9/11. FLIR Infrared Camera proves NIST and 9 11 Commission Lies
WTC Demolition Flashes on VIDEO
9/11: Stabilized WTC2 (E. Fairbanks, NIST FOIA, Version 2)
911: Massive Blasts Audible Inside North Tower as South Tower is Destroyed
North Tower Exploding
9/11 North Tower Demolition – 10.5 Seconds (West Face Zoom And Slow PIP)
This is one of the most important documents of September 11th, the commentary from the videographer is largely forgettable but the analysis of the explosions both the using audio and visual analysis, is amazing.
9/11 Eyewitness rare unfiltered / unaltered amateur footage | What was NOT shown on TV
9/11 Eyewitness is especially important as it proves that the buildings were being blown up throughout the morning, climaxing with a series of massive explosions at the time the Towers were demolished.
Every diversion was exploited, so as the second plane flew in and struck the South Tower, the first tower was being blown up.
9/11~WTC 1 Explosion Shakes Camera Before 2nd Plane Hits WTC 2
911, FDNY – It was a Military Plane that hit the WTC – Updated
One of the saddest things about the fact that the 911 lie succeeded is that it proved that the on paper most well educated people who ever lived were completely scientifically illiterate.
All that is required to destroy the Official 911 story is a very rudimentary understanding of the Laws of Physics.
Epic Reason why 9/11 was an inside job: High Temperatures
9/11 NIST Banned Videos: Flowing Lava and Thermite Reactions
Surreal Pictures Inside WTC 6 Destroys 9/11 Cover Story For Ever !
Because the event in New York was so thoroughly documented by comparison the Pentagon attack tends to be somewhat neglected and many aspects of what happened in the Pentagon remain a mystery.
Hotel CCTV Video of 9 11 Pentagon Explosion
It is absolutely clear that the Pentagon was not struck by a Boeing 757 and the story of a Boeing Jet striking almost at ground level traveling at 500+moh is simply impossible.
Secret 757 test failure, 240 MPH Maximum Speed
It is also clear that whether the Pentagon was struck by any flying object at all or not, the Pentagon was, like the World Trade Center complex in New York, attacked with emplaced explosives. The blasts can be seen and heard, but beyond that the attack is actually very confusing.
9/11 Pentagon Video Taped Explosions
The best work regarding the events at the Pentagon on September 11th that I have found is the work of Barbara Honegger, a former Reagan Administration official.
9-11 The Pentagon The Evidence & Conspiracy – Barbara Honegger Pdx 911 Tr
Flight 93 and Pennsylvania
Cee cee lyles its a frame
9/11 Flight 93 – The Watering Hole
Leads and Conclusions.
9/11 Mexico News Frames Up El Palestinios By 924am
Other than the part about the Pentagon, which is absolutely disastrous, this is one of the most underrated and neglected 911 films I have seen. There is a lot of strong original work here regarding the bombing of New York.
911 and War by Deception
The Proven 9/11 Foreknowledge of Israel’s Agents
9/11 World Trade Center Dancing Israeli Art Students 9 11 Gelatin The B Thing
The interview with Alan Sabrosky is one of the most powerful things I have seen. I disagree however that ordinary ISraeli should be punished for the crimes of their leaders committed without their knowledge and consent. Sabrosky’s logic that the US should simply destroy Israel because of the crimes of the dreadful few, is akin to the logic that saw Dresden, Hamburg, Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Tokyo annihilated towards the end of the Second World War.
The citizens of Israel do not deserve to be punished for the crimes of their leaders any more than the Germans and Japanese citizens deserved it.
It is obvious 70 years later that none of these people deserved to be firebombed due to their criminal leadership and so the same is surely true of Israel today.
**MUST WATCH** Israel Did 9-11 Jewish Ex-Marine SPEAKS OUT
It’s Over, the Zionist attempt to vandalise the Iran Nuclear Deal has failed.
The decision by US Senator Barbara Mikulski of Maryland to side with the Iran deal means that US President Obama now has the 34 of the 100 seat Senate on side ending the possibility of the US Senate achieving the two thirds majority required to overturn the Presidential veto of the (expected but now futile) House and Senate vote against the deal.
The process is that the House and Senate will vote against the deal. The President will veto this and in order to overturn the Presidential veto two thirds in both houses are required.
Two thirds of 100 rounds up to 67 Senators required to overturn the veto. The 34 Senators who have now backed the deal mean that at most the opponents of the deal can achieve 66 Senators which spells the final chapter in an unprecedented defeat for the Zionist lobby in the US and signals the end of a decades long campaign of lies to achieve the violent overthrow of the Iran Government.
