at home or in the hotel room after the job. This is when the depression is acute, when no-one else is around and there is no work to distract the sufferer from the sadness and despair.
Cockpit Door Nonsense Destroyed.
The whole tale regarding the cockpit door appears to have been destroyed in this article by Veteran’s Today’s Gordon Duff who has released an excerpt that appears certainly to have come from an Official document that describes the door’s security system, including the rather obvious but completely damning fact that the doors have an access code that is known to the crew and can be opened from the outside. The whole narrative regarding the unfortunate Mr Andreas Kubitz is absolutely destroyed by this quote. There are no two ways about it.
“Ident.: DSC-25-11-10-00001006.0001001 / 09 OCT 12
Applicable to: MSN 2649-3685, 4670-5367
A forward-opening hinge door separates the cockpit from the passenger compartment. It has three electric locking strikes, controlled by the flight crew. In normal conditions, when the door is closed, they remain locked. When there is a request to enter the cockpit, the flight crew can authorize entry by unlocking the door, that remains closed until it is pushed open.
When the flight crew does not respond to requests for entry, the door can also be unlocked by the cabin crew, by entering a two to seven-digit code (programmed by the airline) on the keypad, installed on the lateral side of the Forward Attendant Panel (FAP).”
The implication I draw from this is not that the audio of the pilot trying to re-enter the cockpit is fraudulent, but rather that the door was electronically locked as part of the operation and the real event has been reported in a fraudulent, dishonest context. It was obviously not the co-pilot preventing the re-entry of the pilot into the cockpit.
According to the German prosecutor, “sick notes” were found torn up in Mr. Lubitz’s apartment. One of the favorite tactics when things have gone wrong and the story is on the rocks, is to create a completely false debate on a non-issue so that every simple minded fool in the world will want to “have their say” on the matter of total irrelevance. It is a way to create the sense of fait accompli also regarding the nonsense being propagated.
In this case, the very idea that depression sufferers are prone to random acts of mass murder is quite simply nonsense. Half of the examples cited by the supposed “experts” are known and proven false flags, from the Egypt Air attack of Halloween 1999, to Port Arthur, to Malaysian Flight 370 and Sandy Hook, they are weaving stories on the foundation of known and proven lies. It is ridiculous.
The ‘sick notes” appear to be planted evidence, He wrote a note to his employer or might he send an E mail, he kept all his old torn up Medical certificates or “sick notes” (it is in dispute) in his house, he didn’t throw them out. It cannot be proven but sick notes all seems a little cute.
Remote Control Hijack Fighter Intercept from France and Italy. Flight Destroyed.
It is unclear what precisely has happened. A number of interesting facts have emerged that indicate that this was an attack carried out by a national intelligence agency, or a rogue network from within that milieu.
The missing data chip from the flight recorder. This makes no sense at all. It is hard to prove someone removed it but it certainly looks that way.
We know that it can be retrofitted to older aircraft, we understand that all modern passenger jets currently operating that are fly by wire aircraft, such as the Airbus A320, can never be seized or hijacked even by the pilot because there is an override remote control system on the planes. I can’t prove that this flight had it, but it is common knowledge that all fly by wire aircraft can and do have these systems, for obvious reasons. It is cost effective. The cost of retrofitting the system, albeit unknown, is going to be far less than the cost of losing a flight and all on board in the event of a catastrophic hijack.
The question that must be asked is why this system was not deployed in this case and in the MH370 case?
I do not know the answer, but it may be staring us in the face.
The obvious way to do it would be to hack into the communications of the aircraft and remotely hijack it using the Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot as the means to disappear or destroy the plane. The neat little extra trick we might not see is the tranquilizer gas attack on the pilot. The plane is flown to a high level to where the pilot or pilots will use oxygen, and the oxygen has perhaps been sabotaged and is now a tranquilizer.
Please listen carefully to the controlled media story regarding Andreas Lubitz,he could be heard breathing, the pilot is going nuts trying to get back in. Lubitz is alive, but is he conscious? We do not know but there is in fact no evidence that he was nor that if conscious he would have been capable of doing anything to stop the attack. Control of the aircraft has been seized by a third party it is obvious, the suicidal Lubitz is a farce right up there with the suicidal Muslim (in fact atheist) Malaysian airlines pilot Zaharie Shah.
The passenger manifest has turned up one very interesting and significant name, Yvonne Selke am employee of Booz Allen Hamilton, an apparent US intelligence affiliated organisation. It is understood Mrs Selke actually worked for the US Satellite mapping Agency the National Geospatial Intelligence agency. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Geospatial-Intelligence_Agency. Whether Mrs. Selke’s presence is connected to the attack is completely unclear, but it is an interesting fact, mirroring perhaps the presence of Philip Wood on MH370.
The passenger manifest has still not been released four days after the incident, the German Wings company clim that because Europeans are not required to present passports at European borders under the Schengen EU agreement. so they have not been able to inform all the families yet! Makes perfect sense!
The Best Explanation
I am not going to pretend that I know precisely what has happened in this case or why the attack was conducted. I believe that i have a logical hypothesis that may be at least close to what has happened.
