the Nice Attack: Anatomy of a Farce.

3650D54C00000578-3694928-image-a-85_1468800748885
The strangely bloodless murder weapon on display after the Nice terror psyop. Photo by WILLIAM ABENHAIM/SIPA/REX/Shutterstock
Mandatory Credit: Photo by WILLIAM ABENHAIM/SIPA/REX/Shutterstock (5770887m) The truck that was driven by Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel through a crowd celebrating Bastille Day being towed away by breakdown lorry Lorry driven into Bastille Day crowd, Nice, France - 15 Jul 2016
Photo by WILLIAM ABENHAIM/SIPA/REX/Shutterstock  The bloodless truck that was driven by Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel through a crowd celebrating Bastille Day being towed away by breakdown lorry Lorry driven into Bastille Day crowd, Nice, France – 15 Jul 2016

“When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?”  The Sign of the Four. Chap. 6, p. 111.

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, The Sign of the Four, 1890. (Source)

The Nice Attack: Tragedy or Farce?

Introduction.

In the weeks since the world was told that Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel murdered 85 people and wounded another 300 with a truck on the Nice boulevard a number of anomalies have emerged leading to speculation that the Nice attack was a staged event.

This piece will seek to place the attack in a historical context and analyse the visual evidence as comprised in the videos made of the event against the narrative with which we have been presented as gleaned from the statements of the French Government and the Wikipedia article on the attack.  This source is required to flesh out the story due to the paucity of statements from the French government.

It is not expected that those who have been moved and traumatised by the story will be swayed by anything that is written here. However if those who believe the authentic read this they will hopefully be made aware at the very least of the many implausible and impossible elements of the Nice narrative.

To those who believe that Mohamed Bouhlel was actually responsible for an horrific atrocity in Nice on Bastille Day I would state that the only reason you believe the official story is that you do not know the official story.

Because the crime is so upsetting, the scenario is semi-realistic and some of the footage quite convincing this may not be a winning argument, (at least in the short-term) but an overwhelming weight of evidence points to the hypothesis that there was no terror attack in Nice nor any authentic victims.

If this hypothesis is incorrect, and people actually died in Nice, this is a tremendous tragedy and a horrific crime for which there can be no justification.

To state the obvious, all killing of civilians whether targeted or otherwise is a criminal act and should be punished by the appropriate court.

Screenshot from Liveleak shows the apparent psychosis caused by the trauma of the narrative. The poster refers to a bloody truck yet there is clearly no hint of blood anywhere
Screenshot from Liveleak shows the apparent psychosis caused by the trauma of the narrative. The poster refers to a bloody truck yet there is no hint of blood anywhere
Police investigate the scene after a truck plowed through Bastille Day revelers in the French resort city of Nice, France, Thursday, July 14, 2016. France was ravaged by its third attack in two years when a large white truck mowed through revelers gathered for Bastille Day fireworks in Nice, killing at dozens of people as it bore down on the crowd for more than a mile along the Riviera city's famed seaside promenade. (Sasha Goldsmith via AP)
Police investigate the scene after a truck plowed through Bastille Day revelers in the French resort city of Nice, France, Thursday, July 14, 2016. France was ravaged by its third attack in two years when a large white truck mowed through revelers gathered for Bastille Day fireworks in Nice, killing at dozens of people as it bore down on the crowd for more than a mile along the Riviera city’s famed seaside promenade. (Sasha Goldsmith via AP)
Possibly even more remarkable than the complete lack of any blood on the front of the truck that we are told killed 85 people by driving into them is the fact that none of the 85 victims struck front on and killed has fallen under the truck. If any of the victims had gone underneath the truck a bloody path would be trailing behind the truck. This photograph clearly depicts the absence of any such remnants of the victims behind the truck.
Possibly even more remarkable than the complete lack of any blood on the front of the truck that we are told killed 85 people by driving into them is the fact that none of the 85 victims struck front on and killed has fallen under the truck. If any of the victims had gone underneath the truck a bloody path would be trailing behind the truck. This photograph clearly depicts the absence of any such remnants of the victims behind the truck. Remember that eyewitness Gwenael Leriche stated “The area behind the truck was a field of dead people, blood and flesh. I had to step over corpses to keep trying to get to him.” (Source)
According to the official story of the Nice attack Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel was shot to death isndioe this cabin, this photo provides compelling evidence that not only is there a strange and total lack of the victims blood at the crime scene, this extends also to any sign that the perpetrator was shot to death in the cab of the truck.
According to the official story of the Nice attack Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel was shot to death inside this cabin, this photo provides compelling evidence that not only is there a strange and total lack of the victim’s blood at the crime scene, this extends also to any sign that the perpetrator was shot to death in the cab of the truck.