The struggle to bomb Iran is now over. The monsters have been defeated, at least on this issue.
I hope it represents the first signs of the reawakening of an independent United States that will never return to the self destructive and evil role as Israel’s brutish and moronic attack dog in the Middle East.
The US Department of Defense has been caught out selling large amounts of military supplies to a fake police department.
May 22nd, 2015.
Boycott Israel! Boycott Apartheid! Boycott Crimes Against Humanity!
1991 Palestinian children killed by Israel since 2000
State of Palestine: Israeli security forces raid Al-Aqsa Mosque, clashes erupt
State of Palestine: Hundreds take to the streets after IDF storm Al-Aqsa Mosque
IDF storms Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem AGAIN with stun grenades and tear gas
Sensitive Site: Clashes at Holy site enter third day in Israel
State of Palestine: Clashes erupt as Israeli security forces raid Al-Aqsa Mosque for third day
This video speaks for itself. I have no idea if this will help but it cannot do any harm. Almost anything that the Canadian Prime Minister opposes vehemently must be a good idea.
Boycott Israel Using The “BUYCOTT” App || MUST SHARE
Israeli soldiers filmed beating unarmed palestinian during west bank protest Palestine TV, Reuter
Israeli forces attack elderly Palestinian family amid demolition in East Jerusalem
The Deluded Netanyahu Response.
For some reason the BDS thing has become the new supposed “threat to Israel. Netanyahu came up with the ever reliable complete inversion of the truth in his interpretation of what is a small and haphazard movement that has made no discernible economic impact on Israel.
Stating that “The attacks on the Jews were always preceded by the slander of the Jews. What was done to the Jewish people then is being done to the Jewish state now,” Netanyahu said, also alluding laughably to “the defamation of the Jewish people” before heroically concluding that “”In those days we could do nothing. Today we can speak our mind, hold our ground. We’re going to do both.”
The really hilarious thing is that the Boycott Israel movement does not resemble that of the Nazi’s at all but it does bear a strong resemblance to the Jewish Boycott of Nazi Germany that began in 1933.
There is quite simply no doubt that Israel has been running an apartheid system in the West Bank for almost fifty years.
The expropriation of the land that belongs to Arab citizens of Palestine by Jewish settlers is a proven fact.
The illegal nature of the entire Settlement project in East Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Golan Heights cannot be disputed. The full text of the relevant International Law governing the protection of civilians can be read here:
“Prohibited actions include forcibly transferring protected persons from the occupied territories to the territory of the occupying power.”
“It is unlawful under the Fourth Geneva Convention for an occupying power to transfer parts of its own population into the territory it occupies. This means that international humanitarian law prohibits the establishment of settlements, as these are a form of population transfer into occupied territory. Any measure designed to expand or consolidate settlements is also illegal. Confiscation of land to build or expand settlements is similarly prohibited.”
Israel is therefore in violation of at least two key tenets of the Fourth Geneva Convention, the transfer of the Israeli civilian population into the West Bank is illegal. The expropriation of land, any land is also completely illegal, The building of structures to house the illegally transferred civilian population is also illegal.
Therefore, in my opinion we have a duty to our fellow human beings in Palestine to oppose the breaches of International Law perpetrated against them by the criminal Zionist state. The fact that the perpetrators of the crimes hide behind crimes committed against their relatives in the middle of the past century is irrelevant. The idea that crimes committed by Europeans in Europe in the 1930s and 1940s somehow justify other crimes committed in the Middle East in the second decade of the 21st century is simply laughable, and speaks to the deceptive and despicable nature of the entire Zionist movement since inception. Israel’s crimes are not crimes because they are being committed by Jewish people acting under the banner of Jewish nationalism, they are crimes because they are clearly, obvious and flagrant breaches of International Law.
Friends of Israel.
The maniacal support of this evil from buffoons such as Canadian PM Stephen Harper only reveals these political harlots as being utterly wicked, venal and corrupt to the very core. Any attempts to protect the criminal Zionist state from criticism should see the likes of Harper prosecuted at the UN for the breach of the Civil and Political rights of Canadians as outlined in Article 19 of the UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of which as a UN member, Canada is a signatory.
1. Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.
2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.”
This quote from the US Government Accountability Office describes how it was done.
