MH17: the Life and Death of a Psyop.

The cockpit area reconstructed to show the area targeted.
The cockpit area reconstructed to show the area targeted.

August 8th, 2014.

MH17: the Life and Death of a Psyop.

Cockpit-MH017

The loss of 298 lives when flight MH17 crashed in the Eastern Ukraine was an immense human tragedy. What followed without delay from the Western media and politicians has been an absolute farce and a complete disgrace. They have humiliated themselves and revealed themselves to be nothing more than zombie cheerleaders, drones without any pretensions of intelligent or critical thought, baying for blood, making absolutely ridiculous claims based on zero evidence and essentially engaging in a conversation of pure fantasy.

It is too early to state conclusively what caused the Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 to crash on July 17th. The funny thing is that the entire Australian media knew the whole story on day one, which was the 18th of July here. (the incident actually happened at 1am Australian time on the 18th of July.)

On the 18th of July, the entire (and I mean entire) Australian media and most of the Western media along with Australian Prime Minister, Tony Abbott, stated with supreme confidence that MH17 had been downed by a Buk1 ( SA 11) anti-Aircraft missile and that Eastern Separatists rebels, (helpfully known simply as Pro-Russian rebels by good old Controlled Media) were the culprits.

Part 1. Lie first. Lie hard. Lie in Unison.

Tony Abbott MH17 Press Conference (July 18, 2014)

It was the Australian Prime Minister who set the tone at his afternoon Press conference on the 18th. Here are some of the key quotes. “It is highly probable that MH17 was shot down by a Pro-Russian militia controlled surface to air missile.” and “So it was shot down, over Russian backed rebel controlled territory by what appears to be a Russian backed rebel missile.” This is by the 50 second mark he has claimed twice to know what happened and who did it. This is fewer than 24 hours after the event.

Given the opening, it is rather strange that he adds at the three minute mark that. “It is absolutely essential that there be a fair, thorough and impartial international investigation.”

Later he moves onto a discussion about the contacts between the Australian Government and Russian diplomats. :”I have to tell you that, uh, that the initial response of the Russian ambassador was to blame the Ukraine for this. And I have to say that this is deeply, deeply unsatisfactory. “ Classic Western spin here, the Russians are essentially doing exactly the same thing as he is doing, stating their belief in a scenario that sits with their interests. (Except the Russians are expressing their views privately Abbott is broadcasting his views to the world.). When others behave as we do and we describe their behaviour as “deeply unsatisfactory” rank hypocrisy is revealed. The hypocrisy of Western supremacism.

“I want to say to the Australian people that as far as I am concerned when you have a situation where Russian backed rebels appear to have killed Australians using, it may well turn out to be, Russian supplied heavy weaponry. Australia takes a very dim view indeed and we want the fullest possible investigation.”

One member of the media (Denis Shanahan of the Australian)) opines that the PM is using slightly harsher language than other world leaders in relation to the culpability of Russian backed troops and asks “Do you have any particular reason for doing so?

The Prime Minister’s response is to present an entirely circular argument that has absolutely no evidence to sustain it. All he is able to offer is the insulting and ridiculous assertion that the fact the plane crashed in a rebel held area meant that only the rebels could be involved. All wrapped in the blatant lie that they “knew” that the Plane was shot down by a SAM. How did they know? What evidence did they have beyond supporting the “goodies” and opposing the “baddies”? Zilch. Absolutely nothing. Zero. Everything Abbott said on July 18th was evidence only of his mendacity, dishonesty and despicable opportunism. The journalist was told to shut up and cheer-lead like the rest of the media zombies. Only more politely.

PM Abbott “ Well this aircraft didn’t come down through accident. It was shot down. It did not crash,it was downed” he reiterates helpfully. “and it was downed in territory controlled by Russian backed rebels.”

This has been the PM’s “heroic” claim that he has used to dodge the fact that he was actually speaking nonsense , and acting as a base propagandist on behalf of his Western handlers. and the deaths of so many Australians provided him with a wonderful chance to “earn his stripes” with the big men of the Empire without risk of consequence. The Russia-Australia relationship is not important to Australia, China, on the other hand is Australia’s largest trading partner. So the Australian PM is severely constrained when it comes to promoting anti-Chinese propaganda.

The claim about the Plane crashing in “Rebel held” areas in unbelievably pitiful. Given that these systems are capable of engaging targets at a distance of up to 40 kilometres (25 miles), the Eastern rebels only control tiny pockets of land and the Ukraine military have the same weapons systems. This claim is so pathetic a seven year old child could see through it. He’s implicitly asking us to believe that anti-Aircraft systems only engage objects directly overhead! Brilliant!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buk_missile_system

PM Abbott in Parliament “Malaysian Airlines MH17 has been shot down over the Eastern Ukraine.it seems by Russian backed rebels.” “We owe it as well to the families of the dead to find out exactly what has happened and exactly who was responsible. As things stand, this looks less like an accident than a crime. I want to repeat this, as things stand, this looks less like an accident than a crime.”

This is tremendous stuff. I love the way he repeats the “Not an accident but a crime ” line twice. It’s one of the stupidest statements a human has ever uttered on the surface of this planet because shooting down a plane and killing 298n people is a crime whether or not it was an accident. The distinction is totally nonsensical.

Synchronised and unanimous adoption of he Government claims by the Australian media indicate that there is no Australian media worthy of the name. These people cannot possibly be as unintelligent as they act. They are apparently conditioned not to use their critical faculties. This is a choice they make. Ignorance is regarded as a virtue in Australia and they want to fit in.

Channel 7. 4 pm bulletin.

“Good afternoon. Now the Foreign Minister has just finished a meeting with the Russian ambassador about the extent of Russia’s involvement in this plane being shot down. Now she asked the Ambassador directly did Russia have any role in this plane being shot down?. The ambassador denied it completely. Saying Russia had no involvement whatsoever.”

Channel 10 5pm

“Good evening. From the minute we woke this morning, and from every moment since the news has only got (sic) worse. Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was shot down by a missile over Eastern Ukraine…We’ll also investigate who fired the shot, as International fury finds it’s focus on Russia… and somewhere amidst the wreckage lies microscopic evidence of a surface to air missile. Evidence (sic) that could prove irrefutable evidence of who exactly triggered this atrocity.”

Evidence might prove to be evidence. Thank you Channel Ten.

Channel 9. 6pm

“Good evening. It’s been a day of anger, mystery and sorrow. The shooting down of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17.over Ukraine…but who fired the missile?”

Channel 9. During Friday Night Football “A Boeing 777 was blown out of the sky. Over Ukraine. Shot down by a Surface to Air Missile.” Later. “Investigators from around the world are now working to determine who launched the missile that took MH17 down. Tonight the blame is resting on Russian backed rebels in Eastern Ukraine. But Moscow is also under fire. Questions are also being raised about why the aircraft was flying over dangerous Ukrainian airspace.”

We don’t know who did it so we have decided to blame the Russians for the time being. Thank you.

MH17 Tragedy | ABC News NSW | Opener – (18.07.2014) – YouTube

The Australian Broadcasting Corporation changed it’s program schedule on the 18th of July 2014. Instead of each State and Territory receiving their own individual 30 minute 7PM news,a single National News was imposed across the entire nation. It was only six seconds after the hour, six seconds into their coverage that the Australian Broadcasting Corporation anchor, Scott Bevan announced with absolutely no ambiguity, that MH17 had been downed by a missile.

“Hello, I am Scott Bevan. Welcome to this special edition of ABC News on the day a missile brought down a passenger plane over Ukraine.“ He continues, “Australia, along with the rest of the world is in shock and mourning after a passenger plane carrying 298 people was shot down by a missile over the Ukraine.”

Part 2.

Kerry, the Russians and Matt Lee of AP. Everything Falls Apart.

July 20th.
vlcsnap-2014-08-06-20h04m08s67
Secretary of State Kerry Enters the Fray.

It became obvious in 2013 that the State department remains a stronghold for Neoconservatives within the US Government. Many other parts of the Executive Branch, from the President to the Defence Secretary and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of staff are no longer staffed by warmongers with any real verve for the information campaign required to start a war based on false premises.

These days, when it comes to starting the Empire’s wars, the State Department is required to do the “heavy lifting” in terms of delivering the right “big lie” at the right time. IN Libya, they succeeded, in Syria they failed.

Kerry:the Humanitarian Bonesman
Kerry:the Humanitarian Bonesman

Towards this end, US Secretary of State appeared on all of the five major US Sunday talkshows in order to make the case that the Plane was downed by the rebels. Speaking on CNN, Kerry was unequivocal.

“We have enormous input about this that points fingers,” Kerry told CNN’s State of the Union. “It is pretty clear that this was a system from Russia, transferred to separatists. We know with confidence that the Ukrainians did not have such a system anywhere near the vicinity at that point of time.” He follows with : “We know because we observed it by imagery that at the moment of the shootdown we detected a launch from that area,” he said. “Our trajectory shows that it went to the aircraft. “

Here we have a number of powerful claims. Unfortunately,  it must be concluded that  the claims made in these quotes are not supported by the known facts. Kerry stated that “the Ukrainians did not have such a system anywhere near the vicinity at that point in time.”  The problem here is that the Russian military have presented credible data, satellite photo’s that show that Ukrainian military Buk1 missile systems were stationed close to Donetsk on July 17th.

Malaysian Airlines plane crash: Russian military unveil data on MH17 incident over Ukraine (FULL)

July 21st Russian Defence Ministry Briefing.

Obviously in a situation like this, information that comes from any and all interested parties should be treated with scepticism. The Russians are involved in this situation, therefore that applies to them. One very interesting thing about the Russian military presentation was that it displays a high level of discipline when compared with what has been on offer from the propagandists of the West. The Russians do not claim that the Ukrainian missile battery destroyed the plane, nor that the military jet in the area was responsible. They merely state that these items were present in the area at the time of the incident and imply that they may have attacked the jet without actually making any direct accusations.

It was Kerry’s second assertion that really gave the game away. Kerry made a very big mistake when he stated that, “We know because we observed it by imagery that at the moment of the shootdown we detected a launch from that area,”

Pay close attention to the exact words. “We know because we observed it by imagery….we detected a launch from that area.” There can be no doubt that Kerry is stating that they have photographic evidence of the launch of the missile that hit MH17.

These comments were made on Sunday July the 20th. Nineteen days ago. There is no doubt that if these images exist, they would be valuable evidence in support of the narrative the US is trying to sell. Yet, nigh on three weeks after Kerry made these claims. We have not seen one frame. Not one photograph. Absolutely nothing. This fact alone makes it very obvious that the “imagery” Kerry described was always a work of fiction, presumably of his own invention. No other conclusion is possible. The reason we have not seen the “imagery’ is that it never existed, and the reason it never existed is that the Eastern rebels did not shoot the Plane down with a Buk1 missile system. One very telling and little remarked upon claim emerged in the Russian military briefing was that the US had a Satellite over the area of the incident at the time of the incident. The Russians can only have made this statement if they were absolutely confident that their allies did not destroy the plane with a missile. They are saying, the USA knows what happened, they have the evidence.

Marie Harf in the Briefing Room.
Marie Harf in the Briefing Room.

Matt Lee, AP journalist is impossible to miss when viewing State Department Press briefings. He’s a real obstacle to the State Department propaganda machine, and although always polite and respectful, Lee has developed a highly adversarial relationship with a series of State Department spokespeople. The role was occupied by the esteemed Victoria Nuland prior to Jen Psaki assuming the role. Of recent times this post has been filled by Deputy Spokesperson Marie Harf T he State Department briefings are supposed to be a forum for the State Department to deliver a propaganda message to a group of committed lackeys who will accept everything at face value and transmit the desired message to the world without question. Matt Lee’s frequent questions and interjections ruin the whole thing. He always asks questions. Shows a very disappointing irreverence towards authority and refuses to be cowed when the Spokesperson attempts to brow beat him into submission.

Matt Lee in the Briefing Room.
Matt Lee in the Briefing Room.

State Department Briefing, July 21st, 2014.

‘Anything other than social media?’ State Dept’s MH17 evidence secret”

Daily Press Briefing – July 21, 2014

The strange thing is that the people at the State Department must have known that Matt Lee would attend this briefing and ask his usual thoughtful and sceptical questions, yet when Marie Harf stepped into that room. She had absolutely nothing to offer beyond, “believe us because we said so.”

The contrast between the the US press and their zombiefied and mindlessly obedient Australian counterparts is stark indeed. The Transcript of this briefing indicates that there are real journalists capable of independent thought active in the US mainstream. I have used the State Department transcript,it doesn’t identify the other journalists who also ask questions at the end. (Almost all of the questions in this transcript are from Matt Lee.)

Initially the State Department spokesperson confidently built on the claims Secretary of State John Kerry made the previous day.

Marie Harf: “There is a preponderance of evidence at this point both sort of out there in the public domain and also from our information that points to the fact that there was a SA-11 launched from separatist-controlled territory. We assess, of course, that the Russian-backed separatists have this system, and one of the main reasons we have called for a full investigation is so we can get all the facts out there.

So what I encourage the Russians to do at this point is to push the separatists that are backed by their government to allow access, to allow investigators who are in Ukraine waiting to go into that area right now, and that’s what I would call on Russia to do at this point.