Starting Point: The Bloodless Murder Weapon.

The fact that the truck allegedly used in the attack bore no sign of having struck even one person, let alone hundreds, given that no blood was evident on either the front of the truck or the tyres has been one anomaly highlighted by those challenging the authenticity of the event. It is however theoretically possible, albeit extremely unlikely, that a blunt instrument could be used to murder 85 people and wound more than 300 others and bear not a spot of blood.

This implies that the driver struck hundreds of people scores mortally and yet none of them went under the vehicle.

The lack of blood on the front of the truck is very telling, but the complete lack of any blood trail behind the truck is downright devastating.

In addition, not only is there a complete lack of any blood of the victims on the truck front or tyres, there is also a complete lack of any blood from the perpetrator having supposedly been shot to death inside the cab despite one eyewitness describing the perpetrator hanging out of the cab after having been shot to death.

“Witness Nadar El Shafei told the BBC: ‘He died inside the vehicle – I saw his head [hanging] out of the window, they kept shooting him from all sides just to be sure. Then they asked us to run away in case there were others inside the car or a bomb.’ (Source)

The complete video of the end scene shootout destroys that narrative completely and will be dealt with later.

At the very least the bloodless murder weapon makes it clear that the attack deserves further investigation, whether to ascertain how such a catastrophic security failure could happen even during the State of Emergency along with the question of whether the event was staged.

A Short History of Vehicle Terrorism.

Vehicles, including heavy vehicles such as front end loaders have been used in numerous attacks on civilians, sometimes with political motive. There have been numerous attacks in Israel/Palestine and there was also an attack in Tiananmen square in 2013 blamed n Uyghur separatists that left two people dead along with the three attackers. (Source).

An attack in Jerusalem in October 2014 also left two civilians dead. (Source) while an attack using a tractor in the same city the following month left one person dead along with the attacker. (Source)

Vehicular assault as a terrorist tactic

According to Wikipedia similar attacks have never managed to kill more than three people(attackers aside) and the largest tally of wounded I could find was 19 when somebody drove a car into a bus stop full of Israeli soldiers, so it is beyond astonishing that during the State of emergency, with Operation Sentinel a large-scale military operation placing thousands of armed troops on the street someone was able to surpass many times over all previous efforts  that achieved in any of the previous recorded vehicle attacks on crowds of people.

Background.

This is Mohamed Bouhlel's Temproary French residency identification, helpfully left in the cab of the truck as has been the custom when framing patsies thriguhout the war on error, from 911, to Charlie Hebdo, Friday the 13th and may others.
This is Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel’s temporary French residency identification, helpfully left in the cab of the truck as has been the custom when framing patsies throughout the war on error, from 911, to Charlie Hebdo, Friday the 13th and many others. The terrorists are always keen on assisting their enemies identify them! It makes perfect sense.
This is one of two selfies released by french prosecutors. The Frnch claim that this photo was taken in the hours prior to the attack. So this fellow is all set to go out and commit mass murder in the supposed name of Islam but he has not a word to say about why he is doing it. What he is upset about, what effect he hopes it will have etc. So a little man wants to make a big name for himself, he has a platform, he supposedly has a cuase. where is the rhetoric, where is the justifiaction, where is the denunicration of the French state or the West? Where is the message to the family? Where is the pledge of support for ISIS? In all aspects of this case the things that would make sense are absent. One or two examples would be perfectly plausible, people do not always do the predictable or logical thing, but everything?
This is one of two selfies released by french prosecutors. The French claim that this photo was taken in the hours prior to the attack. So this fellow is all set to go out and commit mass murder in the supposed name of Islam but he has not a word to say about why he is doing it. What he is upset about, what effect he hopes it will have etc. So a little man wants to make a big name for himself, he has a platform, he supposedly has a cause. where is the rhetoric, where is the justification, where is the denunciation of the French state or the West? Where is the message to the family? Where is the pledge of support for ISIS? In all aspects of this case the things that would make sense are absent. One or two examples would be perfectly plausible, people do not always do the predictable or logical thing, but everything?

Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel.

There is no history of strong religious observance let alone fanaticism on the part of the perpetrator.