“ One of DOE’s unique capabilities is the ability to conduct aerial background radiation surveys. These surveys are conducted by using helicopters or planes equipped with radiation detectors to fly over an area and collect information on existing background radiation sources, such as granite statues in a city or medical isotopes located at hospitals. This can help DOE establish baseline radiation levels against which future radiation levels can be compared in order to more easily detect new radiation sources that may pose a security or public health threat. DOE is not the only federal agency responsible for detecting nuclear and radiological materials.”
The purpose of the survey was principally to provide a background radiation map of New York so that future surveys could then identify any “extra” radiation signals and therefore prevent any future Nuclear terrorist attack on the city.
In September 2006, the GAO released their report, which found that the mapping techniques were effective and that the process should be extended across the US.
In October 2006, an article was printed in the Cleveland Indy Media that claimed.
“One alleged radiation hot spot on Manhattan’s east side has the potential for becoming a political hot spot: A strong radiation spike from the area of the Israeli Embassy. Officials would not comment on why they thought that particular area allegedly showed such a stunning peak in radiation.”
The Rense article is itself based on the Cleveland Indy Media story. The Cleveland story makes a small error in that it refers to the Israeli Embassy, there is no Israeli Embassy in New York, the Embassy is in Washington DC, but Israel has a Diplomatic Consulate in New York, along with it’s UN mission based there There are also Israeli Consulate Generals in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Houston, Miami, Philadelphia and San Francisco.
The rest of the story reads like a conventional news story and even the radiation spike, the claim is treated very lightly and quickly passed over.
It is a single source story, as the GAO does not list the hotspot sites although it seems that a graph originally accompanied the story showing the hot spot areas, the graph has disappeared very soon after the report was released.
It is still an extremely interesting story because it does tend to corroborate a number of claims made about the way the 911 atrocity was conducted.
911-Israeli Foreknowledge is Proven by at Least Two Different Pieces of Evidence.
In fairness it should be acknowledged that foreknowledge of 911 was surprisingly widespread. Different people exhibited different degrees of knowledge.
It can be inferred for example that elements of the US financial services industry had foreknowledge of the fact that something was going to happen involving passenger aircraft due to the massive surge in the “Shorting”, betting against the price of the stocks of United and American Airlines and only those two airlines. The two airlines “used” in the 911 operation.
As this quote from “Insider Trading and 911 the Facts laid bare” by Lars Schall elucidates.
“The atypical volumes, which are very rare for specific stocks lead to the suspicion of insider trading.” Six years after the attacks on the World Trade Center this is the disturbing results of a recent study by Marc Chesney and Loriano Mancini, professors at the University of Zurich. The authors, one of them a specialist in derivative products, the other a specialist in econometrics, worked on the sales options that were used to speculate on the decline in the prices of 20 large American companies, particularly in the aerospace and financial sector.”
“Their analysis refers to the execution of transactions between the 6th and 10th of September 2001 compared to the average volumes, which were collected over a long period (10 years for most of the companies). In addition, the two specialists calculated the probability that different options within the same sector in significant volumes would be traded within a few days. “We have tried to see if the movements of specific stocks shortly before the attacks were normal.” We show that the movements for certain companies such as American Airlines, United Airlines, Merrill Lynch, Bank of America, Citigroup, Marsh & McLehnan are rare from a statistical point of view, especially when compared to the quantities that have been observed for other assets like Coca-Cola or HP,” explains Marc Chesney, a former Professor at the HEC and co-author of Blanchiment et financement du terrorisme (Money laundering and financing of terrorism), published by Editions Ellipses. “For example 1,535 put option contracts on American Airlines with a strike of $30 and expiry in October 2001 were traded on September 10th, in contrast to a daily average of around 24 contracts over the previous three weeks. The fact that the market was currently in a bear market is not sufficient to explain these surprising volumes.”
“The authors also examined the profitability of the put options and trades for an investor who acquired such a product between the 6th and 10th September. “For specific titles, the profits were enormous.” “For example, the investors who acquired put options on Citigroup with an expiry in October 2001 could have made more than $15 million profit,” he said. On the basis of the connection of data between volumes and profitability, the two authors conclude that “the probability that crimes by Insiders (Insider trading) occurred , is very strong in the cases of American Airlines, United Airlines, Merrill Lynch, Bank of America, Citigroup and JP Morgan. “There is no legal evidence, but these are the results of statistical methods, confirming the signs of irregularities.”
“In a new version of their study that was published on September 7, 2011, the authors stuck to their findings from April 2010. They added the emphasis that in no way the profits gained with the put options to which they point could have been achieved due to sheer fortunate coincidence, but that in fact they were based on prior knowledge which had been exploited.”
So it can be inferred foreknowledge of an attack involving these specific carriers but there is no sign that there was foreknowledge of the actual targets, the exact time or any of those other details.
