The US Government and the controlled media claim that Osama bin Laden was killed in a US raid on his Pakistan hideout in 2011. It is a difficult matter to prove given these events are cloaked in lies and disinformation but overwhelming evidence indicates that Osama bin Laden, CIA agent provocateur par excellence, died in Afghanistan in December 2001 and all of the events involving bin Laden and all the statements he supposedly made after 2001 were entirely fake.
When you look at the videos of some of the post 2001 bin Laden appearances it is quite clear that bin laden is being impersonated, crudely and poorly. That fact combined with multiple reports of bin Laden’s death in 2001, in the US. Pakistani and Egyptian press indicates that bin Laden died but lived on in impersonation and myth and the operation that supposedly killed bin laden in Abbottobad Pakistan on May 1st, 2011 was in whole or part a work of fiction.
Benazir Bhutto says Osama Bin Laden is Dead?
In addition to the reports two completely separate Pakistani political figures, Pervez Musharref and Benazir Bhutto also stated that Osama bin laden was dead long before 2011, Bhutto even claimed to know the identity of the person who she claimed killed bin Laden, describing the death as a murder at the hands of Ahmed Saeed Sheikh Omar, a British man with links to al Qaeda, British MI6 and the Pakistani ISI.
It appears that an US military operation took place in Abbottabad in 2011, that it involved Navy Seals and it was designed to kill the dangerous myth of Osama bin Laden. It was a lie that killed a lie.
A Ridiculous Story.
Helpfully, the Military and political accounts of the operation are completely ridiculous. The man who was blamed for the September 11th massacre was supposedly killed without a single photograph being taken of him prior to his burial at sea!
There was never any actual evidence offered that Osama bin Laden was either present in Abbottabad nor that he was killed. There was just a story.
A Wildly Successful Hoax that like Boston brought cheering crowds to the streets.
It was an extremely successful hoax that saw cheering crowds throng outside the White House, I had no idea of the truth and was personally very pleased which is obviously very embarrassing but ultimately this was a hoax that actually served a relatively good cause, the killing of the myth was dishonest and low but the myth was dangerous. Telling the truth would of course have been the right thing to do, it has become clear that this is not a realistic expectation to have of any part of the US government.
The actual operation is very confusing, the apparent helicopter crash, the question of who if anyone was even there. It’s a mess.
Bin laden and 911.
We know that Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda did not conduct the 911 attacks.But did they plan the planes operation only to see the “professionals” step in and blow the buildings up after flying empty drones into them or was the whole thing a work of fiction?
This is an important question without an answer. The al Qaeda group was so compromised and openly used by so many different intelligence agencies that it is almost impossible to determine whether there was any sincere al Qaeda planes operation plot. There was a fellow named Ramzi bin al Shibh, in Germany who was in contact with Mohammed Atta and appears to have assisted in preparations for an operation. He may have been the person closest to the operation who was sincere.
The other problem is that the media coverage of al Qaeda was so completely dishonest and fictional that even when it makes sense that an individual actually believed he was planning the planes operation, it is quite likely the entire account is a complete lie.
Ramzi bin al Shibh and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed appeared to take responsibility for planning the operation in an interview with al Jazeera in 2002. The interview may well be authentic or it may simply be a work of fiction. None of the tapes the written interview is said to be based upon have ever been released.
With Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the fact that he bothered to refuse to talk to the Americans for a long time despite being tortured severely tends to indicate his probable sincerity.
Would the Americans invent the 183 water boardings in a single month? Maybe. It is entirely possible that these two al Qaeda figures sincerely plotted the attacks, but neither man ever set foot in the USA or played any active part in the attacks. The attack may have been real or authentic in Pakistan or Afghanistan or even in Germany, but absolutely everything that took place in the US was under the control of Westerners and the fake al Qaeda terrorists who did enter the United States such as Mohammed Atta were undoubtedly not sincere and no element of the attacks is authentic and the planes operation did not take place.
As far as bin Laden goes, he appears to have been aware of his provocateur role. There is no evidence that bin laden played even the theoretical role the likes of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Ramzi bin al Shibh may have played.
As far as Osama bin Laden goes the truth is pretty clear.
There were multiple reports of his death in late 2001.
There are numerous problems with the post 2001 bin Ladens that indicate an actor (indeed series of actors) were playing the bin Laden role.
The story from the US that bin Laden was killed and they never took a photograph of the corpse or any other part of the operation is completely unrealistic. If they kill him you can guarantee there will be many mementos and proof of what they have done. They would be perfectly proud and happy to show a picture of his bloodied corpse.
The only photos that were claimed to depict the death of bin laden were photo-shopped stills from the movie Black Hawk Down! They didn’t even make an effort.
Seymour Hersh: Why Now?
As far as why Seymour Hersh is pushing his longstanding and rather half baked interpretation at this time?
Seymour Hersh is a high quality Establishment journalist. Seymour Hersh wrote in 2002 that elements of the US government believed that a foreign Intelligence agency must have been involved but he never followed the story up nor sought the immense corroboration available.
Years ago Seymour Hersh stated that not one detail of the raid was correct, which was right, but now he is actually asserting that much of the story is true including the all important fact that Osama bin Laden was actually killed which is nonsense.
The few sane and rational elements of the US administration appear to be under siege and appear to be caving and losing all over the place and something the administration has done has presumably pissed off one of Seymour Hersh handlers enough to cause this story to happen.
The Empire Strikes Back?
The tentative Iran deal appears to have prompted a massive and successful Zionist fightback in Washington and in Syria and in Ukraine the forces of chaos and mayhem in the US government have clearly seized the initiative and are setting the conditions for several possible massive future US wars and it actually seems that the War party are desperately trying to finish off Assad in order to drive a wedge , a violent wedge between the US and Iran and thus avert the nuclear deal by making the US and Iran open enemies in Syria.
There are also rumours that Iran has cut off the Syrian government within the past few months. The actions of Hezbollah in the Qalamoun region where they continue to trounce the anti Government forces in that area, the one positive part of the war for the Syrian government and allied forces who have suffered a series of devastating setbacks in the past month especially in Northern Syria.