“Bouhlel’s rapid radicalisation has puzzled investigators. Friends and family said he had not been an observant Muslim in the past.” (Source)

He ate pork and did not attend the mosque regularly until April.

“Mohamed didn’t pray, didn’t go to the mosque and ate pork,” said Sadok Bouhlel, a 69-year-old retired teacher, in the driver’s hometown of Msaken, Tunisia.”(Source)

He also took alcohol and other drugs and reportedly stole bikes along with being a delivery driver. (Source)

“He stank of alcohol, even during Ramadan, “(Source)

Earlier this year he appeared in court in relation to a road rage incident that saw him throw a pallet at another man.

The French claim the attack was planned for months.”He seems to have envisaged and developed his criminal plans several months before carrying them out,” stated French Prosecutor in charge of the case Francois Molins.(Source)

The claims made by the French prosecutor appear on their face to be quite ridiculous. They are stating that the perpetrator planned the attack for months yet also that he rented a truck  in the nearby town of Saint Laurent du Var on the 11th of July and that the truck was rented for two days and thus due to be returned on the 13th, the day before the attack.

So the months of planning did not enable him to get the most simple details right. By retaining the truck after it was due to be returned he was putting the whole operation at risk completely unnecessarily.

Anyone who had done even ten minutes of planning would have rented the truck on the 12th or the 13th making it due for return after the attack.

By keeping the truck after it was due to be returned to the rental agency, Bouhlel risked the rental company contacting the police or the police asking if he owned the truck and thus preventing the attack.

These risks may be small but he does not achieve anything by being in possession of the truck on the 11th or the 12th, the risk is completely unnecessary and inconsistent with any plan at all.

The perpetrator left no suicide note, no “martyrdom” video, no clandestine pledge of allegiance to ISIS or any similar group and essentially gave no signs whatsoever if being either suicidal nor homicidal or a jihadist. It is that simple.

None of these details on their own is necessarily evidence of anything, but as we look at the details of the Nice attack none of them fit the narrative. None.

An overview of the area the attack is said to have taken place with key landmarks marked. An overview of the Promenade des Anglais with key landmarks marked.
An overview of the Promenade des Anglais with key landmarks marked.

The Attack.

The core story is simple. The mysteriously radicalised ISIS inspired Mohamed Bouhlel drove onto the Promenade des Anglais at 10.45 pm on July the 14th and began to target civilians as he drove up the promenade, staying on the footpath and zig-zagging the truck in order to cause as many casualties as possible.

This is the story until he has traveled around 1.4 kilometres to the intersection of the Promenade with the Boulevard Gambetta where the truck was confronted with several local police, a barricade and a police car marking the beginning of the pedestrian zone.

The attacker broke these barricades and progressed another 400 metres up the Promenade and at this point,  he is filmed for the first time by Richard Gutjahr on a balcony of the Westminster Hotel of 27 Promenade des Anglais.

The truck, now at the 90% mark of its journey up the Promenade drives slowly past the Westminster Hotel through a closed pedestrian zone entirely empty of pedestrians before hurtling into the crowd watching the band and stopping outside the Hyatt Hotel/Casino at 13-15 Promenade des Anglais and La Canne a Sucre (the Sugar Cane Cafe is a loose translation) at number 11 on the promenade around 200 metres up the road past the Westminster at the intersection between the Promenade and the Rue de Congres.

The Childish Lies of the Faux Heroes.

It is unclear what caused the truck to stop. One man claims to have jumped onto the side of the truck and attacked the perpetrator causing him to slow down and somehow enabling the police to shoot the perpetrator dead.

It sounds unbelievable but there are actually at least two separate French men who claim to have climbed onto the truck during the attack. Franck is the fellow who rode the motorbike in the Westminster video and Gwenael Leriche claims he climbed onto the truck at the end of the attack, another 200 metres down the Promenade.

The stories they tell speak for themselves.

Franck’s story.

This is the story Franck, the motorcyclist in the Westminster video told the Nice Matin newspaper as reported by the Guardian.

“I wanted to stop him at any price … my aim was to get to the [driver’s] cabin. When I drew level with him, I asked myself, what are you going to do with your poor scooter, so I threw it against the lorry and continued to run after him.”