These elements of the US financial services industry, trading in Chicago and New York, may have had total foreknowledge, but all that can be reasonably inferred from their actions is that they knew something would happen and these carriers would be affected.
That is a fairly compelling, but rather low level of foreknowledge.
If the foreknowledge of the five “Dancing Israelis” is examined by contrast, the knowledge appears to be far more detailed.
The Dancing Israelis, arrested on September 11th, appear to know the specific target buildings and the exact timing of the attack to within hours at the least.
The Dancing Israelis were observed filming the “aircraft strikes” on the World Trade Centre from the top of a building that required them to drive for ten minutes after learning of the attacks. The building the Dancing Israelis worked “Urban Moving Systems” had a good view of the North Tower,the first tower attacked but a poor view of the South tower.
The Dancing Israelis had no reason to travel unless they knew the other tower would be hit and needed to view that, and they are alleged to have arrived at their filming post within minutes of the first attack according to one eyewitness,
The Israelis were celebrating and filmed themselves with the burning towers in the background.
When arrested the Dancing Israelis did not offer a credible or honest account of their movements on the morning, When the five Israeli terrorists were removed from their van, they helpfully explained the purpose of the attacks and the mindset behind them also. “We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems, the Palestinians are the problem.” also, apropos of nothing, as leaving the vehicle, “We were on the West Side Highway at the time of the incident.” an unprompted and dishonest attempt to create an alibi, In the afternoon there were five members of the group in the van, in the morning, the witnesses had seen only three.
Odigo Message the Other Indicator of Israeli Foreknowledge.
It is also worth remembering the other solid example of foreknowledge in Israel, the Odigo messaging service warning sent out in Hebrew in the hours before the attack. This was not a Jewish warning in the slightest, everyday Jewish people were in the same category as anyone else, there was a small scale warning sent out to certain Israelis prior to the attacks. The warning referred to an incident that day in New York, the foreknowledge was not detailed. It is also completely unclear who sent the warning beyond the fact that it was a user of that messaging service based in Israel but sent out to members, almost all Israeli, across the world..
There were many other better examples of foreknowledge than the Odigo example. There was one story told by a man named Randy Glass of meeting with a Pakistani arms dealer connected to the Pakistani intelligence outfit the ISI (Inter Services intelligence) who stated during a meal in a restaurant more than two years prior to the attacks. “ those towers, will soon be gone”” or words to that effect. There is no suggestion the man was involved, but he knew it was going to happen and the target.
The foreknowledge of the Dancing Israelis extends into probable involvement in the attack.
There have been many allegations made about the use of Nuclear weapons, small nuclear weapons in the demolition of the World Trade Center. Wayne Madsen wrote that 911 was a nuclear event several years ago. Veteran’s Today editor Gordon Duff has repeatedly claimed that Israel smuggled nuclear weapons into New York City prior to the attack and that the weapons were hidden in the Israeli New York Consulate. Gordon Duff has also repeatedly claimed that Israeli intelligence officers placed small nuclear weapons in vehicles in the car park of certain WTC buildings prior to the attack. Duff also claims to have a copy of a secret US government report by the Department of Energy into the fact that 911 was a nuclear attack.. The narrative presented corroborates all the known facts although the specific details cannot be confirmed due to the fact that it is a single source story . The details are so corroborative as to make the account compelling nonetheless.
It is possible that the 2005 Radiation survey was actually a sly attempt to gather intelligence on 911 and that the radiation spike at the Israeli Consulate building, which is just a large office space rented to numerous businesses and other organisations may have been due to the residual radiation that the weapons stored there prior to the attack. left behind or it could indicate a Samson option type of scenario.
It actually seems like a rather cute coincidence that the one city that the DOE surveyed was also the one city that people within the DOE apparently conclude was attacked with Nuclear weapons on September 11thso the probability must be that they were intent on collecting evidence relating to the 911 atrocity and overall it is becoming increasingly obvious that the attack was conducted in large part by the agents and assets of Israeli intelligence, Although it remains unclear what specific entity gave the instructions to these officers.
Crimes of Empire meets Dr. Barrett on Truth Jihad Radio
I was able to chat briefly with Dr. Kevin Barrett during his recent radio show of March 20th. I was extremely pleased and shocked to receive an invitation to chat because I am a huge fan of the show and I have listened to hundreds of hours of the show.