Matt Lee: Right. But what they’re saying is that you should – they’ve put their – what they have out on the table, or at least they say they have done that.

Marie Harf: Well, I haven’t seen any of that. Again, we’ve made an assessment based on a broad range of information. We know this was fired from Russian-controlled territory. It is our assessment, very strong assessment this was an SA-11 that we know the Russian-backed separatists have. We, again, continue to gather more information and call —

QUESTION: Okay.

Marie Harf: — on Russia to push the separatists to allow for a full investigation.

QUESTION: How is it exactly that you know that it was fired from Russian – I mean, from separatist-held territory?

Marie Harf: Well, we have a great deal of information that the Secretary laid out yesterday, and I can go back through some of it today. But we do know first that Russian-backed separatists were in possession of an SA-11 system as early as Monday, July 14th. This is from intercepts of separatist communications posted on YouTube by the Ukrainian Government.

QUESTION: Well, is there anything – okay, is there anything other – because there’s other —

Marie Harf: I can keep going if – or you want to jump in.

QUESTION: Well, is there stuff that’s other than social media that you’re talking —

Marie Harf: Yes, absolutely. There is.

QUESTION: Okay. So what is it that’s other than social media?

Marie Harf: At this point, Matt, we’ve said what our assessment is, very strong assessment publicly. If there’s more information that that’s based on that we can share, we’re happy to do so. We’ll continue looking at that. But look, this is what we know as of right now. Based on open information which is basically common sense, right – we know where it was fired from, we know who has this weapon – backed up —

QUESTION: Well, I don’t —

Marie Harf: — backed up —

QUESTION: — I mean, it’s disputed, though.

Marie Harf: — backed up by a host of information that we have gathered about who did this, where it came from, and what the weapon system was. So one of – we’re just telling you what we know now.

QUESTION: Right, right. But —

Marie Harf: One of the reasons we’ve called on Russia to push the separatists it backs into an investigation is so we can get all the facts. Instead of holding press briefings and making statements, maybe the Russian Government should call on the separatists they support to allow an actual investigation.

QUESTION: Right. But that’s what you’ve done. You’ve held press – well, Security Council meetings and going —

Marie Harf: Well, we don’t have leverage with the separatists. I would say the Russians do and they’re not using it. So let’s have them use it.

QUESTION: Well, okay. But I mean, I think we’re talking at cross-purposes here. I’m asking you —

Marie Harf: It wouldn’t be the first time.

QUESTION: (Laughter.) No, that’s true. What I’m asking – I mean, there are social – all you’re willing to present publicly that backs up your version of the story, which may well be the correct version of the story, but all you have —

Marie Harf (clearly aghast interjects sarcastically) “May well be.”

Matt Lee: (completely misses the sarcasm and soldiers on) Well, it may well be. But I don’t know because I haven’t seen your evidence that shows that the missile was launched from rebel-held territory. But you’re saying – so the only thing you’re willing to put out publicly is the social media accounts, I mean the social media stuff.

Marie Harf: That’s part of it.

QUESTION: Right. But there are social media accounts that says – that disputes that or that claims to present a different version. So are you saying —

Marie Harf: What would that version be, Matt?

QUESTION: Well, I don’t – there are many, many theories.

Marie Harf: Any —

QUESTION: But you’re saying that all of those accounts —

Marie Harf: Most of which are completely illogical, I would point out.

QUESTION: Well, but all of the accounts that do not support your version of events are wrong —

Marie Harf: No.

QUESTION: — and all of the ones that do support it are right? Is that what you’re saying?

Marie Harf: Look, we make assessments based on a variety of intelligence and a variety of information, some of which we can talk about publicly and some of which we can’t.

QUESTION: Well, is the – are you —

Marie Harf: And we also – and look, if you just take a step back, right, we need there to be an investigation so we can get all the facts, period. But on top of that, we have public information, which is, of course, the easiest for us to talk about —

QUESTION: Right.

Marie Harf: — of the separatists bragging about having the system, bragging about the attack that took place, and then walking back from it when it became known that it was a passenger jet. I would ask people who don’t believe our assessment to say, “Okay, what other possible explanation could be – could there be for that?” They defy logic, right?

QUESTION: Well, I don’t know if it defies logic or not, but —

Marie Harf: So when you start from a place of you have separatists out on – again, this is the easiest piece of information for us to talk about – online bragging about it, start there and then work from there and work from all of the evidence we have that we are confident we know where it was fired from, we’re confident we know what it was, and it points in a certain direction. Again, we would encourage Russia to support an investigation if they don’t believe the facts.

QUESTION: Right. It points in a certain direction, but I’m not sure it would stand up to an international —

Marie Harf I strongly disagree. I absolutely believe that it would.

QUESTION: — investigation. Well, are you willing, if not at this moment in time now but soon, to put forward the intel that you say backs the claims that were made on social media? And in particular, it seems to me that the Secretary was very definitive, as you were just now, at saying that you know for sure 100 percent —

Marie Harf: I didn’t say 100 percent. Nothing is 100 percent in any world, Matt. But go ahead. It is our assessment, very strong assessment.

QUESTION: Okay, very strong assessment that the rocket – that the missile was fired from the rebel-held territory.

Marie Harf: Mm-hmm.

QUESTION: And I mean, you can’t – there is no social media that I’m aware of that would lead to —

Marie Harf: Well, at the time that MH17 flight dropped out of contact, we detected a surface-to-air —

QUESTION: Yes.

Marie Harf: — missile launch from a separatist-controlled area in south-eastern Ukraine.

QUESTION: Yeah.

Marie Harf: Which we believe was an SA-11. What you want is the intelligence that underlies that?

QUESTION: Yeah. Well, I mean, they – the Russians have challenged – I’m not – I’m just saying the Russians have said —

Marie Harf: I’m just trying to clarify the question.

QUESTION: — have said we’ve shown – we’ve put out our radar images which show this Ukrainian plane near at least – well, they have. I mean —

Marie Harf: Right.

QUESTION: Why don’t you put out your –

Cornered, Marie Harf retreats behind the National Security veil in a really sad manner. It stands as a profound admission of defeat and this marks the point at which this psychological operation began to rapidly collapse. Things really go downhill from that point. Soon, some of the other journalsts begin to ask difficult and troubling questions to which the State Department have no good answer.

Marie Harf: Well, unfortunately, I don’t have original declassification authority, Matt. But —

QUESTION: Okay. Is —

Marie Harf: Wait, let me finish. But look, we have endeavoured to make public as much information as possible. Obviously, if you’re dealing with an intelligence assessment in part, we are sometimes limited in what information we can share. That’s why I think you saw the Secretary speak much more forward-leaning about why we believe this and how we believe it.

QUESTION: Right.

Marie Harf Sometimes you can’t get into all the specifics. We endeavour to put as many out as possible. We’re continuing to see if we can do more.

QUESTION: Okay.

Marie Harf: I will say that.

QUESTION: So okay —

Marie Harf: Yes, we are —

QUESTION: So there is a possibility —

Marie Harf: I can’t promise you anything, but we’re continuing to see.

QUESTION: There is —

Marie Harf: And I would also say that the Russian Government has a long history during this conflict of misinformation and propaganda that they’ve put out, so I would take anything they say about this with a very large grain of salt.

QUESTION: Well, okay. But I mean, the problem – are you committing now to at least doing – that the intel community is doing its best to declassify stuff that they can put out and at least end the conflicting claims put forward by both the U.S. —

Marie Harf: Well, I would say that the Administration in general is attempting to put out as much information as we can about what underlies our assessment. I would also say that these aren’t competing narratives from two equally credible sources here. The Russian Government has repeatedly put out misinformation and propaganda throughout this conflict in Ukraine, so I would caution you from saying that this is just two equally credible sources.

QUESTION: Well, all right.

Marie Harf: Although you’re happy to report it that way.

QUESTION: No, I just —

Marie Harf: But I would take issue with it.

QUESTION: Well, I mean, again, you might be right, but I don’t see how you can say that everything we say is right and everything the Russians say is a lie.

Marie Harf: That’s not what I said.

QUESTION: That’s exactly what you just said right now.

Marie Harf: That’s not what I said. I said I would say that we are not two credible – equally credible parties when it comes to what we say publicly about the conflict in Ukraine.

(This is the point things really break down, this is the real highlight amusement wise)

QUESTION: And your argument would be that the U.S. is more credible than the Russians are, right? Is that what you’re —

Marie Harf: I’m not even dignifying that question with a response.

(I’ve never attended “spin school” but I am certain that spinmeisters are trained never ever to make comments such as “I’m not even dignifying that with a response.” The idea is to project calm, knowledgeable authority and never ever to lose your cool even slightly. That ruins everything, creates entirely the wrong impression. I’m not seeking to beat up on Ms.Harf she is in an impossible situation due to her boss the Secretary of State’s comments on the previous day. and things go so wrong because she lacks the ability to tell outrageous lies and back them up with the right style of intimidation to seal the deal. She is too nice a person for the role,too human) )

QUESTION: Well, I mean —

QUESTION: Marie, did you see the —

QUESTION: But you’re leaving that impression, Marie.

Marie Harf: That we’re more credible? Yes. We don’t put out mass amounts of propaganda. We don’t put out misinformation about what’s happening there repeatedly over the course of this conflict, which I’ve spoken about from this podium day after day. Absolutely.

QUESTION: But can you tell us —

QUESTION: The problem with that is is that all of 2002 and the beginning of 2003 was propaganda and misleading information that was put out by the United States.

Marie Harf: Okay, Matt. I’m sure that’s a tempting historical analogy to make, but it in no way impacts at all how we are doing this assessment or what we’re doing.

QUESTION: Okay.

Marie Harf: And maybe someday you’ll finally stop using that as a straw man all the time.

QUESTION: It’s a —

FEMALE JOURNALIST: Well Marie, one of the big things is showing evidence.

(Evidence- a concept and word apparently entirely unknown to the Australian media)

Marie Harf: Yeah. I – agreed. Agreed.

QUESTION: I mean, in court or anywhere, and I think that’s what Matt’s saying, is show the evidence, independent evidence of what you got in intel. I mean, the Russians —

Marie Harf: So we —

QUESTION: — said today that they did not deliver any SA – you’ve seen it – bulk missile system. I mean, is there evidence that you have seen – not what the Ukrainians or anything online has shown, but it’s something that the U.S. has got evidence that they – that the Russians supplied this to them?

Marie Harf: This specific system.

QUESTION: Yeah.

Marie Harf: So a few points. And again, I agree that evidence is important and we are attempting to put out there as much as possible. I do think that’s why you saw the Secretary and me today going much further in why we say we believe – why we believe what we say. And I know it’s frustrating. Believe me, we try to get as much out there as possible. And for some reason, sometimes we can’t.

Look, I think it still remains to be seen, right, how the pro-Russian separatists got whatever – the SA-11, the specific one – I’m not assigning culpability there. But we know that there have been legions of young men crossing the Russian border with very sophisticated weaponry. This would not happen without at least the acquiescence or the support of the Russian Government.

These are complicated systems, right, that it takes training on. We know that the Russian Government’s been training the pro-Russian separatists. We know, period, that what’s happening in eastern Ukraine would not be happening without the support of the Russian Government. So we need a full investigation to determine exactly where the SA-11 came from, but we know that the pro-Russian separatists have many of the weapons they have, have the training they have, and have the support they have because of the Russian Government.

QUESTION: They could have stolen it from the Ukrainian —

QUESTION: Does the U.S. – does the – did the U.S. actually have – independently noticed that a Ukrainian war plane was the in the vicinity of the Malaysia —

Marie Harf: I don’t know if I can confirm those reports. I’m happy – I don’t even know if that’s true. I’m happy to check on it.

This exchange can be summarised thus: The claims that Secretary of State John Kerry made were not supported by evidence available to the State Department so when some of the journalists “crossed the Rubicon”, did their job and asked questions, it quickly became fairly clear that the evidence had never existed and would never exist. The US press were told, “believe it because we said so and we are the good guys.” When the Press failed to comply the naked emperor was exposed. It quickly became obvious that there was no evidence because there was no good reason for the US government not to release what they had. The presence of US satellites over Russia has been well known for many decades after all, the US had no plausible reason for not releasing the data they had if it was there and supported their accusations. The Russian Defence Ministry briefing specifically stated that a US space satellite was over Ukraine at the time of the incident.

Part 3. Evidence emerges.

Controlled media hounds are still working the case (MH17 breakthrough: owner of Volvo truck that transported missile fears his life | News.com.au), they are persistent. The only problem for them is that all of their efforts to frame Russia and the Separatists were predicated on the assumption that the Jet was shot down by a Buk 1 Missile system. All of their efforts are directed towards this magical goal, to track down the guilty rocket launcher. It’s been wonderful stuff, they are terribly admirable on each and every level, both as human beings and journalists.

There’s only one problem.

There are multiple pieces of evidence, including observations from an OSCE observer that was part of the first group to visit the site that the fuselage appeared to have machine gun holes in it.

This is a video made by the Canadian broadcasting Corporation (CBC) Their reporter Susan Ormitsen interviewed OSCE observer Michael Bociurkiw in Donetsk, East Ukraine.