“Finally I grabbed on to the cabin. I was on the steps at the level of the open window facing him. I hit and hit him and hit him again. With all my strength, with my left hand in the face. He said nothing. He didn’t even flinch. He had his gun in his hand but the pistol was not working. I had the impression he was trying to fiddle with it, I don’t know. He pointed it at me and pulled on the trigger but it didn’t work.”

“I was ready to die. I was conscious and ready to die to stop him and I kept hitting him. I tried to drag him out through the window because I couldn’t open the bloody door. I kept hitting him. Then he finally hit me on the head with the butt.” (Source)

What an amazing feat of driving from Mohamed Bouhlel! He maintained a perfectly straight line down the Promenade whilst engaging in a fist fight with the hero Franck who performed the even greater deed of making himself invisible throughout the entire melee!

Franck must have some type of special invisibility spray he carries around all the time and uses in moments of crisis.

Two things stand out here. On the one hand the story the man is telling is physically impossible. He states that he threw the scooter at the lorry before giving chase on foot and climbing onto the side of the truck.The second thing is his story bears no resemblance to what is seen in the video of the incident.

Here we see the motorcycle pull up alongside the truck, fall and the truck continue unimpeded. The entire interaction between the truck and the motorcyclist lasts less than one second yet this clown has woven a story of a prolonged interaction that cannot possibly have taken place if we refer to the video.

It was initially reported that the first motorcyclist, the one seen in the Westminster Hotel video had been killed in his heroic attempt to prevent the attack. Richard Gutjahr was the source for that long abandoned falsehood as reported by the Independent.

“As the killer drove a lorry down a packed Nice promenade in an attack that would kill at least 84 people, a person on a motorcycle attempted to stop him and ended up giving his own life to do so, according to holidaying German journalist Richard Gutjahr.” (Source)

Gwenael Leriches story.

Gwenael Leriche is one of two men who claim to have climbed onto the truck and engaged in hand to hand combat with Mohamed Bouhlel causing the truck to decelerate and thus enabling the police to shoot the perpetrator.

Here are two media accounts of this heroic and superhuman feat.

“I knew what was happening was no accident. This guy was carrying out a massacre. He left behind a trail of dead bodies, of flesh and blood. I had to leap over corpses to try to get close to him. He targeted one particular group of people.

“It was carnage. He then accelerated again and got away from me. I saw what was left behind. For a split-second I thought of what I could do for those who had been run over, but it was too late, so I tried again to catch up with him.”

Gwenael clung onto the back of the truck, which was eventually halted by police in a hail of gunfire.” (Source)

and

“According to witnesses, another unnamed passer-by grabbed onto the lorry door, slowing the attacker down again. At this point Mr Leriche was able to catch up.

He and the other passer-by reportedly tried to attack Bouhlel through the lorry windows, but he started firing at them with a pistol. Police then opened fire and the attacker was shot.” (Source)

It is perfectly clear that no-one is going to be able to climb onto a truck that is traveling anywhere much above walking speed, much less the 50 miles (80 kms) an hour that Mohamed Bouhlel is described as achieving as he sped down towards the end of the promenade in the killer truck. If the truck were traveling slowly enough to enable people to do that it stands to reason that there would have been time for all those in its path to evade it. It is after all a much simpler matter to simply step out of the way than to run behind a massive vehicle and jump upon it while it is moving.

Taken on an individual basis these absurdities can be dismissed witness error or faulty reporting but the entire narrative is built upon the same contradictory and absurd ground as these pitiful “hero” stories. The whole narrative is of the same character.

The Visual Record of the Nice Attack.

Start.

There have been and remain serious inconsistencies regarding both the time and the place the attack started and the straightforward matter of where the Promenade was blocked off by the police and breached by the attacker is still being reported as having taken place at two separate locations.

According to the BBC, the attacker breached the barricades located near the Fondation Lenval Hospital whereas the French government and Wikipedia state that the barricade was located on the intersection with Boulevard Gambetta and this is supported by eyewitnesses interviewed by the french newspaper Liberation whose investigation forced the French government to admit to lying about the presence of National police at the breached barricade.

Sécurité à Nice. 370 mètres de questions – Libération (in English)

There are no images of the attack for the first 90% of the distance the truck traveled before it reached the lucky Richard Gutjahr sitting on a balcony of the Westminster Hotel,there are also very few accounts of the victims save for a lone Muslim woman said to be killed just before he reached the Negresco/Westminster area and the story about the truck zig- zagging at high-speed, mounting the footpath and killing people this way.