Dr. Barrett’s work has had a huge influence upon me since late 2011 when I first understood rather late that September 11th was a false flag attack. Dr. Barrett made me realise for the first time that we, being the West are not “good guys who go wrong”, but rather we are the Evil ones at the institutional level and in the world.,
It was also a big deal to me because although I have been lucky enough to have received a high degree of support from day one from the highly respected and influential Aangirfan site, a British site, I had never received any acknowledgement from any member of the American community in the slightest.
Not that I had even necessarily deserved it but to get some acknowledgement that someone within the US thinks my work is at least not complete garbage is obviously pleasing. I think it went ok.
My only previous media experience was conducting fairly cliched and pointless interviews with the rock acts Babes in Toyland and Carcass for Melbourne Community Television. I was not confident enough to put the subject onto the Hampstead matter or any of those things. The good part covered a short recent false flag history, speaking about Oklahoma City, Bali and 911.
The Mysterious Death of the Prosecutor, the Missing Car Bombs and the Truth.
The mysterious death of Argentine prosecutor Alberto Nisman of a gunshot wound on January 18th, 2015 has been the source of much controversy. In order to understand the death of Alberto Nisman it is necessary to understand the case he was working on at the time of his death relating to the massive bombing attacks against the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires in 1992 and the AMIA Jewish community centre in 1994.
The attacks of 1992 and 1994.
The attack is blamed on a suicide car (or van) bomber ramming his vehicle into the target on both occasions. Hezbollah backed by Iran and Syria supposedly the guilty parties. The problem with this narrative is very simple and fundamental,
There is no evidence that the sites were attacked with any car bomb, indeed multiple witnesses attest to the building exploding from within, no one saw the supposed Renault van used in the AMIA attack, on the street, blowing up, driving up or anything. The Argentine Academy of Engineers Certified that the Israel Embassy was attacked from within.
Argentine Journalist Adrian Salbuchi has done high quality work looking at both attacks.
“Notably, in both cases, the government and the media immediately placed the blame squarely on alleged “Islamic Fundamentalist Terror Groups” who were supposed to have used car bombs to blow up both buildings. As the years went by, however, any “Islamic Terror Group” links became weaker and increasingly ambiguous. Neither of the alleged car-bomb vehicles were ever found.”
The Embassy Attack of March 17th, 1992 left 29 dead.
“The case for a car bomb melted away when the State Prosecutor and the Court hearing on this case invited technical specialist surveyors from the Argentine National Engineers Academy to determine what caused the Israeli Embassy building to collapse. Their conclusion was that the explosion took place from inside the building and was not caused by an alleged car-bomb. To make matters worse for Zionist pressure groups, a passer-by had filmed from several blocks away the mushroom cloud that rose from that explosion, a characteristic effect that also pointed to an internal explosion.”
“The embassy building was in a very densely populated part of Buenos Aires and, although the shock wave broke glass windows and plaster of practically all the buildings across the street from the Embassy – even blowing-in a vitreaux of a church across the street, which sadly fell on a priest and killed him – the only building structurally affected was the Embassy itself. Clearly, we either had a car bomb with an unrealistically selective shock wave or the explosion took place inside the building and there was no car bomb.”
“There are many other signs that point to this conclusion. Probably, for this reason, the case of the Embassy was mentioned less and less frequently by the media, especially after strong rumours surfaced that what actually blew up was an arsenal that the Israelis apparently had housed in the building’s basement. At the time of the explosion, a group of Israeli Labour Government officers were meeting to discuss matters pertaining to the recently initiated Madrid Peace Conference process, but “luckily” left the building just before the explosion. The same occurred with the Ambassador himself who, fortuitously, also happened to depart the premises before the blast.”
A Leader of the Israel Lobby in Argentina was allowed to pay US 400,000 to a Witness in the Frame up.
“For a number of years, the case was heard in the District Court presided by a Federal Judge by the name of Juan Galeano, who was so weak – if not downright stupid – that he allowed himself to be coaxed and pressured by local Zionist organizations – the AMIA and DAIA themselves – into authorizing payment of a 400,000 USD kickback to a shady used-car dealer by the name of Carlos Telleldín, who had sold the alleged car bomb van to alleged Hizbollah operatives in return for his formally accusing three Buenos Aires Police officers of being the “local connection” that would lead first to Syria, then to Hizbollah, and finally to Iran.”
“The money for that 400,000 USD kickback was provided by the then-president of the DAIA, Rubén Beraja through his (now defunct) bank Banco Mayo. Beraja recently spent several years in jail because of the fraudulent collapse of that bank.”