The What Really Happened piece on this topic is very strong and material from
Crimes of Empire meets Dr. Barrett on Truth Jihad Radio
I was able to chat briefly with Dr. Kevin Barrett during his recent radio show of March 20th. I was extremely pleased and shocked to receive an invitation to chat because I am a huge fan of the show and I have listened to hundreds of hours of the show.
Dr. Barrett’s work has had a huge influence upon me since late 2011 when I first understood rather late that September 11th was a false flag attack. Dr. Barrett made me realise for the first time that we, being the West are not “good guys who go wrong”, but rather we are the Evil ones at the institutional level and in the world.,
It was also a big deal to me because although I have been lucky enough to have received a high degree of support from day one from the highly respected and influential Aangirfan site, a British site, I had never received any acknowledgement from any member of the American community in the slightest.
Not that I had even necessarily deserved it but to get some acknowledgement that someone within the US thinks my work is at least not complete garbage is obviously pleasing. I think it went ok.
My only previous media experience was conducting fairly cliched and pointless interviews with the rock acts Babes in Toyland and Carcass for Melbourne Community Television. I was not confident enough to put the subject onto the Hampstead matter or any of those things. The good part covered a short recent false flag history, speaking about Oklahoma City, Bali and 911.
New Video Footage Of The British Schoolgirls Who Joined ISIS
March 15th, 2015.
Teenager’s Tragic Soap Opera revealed as Western engineered farce.
The IS psyop has been exposed again after Turkish authorities arrested an IS facilitator they allege is an agent of the Canadian Intelligence Se vice (CSIS) The man, a Syrian named Mohammad Al Rashed, who purportedly went by the alias Dr. Mehmet Resit. was filmed helping facilitate the travel of three British teenagers Shamima Begum, Amira Abase, both fifteen and the sixteen year old Kadiza Sultana into Syria to join the (un) Islamic State group.
The IS group is now known to be receiving assistance from multiple Western nations. With elements of the US, Israel and Canada known to support the group and the support of the French and British can also be safely assumed if not yet completely proven.
Suspected spy from Canadian intelligence assists British girls join ISIS – Daily Sabah
“Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu said that an intelligence agent from a country that is a member of the anti-ISIS coalition had helped the three British girls join the group in Syria. While Foreign Ministry officials refused to comment on the nationality of the agent, security forces reached by Daily Sabah found the agent is suspected to be a spy working for Canada.”
Driven by Bitterness but Highly Credible
These claims are highly credible as proven by the response of the Canadian Government that they would “make no comment on National Security Operational matters” If the story had no basis in fact that would not be the case, they could simply deny all involvement, the content of the Canadian government response is an implicit admission of involvement.
Turkey has also faced highly credible allegations of supporting the IS group.
American Press TV journalist Serena Shim appears to have been murdered for her work exposing the Turkey IS connection and the US Vice President Joe Biden clearly caused severe anger in Ankara when he publicly blamed Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar for following what had clearly been Western policy in Syria of remove Assad at any cost using any allies no matter how criminal or destructive they might be. The people of Syria never mattered, ever. The Syrian government undoubtedly has and had huge shortcomings but the whole Syrian nightmare seems to have been triggered by the Israeli, Saudi and NATO desire to break the territorial contiguity of the “Axis of Resistance” in order to pave the way for an attack on Iran. When the initial gambit failed after the al Ghouta false flag chemical attack of August 2013. An old asset, the Sunni extremists , were used to keep the War on terror fraud alive and presumably carve out pro-US statelets in the areas under IS control in Iraq and Syria after the IS is defeated.
The whole IS operation in the middle east is clearly war for the sake of war against a manufactured and nurtured synthetic enemy, and they keep getting caught.
The Canadian Government of Stephen Harper, Outrageous Lies are a Persistent Habit
Between this revelation and the Ottawa manufactured farce of last October the total dishonesty and moral bankruptcy of the Canadian government and their Western cohorts has been completely exposed. There is a strong likelihood that the Canadian government is now in breach of their own new anti-Terror laws. Canadian PM Harper will live in history as a figure of infamy, and the Canadian people would do well to ask why are they doing this? Who does Harper really serve? It certainly isn’t the people of Canada.
Exclusive video of suspected spy from Canadian intelligence assisting British girls join ISIS
The Mysterious Death of the Prosecutor, the Missing Car Bombs and the Truth.
The mysterious death of Argentine prosecutor Alberto Nisman of a gunshot wound on January 18th, 2015 has been the source of much controversy. In order to understand the death of Alberto Nisman it is necessary to understand the case he was working on at the time of his death relating to the massive bombing attacks against the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires in 1992 and the AMIA Jewish community centre in 1994.
The attacks of 1992 and 1994.
The attack is blamed on a suicide car (or van) bomber ramming his vehicle into the target on both occasions. Hezbollah backed by Iran and Syria supposedly the guilty parties. The problem with this narrative is very simple and fundamental,
There is no evidence that the sites were attacked with any car bomb, indeed multiple witnesses attest to the building exploding from within, no one saw the supposed Renault van used in the AMIA attack, on the street, blowing up, driving up or anything. The Argentine Academy of Engineers Certified that the Israel Embassy was attacked from within.
Argentine Journalist Adrian Salbuchi has done high quality work looking at both attacks.
“Notably, in both cases, the government and the media immediately placed the blame squarely on alleged “Islamic Fundamentalist Terror Groups” who were supposed to have used car bombs to blow up both buildings. As the years went by, however, any “Islamic Terror Group” links became weaker and increasingly ambiguous. Neither of the alleged car-bomb vehicles were ever found.”
The Embassy Attack of March 17th, 1992 left 29 dead.
“The case for a car bomb melted away when the State Prosecutor and the Court hearing on this case invited technical specialist surveyors from the Argentine National Engineers Academy to determine what caused the Israeli Embassy building to collapse. Their conclusion was that the explosion took place from inside the building and was not caused by an alleged car-bomb. To make matters worse for Zionist pressure groups, a passer-by had filmed from several blocks away the mushroom cloud that rose from that explosion, a characteristic effect that also pointed to an internal explosion.”