In addition to the surprising complete lack of any footage, whether filmed deliberately or inadvertently of the truck at any time on the promenade throughout 90% of the attack,  no photographic evidence of the damage the attack caused in this area to either people or property shows up in an internet search under the terms “Nice attack damage”. (Source)

It stands to reason that if the attack took place as it has been described, that some of the tables and chairs of the cafes and restaurants would have been damaged and that these artifacts of the attack could be shown in the media without any fear of being perceived as callous or disrespectful to the victims.

Nice terror attack: Footage shows truck on Promenade des Anglais

The Westminster Video.

The first visual evidence of the Nice attack therefore is the video shot from the Westminster Hotel at 27 PDA by a man named Richard Gutjahr.

Fifteen seconds later,at the 17 second mark of the Gutjahr video the truck passes the end section of crossing 2- 75 metres away.
Fifteen seconds later, at the 17 second mark of the Gutjahr video the truck passes the end section of crossing 2- 75 metres away.
The two crossings outside the Westminster Hotel that we observe the truck traverse. The precise distance between them is 73.2 metres. In order to determine the approximate speed of the truck, 75 metres was used in order to achieve a round answer of five metres per second over 15 seconds.
The two crossings outside the Westminster Hotel that we observe the truck traverse. The precise distance between them is 73.9 metres. In order to determine the approximate speed of the truck, 75 metres was used in order to achieve a round answer of five metres per second over 15 seconds.

How Slow?

At the start of the video we see the truck is just passing the edge of the pedestrian crossing to the right of the Westminster, I measured the time it takes the truck to travel between the crossing number 1, to the right of the Westminster and crossing number 2, to the left of the Westminster.

Measured from the end of one crossing to the next the distance is 75 metres, the time the truck takes to travel between the two crossings is 15 seconds, we see the truck just at the far edge of crossing one at the 2 second mark of the video and it passes the same point of crossing 2 at the seventeen second mark of the video.

These measurements are not necessarily precise but they enable us to determine the approximate speed the truck was traveling at this time.

Based on the measured speed of five metres per second we can calculate that the truck was traveling at around 11 miles per hour (18 kilometres per hour) between these crossings.

(5 metres per second times 60 seconds equals 300 metres per minute. 300 metres a minute times 60 minutes equals 18,000 metres or 18 kms /11.25 miles per hour)

Remember that the story is that the attack has started well over a kilometer earlier, the driver has already breached the police barrier located at the intersection of Boulevard Gambetta, the attack is well underway and the perpetrator knows that the police know what he is doing and will try to stop him having already driven through their barrier which according to the French government was manned by two members of the local police. (Source) (in English)

It is also worth remembering that this was a uniquely deadly and “successful” vehicular act of terrorism, surpassing the previous casualty levels by orders of magnitude.

How odd that the most successful purveyor of vehicular terrorism in the history of the world could achieve such devastating results without even speeding!

How odd also that despite the area in front of the Westminster being well within the pedestrian zone which started hundreds of metres up the street at the intersection with Boulevard Gambetta, and there being 30,000 people in the area watching the 10pm fireworks there are no pedestrians whatsoever in the area through which the truck is driving.

All logic indicates that a man intent on vehicular mass murder, being pursued by the police and having already driven through a police barrier is not going to be driving at 11 miles an hour.
The only reasonable explanation for the speed at which the truck is traveling is that the Nice attack was a staged Hollywood production, a work of fiction and the driver had to slow down to enable the motorcyclist to perform his stunt for the pre-positioned cameraman Richard Gutjahr.

Police fairy stories.

In addition we have the ludicrous account presented in the media as the explanation for the failure of the local police to halt the attack at the point the truck breached the police barricade at the intersection with the Boulevard Gambetta.

Liberation quoted a Nice municipal police officer named Yves Bergerat as stating that the nine millimeter pistols the local police are allocated were incapable of either piercing the windscreen or the tyres of the truck  “Our weapons do not allow to break the windscreen or puncture the tires” which is such nonsense it is almost unbelievable they would try to say it. (Source-in English)

A concrete block after a standard steel jacketed bullet from a 9mm, pistol has been fired into it.
A concrete block after a standard steel jacketed bullet from a 9mm pistol has been fired into it. (Source)

While a nine millimeter pistol is not a very powerful or penetrative weapon, failing to penetrate cinder block in field tests, the idea that such a weapon is incapable of breaking glass or puncturing a tyre is beyond ridiculous.