It can be stated with a high degree of confidence that the Embassy was attacked from within and that the attack logically must have been conducted by the enemies of Iran and Hezbollah. Friends after all are not in the habit of framing one another for sectarian mass murder.
Gareth Porter has also investigated the AMIA attack and his conclusions mirror those of Salbuchi, although when it comes to identifying the perpetrators of the attack his work seems rather weak by comparison. Porter suggests that fascist elements of the Argentine police may have been responsible. On the actual attacks, his work is very strong.
“ATF explosives expert Charles Hunter quickly identified major discrepancies between the car-bomb thesis and the blast pattern recorded in photos. He wrote a report two weeks later noting that in the wake of the bombing, merchandise in a store immediately to the right of the AMIA was tightly packed against its front windows and merchandise in another shop had been blown out onto the street–suggesting that the blast came from inside rather than outside. Hunter also said he did not understand how the building across the street could still be standing if the bomb had exploded in front of the AMIA, as suggested by the car-bomb thesis.”
“The lack of eyewitness evidence supporting the thesis was just as striking. Of some 200 witnesses on the scene, only one claimed to have seen a white Renault Trafic. Several testified they were looking at the spot where the Trafic should have been when the explosion occurred and saw nothing. Nicolasa Romero, the wife of a Buenos Aires policeman, was that lone witness. She said she saw a white Renault Trafic approach the corner where she was standing with her sister and her 4-year-old son. But Romero’s sister testified that the vehicle that passed them was not a white Trafic but rather a black-and-yellow taxi. Other witnesses reported seeing a black-and-yellow taxi seconds before the explosion.”
“Argentine prosecutors argued that pieces of a white Trafic imbedded in the flesh of many of the victims of the explosion proved their case for a suicide bomb. But that evidence was discredited by Gabriel Levinas, a researcher for AMIA’s own legal team. Levinas is a member of a leading Jewish family in Buenos Aires who had published a human rights magazine during the dictatorship (his uncle’s car was used to kidnap war criminal Adolf Eichmann and spirit him off to Israel for trial in 1961.)”
“He discovered that the manufacturer of the white Trafic had been sent fragments of the vehicle recovered by the police for analysis and had found that none of the pieces had ever been put under high temperature. That meant that these car fragments could not have come from the particular white Trafic that police had identified as the suicide bomb car–since that vehicle was known to have once caught fire before having been recycled and repaired.”
“Yet despite the lack of eyewitness testimony and the weakness of the forensic evidence, the State Department publicly embraced the suicide-bomb story in 1994 and 1995.”
“In the case of the AMIA, the Court asked a Border Police (Gendarmería) surveyor to give an “official opinion” about the alleged car-bomb van and this person, by the name of Commander Osvaldo Laborda, officially said that no more parts were found “because the explosion buried it deep under the entrance to the former AMIA building”.
How Nisman Became Involved and the Indiscreet Words of Rabbi Israel Singer.
“President Kirchner, Christina Kirchner (now president) and Foreign Minister (then and now) Jorge Taiana, held a secret meeting in the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel in New York City on 21 September 2006, with eight major Zionist pro-Israel organizations, including The American Jewish Congress, B’Nai B’Rith, ADL and others.”
“We don’t know what they discussed because, as I say, it was held in secret; but, one month later, the Kirchners dispatched special prosecutor Alberto Nisman to the US, where he met with CIA and Mossad agents and, upon his return, launched a formal accusation against the former Iranian government of Ali Rafsanjani. The judge hearing this case at the time, Dr. Rodolfo Canicoba Corral, immediately obliged by accepting it.”
“This was headline news and prompted Rabbi Israel Singer, the political director of the World Jewish Congress, to “congratulate the Argentine government” as Argentina’s accusation against Iran “confirmed the commitment the Kirchners undertook during that secret meeting”. Commitment? To do what? Why? In exchange for what? ”
Nisman Apparent Employee of the State of Israel and Participant in the Cover Up.
“Dr. Labaké (defence lawyer) recently asked Special State Prosecutor Alberto Nisman to dig four meters under the entrance to the former AMIA building in order to determine, once and for all, if the remains of that vehicle exist. Prosecutor Nisman refused to do so, which is not surprising when you consider that he tours the world spreading a fanatically pro-Israel and anti-Arab message regarding the AMIA attack.”
“At the end of 2007, for example, Mr. Nisman was a special guest at the Annual Meeting of the American Jewish Congress. In March 2009, he gave a presentation at the Queensborough Holocaust Library in New York City. At the end of 2008 he personally submitted a full report on the status of this case to the Supreme Court – not of Argentina, as you might expect, but of Israel in Tel Aviv. Clearly, Mr Nisman acts as Special Prosecutor not on behalf of Argentina but of the State of Israel!”
