April 29th, 2017.
Amazing Dutch Whistleblower Interview.
A remarkable and very important video emerged on the internet this week. The video is a 39 minute long interview of a man named Ronald Bernard conducted by a journalist named Irma Schiffer.
There are large gaps in the story Ronald Bernard tells and there is no way to corroborate the claims he makes,, the story Bernard outlines is however broadly corroborated by many confirmed and substantiated facts established in recent decades such as the story told by Belgian woman Regina Louf who claimed to have been abused at an elite party in Belgium at which a young girl was murdered.
The police initially regarded Regina Louf as a fantasist until she was able to direct them to the place where the young girls body had been buried and in addition to that the body still bore evidence of the torture the young girl had suffered prior t0 her death as Regina Louf had described.
More on Regina Louf and Belgium’s well documented problem of elite child abuse and murder:
Too Good to be True?
There is nothing new here, and the interview offers no names of people or institutions and therefore does not fall into the category of “too good to be true” at all in my view.
The Ronald bernard account is just another layer of confirmation. One of many. The importance of the story Ronald Bernard tells lies in the fact that we are hearing the story from the other side, an exceptionally rare event.
If people want to believe that Ronald Bernard is making this stuff up, there is no way to disabuse them of that opinion, there is no way to prove that his story is the truth, but having watched the interview there is no doubt in my mind that the story Bernard tells is substantially true.
I urge readers simply to watch the interview and decide for themselves via this link to the video or scroll to the bottom of this page.
The story Bernard tells is that he was a smart young businessman, acting as a private financial broker when a senior figure notice his talent and invited him “in” telling him that if he chose this path he would have to learn to “put his conscience in the freezer”.
The insider introduced Bernard to his clients and essentially passed his business onto Bernard in exchange for 10% of the earnings.
The role turned out to be a kind of Mr. Fixit, a middle man laundering money and hiding transactions on behalf of elite bankers and intelligence agencies who require these financial instruments to process and launder the money from their drug, weapon and human trafficking operations.
Bernard learned that intelligence agencies are operating as above the law criminal corporations on behalf of their elite masters. Bernard also learned that senior figures within the financial institutions through which the money was passing knew what was happening.
All in all things were going swimmingly, the fact that he was helping these people to start wars, fund terrorism and launder funds obtained through human and drug trafficking was not a problem.
Ronald Bernard was an atheist at this time also so he was not overly troubled by the knowledge that the elites he was working for worshipped a “different” God than most people, they worship Lucifer.
It is worth noting that some people profess themselves to be “light” or benign Luciferians, that may well be the case, or not, but the people who rule the world today are not of that variety, their Lucifer is the destroyer, the blackening force, the force that craves suffering and violent death, the more the better.
People want to debate the nature of Lucifer, that is fine, but the people who matter, those in power, believe in the evil version, an entity interchangeable with Satan, there should be no mistake about that.
One large gap in the story relates to Bernard’s progress within the cult itself, the story jumps wildly from Bernard being an amused witness to a “Church of Satan” ritual that he describes as involving “naked woman and liquor” to the climax of Bernard’s story and the event that precipitated his physical breakdown and fall from grace within the elite, when Bernard states that he was asked to murder a child within a ritual as a kind of “final binding” to the group.
There must be many steps that take place between being an “amused observer” and that request but the story jumps straight from the observer to the potential murderer, hopefully further interviews will flesh the story out in more detail. .
Downfall and Redemption.
After Bernard’s refusal to murder a child and bind himself to the group irreversibly, Bernard appears to have begun to completely break down, his work performance dramatically declined and at some point the group he had been affiliated with abducted and tortured him to in his words “make sure that I didn’t expose them”
At some point after that Bernard completely collapsed physically, suffered multiple organ failure and woke up in the Intensive Care Ward, he later realised that he must have almost died as when he had been taken to the hospital he had observed himself from above, he had looked down and watched the doctors working on his body.
Bernard interpreted that experience to mean that he was something more than simply his body. That he was more than an intelligent lump of meat and that his essence in some form would survive his physical death.
The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.
The remainder of the interview is Bernard offering his post breakdown view of the world, one standout moment was perhaps when Bernard baldly states that “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” is an accurate depiction of the world today. Which is true but a rather shocking statement from a modern European.
People who have not read the Protocols completely misunderstand them, they believe that this work is an anti -Jew hate tract, a “warrant for genocide” as one professional liar described it, it is nothing of the sort.
Regardless of questions of authenticity this is the most important thing to understand.
The Protocols are written from the point of view of a Satanist or Luciferian who poses as a Jew. This is merely a front. The narrator is not a Jew and he does not like Jews, he sees them as he sees all other people, as a nuisance, an obstacle and a resource to be exploited, lied to and if necessary, destroyed.
The narrator is not describing a Jewish plot and the Protocols does not in the slightest suggest that all or most Jewish people are part of some evil plot, in fact it states precisely the opposite.
My understanding of the plotters is that they are a coalition of the blackened, so there are people from all backgrounds represented and in each case their job is to subvert the institutions and positions they inhabit for the benefit of the broader cult.
So you must have Christians, they are very important because you need them to destroy Christianity from within, to turn it into a travesty and we have seen this take place in all major Christian denominations and the same principle stands for all groups and institutions.
As far as authenticity goes, in my opinion the Protocols are a doctored document based on very good intelligence, almost all of the text appears to be authentic but some elements seem to have been added in an attempt to flatter and manipulate the Russian Czar to whom it was originally presented.
As many have stated, the authenticity of this document at this point is completely irrelevant, the document describes the world that is being built, how it is being built and the type of people who are doing it, if that is a consequence of a hoax document being embraced and implemented after release or the document was authentic when published in 1903 makes almost no difference at this juncture.
The Protocols describe the program in a very direct and powerful way. Many other (more respectable) works such as “Tragedy and Hope” and “Brave New World” provide similar insights to the Protocols, but both are far longer and far less direct.
It should be remembered that the elite want people to be prejudiced, to be ignorant, to lump individuals into massive groups and condemn them en masse.
It is the height of foolishness to allow yourself to be tricked or manipulated into thinking like that, while it is true that a demographically disproportionate number of the engineers and managers of evil come from a nominally Jewish background, that should never be used to smear anyone because of their family or religious background.
It is also the height of blindness to imagine that the numerous non-Jews who propagate evil and play key roles in the tyranny project are to be somehow swept aside and forgotten.
The final point Ronald Bernard makes is that people must overcome the divide and rule con if they are going to depose these evil forces who currently rule the world.
The interview is deeply moving and although it is conducted in Dutch, the language has so many words that are similar to or the same as English that it is very easy to follow what is being said rather than merely reading it on the screen as is the case with many more distant languages.
Please do yourself a favour and watch this video if you have not already done so. Whilst much on YouTube is ephemera and nonsense, this is the exact opposite