Investigating MH17 – YouTube

Michael Bociurkiw is an individual with an interesting background. He has written a number of articles for the Huffington Post about the crisis in Ukraine that indicate that he is a “Liberal Neoconservative”. This is the beginning of his article of March 18th of this year. Entitled after Crimea, the Only Question is “What’s Next?” The mood on Maidan Square in central Kyiv remains decidedly grim after a referendum widely branded as illegal and illegitimate took place in Crimea on Sunday.” Later he adds, “Will the insatiable appetite of the hungry Russian bear be satisfied with the Crimean peninsula.” He is quite simply not a person positively disposed towards the Russian Federation. He is the last man in the world likely to “lie for Russia.” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-bociurkiw/

Michael Bociurkiw describes himself as being “intimately familiar with that site.” and .”intimately familiar with the aircraft.”

Susan Ormitsen “What do you think we know about what happened to that aircraft today compared with the first day you came?”

“There have been two or three pieces of fuselage, that have been really pock-marked. It almost looks like machine gun fire, very very strong. machine gun fire that has left these unique marks. that we haven’t seen anywhere else.” He continues. “We’ve also been asked for example,did we see any examples of a missile, well, no we haven’t, that’s the answer. “

Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2 – Wikipedia

One important thing to remember about this quote is the context, this is Michael Bociurkiw’s direct and initial response when asked what they now knew. Machine gun holes. What we are probably going to be told is that this was a crude attempt by the rebels to frame the Ukraine Air Force , they fired their guns into the plane and made the holes. But we know from the context and content of the quote that Mr. Bociurkiw does not believe that or even consider it. It is the first evidence he mentions when asked. He thinks it’s evidence.

Former Lufthansa pilot Peter Haienko was the person who noticed and highlighted the devastating photo of large calibre bullet holes travelling through both sides of the MH17 jet. He stated unequivocally that the damage pattern in the cockpit area was consistent with cannon fire from a heavy machine gun .
vlcsnap-2014-08-06-20h04m21s202
Here is a brief excerpt from Peter Haisenko’s article.

“The facts speak clear and loud and are beyond the realm of speculation: The cockpit shows traces of shelling! You can see the entry and exit holes. The edge of a portion of the holes is bent inwards. These are the smaller holes, round and clean, showing the entry points most likely that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile.”

Sukhoi SU25.
Sukhoi SU25.

Su25 vs SU 27.

One thing that puzzled people, myself included, was the fact that the Russian Defence Ministry claimed that a Ukraine Air Force Sukhoi SU 25 was in the vicinity of the Malaysian airlines jet at the time it began to fall from the sky. When people looked at the specifications of the Su25, the claim made no sense, as the SU25 is listed as being capable of operating at a ceiling of 22,965 feet according to Wikipedia, meaning that this war plane would be incapable of travelling to an altitude to bee capable of firing it’s cannon on MH17. We all missed the fact that the Russian Defence Ministry claimed in their July 21st briefing, that “.Su-25 can gain an altitude of 10000 meters (32 808.399 feet) for a short time. “ I have no idea if this is true, but the Russians have been using these aircraft for 40 years, they developed them. More importantly, if the Russians wanted to lie, they would simply claim it was an SU27, with a much higher “official ceiling” and remove the altitude issue altogether.

I have no idea whose aircraft was responsible for the destruction of MH17, but I believe that the evidence indicates that the Boeing 777 was destroyed by fire from another aircraft. Add to that the lack of observations of a missile contrail . Add to that the multiple eyewitness accounts of Fighter aircraft in close proximity to MH17,along with Russian radar data indicating the presence of a military jet close to the flight corroborating the eyewitness claims.

We have therefore a coherent explanation of what destroyed MH17 that fits all the known facts and is not contradicted by any known facts.

The controlled media have nothing. It’s absolutely hilarious. They are apparently hoping that no-one will notice that there is not any evidence that substantiates their claim that the Flight was struck by any ground to air missile operated by anyone.

They are running around with their pre-event manufactured highly edited audio frame up and their useless photos of Ukrainian military Buk missiles driving around Ukraine, pretending they are “escaping to Russia”. The efforts at lying and brainwashing have certainly been dedicated. You almost feel sorry for them that all their pitiful efforts could not possibly have been more futile Because the entire con job hinged on the “fact” that MH17 was destroyed by a ground to air missile, and the witnesses and physical evidence and the observations of Michael Bociurkiw and German Pilot Peter Haisenko along with photographic evidence that corroborates the hypothesis that the aircraft was attacked by another aircraft. The identity of that aircraft and who operated it are not known. The Russians claim that the Aircraft was operated by the Government of the Ukraine. These claims may well be correct, but must be treated with scepticism because the Russians are a party to the East Ukraine conflict . The fact that the Russians sought to present evidence without laying blame, whereas the West did the exact opposite, means that on this matter at least, the claims of Russia deserve more credence. This is not to suggest that the Russians are an inherently more trustworthy party. That would be completely naive, but on this matter they have presented evidence whereas the West has only made wild and opportunistic claims.

I have true pity for people who are yet to understand that false flag attacks are both the traditional and contemporary way that the people who really run the world get things done.

Provocation may be a concept that people may find easier to accept. You want to start a war, but you don’t want to be seen as the aggressor. So you create a scenario that will provide you with a pretext for a war of aggression. This is really the oldest trick in the book, and until recently it had always worked brilliantly. Neoconservative Patrick Clawson actually lays out much of America’s false flag history in this short video.

Israel Lobbyist – We Need a False Flag to Start War with Iran!

The point of which is to recommend another false flag provocation in order to achieve war with Iran. He forgot to mention September 11th, of course. The most public,brutal and well documented false flag terror attack in history. The controlled media owned the public mind, owned almost all of us, and there was nowhere to go seemingly. Those days areover. The means of media production are in the hands of everyone, for better or worse.

 

 St Patrick's Cathedral in Melbourne
St Patrick’s Cathedral in Melbourne

Part 4.

We Don’t Like to Talk About That Anymore.

August the 7th was our designated national day of mourning in Australia for the victims of this tragedy. . It was tremendously sad to see all the bereaved at the Ecumenical Melbourne service. Strangely, the story did not feature prominently in the news. The coverage generally began about ten minutes into the news on all of the stations.Only one of the stations made any reference to either the culprits. Nor the weapons system involved. Only the State broadcaster ABC was still prepared to read the script. The claim was revised to the genuinely meaningless. :”It is believed that Pro-Russian rebels were responsible.” Think about that. It is believed. Think about some of the other things people believe.  There are people who believe that if they commit suicide they will be reunited with the “space brothers” on the

Inconsistent with damage from anti Aircraft missile.
Inconsistent with damage from anti Aircraft missile.

Comet Halle-bop. There are people who believe Michelle Obama is a male despite the fact that she has given birth to two children. There are people who believe any number of things, and it means absolutely nothing. Anyone can believe anything! It is only when we test these beliefs against objective reality that we can measure their veracity. It’s called testing an hypotheses, and we know that the consequences of not testing the veracity of our beliefs is that we have little or no idea whether they are grounded in, or consistent with, history and objective reality. Only their blind tribal faith in the West can sustain this belief. So they revert to that.

August 7th was also the day that the Dutch and Australian recovery teams abandoned their tenure due to the Ukraine government’s military offensive in the area. The same operation they had previously promised not to launch. Also the military operation that the Ukraine government guaranteed would be over by July 31st. Again all of their rhetoric rebounds upon them. Who is hindering and all but cancelling the investigation? Who is obstructing and destroying the investigation? It’s the Ukraine government.

Why did Yatsenuk resign?
Why did Yatsenuk resign?

August 7th was also the day that the Russian federation, imposed limited Economic sanctions on Australia, along with a host of EU nations, the USA and Norway. The sanctions will disrupt 400 million dollars of Economic activity. New buyers will have to be found. The economic consequences are unlikely to be severe, or even noticeable. However, this is the second time in the space of months that this government has put Australia economy, and especially our farming sector under threat because of reckless and inexplicable Foreign policy that seems to rake no account of the interests of the Australian people and economy. First it was the immoral support for the Israeli Apartheid state that put our farmers extremely lucrative, live export trade under threat from rightfully enraged Arab governments. Now, we have this madness of jumping the gun, speaking nonsense, being eclipsed and humiliated by reality and hurting our farmers. Who are these decisions seeking to serve? What possible ;loyalty could the Australian government have for a Kiev government with suspect legitimacy, racist thugs in it’s Ministerial ranks, and who are currently destroying Donetsk and Luhansk in every bit as evil and futile a manner as Israel destroyed Gaza.

Other than some fans in the State Department and NATO, the Kiev government really has almost nothing going for them. All Ukrainian governments since independence at the fall of the Soviet Union have been hopelessly, even legendarily corrupt. This is true whether the President is pro Western or pro Russian. This is why on several occasions in the Ukraine sitting Presidents receive only 5% of the vote in Presidential elections. This Ukraine government appears to be more of the same, only with the IMF and War as a bonus vices. All the people who look positively upon the Government of the Ukraine presumably didn’t notice, or approved of the mass murder of civilians in the city of Odessa on May 2nd this year. Forty eight civilians murdered by Right wing paramilitaries aligned with the Ukraine government and no prosecutions. No justice for those victims. And given the criminal decision of the Kiev Government to launch a major offensive in the crash area that made further investigation and retrieval impossible who are these people and why do they continue to enjoy uncritical Western support?

Selected Sources:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/evidence-is-now-conclusive-two-ukrainian-government-fighter-jets-shot-down-malaysian-airlines-mh17-it-was-not-a-buk-surface-to-air-missile/5394814

http://www.globalresearch.ca/support-mh17-truth-osce-monitors-identify-shrapnel-like-holes-indicating-shelling-no-firm-evidence-of-a-missile-attack/5394324

http://www.globalresearch.ca/german-pilot-speaks-out-shocking-analysis-of-the-shooting-down-of-malaysian-mh17/5394111

The 4th Media » A Deleted BBC Report: “A Ukrainian Fighter Jet Shot Down MH 17,” Donetsk Eyewitnesses

http://www.4thmedia.org/2014/07/deleted-bbc-report-ukrainian-fighter-jet-shot-down-mhi7-donetsk-eyewitnesses

▶ The Video Report Deleted by the BBC – ENG SUBS – YouTube [360p]

MH17 crash: Kerry lays out evidence of pro-Russia separatists’ responsibility | World news | theguardian.com

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/20/mh17-crash-kerry-evidence-pro-russia-separatists-responsibility

MH17: Kerry says all evidence points to pro-Russia Ukrainian separatists | World news | theguardian.com

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/20/mh17-kerry-evidence-ukrainian-separatists

Buk missile system – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buk_missile_system

Michael Bociurkiw | OSCE

http://www.osce.org/contacts/117909

Malaysia Airlines MH17: Michael Bociurkiw talks about being first at the crash site – World – CBC News

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/malaysia-airlines-mh17-michael-bociurkiw-talks-about-being-first-at-the-crash-site-1.2721007

Susan Ormiston – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Ormiston

Aangirfan: CIA SAYS MH17 DOWNED BY UKRAINE GOVERNMENT; MH17 ESCORTED BY UKRANIAN FIGHTER JETS

http://aanirfan.blogspot.com.au/2014/07/aids-researchers-killed-in-ukraine-air.html

Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17: ‘Terrible tragedy’, Tony Abbott offers condolences to families for what would be ‘unspeakable crime’

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/malaysia-airlines-flight-mh17-terrible-tragedy-tony-abbott-offers-condolences-to-families-for-what-would-be-unspeakable-crime-20140718-3c4sx.html

MH17 breakthrough: owner of Volvo truck that transported missile fears his life | News.com.au

http://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/mh17-breakthrough-owner-of-volvo-truck-that-transported-missile-fears-his-life/story-fnizu68q-1227014149633

Interest in MH17 Fades as Sanctions & War Edge Closer | New Eastern Outlook

http://journal-neo.org/2014/08/05/interest-in-mh17-fades-as-sanctions-war-edge-closer/

Ukraine’s Security Service Has Confiscated Air Traffic Control Recordings With Malaysian Jet | Zero Hedge

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-07-18/ukraines-security-service-has-confiscated-air-traffic-control-recordings-malaysian-j

Sukhoi Su-27 – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SU_27

Sukhoi Su-25 – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-25

YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS! Farcical False Flag Threatens to Ignite Global War.

Russian Su 34  jet said to be armed with KH 35 Uran anti-ship missiles patrols the skies above Tartous on the Mediterranean coast of Syria, April 11th, 2018. (Source)

April 14th, 2018.

YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS!

Farcical False Flag Threatens World War Three.

Russia and the US on the Brink of Armed Conflict.

The Battle for Eastern Ghouta is over, Syria and her allies have reclaimed the six-year long insurgent stronghold in a two month military operation that has provoked an extremely dangerous tantrum from the West and their allies that has the US and Russia in a rhetorical state of war and seemingly on the path to armed conflict.

The US, Britain and France have promised a strong joint response to the preposterous lie they are perpetrating of the “chemical attack” in Eastern Ghouta’s now evacuated insurgent enclave, Douma.

STUNNING evidence from BBC journalist exposing White Helmets staging chemical attacks in Douma

Make no mistake, there was no attack, merely a very crude, childish hoax

The alleged attack did not happen, not by any hand. The complete lack of physical evidence or witness testimony of any attack from anyone in Douma makes that perfectly clear.