The Political Context in Israel in the Early 1990s and how it may relate to the Argentine attacks.
“Look at the timeline: on 14 July 1994, right smack in the middle of the unfolding of this insidious internal fighting amongst Zionists and inside Israel, the AMIA building was blown up. AMIA’s leadership at that time was pro-Labour, so it was clearly a “warning shot” from the ultra-right Nazi-Zionist wing for Rabin and his Labour government to stop negotiating “Land for Peace” with the Palestinians. It now appears that prime minister Rabin, who was a tough guy, did not “get the message”. So, when does this whole sequence come to a head? On 4 November 1995 – just 16 months after the AMIA attack – Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin was gunned down, JFK-like, on the streets of Tel-Aviv, not by a Neo-Nazi nor by an Islamic Fundamentalist, but by one Ygal Amir, a young ultra-right-wing student member of the settler’s movement linked to the internal security service Shin Beth, which was being vigorously reshuffled by Rabin. he in-fighting among Zionists had as one of its bloody episodes the bombing of the Israeli Embassy and later the AMIA building in Argentina, which was perceived by the Zionist Nazis at the time as a symbol of Labour’s stronghold. Why Buenos Aires, you might ask? Simple – because Argentine public security has always been, and still is, very weak, thus making both terror operations relatively easy with Argentine targets.”
The Familiar Trademarks.
“Nevertheless, and similar to 9/11, although they have shown the technical capability to carry out false flag attacks with (almost) technical perfection – using bombs, controlled demolitions, and all – they still are extremely sloppy in that they have left their fingerprints all over the place when perpetrating these attacks which have been revealed by inconsistencies that have proven impossible to explain away.”
The Argentine Government Had Nothing to Fear from the NIsman Affidavit and No Motive to Kill Nisman.
“The central accusation in his affidavit, made 96 times, according to press accounts, was that Kirchner and Timerman had sought to revoke the Interpol arrest warrants against the former Iranian officials.
“But Ronald K. Noble, the secretary general of Interpol for 15 years until last November, denied Nisman’s accusation. Noble declared, “I can say with 100 percent certainty, not a scintilla of doubt, that Foreign Minister Timerman and the Argentine government have been steadfast, persistent and unwavering that the Interpol’s red notices be issued, remain in effect and not be suspend or removed.”
“Noble’s denial raises an obvious question: Why would the Kirchner government, knowing that Nisman’s main claim could be easily refuted, have any reason to kill him on the eve of the presentation of his case? Why give those seeking to discredit the government’s policy on the AMIA bombing the opportunity to shift the issue from the facts of the case to the presumption of officially sponsored assassination?”
“Nisman’s suggestion that former Iranian president Abolhassen Banisadr had “direct knowledge” related to the AMIA bombings was a stunningly brazen falsehood. Banisadr had been impeached by the Iranian legislature in June 1981 and had fled to Paris the following month – 13 years before the bombing.”
“Nisman also cited the testimony of Abolghassem Mesbahi, who called himself a “defector” from the Iranian intelligence service, that Iranian officials had made such a decision sometime in August 1993. But Mesbahi was known by U.S. intelligence analysts as a “serial fabricator”, who had also told an obviously false story about Iranian involvement in the 9/11 attacks.”
The Recurring Cabal Modus Operandi
When Cornered Lash Out. When Caught in a Lie Tell another Bigger Lie.
Nisman was on holiday in Europe when he was directed to return home after a meeting in Amsterdam, a notorious stronghold of Israeli intelligence in Europe. Nisman had been given a thankless and impossible task. The framing of Iran and Hezbollah for an horrific attack they cannot possibly have conducted due to the central lie about there being a car bombing.
The lack of the car bombing was an impossible hurdle for Nisman to clear and when this became completely obvious, Nisman’s handlers decided that he was worth more to them dead than alive. In the wake of his murder there have been many shenanigans but in time the truth will out and the Argentine massacres will be seen in their true context as the beginning of a series of spectacular and deadly attacks conducted by the same group, using captured members of Law enforcement, and murdering police who don’t cooperate with the frame up or cover up that False Flag terror always requires.