The same Liberation article forced the French interior Minister to admit to having lied about the deployment of National Police at the breached barricade in Nice (or as the Guardian delightfully expressed it, caused Cazeneuve to “backtrack.”

“France’s interior minister has acknowledged that there was no national police presence at the entrance to the pedestrianised walkway in Nice during the attack. In what represents a backtracking on his previous claim that national police were present, Bernard Cazeneuve said local police, who are more lightly armed, were guarding the entrance through which Bouhlel drove his truck. ” (Source)

The attempt to cover up the lack of National Police in Nice was the “simple” reason the French police anti-terrorism branch ordered the Nice authorities to destroy the CCTV footage of the event, an order that was opposed by the Nice authorities and never carried out.

This story appears to have been a classic piece of obfuscation, a limited hangout-selling the small scandal to protect the big lie. It is entirely possible some of the CCTV footage will be released in the future, however it can be guaranteed that almost all of the footage will be suppressed because it’s release would expose and destroy the Nice lie and those who delivered it.

Richard and Einat.
Richard Gutjahr has some very interesting connections, he is married to a member of the Israeli Knesset named Einet Wilf who previously served in the Israeli cyber unit named 8200. Unit 8200 are engaged in the collection if signals intelligence, the best analogy would be the NSA or GCHQ)

Einet also acts as a propagandist and advocate for Israel, making speeches where she tries to reinforce the laughable notion that Israel is not an apartheid state engaged in ethnic cleansing, and that those who tell the truth about Israel are engaging in a conspiracy against Israel based on anti- Jewish prejudice! (Source)

The Westminster video discredits and mocks the story of the horrific mass murder in Nice and all those who would believe it.The Westminster video alone, combined with the bloodless murder weapon provide compelling evidence of fraud and strongly imply that the Nice attack was a staged event.

NICE, FRANCE, Side View of Truck

The Side On Video.

The second video is the side on footage shot from within the crowd at the far end of the promenade near where the music was playing. The footage is of wretched quality, we are shown a large crowd of people,the truck is seen too plunge through behind where the people are standing and we are thus invited to imagine the truck has driven through a dense crowd of people but there is no evidence in the video to indicate whether the truck actually struck any people nor if there were even any people standing in the path of the truck.

In common with the far more effective and celebrated front-on footage is the fact that the massive truck cannot be heard despite driving within a few metres of the camera.

The Front On Video.

NICE: FRONT VIEW OF TRUCK ATTACK

For many people such was the realism of the front on footage that it ended all debate in their mind as to the authenticity of the event. This is perfectly understandable given the emphasis given to the visual in our culture and the fact that the footage is of a far higher quality than what has been created to support other staged events of recent years.

The footage is truly great because it causes the casual viewer to imagine the attack in their own minds. This ability to make the audience imagine the moment of horror by providing the right visual cues has long been a hallmark of great film directors in the horror and thriller genres with the shower scene from Psycho a very obvious and classic example.

The front on footage does not depict the truck making contact with anyone but it takes you right up until the preceding moment and makes the audience believe they have seen the truck run into a group of people by using the same classic cinematic techniques of leading the audience up to the edge and prompting them to visualise the unfolding horror.

This piece of footage propels this event to a new and higher level of deception than has previously been detected and actually changes the paradigm established in the years since people noticed these faux events in 2012 in the wake of the Aurora and Sandy Hook staged events.

In the past these operations always broke one of two ways, there were cases like Charleston or Umpqua Community College :shootings”where it was absolutely clear that the event was not authentic but very hard to prove because of the complete lack of visual evidence presented and on the other hand were cases such as Boston, the WDBJ shooting and to some extent Orlando where the authors try to present the public with the event on film and destroy their own narrative due to the very obviously contrived and fake nature of what is shown.

This event has changed that paradigm and means that at the very least those intent on claiming that events are staged are going to have to come up with substantive evidence of their claims if they are to be sustained in the face of dramatically improved staging.

I believe that if the Nice narrative is considered in its entirety there can be no serious discussion as to the authenticity of the event and thus do not believe that it is necessary to debunk this footage in order to make the argument the Nice attack was a staged event.

I cannot claim to know precisely the techniques that were used to create this footage, it is however indisputable that the means to create seemingly real footage without an actual attack are widely available and accessible to anyone with a personal computer and given the wealth and power the fake war on terror has given to the factions and industries who benefit directly from the concocted threat there can be no question of people having the motive to create this video.