Even someone at the BBC noticed that the event was staged.

BBC producer Riam Dalati noticed that the same bodies had been used to stage different scenes of the manufactured and fictional chemical attack. The tweet was soon deleted. (Source)

More importantly, Russian military investigators traveled to the hospital in which the event was staged and found…no victims, no eyewitnesses, no signs of any attack with any toxic substance at all.

TASS: World – Doctors in Syria’s Douma refute reports of patients suffering from chemical poisoning

This quote from Tass encapsulates the complete lack of evidence in Douma on all fronts very well.

“Syrian doctors in Douma have dismissed the rumors they had received patients suffering from chemical poisoning. In an interview to the media doctor Yaser Abdel Majid, of the city hospital, said that they had never received patients with chemical poisoning either last weekend or since the beginning of hostilities in Syria,” the reconciliation center said.

Earlier, staffers of the Russian center for reconciliation had questioned doctors and other personnel of Douma’s hospital. The medics said that “all those who had received their medical aid had ordinary injuries, fractures and fragmentation and gunshot wounds.”

Eyewitness Accounts.

There has been confirmation of this from ambulance driver Ahmed Saur, who has worked in one of Douma’s districts for the past several years and by virtue of his profession sees the patients doctors go to.

“On April 6-8 we had not a single patient suffering from chemical poisoning. Only ordinary war wounds,” he said.

Earlier Syrian Red Crescent Society doctors told the media all rumors about patients with chemical poisoning were not true.

Also, the reconciliation center said “militants leaving the city have been questioned and none of them knew anything about chemical weapons allegedly used against them.”.

This story is ultimately as realistic as if the Western media now reported on fierce clashes in Douma with the insurgents of Jaish al Islam fighting to the last man and inflicting severe casualties on the “regime” Army when in reality, the final batch are in the process of evacuation!

That fact is every bit as concrete as the fact that the doctors working in the Douma hospital reported to the Russian military investigators sent to the precise hospital depicted as an attack site in the Jaish al Islam/ White helmet video depicting the alleged attack and discovered no traces of any chemical weapon having been used, no patients in the hospital as a result of any chemical attack, and no dead bodies anywhere who died in the clearly fraudulent and fictional “attack”.

Russian military police in Douma, April 10th, 2018. (Source)
Russian military investigators in Douma hospital cannot find any signs whatsoever of any chemical attack. No victims, dead, eyewitnesses nor forensic traces of toxic substances.
Russian military investigators in Douma hospital cannot find any signs whatsoever of any chemical attack. No victims, dead, eyewitnesses nor forensic traces of toxic substances.

The claim from the Syrian American Medical Society of 500 casualties in Douma on April 7th, like the white Helmets, and the insurgents themselves, the SAMS is a cynical propaganda outfit heavily funded by a Western Government. ALl of the supposed sources for this, literally are on the payroll of France, US, Britain, Israel or Saudi Arabia. (Source)

Even the departing insurgents of Jaish al islam claimed no knowledge of any chemical weapon incident, although there is an overwhelming likelihood that when they arrive in Idlib they will become participants upon their masters orders.

One of the four thousand people released from the captivity of Jaish al islam as part of the evacuation deal related being made to participate in a faux chemical attack filmed in 2015.

“A Syrian civilian who was freed from Jaish al-Islam captivity in Douma on Monday, recounted how the militant group had allegedly forced him to participate in a “pretend” chemical weapons attack scene that they then filmed, back in 2015. “We went [to Douma] and they [Jaish al-Islam] gathered us and forced us to take our shirts off, and said ‘the army is about to use chemical weapons,'” Mohammed Khudr Mousa stated from Salamiyah on Wednesday. “‘You should pretend chemical weapons were used against you and that you cannot breathe. We will pour water on you to revive you,'” he recalled his captors saying. Khudr Mousa went on to describe how a doctor held captive by the militant group was allegedly “forced to fill syringes, pretending that he was injecting us to revive us.” “They [Jaish al-Islam] poured water on us, and forced us to pretend we were unconscious according to their wishes. They brought a camera and filmed us,” he alleged. In an off-camera comment, he told Ruptly that he was not able to say whether the video he was part of was published. ” (Source)

That description closely matches what is depicted in the White Helmets/Jaish al islam footage privdied to a baying Western media in support of the work of fiction they were jointly creating.

The same lies repeated over and over. Healthy child treated as supposed gas victim. Douma, April 7 or 8th, 2018. (Source)
The same lies repeated over and over. Healthy child treated as supposed gas victim. Douma, April 7 or 8th, 2018.

Forget about facts, we are the West!

But none of that matters at this point. The US navy is heading to the eastern Mediterranean, the Russian navy are conducting a two-week live fire exercise in the Mediterranean, one mistake or carefully staged provocation is all that it is going to take to propel Russia and the US into a shooting war that could easily escalate into Armageddon.

What is happening is actually rather simple, the jihadists have failed so now the West is going to fight a conventional war against Syria, Iran and Russia themselves.

The defeat that is being inflicted upon the West, Israel and Saudi Arabia, simply cannot be borne. Therefore as the insurgency fades into history they are to be replaced by the armed forces of the US, UK, France and whomever else is willing.

The Saker: “What price will mankind have to pay for the collapse of the Empire?”

Russia has warned of “grave consequences” should the US and allies attack Syria on the back of their ridiculous, despicable and transparent lie. But it seems that the Western leadership and policy elite are suffering from psychotic delusions of such magnitude that they do not understand the dangerous consequences this course of action may initiate.

Even those who expressed some skepticism about the fictional chemical attack (was it Sarin, Chlorine or both?) and the wisdom of a military response like Tucker Carlson seem utterly unaware of the risks involved. These people still believe that the potential costs of any operation can be safely assessed alongside Libya, Iraq and other recent adventures, but the situation is quite different.

South Front graphic depicts US naval assets currently located in and around the Eastern Mediterranean. In around ten days they are expected to be joined by a carrier group.

The US President reiterated the threat and plainly stated that the US is going to attack Syrian with missiles in a 4am tweet. Mika Brzezinski on MSNBC’s Morning Joe offered an unintentionally comical response to the tweet, stating that “at least he is focused on Russia” (Source)

It really doesn’t matter who is pretending to be the President, that is a con. Still it is hard to ignore the fact that this is a piece of human garbage.

Trump then, minutes later issued a seemingly contradictory, “conciliatory” tweet towards Russia and then returned to form, whining that the FBI and Democrats were at fault for the strained Russia US relationship as though he were a mere onlooker rather than an up to his neck in it participant.

The tweet issued by the US President shortly after threatening Russia directly. Stop making sense!
In tweet number three the President returns to a favourite conversational theme-narcissistic whining and deflection.

None of it made any sense and the truth is that the ruling elite will use the US military to do what they want regardless of any President. Not that Trump offers anything resembling resistance, it is just that it would scarcely matter even if he was capable of doing so.

Either the US and  it’s allies will see sense and do nothing; Russia will make discretion the better part of valor and let the US attack Syria, exposing them as a paper tiger and nonentity, or something absolutely terrible is about to happen.

What is going to happen next?

As genuinely disturbing and truly disgusting as the developing situation is, the prospects of a large-scale military conflict between the US and Russia in the near future is far from inevitable.

As the Saker noted, neither the US or Russia are looking for thermonuclear war but the infantile and delusional mindset of the current Western leadership make armed conflict with Russia almost inevitable at some point and once it starts, it is entirely possible that mutual escalation can very quickly become mutual destruction.

SouthFront published an analysis of the most likely potential scenarios any escalation may take.

Main Scenarios Of Possible Military Escalation If US Strikes Syria

It seems a sober and realistic assessment, although I would add that along with conflict between the US and Russia, a regional war involving some combination of Saudi Arabia and Israel against some combination of Iran and Hezbollah is also very, very possible in the coming weeks.

The longer the leaders of the Western criminal faction (Italy and Germany have opted out) hesitate the more the evidence of their lies is developed and the more embarrassment they will face if they continue on the delusional path they are on. The farcical nature of this story is not going to avoid the light of day for long, even the walking dead are going to realise this is pure nonsense at some point in the near future.

An Accurate Forecast and an Unmistakable Threat.

Another ridiculous element of this story is that on numerous occasions during the past several months the Russian military have told the world that a false flag chemical attack was being prepared in Eastern Ghouta.

Following a typically deluded and infantile speech at the UN from the US representative Nikki Haley, Chief of the Russian General Staff Valery Gerasimov outlined in detail on March 13th the scenario that is now unfolding and also clearly stated that the Russian military are embedded within the Syrian military in Syria, any attack on the Syrian military will be tantamount to an attack on the Russian military and in this case Russia will target both the missiles and the launch platforms for the missiles.

He is clearly saying that “if you attack the Syrian military we will hit your missiles, jets and ships”.

At that point, the situation will be very close to cataclysmic, and all because the West, Israel and Saudi Arabia cannot accept the defeat that is being inflicted upon their proxy army in Syria.

This statement may be responsible for dissuading the US. Trump after all is used to humiliation, he does it to himself everyday and he was the only person who was foolish enough to flat-out state they were going to attack Syria.

Russian military briefing from mid March, General Valery Gerasimov predicted the false flag chemical attack in Douma and threatened that US ships and aircraft would be hit in response.to any attack on Syria because “Russian military personnel are present at all Syrian military sites.” (Source)
Russian military briefing from mid March predicted the false flag chemical attack in Douma and threatened that US ships and aircraft would be hit in response.to any attack on Syria because “Russian military personnel are present at all Syrian military sites.” (Source)
Russian military briefing from mid March predicted the false flag chemical attack in Douma and threatened that US ships and aircraft would be hit in response.to any attack on Syria because “Russian military personnel are present at all Syrian military sites.” (Source)
Russian military briefing from mid March predicted the false flag chemical attack in Douma and threatened that US ships and aircraft would be hit in response.to any attack on Syria because “Russian military personnel are present at all Syrian military sites.” (Source)
Russian military briefing from mid March, General Valery Gerasimov  predicted the false flag chemical attack in Douma and threatened that US ships and aircraft would be hit in response.to any attack on Syria because “Russian military personnel are present at all Syrian military sites.” (Source)
Russian military briefing from mid March predicted the false flag chemical attack in Douma and threatened that US ships and aircraft would be hit in response.to any attack on Syria because “Russian military personnel are present at all Syrian military sites.” (Source)
Russian military briefing from mid March predicted the false flag chemical attack in Douma and threatened that US ships and aircraft would be hit in response.to any attack on Syria because “Russian military personnel are present at all Syrian military sites.” (Source)
Russian military briefing from mid March predicted the false flag chemical attack in Douma and threatened that US ships and aircraft would be hit in response.to any attack on Syria because “Russian military personnel are present at all Syrian military sites.” (Source)
Russian military briefing from mid March predicted the false flag chemical attack in Douma and threatened that US ships and aircraft would be hit in response.to any attack on Syria because “Russian military personnel are present at all Syrian military sites.” (Source)
Russian military briefing from mid March predicted the false flag chemical attack in Douma and threatened that US ships and aircraft would be hit in response.to any attack on Syria because “Russian military personnel are present at all Syrian military sites.” (Source)
Russian military briefing from mid March predicted the false flag chemical attack in Douma and threatened that US ships and aircraft would be hit in response.to any attack on Syria because “Russian military personnel are present at all Syrian military sites.” (Source)
Russian military briefing from mid March predicted the false flag chemical attack in Douma and threatened that US ships and aircraft would be hit in response.to any attack on Syria because “Russian military personnel are present at all Syrian military sites.” (Source)
Russian military briefing from mid March predicted the false flag chemical attack in Douma and threatened that US ships and aircraft would be hit in response.to any attack on Syria because “Russian military personnel are present at all Syrian military sites.” (Source)
Russian military briefing from mid March predicted the false flag chemical attack in Douma and threatened that US ships and aircraft would be hit in response.to any attack on Syria because “Russian military personnel are present at all Syrian military sites.” (Source)
Russian military briefing from mid March predicted the false flag chemical attack in Douma and threatened that US ships and aircraft would be hit in response.to any attack on Syria because “Russian military personnel are present at all Syrian military sites.” (Source)
Russian military briefing from mid March predicted the false flag chemical attack in Douma and threatened that US ships and aircraft would be hit in response.to any attack on Syria because Russian military personnel are present at Syrian military sites.” (Source)
Russian military briefing from mid March predicted the false flag chemical attack in Douma and threatened that US ships and aircraft would be hit in response.to any attack on Syria because Russian military personnel are present at Syrian military sites.” (Source)Russia and the US are therefore in a rhetorical state of war right now, unless one of them back down a shooting war of some scale between the US and Russia will start within the next week.

What Really Happened in Eastern Ghouta?

Beforethe Damascus Steel Operation, February 15th, 2018.

SouthFront map depicts the military situation in Eastern Ghouta as of February 15th, 2018, just before the Syrian Government ground operation began. (Source)

By Early April, Douma is completely isolated, Harasta and Jobar have been evacuated and reclaimed by Syria.

The military situation in DEastern Ghouta as of April 4th, 2018. Only 13% of the insurgent pocket remains. (Source)

April 12th, the final Jaish al islam fighters and their families await evacuation from Eastern Ghouta, Russian MPs patrol the streets of Douma.