“The embassy building was in a very densely populated part of Buenos Aires and, although the shock wave broke glass windows and plaster of practically all the buildings across the street from the Embassy – even blowing-in a vitreaux of a church across the street, which sadly fell on a priest and killed him – the only building structurally affected was the Embassy itself. Clearly, we either had a car bomb with an unrealistically selective shock wave or the explosion took place inside the building and there was no car bomb.”
“There are many other signs that point to this conclusion. Probably, for this reason, the case of the Embassy was mentioned less and less frequently by the media, especially after strong rumours surfaced that what actually blew up was an arsenal that the Israelis apparently had housed in the building’s basement. At the time of the explosion, a group of Israeli Labour Government officers were meeting to discuss matters pertaining to the recently initiated Madrid Peace Conference process, but “luckily” left the building just before the explosion. The same occurred with the Ambassador himself who, fortuitously, also happened to depart the premises before the blast.”
A Leader of the Israel Lobby in Argentina was allowed to pay US 400,000 to a Witness in the Frame up.
“For a number of years, the case was heard in the District Court presided by a Federal Judge by the name of Juan Galeano, who was so weak – if not downright stupid – that he allowed himself to be coaxed and pressured by local Zionist organizations – the AMIA and DAIA themselves – into authorizing payment of a 400,000 USD kickback to a shady used-car dealer by the name of Carlos Telleldín, who had sold the alleged car bomb van to alleged Hizbollah operatives in return for his formally accusing three Buenos Aires Police officers of being the “local connection” that would lead first to Syria, then to Hizbollah, and finally to Iran.”
“The money for that 400,000 USD kickback was provided by the then-president of the DAIA, Rubén Beraja through his (now defunct) bank Banco Mayo. Beraja recently spent several years in jail because of the fraudulent collapse of that bank.”
It can be stated with a high degree of confidence that the Embassy was attacked from within and that the attack logically must have been conducted by the enemies of Iran and Hezbollah. Friends after all are not in the habit of framing one another for sectarian mass murder.
Gareth Porter has also investigated the AMIA attack and his conclusions mirror those of Salbuchi, although when it comes to identifying the perpetrators of the attack his work seems rather weak by comparison. Porter suggests that fascist elements of the Argentine police may have been responsible. On the actual attacks, his work is very strong.
“ATF explosives expert Charles Hunter quickly identified major discrepancies between the car-bomb thesis and the blast pattern recorded in photos. He wrote a report two weeks later noting that in the wake of the bombing, merchandise in a store immediately to the right of the AMIA was tightly packed against its front windows and merchandise in another shop had been blown out onto the street–suggesting that the blast came from inside rather than outside. Hunter also said he did not understand how the building across the street could still be standing if the bomb had exploded in front of the AMIA, as suggested by the car-bomb thesis.”
“The lack of eyewitness evidence supporting the thesis was just as striking. Of some 200 witnesses on the scene, only one claimed to have seen a white Renault Trafic. Several testified they were looking at the spot where the Trafic should have been when the explosion occurred and saw nothing. Nicolasa Romero, the wife of a Buenos Aires policeman, was that lone witness. She said she saw a white Renault Trafic approach the corner where she was standing with her sister and her 4-year-old son. But Romero’s sister testified that the vehicle that passed them was not a white Trafic but rather a black-and-yellow taxi. Other witnesses reported seeing a black-and-yellow taxi seconds before the explosion.”
“Argentine prosecutors argued that pieces of a white Trafic imbedded in the flesh of many of the victims of the explosion proved their case for a suicide bomb. But that evidence was discredited by Gabriel Levinas, a researcher for AMIA’s own legal team. Levinas is a member of a leading Jewish family in Buenos Aires who had published a human rights magazine during the dictatorship (his uncle’s car was used to kidnap war criminal Adolf Eichmann and spirit him off to Israel for trial in 1961.)”
“He discovered that the manufacturer of the white Trafic had been sent fragments of the vehicle recovered by the police for analysis and had found that none of the pieces had ever been put under high temperature. That meant that these car fragments could not have come from the particular white Trafic that police had identified as the suicide bomb car–since that vehicle was known to have once caught fire before having been recycled and repaired.”
“Yet despite the lack of eyewitness testimony and the weakness of the forensic evidence, the State Department publicly embraced the suicide-bomb story in 1994 and 1995.”
“In the case of the AMIA, the Court asked a Border Police (Gendarmería) surveyor to give an “official opinion” about the alleged car-bomb van and this person, by the name of Commander Osvaldo Laborda, officially said that no more parts were found “because the explosion buried it deep under the entrance to the former AMIA building”.
How Nisman Became Involved and the Indiscreet Words of Rabbi Israel Singer.
“President Kirchner, Christina Kirchner (now president) and Foreign Minister (then and now) Jorge Taiana, held a secret meeting in the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel in New York City on 21 September 2006, with eight major Zionist pro-Israel organizations, including The American Jewish Congress, B’Nai B’Rith, ADL and others.”
“We don’t know what they discussed because, as I say, it was held in secret; but, one month later, the Kirchners dispatched special prosecutor Alberto Nisman to the US, where he met with CIA and Mossad agents and, upon his return, launched a formal accusation against the former Iranian government of Ali Rafsanjani. The judge hearing this case at the time, Dr. Rodolfo Canicoba Corral, immediately obliged by accepting it.”
“This was headline news and prompted Rabbi Israel Singer, the political director of the World Jewish Congress, to “congratulate the Argentine government” as Argentina’s accusation against Iran “confirmed the commitment the Kirchners undertook during that secret meeting”. Commitment? To do what? Why? In exchange for what? ”
Nisman Apparent Employee of the State of Israel and Participant in the Cover Up.
“Dr. Labaké (defence lawyer) recently asked Special State Prosecutor Alberto Nisman to dig four meters under the entrance to the former AMIA building in order to determine, once and for all, if the remains of that vehicle exist. Prosecutor Nisman refused to do so, which is not surprising when you consider that he tours the world spreading a fanatically pro-Israel and anti-Arab message regarding the AMIA attack.”