When it comes to generating antipathy the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is a real leader. Few have been easier to despise than this psychopath who scarcely even bothers to conceal his true nature. He is apparently incapable of it as indicated by his remark to the New York Times on September 11th, 2001 that the attacks were “very good.” This is the quote from the New York Times article
A DAY OF TERROR – THE ISRAELIS – Spilled Blood Is Seen as Bond That Draws 2 Nations Closer – NYTimes.com
” ”It’s very good.” Then he edited himself: ”Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.” Please understand that Netanyahu is not saying he has sympathy for the United States after all the people were murdered there, he is stating that he is pleased because the massacre of Americans will cause the US to feel sympathy for Israel, it is a stratospheric degree of narcissism rarely seen.
Hatred of Netanyahu is so widespread that is almost redundant at this stage.
Israel Zionist Jew Benjamin Netanyahu chronic liar & conman
The truth is that Netanyahu is no longer an effective advocate of the Zionist cause. Netanyahu’s speech at AIPAC yesterday was met with no more than a polite response. The last time the response would have been rapturous, the way it used to be for BIbi in the Congress.
Netanyahu gets more standing ovations than Obama – Salon.com
Netanyahu received no less than 29 standing ovations during his speech at the Capitol in 2011. It feels like the distant past. Although the Israeli ownership of the House and Senate persists till today, they only represent the views of the highly partisan or ultra-ignorant at this stage.
Netanyahu’s visit is aimed at bolstering his chances in the Israel election in a fortnight and more broadly at ending the Iran nuclear deal. Netanyahu’s fate in the Israeli elections scarcely matters, any replacement will be almost identical policy wise. The Nuclear deal with Iran is a big deal, the subject of a major power struggle that has not yet been completed. Netanyahu’s history of exaggeration and inaccuracy regarding the Iran nuclear dossier mean that the prevention of a deal will be impossible for Israel if the US shows an adequate degree of political will.
The Death of American Democracy
There have been many recent signs that Israeli intelligence factions now believe that Netanyahu’s leadership is counterproductive. A new salesman/con artist is required. It would not be surprising to see a very violent and sudden end to the Netanyahu career as his backers abandon him and seek to use his demise to their advantage. I hope that Netanyahu dies in prison in many years time but I fear that fate will not be so slow in returning Netanyahu to his source, whatever that might be.
War Criminal in the House of Harlots on the Day of Treason.
That was some of the worst fifty minutes I have ever spent. The final twenty minutes a completely boring rehash of what had already been said. Had to laugh that he had the chutzpah to drag Elie Wiesel in there as the poster boy of Holocaust survivors, the whole “everyone wants to kill us that’s why we constantly have to murder people” schtick is becoming immensely tiresome.
There were some comic gems as you would expect.
“If Iran wants to be treated like a normal country let it act like a normal country. ” So does this mean that Israel is going to start acting like a “normal” country?
“No of course not, Israel is the only Jewish state and our history of victim-hood means that our aggression is not aggression, our murders are not murder our theft is not theft, our outlaw behaviour is not unlawful.”
He really does try and claim the special right to aggression on the basis of a shared neurosis fostered by the Zionists and the Nazis that all gentiles have some strange Jew hating disease that constantly causes them to be singularly obsessed with killing them all. The whole thing was like watching a children’s play. The actor’s are deadly earnest, everyone offstage knows the play is pure nonsense.
For this criminal to actually think he has the right to attempt to dictate the Foreign policy of the West regarding Iran after the cataclysms the Israel leadership and Lobby in the US have engineered over the past decade or so is quite remarkable. The narcissism really knows no end. Nor the gall.
Oh and I did keep count of the standing ovations. Sometimes it was hard to differentiate between one extended and two separate standing ovations. I counted sixteen, which is only an approximation but within one or two either way.
The standing ovations are basically written into the speech, so the number is not important. There were several times during this speech when a standing ovation, an extended pause was written into the speech and on occasions only a tiny proportion actually stood. Mostly it was half or two thirds, but there were several only cheered by the most enthusiastic “funding recipients” at the very front. There were certain times that it seemed as though almost none of the Democrats were participating.
The whole Netanyahu vs Obama brouhaha now seems very simple. Obama wants to make a deal with Iran, Netanyahu wants to stop him. Netanyahu has no credibility whatsoever but the controlled media will support Israel’s aims as always. If a deal is done, Obama wins and Israel begins it’s fast track slide to obsolescence and assimilated disintegration within a single state in Palestine.
If the deal is quashed by the Lobby, this tells us that the US is still an owned and controlled Zionist colony on the road to total self destruction and when the next President enters the White House, there will be no question about deals, the debate will be all about when Iran will be bombed.
Here is an interesting and very different point of view on this subject from Tony Cartalucci..
Land Destroyer: Obama-Netanyahu “Fallout” is Theater – Planned in 2009