The final battle map of Eastern Ghouta, April 12th, 2018.
Russian military police in Douma.April 2018.

The Battle of Eastern Ghouta.

In order to understand just how farcical and pathetic these latest lies are, it must be understood that the battle for Eastern Ghouta was over to the point that other militant factions were already evacuating Douma.

The Syrian military and allies had no motive to change what they had been doing for the last six to eight weeks, during which a well conceived and executed operation had seen the previously impregnable enclave overrun with relative ease.

In a matter of weeks the six year old enclave was split into three isolated pockets by a  Syrian/Russian military operation that by April 7th, had reclaimed 87% of the enclave, reducing a 110km square pocket to a threadbare and doomed 14km square.

During the month of March militants and their families were completely evacuated from the other major districts of Ghouta, Harasta and Jobar.

First group of militants to leave Harasta for Idlib

Harasta fully emptied from terrorists

Latest map update of East Ghouta after Harasta declared under Syrian Army control

Battle of Harasta (2017–18)

Parts of Eastern Ghouta have now been completely cleared and life is returning to normal, schools are reopening. The very notion that the Syrian Government has used chemical weapons in the enclave is preposterous and contemptible.There is no possibility that the Syrian military used anything other than explosives and incendiaries when they attacked Douma on Saturday April 7th, following a breakdown in evacuation  negotiations with the largest insurgent faction in Douma, the Saudi backed Jaish al Islam.

Following a single day of ground operations against their positions on April 8th, Jaish al Islam returned to the negotiating table and are now in the process of being evacuated, having released the thousands of people, soldiers and civilians they had imprisoned.

Douma Evacuation: Militants leave last stronghold as more captives released

What Assad has actually done with the children of East Ghouta! Children returned to school following the evacuation of militants and their families.(Source)
Life returning to normal in the parts of East Ghouta, cleared of insurgents. (Source)

Conclusion- A  Sobering Realisation.

This most childish and silly lie at this time brings a most sobering realisation.

The owners of the West genuinely believe that they own reality, they can tell any lie and do anything on the back of it and there is nothing that we, the people of the West can do about it although I would urge people to contact their local representative and politely but forcefully express their displeasure at the proposed military operation,  but both the US Congress and the British Parliament are almost certainly going to be bypassed as the Western elites and their political and media prostitutes rush headlong towards cataclysm.

Anything that may help is worth trying but please understand that there is no hope within the current political system as it operates in the West, nor is there any obvious viable alternative.

It does not matter who we vote for, that is for certain and anyone who has not recognised and expressed this at this stage is either a dupe or a con artist.

Obama and Trump were only whores, that is all they ever were. Hell awaits them both and anyone who says anything positive about either is either a shill or a hapless fool. Or both, but the identity of the President is irrelevant to the policy outcome, the only question is the brand of lies they are expected to tell. That is the only thing that is at stake in the modern election.

The other very troubling understanding is that these people are never going to stop until they are forcibly halted.

They only know how to lie and kill. It is like a massive, dysfunctional evil robot that only lies and orders killing is sitting behind the entire post Cold War Western world. Not only will it not stop until the entire Middle east is destroyed, it now sadly seems that it will not stop until the West itself is destroyed.

This is a situation of almost complete megalomania, they have been lying so much for so long that they no longer know they are lying.

The combination of military power and childish delusion may well be the catalyst that triggers the end for this current world civilisation.

Sources.

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/04/12/american-officials-continue-make-laughing-stocks/

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/04/13/trump-regime-insane/

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/04/11/idiocy-bringing-end-world/

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/04/10/last-days-hell-breaks-loose/

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/03/26/verge-nuclear-war/

https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/syrian-military-raises-flag-over-last-militant-stronghold-in-east-ghouta/

https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/russia-declares-victory-over-militants-in-east-ghouta/

https://maps.southfront.org/military-situation-eastern-ghouta-february-15-2017-syria-map-update/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghouta_chemical_attack

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/apr/08/syrian-government-accused-of-chemical-attacks-on-civilians-in-eastern-ghouta

https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/pictures-well-over-ten-thousand-children-from-east-ghouta-return-to-school-details/

http://theduran.com/east-ghouta-victory-in-sight-for-syrian-army-over-jihadis/

http://theduran.com/heres-why-the-us-failed-to-save-the-jihadis-in-east-ghouta/

Syria: Makeshift chemical weapons lab discovered in East Ghouta by Syrian Army

Terrorist capabilities laid bare in an Eastern Ghouta chemical lab — RT Op-ed

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/421515-ghouta-syria-chemical-weapons/

http://www.dw.com/en/syria-thousands-flee-eastern-ghouta-as-regime-captures-more-key-towns/a-42994032

https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/syrian-authorities-crackdown-on-security-personnel-looting-east-ghouta-towns/

https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/breaking-thick-smoke-engulfs-east-ghouta-as-final-batch-of-evacuating-rebels-burn-their-last-bases/

https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/syrian-army-controls-87-percent-of-east-ghouta-map/

https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/breaking-another-record-number-rebels-and-their-family-members-leave-east-ghouta-for-northwest-syria-details/

International Lawyers: Strike Against Syria Would Be Illegal

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/apr/11/theresa-may-indicates-willingness-for-military-action-against-syria

Las Vegas Massacre: Hard Proof Stephen Paddock is Being Framed.

Las Vegas police seek cover behind their vehicle during the supposed massacre of October 1st, 2017. Confusingly the civilian bystanders remain nonchalant despite standing in the supposed line of fire of the shooter situated in the Mandalay Bay resort complex building to the left.

October 5th, 2017.

Massacre In Las Vegas:100% Proof Stephen Paddock is being framed.

By now everyone on the planet who has access to the internet or television is familiar with the blood chilling story of the massacre in Las Vegas on October 5th, 2017.

We are told that Stephen Paddock, 64 years of age, meticulously planned the attack, moving dozens of weapons and thousands of rounds of ammunition into his hotel room on the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay Hotel and opened fire on the crowd attending the Route 91 Harvest Festival in the “Las Vegas Village” located at the foot of the 43 storey complex, having first used a hammer to smash two holes in the windows of the hotel in order to be able to shoot the people below.

2017 Las Vegas Strip shooting – Wikipedia

At this point there is simply no way that story is even approximately true as photographs taken when the massacre was underway clearly show that the windows in the room Stephen Paddock was supposedly committing this mass murder operation in can be seen to be complete and intact long after the event has supposedly started.

Photograph from October 2nd shows the precise location of the shooter as revealed by the two broken windows on the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay Hotel building. This long shot allows us to measure precisely the location of these holes and note they are six windows down from the spot where the grey cladding ends.
This is the source for the cropped photograph below, the photo is clearly taken after the shooting is underway, that is why the police are there hiding behind their car. (Source)
A cropped version of the above photograph taken during the massacre reveals that there were no holes in the windows on the 32nd floor during the massacre. Therefore irrefutably proving the official version of the event a complete lie. The implications are clear, Stephen paddock has been framed. The LVPD have not been honest in their account and either broke the windows themselves or allowed another to do so and there is no possibility, if there even was a shooting massacre, that the perpetrator or perpetrators were situated on the 32nd floor. This simply kills the story they are telling stone dead
Close up of the holes enable us to more easily pin down their precise location. Each slightly to the left of the grey cladding as viewed from the outside.

 

The Implications.

The implications of this are that:

It is physically impossible that the massacre was conducted by a gunman on the 32nd floor room Paddock was supposedly occupying.

It is impossible that the account presented by the LVPD and FBI is accurate and complete.

It is inescapable that if the window was not broken prior to the massacre, someone else with access to the room has broken the window after the massacre in a bid to frame Mr. Paddock.

Therefore Mr. Paddock has been crudely framed by someone connected to the investigation and cannot possibly have been responsible for the killings.

 

 

Amazing Dutch Whistleblower Video.

Screenshots from the key moment in the interview of Ronald Bernard conducted by Irma Shiffer. (Source)
Screenshots from the key moment in the interview of Ronald Bernard conducted by Irma Shiffer.(Source)
Screenshots from the key moment in the interview of Ronald Bernard conducted by Irma Shiffer.(Source)
Screenshots from the key moment in the interview of Ronald Bernard conducted by Irma Shiffer. (Source)

April 29th, 2017.

Amazing Dutch Whistleblower Interview.

A remarkable and very important video emerged on the internet this week. The video is a 39 minute long interview of a man named Ronald Bernard conducted by a journalist named Irma Schiffer.

There are large gaps in the story Ronald Bernard tells and there is no way to corroborate the claims he makes,, the story Bernard outlines is however broadly corroborated by many confirmed and substantiated facts established in recent decades such as the story told by Belgian woman Regina Louf who claimed to have been abused at an elite party in Belgium at which a young girl was murdered.

The police initially regarded Regina Louf as a fantasist until she was able to direct them to the place where the young girls body had been buried and in addition to that the body still bore evidence of the torture the young girl had suffered prior t0 her death as Regina Louf had described.

More on Regina Louf and Belgium’s well documented problem of elite child abuse and murder:

Belgium’s X-Dossiers of the Dutroux Affair: The victim-witnesses

The Eurocrats and Marc Dutroux IV: Underworld Justice

Belgium’s silent heart of darkness

The Horrors of Hampstead Happened Elsewhere

Too Good to be True?

There is nothing new here, and the interview offers no names of people or institutions and therefore does not fall into the category of “too good to be true” at all in my view.

The Ronald bernard account is just another layer of confirmation. One of many. The importance of the story Ronald Bernard tells lies in the fact that we are hearing the story from the other side, an exceptionally rare event.

If people want to believe that Ronald Bernard is making this stuff up, there is no way to disabuse them of that opinion, there is no way to prove that his story is the truth, but having watched the interview there is no doubt in my mind that the story Bernard tells is substantially true.

I urge readers simply to watch the interview and decide for themselves via this link to the video or scroll to the bottom of this page.

Outline.

The story Bernard tells is that he was a smart young businessman, acting as a private financial broker when a senior figure notice his talent and invited him “in” telling him that if he chose this path he would have to learn to “put his conscience in the freezer”.

The insider introduced Bernard to his clients and essentially passed his business onto Bernard in exchange for 10% of the earnings.

The role turned out to be a kind of Mr. Fixit, a middle man laundering money and hiding transactions on behalf of elite bankers and intelligence agencies who require these financial instruments to process and launder the money from their drug, weapon and human trafficking operations.

Bernard learned that intelligence agencies are operating as above the law criminal corporations on behalf of their elite masters. Bernard also learned that senior figures within the financial institutions through which the money was passing knew what was happening.

All in all things were going swimmingly, the fact that he was helping these people to start wars, fund terrorism and launder funds obtained through human and drug trafficking was not a problem.

Ronald Bernard was an atheist at this time also so he was not overly troubled by the knowledge that the elites he was working for worshipped a “different” God than most people, they worship Lucifer.

It is worth noting that some people profess themselves to be “light” or benign Luciferians, that may well be the case, or not, but the people who rule the world today are not of that variety, their Lucifer is the destroyer, the blackening force, the force that craves suffering and violent death, the more the better.

People want to debate the nature of Lucifer, that is fine, but the people who matter, those in power, believe in the evil version, an entity interchangeable with Satan, there should be no mistake about that.

One large gap in the story relates to Bernard’s progress within the cult itself, the story jumps wildly from Bernard being an amused witness to a “Church of Satan” ritual that he describes as involving “naked woman and liquor” to the climax of Bernard’s story and the event that precipitated his physical breakdown and fall from grace within the elite, when Bernard states that he was asked to murder a child within a ritual as a kind of “final binding” to the group.

There must be many steps that take place between being an “amused observer” and that request but the story jumps straight from the observer to the potential murderer, hopefully further interviews will flesh the story out in more detail. .

Downfall and Redemption.

After Bernard’s refusal to murder a child and bind himself to the group irreversibly, Bernard appears to have begun to completely break down, his work performance dramatically declined and at some point the group he had been affiliated with abducted and tortured him to in his words “make sure that I didn’t expose them”

At some point after that Bernard completely collapsed physically, suffered multiple organ failure and woke up in the Intensive Care Ward, he later realised that he must have almost died as when he had been taken to the hospital he had observed himself from above, he had looked down and watched the doctors working on his body.

Bernard interpreted that experience to mean that he was something more than simply his body. That he was more than an intelligent lump of meat and that his essence in some form would survive his physical death.

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

The remainder of the interview is Bernard offering his post breakdown view of the world, one standout moment was perhaps when Bernard baldly states that “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” is an accurate depiction of the world today. Which is true but a rather shocking statement from a modern European.

People who have not read the Protocols completely misunderstand them, they believe that this work is an anti -Jew hate tract, a “warrant for genocide” as one professional liar described it, it is nothing of the sort.

Regardless of questions of authenticity this is the most important thing to understand.

The Protocols are written from the point of view of a Satanist or Luciferian who poses as a Jew. This is merely a front. The narrator is not a Jew and he does not like Jews, he sees them as he sees all other people, as a nuisance, an obstacle and a resource to be exploited, lied to and if necessary, destroyed.

The narrator is not describing a Jewish plot and the Protocols does not in the slightest suggest that all or most Jewish people are part of some evil plot, in fact it states precisely the opposite.

My understanding of the plotters is that they are a coalition of the blackened, so there are people from all backgrounds represented and in each case their job is to subvert the institutions and positions they inhabit for the benefit of the broader cult.