“At the end of 2007, for example, Mr. Nisman was a special guest at the Annual Meeting of the American Jewish Congress. In March 2009, he gave a presentation at the Queensborough Holocaust Library in New York City. At the end of 2008 he personally submitted a full report on the status of this case to the Supreme Court – not of Argentina, as you might expect, but of Israel in Tel Aviv. Clearly, Mr Nisman acts as Special Prosecutor not on behalf of Argentina but of the State of Israel!”
The Political Context in Israel in the Early 1990s and how it may relate to the Argentine attacks.
“Look at the timeline: on 14 July 1994, right smack in the middle of the unfolding of this insidious internal fighting amongst Zionists and inside Israel, the AMIA building was blown up. AMIA’s leadership at that time was pro-Labour, so it was clearly a “warning shot” from the ultra-right Nazi-Zionist wing for Rabin and his Labour government to stop negotiating “Land for Peace” with the Palestinians. It now appears that prime minister Rabin, who was a tough guy, did not “get the message”. So, when does this whole sequence come to a head? On 4 November 1995 – just 16 months after the AMIA attack – Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin was gunned down, JFK-like, on the streets of Tel-Aviv, not by a Neo-Nazi nor by an Islamic Fundamentalist, but by one Ygal Amir, a young ultra-right-wing student member of the settler’s movement linked to the internal security service Shin Beth, which was being vigorously reshuffled by Rabin. he in-fighting among Zionists had as one of its bloody episodes the bombing of the Israeli Embassy and later the AMIA building in Argentina, which was perceived by the Zionist Nazis at the time as a symbol of Labour’s stronghold. Why Buenos Aires, you might ask? Simple – because Argentine public security has always been, and still is, very weak, thus making both terror operations relatively easy with Argentine targets.”
The Familiar Trademarks.
“Nevertheless, and similar to 9/11, although they have shown the technical capability to carry out false flag attacks with (almost) technical perfection – using bombs, controlled demolitions, and all – they still are extremely sloppy in that they have left their fingerprints all over the place when perpetrating these attacks which have been revealed by inconsistencies that have proven impossible to explain away.”
The Argentine Government Had Nothing to Fear from the NIsman Affidavit and No Motive to Kill Nisman.
“The central accusation in his affidavit, made 96 times, according to press accounts, was that Kirchner and Timerman had sought to revoke the Interpol arrest warrants against the former Iranian officials.
“But Ronald K. Noble, the secretary general of Interpol for 15 years until last November, denied Nisman’s accusation. Noble declared, “I can say with 100 percent certainty, not a scintilla of doubt, that Foreign Minister Timerman and the Argentine government have been steadfast, persistent and unwavering that the Interpol’s red notices be issued, remain in effect and not be suspend or removed.”
“Noble’s denial raises an obvious question: Why would the Kirchner government, knowing that Nisman’s main claim could be easily refuted, have any reason to kill him on the eve of the presentation of his case? Why give those seeking to discredit the government’s policy on the AMIA bombing the opportunity to shift the issue from the facts of the case to the presumption of officially sponsored assassination?”
“Nisman’s suggestion that former Iranian president Abolhassen Banisadr had “direct knowledge” related to the AMIA bombings was a stunningly brazen falsehood. Banisadr had been impeached by the Iranian legislature in June 1981 and had fled to Paris the following month – 13 years before the bombing.”
“Nisman also cited the testimony of Abolghassem Mesbahi, who called himself a “defector” from the Iranian intelligence service, that Iranian officials had made such a decision sometime in August 1993. But Mesbahi was known by U.S. intelligence analysts as a “serial fabricator”, who had also told an obviously false story about Iranian involvement in the 9/11 attacks.”
The Recurring Cabal Modus Operandi
When Cornered Lash Out. When Caught in a Lie Tell another Bigger Lie.
Nisman was on holiday in Europe when he was directed to return home after a meeting in Amsterdam, a notorious stronghold of Israeli intelligence in Europe. Nisman had been given a thankless and impossible task. The framing of Iran and Hezbollah for an horrific attack they cannot possibly have conducted due to the central lie about there being a car bombing.
The lack of the car bombing was an impossible hurdle for Nisman to clear and when this became completely obvious, Nisman’s handlers decided that he was worth more to them dead than alive. In the wake of his murder there have been many shenanigans but in time the truth will out and the Argentine massacres will be seen in their true context as the beginning of a series of spectacular and deadly attacks conducted by the same group, using captured members of Law enforcement, and murdering police who don’t cooperate with the frame up or cover up that False Flag terror always requires.
The 911 Towering Inferno Myth Destroyed by Dubai Fire.
This is the real effect massive “towering inferno” style building fires have on the structure of a steel and concrete skyscraper. Nothing. This fire took place in Dubai yesterday, the building is the 88 storey (79 above the ground) 336 metre Marina Torch Hotel. and the structure is still completely intact following the massive fires. Once again the pure silliness of the Official 911 story is made abundantly clear to all with eyes.
I am reminded of the time I took “Fire training” a year or so ago. It was a very short course, only around two hours, but it was conducted by a former member of the Australian military, an Engineer. The instructor clearly seemed to accept the myths of the War on Terror because he kept referring to “Islamic extremists” as a threat.
It was funny because during the training he also mentioned specifically that as a sapper in the military they were taught that in order to destroy a large building, the underlying structure must be attacked. He stated that it was not enough even to place explosives inside a building to destroy it but the explosives had to be specifically placed inside or next to the key supporting elements of the building. Many more know the truth about 911 than have actually realised it at this point and the former Engineer seems an example of that.
The idea that setting fire to a steel and concrete skyscraper will destroy it is pure Hollywood fantasy, simply a joke.
This excellent video provides a history of “Towering Inferno” high rise fires of recent history underlining the farcicial nature of the official narrative.
9/11 In Perspective
UAE: Aftermath of colossal INFERNO at Dubai’s Torch skyscraper
UAE: Huge FIRE engulfs one of the world’s tallest residential buildings
UAE: Raging fire envelops luxury skyscraper
9/11 WTC 7 Demolition – Deep Audible Explosion Before The Penthouse Collapse
9/11: South Tower Collapse video compilation
9/11 North Tower Demolition – Profile With Good Audio
9/11/01: FDNY FLIR Footage of Twin Towers Shows Explosion Below Impact Point In the North Tower
9/11. FLIR Infrared Camera proves NIST and 9 11 Commission Lies
American Sniper, the Mahmudiyah Massacre and the Supremacist Mindset.