There are however significant anomalies of the footage that indicate the footage is not authentic and also point towards how the illusion may have been achieved.

Scutiny of this still from the front on video points to digital fakery although the wretched quality of the video makes it hard to be completely certain. If we look at the figures in the foreground we can see that they are casting a consistent and easily visible shadow, yet when we look at the person wearing black slightly behind them, he casts no shadow at all, yet he is under the same light source and in almost the same place as the others. Digital insertion of some of the figures in the video appears to be the best explanation for this anomaly.
Scrutiny of this still from the front on video points to digital fakery although the wretched quality of the video makes it hard to be completely certain. If we look at the figures in the foreground we can see that they are casting a consistent and easily visible shadow, falling to the right of screen, yet when we look at the person wearing black slightly behind them, he casts no shadow at all, yet he is under the same light source and in almost the same place as the others. Digital insertion of some of the figures in the video appears to be the best explanation for this anomaly.

Anomalies

One of the first things that stands out in the video are the actions of the young man with the skateboard prior to the truck’s arrival. The young skateboarder appears to know that something is about to happen and also the direction the something will appear from.

When the truck appears it is filmed for only a brief moment and the photographer inexplicably pans the camera away from the truck. When stills of this brief moment are examined they appear to show that some of the people in the video cast a clear shadow whilst others cast no shadow whatsoever.

Another strange element of this video is that despite at the end of the video the truck driving within feet of the camera at no time do we hear the sound of the massive truck engine. This seems impossible and suggests that either the truck was digitally inserted into the footage or the footage was given a soundtrack completely independent of the video.

The audio is another very strong and well thought out element of the staged Nice event, the sound of a distressed female screaming, as is heard over and over again in the Nice footage, triggers a primal response in the audience, the sound acts like a primal cue, triggering both an emotional and physiological response that is almost impossible to resist. It is a classic, possibly the classic trigger for the fight or flight reaction.

The fact that the people screaming are simply being paid to do so and the soundtrack may even have been created somewhere else at another time makes little difference.

My opinion is that the truck drove down the promenade through an area where no people were in the way and some of the people were digitally inserted in order to create the illusion of a collision along with the cleverly positioned camera operator filming from an angle that created the illusion that people were in the path of the truck when these people were actually outside the path of the truck. .

This would be consistent with all the other footage that we see of the event from the Westminster Hotel onward, the truck is there, but it is traveling at the wrong speed and failing to target or hit any people. People are present on the scene but none are even in the path of the truck.

Weighing Contradictory Evidence.

The thing I would like to emphasise is that when we consider the weight we give to different evidence we have to use logic to weigh the importance of different pieces of evidence.

So we know the truck is bloodless and this makes absolutely no sense.

According to one of the faux heroes Gwenael Leriche who claimed that he helped stop the attack by jumping on to the side of the truck and fighting the perpetrator “The area behind the truck was a field of dead people, blood and flesh. I had to step over corpses to keep trying to get to him.”

So there must be blood on the truck, there simply must be and there is no known means or motive for anyone to tamper with the truck to render it bloodless.

On the other hand the motive for filming the truck on the promenade and digitally inserting some people into the footage is perfectly clear and the means are readily available to anyone with a personal computer.

These factors mean that greater weight must be given to the bloodless truck than the front on video because while there are many powerful motives to produce fake footage of a terror attack, there is no realistic prospect that someone clandestinely cleaned the truck in order to trick people who a real terror attack was not real and we have photography of the truck from directly after the attack that shows this hypothesis is impossible as well as being entirely illogical.

Nice Attack: Moment police stormed and killed truck driver

Nice : voici la vidéo intégrale du “témoin” israélien

The ‘Final Shootout” Videos.

There are at least two videos that claim to depict the police shooting to death Mohamad Bouhlel outside the Hyatt hotel Casino at 13-15 and La Canne a Sucre (the Sugar Cane) at number 11.

The striking thing about these videos is that neither of them contain any sign that anyone is even in the cab of the truck.

A still froom the Nader el Shafai video, there is no sign of the gunman or anyone else inside the cab of the truck at any time, in stark contrast with el Shafai's description of the dead gunman hanging out the window of the cab.
A still froom the Nader el Shafai video, there is no sign of the gunman or anyone else inside the cab of the truck at any time, in stark contrast with el Shafai’s description of the dead gunman hanging out the window of the cab.