So you must have Christians, they are very important because you need them to destroy Christianity from within, to turn it into a travesty and we have seen this take place in all major Christian denominations and the same principle stands for all groups and institutions.

As far as authenticity goes, in my opinion the Protocols are a doctored document based on very good intelligence, almost all of the text appears to be authentic but some elements seem to have been added in an attempt to flatter and manipulate the Russian Czar to whom it was originally presented.

As many have stated, the authenticity of this document at this point is completely irrelevant, the document describes the world that is being built, how it is being built and the type of people who are doing it, if that is a consequence of a hoax document being embraced and implemented after release or the document was authentic when published in  1903 makes almost no difference at this juncture.

The Protocols describe the program in a very direct and powerful way. Many other (more respectable) works such as “Tragedy and Hope” and “Brave New World” provide similar insights to the Protocols, but both are far longer and far less direct.

It should be remembered that the elite want people to be prejudiced, to be ignorant, to lump individuals into massive groups and condemn them en masse.

It is the height of foolishness to allow yourself to be tricked or manipulated into thinking like that, while it is true that a demographically disproportionate number of the engineers and managers of evil come from a nominally Jewish background, that should never be used to smear anyone because of their family or religious background.

It is also the height of blindness to imagine that the numerous non-Jews who propagate evil and play key roles in the tyranny project are to be somehow swept aside and forgotten.

The final point Ronald Bernard makes is that people must overcome the divide and rule con if they are going to depose these evil forces who currently rule the world.

The interview is deeply moving and although it is conducted in Dutch, the language has so many words that are similar to or the same as English that it is very easy to follow what is being said rather than merely reading it on the screen as is the case with many more distant languages.

Please do yourself a favour and watch this video if you have not already done so. Whilst much on YouTube is ephemera and nonsense, this is the exact opposite

“Moderate” Mass Murder! Insurgent Car Bomb Slaughters more than 100.

Scenes of mayhem and horror in al Rashideen following the massacre of more than 100 people including at least 68 children in a car bomb attack. (Source)
Sunni insurgents tried to murder these people because they are Shia Muslims, here wounded civilians in the moments after the blast.

April 18th, 2017.

Western Backed Insurgents Conduct Sectarian Massacre west of Aleppo. 

Death Toll is 126, including 68 children.

Suicide Car Bomber Targeted Shia Evacuees from Idlib.

After more than two years under siege in their hometowns of al Fuah and Kafriya, on April 15th, they got on the buses and began the journey to the relative safety and freedom of Government held Aleppo City.

Siege of al-Fu’ah and Kafriya

Only kilometres from their final destination the convoy of buses stopped in the insurgent held Rashideen district west of Aleppo.

Many disembarked and took the chance to stretch their legs. Many children on the buses took the opportunity to escape the cramped environment of the bus.

At some point a supposed Muslim, a fighter from one of the insurgent groups (other than ISIS who do not have any presence whatsoever to the west of Aleppo) detonated a van packed with an estimated tonne of explosives in close proximity to the buses causing the scene to become one of utter carnage and devastation.

Deadly Aleppo suicide attack kills 100 in evacuation operation | World news | The Guardian

Explosion rocks west Aleppo, residents of Fouaa and Kefrayya targeted (Photos, 18 +).

2017 Aleppo suicide car bombing

Evacueees in al Rashidin in the moments preceding the blast.
Survivor of the massacre in the Aleppo University hospital where the wounded were treated. (Source)

Heart-wrenching footage from overcrowded Aleppo hospital

The attack is among the most deadly terror bombings of the entire war and the worst since the massacres of last May that killed more than 130 when a large team of suicide bombers attacked the coastal cities of Jab’leh and Tartous, in that case the carnage was caused by at least seven separate human bombs.

May 2016 Jableh and Tartous bombings

Syria: Terrorist bombings in Tartous and Jableh constitute serious escalation by Riyadh, Ankara, and Doha – Syrian Arab News Agency

More than a dozen insurgents also died in the blast, which appears to have been directed by insurgent factions opposed to the Idlib/Damascus evacuation deal.

The deal remains in place but is only partially complete, an estimated 8000 people remain in al Fuah and Kafriya and Madaya and Zabadani are also only partially evacuated.

Syria resumes evacuation after terrorists kill 112

No party has claimed responsibility for the atrocity and it is likely that the specific offenders will never be identified. Suspicion has fallen upon an outfit named Fawlaq al Sham, who expressed vocal opposition to the evacuation deal. This group was vetted by the US government, labelled moderate and armed with high quality weapons such as the BGM71 TOW missiles.

The Moderate Rebels: A Growing List of Vetted Groups Fielding BGM-71 TOW Anti-Tank Guided Missiles | Hasan Mustafa

In truth the insurgency has taken on such a vicious and sectarian character that there was widespread dissatisfaction with the deal. Many fighters wanted to enter al Fuah and Kafriyah and kill everyone there on the basis that they are Muslims of the Shia variety. Almost any of the numerous insurgent groups operating in western Syria are therefore suspects in the massacre.

In addition to the mass killing, insurgents also kidnapped hundreds of the civilian evacuees, their fate is unknown at this time but if further false flag attacks are planned as the Russian President recently claimed, they may well wind up murdered and used as the victims in a new atrocity to be blamed on the Syrian government.

200 Syrian civilians kidnapped by Al-Qaeda faction amid evacuation deal

An Aberration.

The culture of hatred and devaluation of human life has grown and spread like a cancerous growth in the Middle East over the past several decades.

In the Middle East, the suicide bombings were initially a largely Shia innovation in Lebanon in response to the murderous Israeli invasion and occupation that commenced in 1982 and continued until the year 2000.

The first Sunni group to engage in these operations on a large-scale was the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas who adopted the tactic in 1993, and proceeded to thoroughly blacken the Palestinian cause and help to justify and obscure Israel’s criminal nature with a series of horrific massacres of Israeli civilians over the succeeding decade.

Following the criminal US/British/Australian invasion of Iraq in 2003 the tactic was embraced by Sunni insurgents and the number of such attacks skyrocketed.

Between 1982 and the Israeli withdrawal in 2000, Hezbollah conducted, by US academic Robert Papes count, fewer than 40 suicide attacks on Israeli occupation forces.

In Iraq and Syria the so-called Islamic State group frequently exceed that in a single month, for example the group claimed to have conducted 85 such attacks in January 2016, more than double what Hezbollah had done in 18 years fighting the Israelis.

LiveLeak.com – 85 Martyrdom Operations Carried out by Islamic State Fighters in Iraq and Syria during January 2016 [Infographic]

The blame cannot therefore be placed at the feet of any one group, however suicide is expressly forbidden in Islam so to claim that the suicide bomber is going to paradise or that there is any ground for suicide attacks in Islam is a fallacy, a lie.

Attacks on military targets are not obvious war crimes in the same way as the Rashideen bus massacre but they do violate the rules the Koran asks Muslims to live by and more importantly clearly run counter to the value on life the Koran demands.

“And do not kill yourselves, surely God is most Merciful to you.”

— Qur’an, Sura 4 (An-Nisa), ayat 29 (Source-Translation)

The whole “We are the soldiers of god and we are fond of death” narrative has been completely bankrupt, an outright aberration from day one and will always be so. If you are a real soldier of god, you value life and do not crave or fetishise death.

In fairness it should be noted that  from a military tactical point of view it makes sense for poorly armed militia groups to use human bombs when facing the onslaught of air and ground bombing that accompanies a conventional military offensive. It should also be pointed out that many non-Muslims have conducted suicide attacks, from socialists in Lebanon to the Tamil Tiger separatists in Sri Lanka, who were the most prolific suicide bombers in the world prior to the Iraq war and the emergence of al Qaeda in Iraq as documented by Robert Papes in his work on the topic “Dying to Win“.

Personally it always seemed terribly wrong to me for one person, almost always a more senior person in rank and age to suggest to a foot-soldier that he should conduct an operation where his death is an essential part of the operation.

Just because a tactic makes sense in a certain situation does not mean that it is the right thing to do. It is totally immoral and the foot soldiers are simply being manipulated in a cynical and wicked manner whatever group they represent.

None of that exonerates the Neocon Zionists (nor their “Humanitarian bomber” underlings) who have been the core group responsible for the destabilisation and destruction of the Middle East over the past decades. But there is no doubt that the imperial onslaught has created terrible distortions within the Arab and Muslim world that must be addressed along with the imperial onslaught and the parallel support from Western intelligence for extremists that was the root cause.

Conclusion.

It goes without saying that the massacre in al Rashideen did not merit a mention from the new-found ally of the jihadists in the White House.

All the supposed humanitarian concern supposedly created by the Khan Shaykhun false flag incident attack was completely absent when it came to this far larger massacre. The 68 dead children did not merit even a passing mention, let alone a salvo of cruise missiles from the President who makes no attempt to hide his cynicism and hypocrisy.

 US Rebels slaughter 100’s of Women and Children in Syria

68 children among 126 killed in Aleppo blast

The Shocking Massacre of Kafriya and al-Fu’ah

Civilians attacked: UN condemns bombing of evacuees, Western media acquit rebels

CRIMINAL AGGRESSION! US Attacks Syria with Cruise Missiles on the Back of Big Lie.

Aftermath of the attack.  The damage is secondary, it is the precedent that matters.
Aftermath of the US attack on the al Sharat airbase in Homs.
Aftermath of the US attack on the al Sharat airbase in Homs.
Southfront map shows the location of the base near to the east Homs battlefield where the Syrian Army are battling ISIS. After promising to crush ISIS Trump is now offering them air support.

April 8, 2017.

US Attacks Syria with Cruise Missile Barrage on the Back of Big Lie.

At around 3.40am Damascus time on April the 7th, the US Navy launched a barrage of 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles upon the Shayrat Syrian Air Force base in Homs province leaving at least six members of the Syrian military dead along with 9 civilians including four children.

Reports of damage vary widely but an aircraft repair depot containing damaged 8 planes and the radar station appear to have been the greatest losses of material.

The attack appears to have been extraordinarily militarily ineffective,but that is secondary to the fact that a threshold has been crossed, a precedent has been set and once these operations begin they almost inevitably achieve a momentum of their own.

In response Russia has suspended the agreement with the US coalition designed to avoid accidental collision or clashes between the Syrian/Russian and US coalition aircraft.

US air strikes in Syria: Russia suspends agreement preventing direct conflict with American forces | The Independent

This is a troubling and potentially extremely dangerous development, but all signs indicate that Russia understands perfectly well that it is no position to directly engage the US in the Middle East.

Therefore in my opinion Russia will not respond directly against the US in Syria, certainly not in the near future, but will seek to engineer a diplomatic end to the issues.

The End of Donald Trump.

The attacks signaled to all intents and purposes the end of the Trump administration in any meaningful sense in all but name.

Trump has walked away, he is no longer present, they had a regime change over there this week it seems and now he knows he is just the front-man, has accepted it and is playing the role.

Paul Craig Roberts on Infowars, April 6th, 2017.

Paul Craig Roberts:”The establishment has reasserted itself. ”

Alex Jones: “Doesn’t he understand , he is a smart guy, that when he rolls over to these people it only encourages them.  They want his head on a spike.”

Paul Craig Roberts:”Well they don’t need his head on a spike if he surrenders to them.”

“I can’t say what he is doing but to me it looks like surrender.” (Source)

Robert Parry at Consortium News provides a credible, albeit anonymously sourced account of the internal machinations:

“the Trump national security team split between the President’s close personal advisers, such as nationalist firebrand Steve Bannon and son-in-law Jared Kushner, on one side and old-line neocons who have regrouped under National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, an Army general who was a protégé of neocon favorite Gen. David Petraeus.”

White House Infighting

“In this telling, the earlier ouster of retired Gen. Michael Flynn as national security adviser and this week’s removal of Bannon from the National Security Council were key steps in the reassertion of neocon influence inside the Trump presidency. The strange personalities and ideological extremism of Flynn and Bannon made their ousters easier, but they were obstacles that the neocons wanted removed.”

“Though Bannon and Kushner are often presented as rivals, the source said, they shared the belief that Trump should tell the truth about Syria, revealing the Obama administration’s CIA analysis that a fatal sarin gas attack in 2013 was a “false-flag” operation intended to sucker President Obama into fully joining the Syrian war on the side of the rebels — and the intelligence analysts’ similar beliefs about Tuesday’s incident.”

Instead, Trump went along with the idea of embracing the initial rush to judgment blaming Assad for the Idlib poison-gas event. The source added that Trump saw Thursday night’s missile assault as a way to change the conversation in Washington, where his administration has been under fierce attack from Democrats claiming that his election resulted from a Russian covert operation.”

Later Parry writes

“logic and respect for facts no longer prevail inside Official Washington, nor inside the mainstream U.S. news media.”

Trump’s ‘Wag the Dog’ Moment

They Know It is All a Lie.

In the space of 24 hours Trump has completely repudiated everything he ever said about Syria and foreign policy in general. The intelligence reports must be pretty damning, they must have concocted a case? Apparently not according to Philip Giraldi, extremely credible former CIA officer who stated:

“The intelligence confirms pretty much the account that the Russians have been giving … which is that they hit a warehouse where the rebels – now these are rebels that are, of course, connected with Al Qaeda – where the rebels were storing chemicals of their own and it basically caused an explosion that resulted in the casualties. Apparently the intelligence on this is very clear.”