I first heard of Chris Kyle when there was a controversy regarding an incident involving former Governor of Minnesota, Professional Wrestler and fellow US Military Veteran Jesse Ventura. The story that Chris Kyle told was that after hearing Ventura make critical statements about the Iraq and Afghan wars he became enraged and punched Ventura and ran way, Kyle added helpfully that running away after punching someone was “as he had been trained to do. “ A US court found that Kyle’s story had defamed Ventura and awarded Ventura more than $1.8 million dollars in damages.
Chris Kyle came to prominence as the former Navy Seal sniper who boasted of having killed more than 200 citizens of Iraq.
Kyle’s boasts seemed rather lacking in gallantry, but I didn’t have to go there did I? I did not have to live with being shot at and blown up and if I had, I would probably hate the people who were doing that and want to kill them. These are normal human combat responses, the enemy is demonised to bind the group and make it easier psychologically to kill them.
I have a high degree of sympathy for the US military along with the Iraqi people as the primary victims of the Iraq war.
The death toll for the US finished at more than 4800 dead and tens of thousands were wounded, not to mention the PTSD, the suicides and all the other avoidable suffering that has flowed from this event. This was a mini Vietnam for the US military an absolute meat-grinder as they were deployed insanely as an Occupation force in the Middle East.
The young men and women who joined the US military after 911 and fought in the Iraq war had no idea at all that the attack ofSeptember 11th 2001 was a false flag conducted by Westerners. No idea that Saddam was never a threat. They had been thoroughly brainwashed their whole lives they had never heard the name Smedley Butler let alone read his work and they did not know that War is a Racket.
Like almost everyone of their age, they accepted the propaganda messages delivered throughout their lives by the entire media and cannot reasonably be blamed for having done so. By the time they realised the whole story was a cheap lie, it was too late.
This video of a speech by a US military Iraq war resister provides examples of Criminal orders that US soldiers were given in Iraq, namely that if attacked in a crowded area they should kill everyone in the area.
There is no getting around the fact that terrible crimes were committed by US forces in Iraq. Hollywood made a movie called “American Sniper” about the life and death of Chris Kyle, his name is up in lights. Stephen Green by contrast died in total obscurity, very few papers even reported on the death of Stephen Green.
Who was Stephen Green?
Stephen Green was a US soldier deployed to Iraq with the 101st Airborne Division. Stephen Green reportedly committed suicide in a US prison in February 2014. Stephen Green was serving a Life sentence without parole for leading a group of US soldiers on a rampage in the Iraqi town of Mahmudiyah that led to the gang rape and murder of a fourteen year old Iraqi girl Abeer Qassim Hamza al-Janabi and the murder of her family on March 12, 2006 . It was not a military mission, they attacked the house close to their base of their own volition, completely outside the military chain of command. Hoping to make it look like insurgents, they used an AK- 47 to murder the family of four which included a five year old girl also along with the parents and the rape victim.They shot the girl after they raped her and doused her in kerosene and set her body on fire to destroy any forensic identification.
One of the soldiers had an attack of conscience and confessed to the crime. Stephen Green had already been diagnosed with a personality disorder and had complained that he wasn’t coping.
Green was tried in a US civilian court and it seemed surprising that he avoided the Death penalty. That is the short and unpleasant story of Stephen Green and his 101st Airborne unit. I doubt that Hollywood will ever make a story of Stephen Green’s life and it would certainly make dismal viewing. It is worth mentioning that Green was remorseful for his actions, stating that, ‘I wasn’t thinking these people were humans.’ indicating that although these were extreme crimes they were enabled by a broader casual supremacism embodied in Kyle’s “savages” remark in his book that sought to deny the humanity of the Iraqi people. Green also stated before his death that he expected to face “God’s judgement.” for his appalling crime.
Mahmudiyah massacre – BBC News
The next time someone tries to tell you that Muslims are a bunch of primitive inhumane savages, it might be worth reminding them of the awful death of Abeer Qassim Hamza al-Janabi and her family.
It would be unfair to blame Americans in general or even the US military in general for the crimes of Green and his comrades, but we do that reflexively on a daily basis to Muslims do we not?
When Chris Kyle was shot to death I found his book online and tried to read it. I did not finish “American Sniper” in fact I think I made it up to about the fifth page when I found this absolute pearl and decided that there was no reason to continue as there could be no doubt that the book was the product of a very low quality intellect. This is the passage from page twelve.
“Savage, despicable evil that’s what we were fighting in Iraq. That’s why a lot of people, myself included called the enemy “savages”. There really was no other way to describe what we encountered there.”
And at that I was unable to continue. The problem here is very simple, he clearly doesn’t view the people of Iraq as being human beings, that is bad enough, but the thing that I can’t stand about this passage is that he is so wrapped up in his tribe and his identity and so deeply committed to the unspoken Western supremacism that it never occurs to him for a second to attempt to view events from the Iraqi point of view.
An intelligent person would simply imagine how the people of his hometown of Odessa and the people of Texas would react to an Iraqi Military Occupation?
If Iraq invaded USA and the Iraqi military took control of Texas and overthrew the Government of the United States would any of the people of Texas resist this turn of events? Would people in Texas cheer the Iraqi Army as they drove their tanks through their nation or might they attempt to attack the Iraqi military in order to challenge their authority and cause them to leave?
This is only an application of the Golden Rule. If it was ok for the United States to attack and occupy Iraq then it must also be valid for the Iraqis to invade and occupy the United States. Right?
The supremacist assumption that “oh well this is just how it is, we are the world bosses based on our proven superiority” is a psychopathic and immoral view of the world that will lead only to our total downfall.
Iraq after all, posed no threat to the United States, had zero involvement in the 911 or Anthrax attacks. The idea that the Iraq operation was necessary to either the US or world security is completely discredited at this stage.
The very idea that there are these people halfway across the world who must be occupied for Security reasons is really the height of evil. This is a transparent and despicable Zionist fantasy designed to legitimise the Israeli criminal policies in Occupied Palestine whist greasing the palms of the Military Industrial Complex War machine.