The Big Secret.
For reasons unknown, the Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot system, a terrific technological achievement and a boon for passenger safety, has never been written about in the mainstream media. Perhaps this is due to the fact that although patented in 2006, the system was in place long before that and would nullify the 911 official story even further.
Echoes both Distant and Recent and an Hypothesis.
It has been fewer than three months since an Airbus A320 aircraft fell into the ocean leaving all on board Air Asia flight 8501 dead. Another crash without any clear reason and no distress signal. The lack of distress signals from doomed aircraft is actually a recurring theme of recent times. The mystery disappearance of Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 was also marked by the striking and inexplicable complete lack of any distress call or signal.
What appears to have happened to the Egypt Air 990 lost in the ocean on Halloween 1999. To the Air France flight 447,to MH 370, Air Asia 8501 and to German Wings 4U9525 is that a hostile force hacked into the autopilot system and seized the plane remotely via an electronic hijacking. There may also have been an on the aircraft element to these attacks, or perhaps not. The tranquilizer gas may have been used, or not.
After the German Wings flight was hijacked, the French and Italian Air forces went into action to prevent the flight hitting a populated area. If the flight manifest is ever released it might be interesting to see if there were other possible patsies among the passengers. The interceptors may have prevented a large terror attack, when they arrived, the remote hijackers chose to destroy the flight on the mountain and the Security and Law Enforcement are carrying on with the grotesque Lubitz suicide charade because the fact that “dark elements” are seizing and destroying passenger aircraft at will via remote hijacking is simply too damaging a secret to share with the people due to the economic impact of the loss of confidence in the safety of passenger flights. The evil ones have them over a barrel. No one can mention what they are doing because the economic impact could be intolerable and worldwide..
That would explain why so many apparently decent people play along with the charade and why they believe it is the right thing to do. This would explain why evidence relating to the MH370 disappearance is sealed. It is only an hypothesis, but it is rather compelling in my opinion. It would also explain the reason that German Wings pilots were refusing to fly the following day. They knew that they have the best mechanics and engineers in the world, that it was not mechanical error, they were refusing because they know what is happening with the remote hijackings and found it unacceptable to work under these current circumstances where the cabal can destroy passenger jets at will and nobody can do a thing about it. .
The German Wings narrative, and the Egypt Air Flight 990 narrative are both complete nonsense at face value.
These incidents, the Air France Flight 447, the Air Asia 8501, the Malaysian attacks, the TWA 800 shoot-down were all seemingly “Deep messages”.
Mass murder is actually one of the stock standard ways the Western Cabal express their displeasure and make their feelings clear to their rivals and enemies.
I have no real idea whom this message was addressed towards, but the most logical speculation related to an attempt to intimidate Germany in order to cause Germany to take a rejectionist line at the Geneva Nuclear talks.
The Iran nuclear deal would represent a catastrophic defeat for the Cabal. Not because Iran is any threat at all, the problem is they were counting on initiating World War 3 using the US as the spearhead to attack Iran. If the US wouldn’t do it Israel would attack the Iranian facilities, nuclear research and military bases, with Nuclear weapons, in order to set off the Armageddon chain of events that would lead to the violent destruction of the entire Middle East including Israel. and possibly the destruction of much more than just the Middle East.
Multiple Israeli semi Official sources have intimated that they intend to “go out with a bang” if it comes to that and there have been veiled threats to destroy European capitals in that event. That sounds mad, well, they are mad unfortunately, although i have never believed they would target Europe, unless the goal was Armageddon. It has never been clear to me that Armageddon is the goal, it may be but it does occur to me that if Armageddon were the goal, you could just do it, more importantly why bother to patiently and over a long term period implement both the legal and physical infrastructure required for the police state?
There may be millennial armageddonists within the power structure and it may eventuate, but it clearly is not the predominant faction and many are planning for the future with great diligence and tenacity.
The Black Hand Strikes Again.
Once again the “hand of darkness” grows increasingly dysfunctional, desperate and transparent. They are daring a world leader, any major world leader to actually stand up and call them out and start to take the actions required to begin to punish the people responsible for all these “mysterious” atrocities and stop the insane, vindictive and evil crime spree. They are daring any well protected and courageous leader to move against them. They are begging for it. The Cabal clearly are not intent on stopping. They must therefore be stopped.
In Europe and the United States, the penny is beginning to drop. The cabal are thugs, they have been indiscreet and brazen and their days are numbered in low digits no matter what they do. It is over no matter what they do, no matter what atrocities or wars or psyops they conduct will only delay the inevitable. They had a very good run, they ran wild with their fiendish and frequently brilliant evil plots.
The Reason It is Over-The Internet Closed the Gap.
When September 11th happened, the concept of false flag terror was unthinkable, the history of Operation Gladio and other black ops was not widely known. On a cosmic level the 911 perpetrators deserved to rule over us because they were far more mentally advanced and adept than the regular people. That has changed, the gap has closed, they no longer funtion as the ruling elite, information wise. The reign of terror is coming to an end. As the regular people have become adept at understanding their psyops and machinations, their work has disintegrated into incoherent and meaningless acts of evil.