(Source)

4/6/17 Philip Giraldi says IC-Military Doubt Assad Gas Narrative – The Libertarian Institute

In order to see just how these actions represent a complete repudiation of everything Trump claimed to represent, we need simply to measure the actions against the President’s own words upon inauguration.

The Inaugural Address | whitehouse.gov

The Promise to serve the people rather than the establishment.

“Today’s ceremony, however, has very special meaning. Because today we are not merely transferring power from one Administration to another, or from one party to another – but we are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the American People.

For too long, a small group in our nation’s Capital has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost.

Washington flourished – but the people did not share in its wealth.

Politicians prospered – but the jobs left, and the factories closed.

The establishment protected itself, but not the citizens of our country.

Their victories have not been your victories; their triumphs have not been your triumphs; and while they celebrated in our nation’s Capital, there was little to celebrate for struggling families all across our land.

That all changes – starting right here, and right now, because this moment is your moment: it belongs to you.

What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people.

January 20th 2017, will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again.”

The forgotten men and women of our country will be forgotten no longer.

Everyone is listening to you now.

You came by the tens of millions to become part of a historic movement the likes of which the world has never seen before.

At the center of this movement is a crucial conviction: that a nation exists to serve its citizens.

Americans want great schools for their children, safe neighborhoods for their families, and good jobs for themselves.

These are the just and reasonable demands of a righteous public.”

This is a very powerful statement and the way I interpret it is he is saying that when he makes a decision the impact of said decision on the average American will be at the core of the process. It is the promise to govern in the interests of the people,”a nation exists to serve its citizens.”

This is a great litmus test by which to evaluate Trump as President.

Later in the speech the same themes are expressed even more forcefully and the folly of the US foreign policy over recent decades is also discussed.

“For many decades, we’ve enriched foreign industry at the expense of American industry;

Subsidized the armies of other countries while allowing for the very sad depletion of our military;

We’ve defended other nation’s borders while refusing to defend our own;

And spent trillions of dollars overseas while America’s infrastructure has fallen into disrepair and decay.

We’ve made other countries rich while the wealth, strength, and confidence of our country has disappeared over the horizon.

One by one, the factories shuttered and left our shores, with not even a thought about the millions upon millions of American workers left behind.

The wealth of our middle class has been ripped from their homes and then redistributed across the entire world.

But that is the past. And now we are looking only to the future.

We assembled here today are issuing a new decree to be heard in every city, in every foreign capital, and in every hall of power.

From this day forward, a new vision will govern our land.

From this moment on, it’s going to be America First.

Every decision on trade, on taxes, on immigration, on foreign affairs, will be made to benefit American workers and American families.”

The Inaugural Address | whitehouse.gov

So is there any possible way that the average American family will benefit from the hurling of cruise missiles against Syrian military airfields? If so, how?

There is simply no way any of this benefits the people of the US and that militarily ineffective barrage cost the taxpayers of the US more than 90 million dollars on missiles alone.

(the cost of a single Tomahawk cruise missile is listed as being 1.59 million dollars, 59 times that gives you 93.8 million dollars)

Dud Tomahawk Cruise Missile at the Shayrat airbase in Homs after the US attack.
The hole made by a cruise missile impact upon the arched hangar where the Syrian Air-force stored the planes they were repairing.
Syrian soldiers outside the Shayrat airbase the day after the US attack.
Graphic shows the purported targets attacked by the US. (Source)

An Open and Shut Breach of International Law.

The attack was not in conformity with international law and can therefore be deemed a war crime in and of itself, an act of criminal aggression taken on an evidence free pretext and without the required UN mandate. It is beyond unlikely that anyone will ever be prosecuted for making this illegal order but that is due to the impotence of the administration of international law, the illegality is uncontroversial.

“All members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state” (Source)

Even if they eventually hold an investigation and it supports the assertions the US President has made about the origin of the Khan Shaykhun attack, the response was still illegal because there was no UN mandate and no imminent threat- the only situation that provides a legal exception.

” a general prohibition (on the use of force against another nation), subject only to the exceptions stated in the Charter (self-defence and Chapter VII action by the Security Council).

Use of Force by States-Wikipedia

Besting Obama in a bad way.

In his crude way, Trump has shown Obama the “correct” way to capitalise on a big lie.

Act before there is time for the real evidence to emerge. Act like a moron and pretend everyone knows what has happened without evidence, or recourse to basic commonsense.

Create facts on the ground with your response, that is, start the war and after that you’re off and away, the situation will now escalate naturally due to the action that you have taken enabling you to ride the big lie all the way to your desired outcome.

The desired outcome here would appear to be the complete destruction of the Syrian government and the dismemberment of the nation, with Israel gifted the Golan,al Qaeda, the Kurds and the Alawi/Shia./Druze/Christians all hosting mini-states in the place of Syria and never-ending bloodshed in its place.

 

Russian MoD drone footage of aftermath from US missile strike on Syrian Army airbase

RAW: US fires Tomahawk missiles at Syrian military base from USS Ross and USS Porter ships

Syria: Footage of Shayrat base after US airstrike

Syria: False Flag Triggers International Crisis.

The Mail Online headline is simply a lumpen version of the standard propaganda line being transmitted by the everlasting hell-bound liars of the Western controlled media. Seasoned war criminals whose bloodthirst is unquenchable.The death toll they are quoting is 25% in excess of what the Strian Observatory of Human Rights are quoting more than 24 hours later.(Source)
Other than the fact that the photo was not taken in Idlib, nor in Syria and the fact that the child is perfectly healthy, rather than suffering from a chemical attack the Mail caption is right on the money.
This image is of a UN subsidiary UNFPA *the United Nations Population Fund) conducting routine health checks on infants (source) presumably in the Philippines following Typhoon Haiyan in 2013. Either way, the photo is not taken in Syria and the child is perfectly healthy. The ever imaginative and creative Mail Online somehow transformed this scene of a healthy South East Asian child being examined by a South East Asian health worker in a room full of South East Asian women none of whom dress in manner remotely resembling the women of Idlib into the aftermath of the Idlib chemical attack.In the minds of the trash who compile the Mail, the fact that there are no Arabs in a photo of ” Syria” does not register. The fact there are no Hijabs or Chadors in al Qaeda ruled Syria does not register. All they know is that they are supposed to lie.
The Mail improves and manages to post a photograph that was actually taken in Syria.. Hurrah! While they did remove the Philippine photograph this one leads the story to this day. This is a photograph of a completely healthy child in a hospital pretending to cry and doing a rather poor job of it.  The  tousled hair is a trademark the pitiful propagandist believe mimics the after effects of an air strike. Check the child for yourself, legs, untouched, arms untouched, there is no injury nor any grief. Almost certainly a retread from the earlier Aleppo propaganda campaign of 2016.(Source)
Graphic pinpoints the location of Khan Shayhkun, at the very southern point of Idlib.

Syria: Idlib False Flag Triggers International Crisis.

 Trump De-Cloaks as Puppet of Evil.

April 7th, 2017.

The Khan Shayhkun Massacre.

On April 4th several Su22 jets belonging to the Syria Air Force attacked a town named Khan Shaykhun (population approx 50,000) in Syria’s northwestern Idlib province.

According to the Syrian and Russian military, the warplanes targeted militant warehouses, arms depots and production facilities on the outskirts of the town.

Following the attacks a number of people in the area it is claimed, began to suffer symptoms consistent with exposure to toxic chemicals. The division between the people who died as a result of high explosives versus chemical exposure has not been made clear, however it is claimed that more than 80 people died following the attack of the warplanes and the subsequent toxic exposure.

There is no clear indication what chemicals the people were exposed to nor the source of the exposure.

Russia and Syria claim that the Syrian Air Force unwittingly bombed an insurgent chemical production facility, inadvertently causing the exposure of civilians to toxic chemicals the insurgents were using to produce weapons.

According to Philip Giraldi, former CIA officer the US government intelligence indicates that it was not an attack by the Syrian Government using chemicals.

“The intelligence confirms pretty much the account that the Russians have been giving … which is that they hit a warehouse where the rebels – now these are rebels that are, of course, connected with Al Qaeda – where the rebels were storing chemicals of their own and it basically caused an explosion that resulted in the casualties. Apparently the intelligence on this is very clear.”

(Source)

4/6/17 Philip Giraldi says IC-Military Doubt Assad Gas Narrative – The Libertarian Institute

2017 Khan Shaykhun chemical attack – Wikipedia

The entire Western media and the anti-Syrian government activists supported by the West and their allies claim that the warplanes launched the chemicals themselves and tellingly the Israeli government fresh from air strikes in direct support of the Islamic State near Palmyra, chipped in within hours of the incident:

Israel says Idlib chemical attack approved by highest level of Syrian government

Beyond what is implied by commonsense and logic there is almost zero evidence to support either hypothesis. According to the Western media we already know that the Syrian Government were responsible because we all “know” having dutifully digested more than six years of propaganda on the subject that Bashar al Assad is a “really, really horrible person” and that is the end of the matter.

The argument is completely circular, utterly vapid and echoes the script from numerous previous seasons of regime change propaganda directed against Syria and many other targets.

Assad chemical attack in Syria’s Idlib kills at least 100 | Daily Mail Online

The Motive,Timing and Possible Beneficiaries of this event.

Only days earlier, on March 3oth, US Secretary of State Tillerson made what seemed at a time a mundane statement to the effect that the US had accepted that the regime change operation in Syria had failed and would henceforth focus on battling the jihadists of ISIS and al Nusra.

US Didn’t “Change Priorities” in Syria, It Lost | New Eastern Outlook

This is how CNN reported on the comments.

US signals openness to Assad staying put – CNNPolitics.com

The Trump administration doubled down Thursday on prioritizing the fight against ISIS over ending the Syrian civil war and getting rid of its main protagonist, President Bashar al-Assad — a suggestion that was swiftly criticized by hawks on the Hill.”

“Indicating a possible shift in US policy on the war in Syria from the days of the Obama administration, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said on a trip to Turkey that the “longer-term status of President Assad will be decided by the Syrian people.”

CNN further reported that the comments had been echoed by the US envoy to the United Nations, Nikki Haley.

“US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley was even stronger about the Trump administration’s decision not to push for Assad’s departure. “Our priority is no longer to sit and focus on getting Assad out,” Haley told wire reporters Thursday.”

The Independent delivered a longer quote from the same briefing.”You pick and choose your battles and when we’re looking at this, it’s about changing up priorities and our priority is no longer to sit there and focus on getting Assad out,” US Ambassador Nikki Haley told a small group of reporters on Thursday. (Source)

These statements at the time seemed little more than a bland acceptance of the blindingly obvious fact that unless the US was willing to wage a war against Russia, it was not going to get its way in Syria.

The War Party predictably reacted with fury to this development and the seasoned warmongers Senators McCain and Graham were equally predictably at the forefront, as CNN further reported:

“The comments drew heavy criticism from Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham, Republicans who have long advocated for an increased US military presence in Syria against Assad and his Russian allies.”

“This overlooks the tragic reality that the Syrian people cannot decide the fate of Assad or the future of their country when they are being slaughtered by Assad’s barrel bombs,”McCain said in a statement.

The motive to change this situation is so obvious and powerful that it scarcely bears stating.

The Results.

Less than a week after this setback, the War Party have the situation back in hand. The President has more than blinked he has bent and broken, revealing the mendacious and cowardly individual behind the brash front.

At this early stage only two days after the event, Khan Shaykhun is emerging as a triumph, exactly the tonic required to get the West back on track towards the complete destruction of Syria with the war party returned to their rightful place at the helm using the US military and taxpayer to destroy the Middle East as per Israel/Big Oil and the munitions industry demands and needs on the back of whatever lie is required.

This is the way things are supposed to be, this is a restoration and now that Trump has broken they can call of the dogs and cease all the Russia-gate nonsense and return to the mundane but immensely profitable business of endless war and world domination whilst putting the finishing touches on the police state.

Layers of Lies.

It is worth noting that in the fact based world there was never any actual evidence that the Syrian Government forces had ever used chemical weapons, anywhere, however UN investigations of a series of attacks in a village named Khan al Assal in early 2013 concluded that Syrian insurgents had used Sarin gas in a series of attacks leading to the deaths of government soldiers and civilians who supported the government.

Ex-UN envoy to Syria Lakhdar Brahimi: Khan al-Assal CW attacks likely carried out by opposition. | Interventions Watch

UN’s Carla Del Ponte Stupefied By Syrian Opposition Sarin Use

These reports were simply ignored by the entire Western media and hidden behind the massive false flag chemical weapon attack several months later in 2013, in outer Damascus. That was the attack that took place two days after a UN Investigative team arrived in Damascus to investigate the Khan al Assal attacks.

How helpful and considerate it was of the Syrian leader Bashar al Assad to conduct a massive atrocity within driving distance of the UN investigators Damascus hotel. How beneficent of Assad to provide the then US puppet Obama with the cassus belli Obama had written into the script almost precisely one year earlier!

Possible Implications of Faulty US Intelligence in the al Ghouta Nerve Agent Attack of August 21st, 2013.