Tall stories a Serial Kyle vice.
In addition to his views on Iraqis, Kyle was quite the tall story teller it seems. Chris Kyle apparently had a need to exaggerate and even invent his violent exploits and killings, making two separate fantastic claims about killings he conducted in the United States. Kyle claimed (apparently proudly) that he had killed up to thirty US civilians in New Orleans in the aftermath of the Hurricane Katrina disaster of August 2005 as part of “crowd control’ operations at the New Orleans Super Dome.
From Raw Story.
.”The Real Chris Kyle Made Up A Story About Killing Dozens of People In Post-Katrina New Orleans: Kyle claimed that he killed 30 people in the chaos of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina, a story Louisiana writer Jarvis DeBerry calls “preposterous.” It shows the sort of mentality post-war Kyle had, but the claim doesn’t appear in the film. ”
Kyle also apparently invented a story about the fatal shooting of two “car-jackers” that it can be stated with near certainty did not happen. Raw Story again:
“The Real Chris Kyle Fabricated A Story About Killing Two Men Who Tried To Carjack Him In Texas: Kyle told numerous people a story about killing two alleged carjackers in Texas. Reporters tried repeatedly to verify this claim, but no evidence of it exists. ”
Chris Kyle’s status as a poster boy for the US military and Western wars is therefore another small sad sign of the moral and intellectual descent of Western civilisation under the tutelage of Hollywood and the Corporate media.
Whereas I managed to reach page twelve of “American Sniper” when reading or attempting to begin to read Adolf Hitler’s political autobiography “Mein Kampf” I actually only made it to the second paragraph when I came across this statement.
“One blood demands one Reich. Never will the German nation possess the moral right to engage in colonial politics until, at least, it embraces its own sons within a single state. Only when the Reich borders include the very last German, but can no longer guarantee his daily bread, will the moral right to acquire foreign soil arise from the distress of our own people. Their sword will become our plow, and from the tears of war the daily bread of future generations will grow.” (Source)
Although Hitler is a more superficially intellectually impressive writer than Kyle and his ghostwriters, I truly felt that there was no need to finish the book having read that.
Here is the man who is going to pretend to be the friend of the German people yet in reality he is a completely cynical, dishonest and self-aggrandising Imperialist. This is written in 1924, fifteen years before the Second World War and yet here is Adolf Hitler making it absolutely clear that his goal is to build a German empire in Europe at any cost to the German people who should suffer starvation and misery in order to get them in the right “frame of mind” for the German Imperial European Crusade.
It is chilling to read these words and to understand that tens of millions of people died in the pursuit of the “greater Germany” Imperial vision.
“Only when the Reich borders include the very last German, but can no longer guarantee his daily bread, will the moral right to acquire foreign soil arise from the distress of our own people. Their sword will become our plow, and from the tears of war the daily bread of future generations will grow.”
I believe in evaluating historical political leaders against their stated goals and the actual results.
Mein Kampf, and Hitler’s speeches are full of romantic blather about the “German people”. Hitler claimed to represent the German people and the promotion of the German nation many many times.
So it seems that the fate of the German people and nation is a valid criteria for judging the Hitler career.
The results of the Third Reich and Hitler on the German people and the German state were unambiguously disastrous.
When Hitler left power the German nation was under the control of the Soviet Union and the Western powers. The Russian Army were in Berlin. The conquering Soviet Army embarked on a campaign of rape that saw millions of German women raped at the end of the war according to mainstream historian Anthony Beevor.
This is what happened to the German people and the treasured “German blood” thanks to Hitler’s adventurism and megalomania. It cost more than 4 million German soldiers lives also in order to achieve total defeat in a war that the Germans started that left upwards of fifty million people dead including more than 7 million German citizens in total.
Where are the good parts with this Adolf Hitler, some nifty propaganda films perhaps? A couple of keynote speeches that worked well?
Hitler fans propose that he was the enemy of the Bankers. History indicates that Hitler and the Nazi party were a Wall Street supported and sponsored project from the very early days. Hitler does not seem to be the enemy of the Bankers, he seems to be their agent, albeit presumably unwitting.
The big lie is not that Hitler was a negative and evil individual but more that there was a huge moral gap between Hitler and the other leaders of the war in Japan, the UK, the United States and Russia.
The US air force murdered 100,000 Japanese civilians in a single night of bombing Tokyo. The Japanese government at the time was a wicked Government that had committed numerous war crimes, especially in Manchuria, China, but that really doesn’t begin to make killing 100,000 Japanese civilians in a single bombing raid alright does it? If this is not a War crime then the term has no meaning.
The big omission from the World War 2 narrative is the way the USA made a deal with numerous senior Nazi officials who were exported to the US and assumed important roles in US scientific, military and intelligence circles. The Third Reich was not defeated but more absorbed into the US Empire. It is worth remembering that one Wall Street oligarch punished in US courts for assisting the Nazis during the war was the father of George H. W Bush (US President from 1989-1993) Prescott Bush
It shouldn’t be forgotten that Germany was split in two for more than forty years after Hitler’s demise. He was simply a cataclysmic figure in the history of the German nation and the German people both of which Hitler saw simply as vehicles for his Imperial mania and delusions of grandeur.
Mein Kampf is more the work of the angry young man than the full fledged monster .Although the monster is present. “Jews are not humans” we are told by the probable product of an illegitimate Rothschild heir. (If Hitler was a Rothschild heir this would be racially a meaningless distinction we now know, European Jews are racially identical to other Europeans, there is no Jewish race and never was in Europe. Jews are a Religious and Cultural group misunderstood as being racially distinct historically, so although the genetic difference is irrelevant, the man who was happy to openly declare Jews “non-humans” must have burned with rage and shame at this terrible secret.)
Hitler clearly was not the saviour of Germany and all the beneficiaries of Hitler’s career were not Germans.The Wars never help the people who are expected to fight them, only the backroom boys. It is one of those cliches that bears repeating until people realise that all the tribal divisions are control tools designed to enable the easy manipulation of the people by a power elite who are apparently completely committed to war and chaos under any pretext. Men like Kyle and Hitler are simply infused with whatever myths are required to get them to perform their assigned role in the cycle of destruction. It is sad to see so many people still buy supremacist nonsense in the West today and the results of this mindset have done nothing but bring misery to the world and will continue to do so as long as they persist.