They are mentally disintegrating it is obvious from the actions they take. The plots are no longer brilliant and cinematic, their stories are no longer coherent. It is done.
Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot
Field McConnell – Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot Used On 9/11 Planes, Impossible To Hijack!
Crimes of Empire meets Dr. Barrett on Truth Jihad Radio
I was able to chat briefly with Dr. Kevin Barrett during his recent radio show of March 20th. I was extremely pleased and shocked to receive an invitation to chat because I am a huge fan of the show and I have listened to hundreds of hours of the show.
Dr. Barrett’s work has had a huge influence upon me since late 2011 when I first understood rather late that September 11th was a false flag attack. Dr. Barrett made me realise for the first time that we, being the West are not “good guys who go wrong”, but rather we are the Evil ones at the institutional level and in the world.,
It was also a big deal to me because although I have been lucky enough to have received a high degree of support from day one from the highly respected and influential Aangirfan site, a British site, I had never received any acknowledgement from any member of the American community in the slightest.
Not that I had even necessarily deserved it but to get some acknowledgement that someone within the US thinks my work is at least not complete garbage is obviously pleasing. I think it went ok.
My only previous media experience was conducting fairly cliched and pointless interviews with the rock acts Babes in Toyland and Carcass for Melbourne Community Television. I was not confident enough to put the subject onto the Hampstead matter or any of those things. The good part covered a short recent false flag history, speaking about Oklahoma City, Bali and 911.
Hampstead Satanic Abuse Case: UK Column, 20 March, 2015.
Hampstead: Questions for Mrs Justice Pauffley
March 21st, 2015.
Brief Hampstead Update.
I am still reading the judgement and working on my analysis. I intend to examine both the case history of the Justice and this judgement in detail as I believe they deserve.
In the interim. I would state the obvious and suggest readers watch Brian Gerrish’s brilliant denunciation of the judgement and Deborah Mahmoudieh’s excellent video also. Enjoy Aangirfan and the Tap while they last as it seems that a massive establishment attack is about to begin against these heroic sites. You can see it coming from a mile away. The rulers are not amused and they want to “see something done” about those (please note quotation marks!) “awful little people” with their terribly truthful and indiscreet websites pointing out the bleeding obvious and undeniable fact that the British elite are collectively complicit in the cover up of Establishment child abuse in Britain and have been for decades and this is a sad, but known and proven fact.
It is Time for the Cover Up to End Right Now
On some profound level the British ruling class apparently do not the view the “commoners’ as fully human. I honestly do not see what other conclusion can be drawn from their behaviour. Their loyalty to their class seems to have destroyed their collective humanity long ago. They actually believe that they should have the right to rape and murder the children of “commoners” and expect the chaps from MI5 or Special Branch or whomever to step in and protect them if any honest police happen to come across one of their atrocities..As it happens, historically, the chaps from MI5 or Special Branch HAVE protected the abusers in order to “maintain the prestige of the British Establishment” which by some immaculate corruption they managed to conflate with the Security of the British State.
Key institutions of the British State appear to have been heavily involved in serious crimes against children with almost complete impunity for decades.
This is an intolerable situation clearly. If the institutions of the state are not reformed radically, logic dictates that eventually the mass of the people will understand what is happening and what they have been doing and seek to destroy the very institutions of the state.
As an outsider I would suggest that perhaps some type of “clear the decks” process is urgently required. Perhaps there should be an amnesty for certain people, Law Enforcement and Intelligence Officials perhaps, and other perpetrators of the cover up might be offered an amnesty. A more widespread amnesty may be a positive idea but that should be at the discretion of the victims rather than any outsider, obviously these are merely constructive suggestions. Perhaps a Truth and Reconciliation style process might be beneficial.
The idea that when the Establishment commit a crime, whether the Iraq war or the child rape at the Elm Guest House, they will just conduct an inquiry of whatever length and futility required to make the problem go away and expect people to be grateful and actually equate this process of obfuscation and delay with justice is no longer sustainable. The contempt of the rulers for the people is completely unmistakeable and nauseating.
The more I observe it almost seems like a “class” apartheid society, as hyperbolic as that must sound. The way the ruling class believe they have the right under some preposterous national security cover to get a free pass for crimes against children of a sexual and violent nature. Now they want to blame the internet. Pretend that some prurient interest is being served. Which truly shows how low they are.
In order to preserve the positive ideas and people within British institutions the cover up has to end now. The obfuscation and denial must end right now. The persecution of victims and whistle blowers and honest police must end right now.
It is time to admit the bleeding obvious. it is time to renovate the house in order to preserve the underlying structure. Historically we know that reform or revolution are the only options. Revolutions are destructive and disastrous and only lead to even worse people in power generally so I am urging a rethink. A restoration of the Rule of Law, hardly a subversive idea is it?
The world will not end. The walls will not fall down. People will not be hunted or strung up or any of that vile mob nonsense. Just tell the truth and apologise and hopefully the psyche of this deeply divided, wounded and utterly dysfunctional nation can return to balance and a semblance of normalcy and the rule of Law. The choice is yours.