EXCLUSIVE: Syrians In Ghouta Claim Saudi-Supplied Rebels Behind Chemical Attack

Seymour M. Hersh · The Red Line and the Rat Line: Erdoğan and the Syrian rebels · LRB 17 April 2014

Seymour M. Hersh · Whose sarin? · LRB 19 December 2013

In the world of reason and logic, it was obvious on day one that the narrative Westerners were being force-fed about the al Ghouta attack was  puerile nonsense, for them to think they can repeat that nonsense four years later when the narrative is beyond ludicrous is proof of the unshakeable fanaticism of the war party, but also of their total creative and intellectual poverty.

The Situation in Idlib.

In Idlib governate, the last remaining Syrian Army positions of substance fell to the combined insurgent forces led by al Qaeda, in March 2015. Back then the jihadist coalition was going by the Army of Conquest title, these days they are Hayat Tahrir al Sham.

Despite the Russian support over more than eighteen months the Syrian Army and their allies have made zero progress in Idlib since 2015, recently agreeing to evacuate the only towns in Idlib that remained under Government control, making a deal to evacuate the government held Shia majority villages of al Fuah and Kafiryah in exchange for letting the insurgents evacuate two long besieged villages in the Damascus countryside Madaya and Zabadani.

Syria conflict: ‘Deal reached’ for four besieged towns

The deal essentially ended the tiny remaining ground war in Idlib province, ended all urgency of the Syrians and their allies doing anything in Idlib at all. Idlib is now simply a rear area, the only battles on the ground in Idlib are the intra-jihadist civil wars that break out intermittently.

So whereas it could be posited that the Syrian military have the motive to conduct a chemical weapons attack in a place like Der ez Zour, where a large Syrian force is entirely surrounded by ISIS and under constant ground attack and a similar argument could be made regarding other areas where the Syrian army are engaged in large-scale ground warfare, such as against ISIS in eastern Homs or against Tahrir al Sham in northern Hama. The simple fact is that the Syrian Army have not engaged in large-scale battles in Idlib since 2015, the Syrian Army has little or no presence in Idlib and therefore no realistic motive to resort to the desperate measure of the chemical attack.

There was nothing the Syrians and Russians could achieve in Idlib that would be helped by the use of chemicals, quite the opposite.

The insurgents on the other hand, are losing the war, slowly and painfully, only days earlier the US government has basically admitted the cause is lost. Their situation is desperate, they have obvious and powerful motives to either capitalise on the accidental dispersion caused by an attack on their weapons depot or even to propagate the whole thing. They are the ones who need the situation to change, they are the ones who need some event to cause the President to pivot 180 degrees in the space of a day as he just did.

They have everything to gain and nothing to lose, a history of chemical weapons false flag attacks. The scales of probability are entirely lopsided in every matter pertaining to motive.

At the point when the image of the Syrian state is being rehabilitated, at the point they are receiving massive assistance of all kinds from the Russian government, the Syrian government we are expected to believe just decided to flush the whole thing down the back for no discernible military purpose.

Trump Goes Full Retard (and the critics are gasping with joy)

Overnight President Trump has apparently been lobotomised and today we have seen the President completely break and capitulate to the war party in order to save himself.

The cad, coward and weak-minded fool that he is can no longer be hidden or denied.

As luck would have it, the King of Jordan was visiting DC and the US President took the opportunity at the joint press conference to address the Khan Shayhkun incident.

There are some real gems of black comedy here, President Trump not only knows that the Syrian Government are the culprit “These heinous actions by the Assad regime cannot be tolerated.” (Source)

He also magically knows the details of the chemical that was used just a day after it happened:

“a chemical gas that is so lethal — people were shocked to hear what gas it was — that crosses many, many lines, beyond a red line. Many, many lines.”(Source)

Although characteristically the President did not provide any specific details or evidence supporting these claims.

So did the US send technicians into al Qaeda held Idlib, which the US has itself been bombing regularly in recent months, grab some samples, take them to a lab to have them analysed and then transmit the results to the awaiting President and all his new-found War Party cohorts all in the space of 24 hours?

Clearly the President is simply talking crap based on nothing, using the same low tactics he has been targeted with on the Russia issue. The same low tactics they used against Saddam and Gaddafi and every other manufactured bogy.

Even in the world of lies the people who conjure these narratives are cheap imposters. It is simultaneously pathetic and despicable and if they get their way, no matter what happens it is a rock solid guarantee that whatever steps the US takes to destroy the Syrian state the world will feel the negative repercussions in terms of regional instability for decades.

The Nightmare Renewed.

There will be no happy ending, we know it, we have been on this ride several times before and we know how it ends, even better we know that it never ends, as the US mission in Afghanistan enters its sixteenth year with no end in sight and after ISIS the violence in Iraq will not end. The same US military that beseeched Obama for tens of thousands of extra troops in 2009 are now performing the exact same maneuver with the Chaos Clown who had already gone a long way towards proving his fealty with a $54 billion request to increase the budget of themost bloated and unnecessary department of any government anywhere, ever.

Obama was the first US President who did not preside over a single day of peace and Trump is already all but guaranteed to be the second.

Any military operations, covert or otherwise the US government undertakes against the Syrian government will threaten regional or global war, will accelerate the destruction of the Syrian state, will be contrary to international law and thus subject to sanction as aggression and beyond all that, anyone with a lick of sense knows that there is one very simple rule in the Middle East, the more the US military does, the worse things get.

The President knows this perfectly well, he stated repeatedly throughout the campaign that over the past fifteen years the US has expended trillions of dollars in wars that never end and achieved nothing.

Once Rexxon started threatening North Korea with war it was pretty clear that Trump is not really the 45th President of the United States, Donald Trump is better described as the tenth President of the post- executive Presidency, he is puppet number ten to have played the role since the rulers made clear their active displeasure with the last man to defy them by having him shot to death in the full light of day and the full complicity of the security detail. When the brother didn’t get the message the same group underlined it by rubbing him out too when he had the temerity to run for office.

Number 10.

Trump is not going to be judged against George Washington, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln or even Kennedy, Trump will be judged alongside the rest of the puppets, quality individuals such as Bill Clinton, Lyndon Johnson, George H.W Bush, George.W Bush, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Richard Nixon and Barack Obama.

The pattern is established and the reasons for the repetition of cataclysmic errors go far beyond the shortcomings of whatever puppet is currently playing the President or which Generals command the campaign.

It has taken only 75 days of intense undermining to cause a complete rethink, a complete repudiation of not only the campaign rhetoric but the excellent words of the inaugural speech also and this comic gem stands out as the precise moment that President Trump announced himself openly as a fraudster and a sellout, just like Obama and the rest of them.

“I like to think of myself as a very flexible person.  I don’t have to have one specific way, and if the world changes, I go the same way, I don’t change.  Well, I do change and I am flexible, and I’m proud of that flexibility.  And I will tell you, that attack on children yesterday had a big impact on me — big impact.  That was a horrible, horrible thing.  And I’ve been watching it and seeing it, and it doesn’t get any worse than that.” (Source)

Unless, you were to consider for a moment, the far more deadly US air attack in Mosul that slaughtered many more of the exact same people as we are told died in Idlib but this event, one for which he bore direct command responsibility, did not elicit any public comment whatsoever from the President, who prefers to tweet on topics such as the ratings of the Arnold Schwarzenegger version of the Apprentice, the size of the crowd at the inauguration and other similarly weighty topics. Especially those that have a feel-good quality.

200+ people, mostly civilians, killed in US-led airstrikes in Mosul

Trump continued: “And I have that flexibility, and it’s very, very possible — and I will tell you, it’s already happened that my attitude toward Syria and Assad has changed very much.  And if you look back over the last few weeks, there were other attacks using gas.  You’re now talking about a whole different level.” (Source)

Now that Trump has proven his cowardice and loyalty to the empire of lies, presumably all the “establishment issues” will miraculously disappear. After all they will tell each other “we can’t be infighting when there are wars to be fought.”

Trump has ‘drunk the Kool Aid’ on Syria narrative

‘These heinous acts by the Assad regime cannot be tolerated’ – Trump on alleged chemical gas attack

Trump Just Announced He is Illuminati (2017). Will finish what Bush and Obama started

 

Here we have the maniacs who can never spill enough blood, fulminating upon the next US move to create chaos in the Middle East whilst fulfilling the master Israel’s needs. These midwives and mavens of mass murder are all but foaming at the mouth with gleeful anticipation.

There have never been worse people than these anywhere. Ever. Over the passage of time it is sadly becoming clear that the US is going to remain the most destructive and murderous force on the planet unless and until it collapses or is destroyed. Hell awaits think tank psychopaths, hell awaits.

What are Trump’s options in Syria

‘We are compelled to take own action’ if UN fails in Syria – US envoy

Legendary Donbass Commander “Givi” Slain in Donetsk.

Mikhail Tolstykh interviewed in recent days.
Mikhail “Givi” Tolstykh interviewed in recent days.
The horrific aftermath of the attack on Givi's office in Donetsk on February 8th, 2017.
The horrific aftermath of the attack on Givi’s office in Makiyivka, Donetsk on February 8th, 2017.

February 9th, 2017.

Legendary Donbass Commander Slain in Donetsk.

The legendary Commander of the Somali (armoured) Battalion of the Donbass Militia forces Mikhail Tolstykh, known as Givi has been killed in an early morning attack on his office in the military headquarters of the DPR militia in Makiyivka near Donetsk.

There are differing accounts of the attack, with claims that a bomb was placed in or near Givi’s office but other claims that there was an attack by an incendiary rocket system named the RPO-A Shmel.

A Devastating Blow.

The loss of Givi is a monumental, truly devastating blow against the Donbass militias and follows the recent assassination of the Luhansk militia commander Oleg Anashchenko, killed by a roadside bomb attack on his vehicle on February 4th (Source) and the October assassination of Motorola an attack that resembles the killing iof Givi in many respects.

There has been a recent intensification of military attacks on the self-proclaimed Donbass Republics by the Ukraine military and their allies focused on the town of Avdiivka that left dozens of soldiers and civilians dead on both sides of the contact line. (Source)

The renewed Ukrainian assaults are widely perceived as an attempt to provoke Russia to become overtly involved in the Eastern Ukraine war and then use this involvement to curtail all attempts at rapprochement between Russia and the US, an oft stated aim of the new US President that potentially threatens the flow of money and weapons that are keeping the Ukraine military afloat.

Putin: Ukraine is extorting cash through war

Who was Mikhail Tolstykh?

The details of Givi’s life are that he was born in 1980 in the Ukraine, he was from the eastern town of Ilovaisk, he spent some time in the Ukraine military prior to the Donbass war.

The nickname is used in Russia to refer to people of Georgian background, Givi was not from Georgia nor had even been there, but his great-grandfather was an ethnic Georgian.

Givi came to prominence initially due to his ostentatious display of courage caught on film in late 2014 when he remained nonchalant as a barrage of rockets was landing in his close vicinity.

It is hilarious to watch him simply ignore the threat to life and limb, calmly chatting as his fellow soldiers run for cover.

Givi and MLRS “Grad” shell strike.

Givi played a significant role in many successful military operations including the Battle Of Ilovaisk  and the Second Battle of Donetsk Airport when he earned a degree of infamy after aggressively confronting captured Ukrainian soldiers and cutting their badges from their uniforms and forcing the captives to “eat” them.

[eng subs] Givi & Motorola talk to captive UAF colonel

Givi had been subjected to previous attempts on his life, but these earlier attempts were very amateurish, little more than drive by shootings in stark contrast to the highly professional killings of recent times.

Givi was the classic inspirational field commander, the fact that he was a native of the Donbass region makes his death an exceptionally heavy blow, even when compared to the Motorola killing. When they killed Motorola I thought, it could be worse, it could be Givi, and now they got him.

Who Benefits?

The short simple answer is that the Ukraine Government and military and their supporters benefit greatly from this event. There is no point speculating at this early stage as to the identity of the perpetrators, however it seems to me that the commitment and ability of the Ukraine Government and their Western backers has been widely underestimated.

There are people in Western Intelligence who are good at their jobs, they know how to compromise people, how to turn people and force them to collaborate in operations and it seems that the underestimation of these agencies and an overestimation of the support the militia have within the Donbass has left the door open for the Ukrainians and their allies to enlist people on the ground in Donetsk to help them carry out these operations.

The Ukraine Government signed onto the Minsk accord in early 2015 and in the succeeding two years have refused to attempt to implement the deal point-blank. The heads of the self-proclaimed Republics offered to meet and negotiate with the Ukraine Government and this offer was flatly refused.

Over the two years of low intensity warfare that followed the signing of the second Minsk accord, the Ukraine has been on the offensive, seizing a number of settlements from the Donbass militia forces whole their Western sponsors continue to pretend that the Donbass militia are responsible for this situation.

Until the leaders of the Western nations supporting the Ukraine take a more honest approach and consequences are imposed on the Ukrainians for their mendacity, the senseless killing will continue indefinitely.

 

Mikhai "Givi"l Tolstykh 1980-2017. R.I.P
Mikhai “Givi” Tolstykh 1980-2017. R.I.P

URGENTLY! The first images from the place of death of Givi

URGENTLY! The charred body in place Givi murder

The End of the Donbass War?

Discontent in Donbass

The Motorola Assassination and the Future of Donbass.