Officially the Boston Bombings were twin bomb attacks that targeted spectators at the Boston Marathon at 3pm on April 15th, 2013 leaving three dead and 264 injured including numerous amputees. In fact the Boston Bombings were two bomb attacks that did not happen. The Boston bombings were a psychological warfare operation conducted against the citizens of the US and the world by the US government (or elements therein) and the Corporate media. The Boston Bombings are probably the most thoroughly documented hoax event in modern human history.
The idea that something so upsetting could be completely fabricated is rather confronting. So I will first prove that the incident coincided with a publicly announced drill and was therefore not possibly an authentic terror attack.
This video makes that clear.
Boston Bombing THIS IS A DRILL Announcement Heard Live
We actually hear the announcements, supporting the witness statements to the same thing. The drill was announced for Boysten Street, outside the library, at 3.00pm, the exact time and place of the detonation. The fact that it was a drill was announced just prior to the detonations so there can be no mistake. The detonation was part of a drill.
How Do We Know It was Not a Real Bombing Attack?
Once we understand that the event cannot possibly have been an authentic terror attack, we can take a closer look and discover specifically what type of manufactured event took place.
All the footage, and there is hours and hours of footage indicates that the Boston bombings were a drill sold as a live event. The footage shows multiple signs of fraud and no signs of authenticity. Everything, all the blood and all the wounds are not authentic. It is actually a less malign conclusion to make than that it was a real false flag terror attack- that the drill went “live” as so many have previously done.
The Boston bombings failed badly and will be exposed because despite the complexity of the operation and the audacity of the plot, the whole Operation seems to have been predicated on the idea that there is no internet and no way to record television because any and all scrutiny of the footage makes it absolutely clear that the event was entirely false and staged and the only victims of this event are the Tsarnaev brothers and their associates.
All of the footage depicts a live action simulated event, none of the footage depicts an actual bombing attack. We have fake dismembered limbs falling off and being re-attached mid event. Stage dust being openly distributed over the scene. Fake blood is shown being applied and many empty fake blood containers are visible. Any of the footage can be viewed and all the footage reveals the same thing.
The Boston Bombings were one of the most ambitious and audacious psychological operations ever conducted, a truly grand deception with real flair shown in the positioning of multiple patsies at the scene and the use of hundreds of people.
It was a very elegant tactical move and I admit I was absolutely thrown by the fact that this event was an actual hoax for a long time. I just couldn’t believe it. I mean these are public events. You’d need hundreds of people right? They had hundreds of people and of course the ever reliable controlled media are still the reliably corrupt authors of our consensus reality.
The use of the Craft International mercenaries to create a “false flag“ within a hoax and make people chase the twin red herrings was another neat innovation.The average false flag researcher is going to see the Tsarnaev brothers being framed, is shown the photos of the mercenaries with their Caps with the sinister looking skull and immediately blame them. Therefore creating a completely false argument between the conventional people who blame the Tsarnaev’s falsely, and the “conspiracy theorists” who will all blame the Craft International mercenaries, also falsely, missing the important fact that close scrutiny of the bombings indicate that far from being an actual terrorist atrocity conducted by the Tsarnaev brothers, Craft International or any of the other usual suspects the bombings were simply a made for television event.
A big smoke bomb and a huge cast of crisis actors. It sounds mad and it is, but unfortunately this was a hoax and the trial of Dhokar Tsarnaev is an absolute travesty. Just another sad reminder that the days of the rule of law operating in the United States are long gone. That allegation can’t be applied to every court or every jurisdiction but it is broadly true.
They actually used amputee crisis actors to simulate the effects of a bombing massacre. They had crisis actor people there to offer fake assistance to fake victims and tell childish stories to gladden and warm the wounded hearts of the American people., bosses to direct the minions, fake blood, fake dust. It is really incredible the audacity of this event where they staged a drill and sold it as a real event using a multitude of crisis actors. All together playing a role.
It worked, at least temporarily, almost everyone believes it really happened and was thus a terrible tragedy.
The Real Victims of the Boston hoax.
Two people have died in relation to this event. Tamerlan Tsanaev and Igrahim Todashev. Both deaths in the custody of US Law Enforcement.
Several Tsarnaev associates and family members have also been imprisoned already on spurious and nonsensical charges.Real tragedies. Now Dhokar, who returned to his dorm on the night of the bombings and acted as if nothing had happened. Faces the possibility of being the third real victim in this psychopathic American stage show. It is astonishing, I pinch myself. I mean stories of injustice are not uncommon. Innocent people have been executed by US courts, 100%, it has been proven by students at Columbia Law School. But I have never heard of someone actually facing a possible death sentence for murders that simply did not occur. It’s a new low. Such madness makes me foolishly think that we must be reaching the end of something. For better or worse this cannot last. They are building their house in quicksand, it’s madness and it almost seems almost as if they are working towards a specific deadline. The pieces seem to be falling into place for a massive attack on the United States to be blamed on IS conducted by the “rogue network” in order to achieve the “complete 911 reset” that they believe they need in order to really move the tyranny agenda towards it’s logical totalitarian conclusion.
Uncle Ruslan Tsarni deserves special mention in this case. He stands out as a villain of the utmost wickedness and a traitor to both his family and humanity. For him, with the CIA father in Law to stand up as he did and claim that the Tsarnaev brothers should “seek forgiveness” for their actions was a low point in the history of human disloyalty. The one who should be seeking forgiveness is of course, the despicable Uncle Ruslan, What a sad excuse for a human being is Uncle Ruslan. But he is not alone. The Boston crew includes a number of the most wicked liars the world has ever been cursed to experience.
The unbelievably silly comedian and fake hero Carlos Arredondo is hard to surpass. The man with the fake “wetback” accent, the US flag draped in fake blood he held is a potent symbol of the truth of this event. The Red Cross id card around his neck one of those way too cute little touches. Why would a spectator at a major event possibly feel the need to bring along his Red Cross id card?
People get especially upset when it is claimed that an event that has made a clear and understandable emotional impact did not take place. The funny thing is that the truth is actually a less horrendous story than any of the consensus reality myths that revolve around the assumption that a real bombing attack took place in Boston.
Dhokar Tsarnaev is not receiving appropriate or honest legal counsel as is his legal right. Tsarnaev is effectively being engaged by two Prosecutors, and one of them has a Legal obligation to defend Tsarnaev to the best of their ability or remove themselves from the case.
It must be understood that the Defence Lawyer has a responsibility both to the Client and to the Court to provide honest and strenuous representation of all clients. It is an essential component of the integrity of the adversarial Legal system. It has nothing to do with anyone’s opinion of the defendant or anything like that. Any defence lawyer with a scintilla of integrity would choose to defend Tsanaev on the basis that
a) There is no evidence he conducted the bombing attack and (more importantly)
b)The bombing attack did not happen as literally thousands of anomalies conclusively and unmistakably prove. What defense could be more powerful than that the crime did not take place?
They do not even have to prove 100% it was a hoax in Court for Tsarnaev to escape conviction, they only have to meet the threshold of reasonable doubt.
This is the chance to get an innocent defendant exonerated of Capital offenses, a triumph that a Lawyer could build a big career around.
I assume that it doesn’t even matter and that elements of the US “National Security State” would step in if anyone tried to offer honest representation.
If Tsarnaev was allowed to have a lawyer the entire project would collapse of course, it is simply unthinkable. The fix is in and he is receiving no defense worthy of the name. Whatever is even left of this young man inside the prison just needs to try and stay alive and have faith that the obvious truth will emerge at some point in the future. Burning down the lives of innocents and dupes is pretty much what the”lads(and lasses)”of the Empire do best. This is really their staple and it is almost impossible to envisage Dhokar Tsarnaev being exonerated at this time.
The West Texas Fertilizer Plant Missile Attack.
Two days after the Boston Bombing Hoax, two days shy of the 20th anniversary of the bloody end to the Waco siege, just 20 miles to the north of Waco and while the Boston patsies were still being framed/sought there was a very real Terrorist attack in the United States that left at least fifteen people dead and for which no-one has ever been sought.
At first and even second glance, an explosion at a Fertilizer Plant seems like a common place and semi-natural event. To suggest otherwise was dismissed at first glance by most people as being “too wacky” to contemplate.
The problem is that the footage of the attack has several strong indications that the plant was struck by a missile, If the flash of orange entering the frame from the left were all, that would just be an anomaly, but the sound of the missile can be heard very clearly on all three video recordings of the strike.
Fertilizer Plant Explosion – All 3 Angles
A high pitched whistling sound can be heard very clearly followed by a distinctive “whip crack” and the sound is identical to that of a missile strike from a weapon such as the J DAM (Joint Direct Attack Munition), the two sounds can be compared side by side.
It is very hard to fathom what motive anyone would have for conducting this attack or whom may have been responsible. The only semi-clue at face value being the proximity to Waco and the closeness to the date of the Waco massacre 20th anniversary.
It would be a reasonable assumption that the weapons and their delivery platform belong to the US military, it’s hard to get around that as at least a working assumption. Whether these tools were seized and deployed by some “rogue network” inside or outside the Government is unclear. It is a pretty troubling event and I have no real idea who did this, or even why they did it. Beyond an amorphous and intuitive idea that the “Dark Elite” may have been celebrating their previous success at Waco with an “unfriendly reminder’ of their capabilities.
There was one very interesting single source story that proposed to at least begin to explain the motives for this attack, The story relates to the claim that the 911 attack was conducted using small Nuclear weapons and that the Nuclear weapons used in the attack were requisitioned from an American store by an organised crime group. Stolen from a US military storage facility and transported out of the USA. The single source claims that there are witnesses sitting in sealed Grand Juries who claim to have transported the stolen Nuclear weapons. W54 plutonium pits, and the claim is that 350 were stolen sometime between 1988 and 1998.
One of the places the weapons were stored prior to being smuggled out of the United States it is claimed, was the West Texas Fertilizer Plant.The path that is described is this. From the Pantex facility in Amarillo Texas, onto West Texas in freezer trucks, then to Houston Port and onto the Canary Islands. From the Canary Islands to a Mauritania Iron mine and from the Mauritania Iron mIne to Tel Aviv.
The names and groups mentioned are Victor Bout, imprisoned Russian Arms merchant, the Bush family and Israeli intelligence. Every single source story must be viewed with extreme caution obviously but this is an interesting story and simply the only thing close to an explanation for the madness in West Texas on April 17th, 2013. I cannot confirm this story and do not claim that it is correct.
It is beyond me why anyone would choose to store such an item in a Fertilizer Plant. Even if that story is accepted at face value from the single source, it still doesn’t really explain why it would be attacked, although I suppose that intimidation, a ruthless display of force and power and even the possible destruction of evidence are possible motives. Another very interesting thing is that the West Texas blast created a very classic mushroom cloud.This doesn’t prove anything alone, but it is very interesting that the aftermath resembles the aftermath of a nuclear attack and if the site were attacked with a small nuclear device, commonly deployed by several Western Military forces for several years it would render any past Nuclear footprint at the site, caused by for example, a bunch of stored Nuclear weapons forensically irrelevant. If this story is correct, as seems at least possible, this was the 911 perps destroying a crime scene that could be traced back to them and showing their general displeasure at continued speculation about 911 and the various US Government investigations into the event and the real perpetrators which appear to be ongoing in a kind of parallel Legal stasis.
These are two very unhappy stories and what they say about the system of Justice in the United States is beyond troubling. At the heart of the Empire not only truth but reality itself has been subsumed and overtaken. Until the authorities choose to say that a terror attack has happened, it didn’t happen and conversely if the US government decides that a terror attack happened and people were killed, you’d better believe it regardless of the facts and be grateful you are not rotting in prison on concocted charges like Dhokar and his friends Khairullozhon Matanov and Dias Kadyrbayev or his sister Ailina Tsarnaeva.