A man named Nader el Shafai filmed the version of the final shootout scene that was filmed from the beachside looking across towards La Canne a Sucre and the Hyatt. The version he shot has been the version featured most in the media. Nader El Shafai’s account of what he saw that night is completely and irretrievably inconsistent with the video he has made and this footage can be easily dismissed on this basis alone.

“Nader El Shafei told the BBC: ‘He died inside the vehicle – I saw his head [hanging] out of the window, they kept shooting him from all sides just to be sure. Then they asked us to run away in case there were others inside the car or a bomb. (Source)

So he was there well past the point that the supposed perpetrator was killed by the police and he plainly and unambiguously states that he saw the dead man hanging out the window of the cab. “I saw his head [hanging] out of the window, they kept shooting him from all sides just to be sure.”

So in order to learn that Mr. El Shafia is not an honest witness or anything approaching it, we need only consult the video he shot of the event and note that there is at no time any sign of the gunman, dead or alive and he is most certainly not to be seen  dead and hanging from the window .

Once again there is a wide chasm between what is supposed to have happened and what the videos depict.

How can this be? How can it be that just at the very moment the terrorist has come to a halt and his only choice is to use his weapon to continue the killing spree until he is killed by the police he is DOING NOTHING.

So within a matter of seconds it seems the perpetrator has again been transformed from a mass murderer with an insatiable appetite for dead “infidels” and “martyrdom” into a complete non-entity with no interest in shooting even the police who surround him as he faces certain death!

Here we have the identical  abyss between what the terrorist does when he is off camera and what he actually does when the film is running  as provided by the Westminster footage.

The same man who zig-zagged at 50 miles an hour driving on the footpath to maximise the casualties for the first 1.8 kilometres of the journey was suddenly seen to be driving at little more than stalling speed when the Gutjahr camera was rolling and he was not zig-zagging nor did he strike anyone.

Overview if the scene in Nice in the direct aftermath of the event.
Overview of the scene in Nice in the direct aftermath of the event.
This photo shows the same area of road, the grey booth is a good marker. It seems that the objects seen on the ground were placed there after the truck had completed it's journey.
This photo shows the same area of road, the grey bus stop is a good marker. It seems that the objects seen on the ground were placed there after the truck had completed it’s journey.

The Aftermath.

The aftermath footage shows many people fleeing the area of the Promenade in panic. These people are genuine and so is the fear they exhibit. Their behaviour has been explained by many people who were present in Nice on July the 14th who state that someone shouted there has been a terrorist attack, generally a shooting and once a few people started running others followed instinctively fleeing from a genuinely perceived threat that had been successfully implanted in the crowd by other people’s reactions.

It is a common occurrence for people to flee from non-existent threats, it happened last week when there were false reports of a terror attack at a US airport and in France we saw a classic example in the wake of the Friday the 13th events last year when a crowd in Paris fled wildly in response to several firecrackers let off by persons unknown as the people tried to march in unity against the intimidation of the terrorists.

It is very easy to cause panic in a crowd of people and this panic can be created without the presence of any actual violence or danger so the fleeing crowds in Nice do a great job o supporting the illusion that an attack has taken place but these actions are not evidence that anything has happened.

Anomalies.

The act of questioning whether objects purported to be dead bodies are authentic is deeply frowned upon in our culture. Seen as the height of callousness and lunacy. There are however anomalies so obvious when we look at the aftermath scene on the Promenade des Anglais that at the very least deserve further investigation and critical scrutiny. These are a few of the really obviously problematic images shot in the aftermath of the purported Bastille Day Massacre.

Here is a mystery person on the Promenade des Anglais on Bastille Day. This person is clearly not a reveller, nor a doctor or nurse or paramedic. Who are they and what on earth are they doing? It has been claimed that this person was placing fake blood at the scene, it is unclear form the very brief glimpse we are given what she is doing but she clearly does not belong t any of the categories of people we expected to be present at the scene.
Here is a mystery person on the Promenade des Anglais on Bastille Day. This person is clearly not a reveler, nor a doctor or nurse or paramedic. Who are they and what on earth are they doing? It has been claimed that this person was placing fake blood at the scene, it is unclear from the very brief glimpse we are given what she is doing but she clearly does not belong to any of the categories of people we expected to be present at the scene. In addition the person rather than attending to any of the victims is placing an object on the scene quite clearly.
This is supposed to be a dead body. This is a blue circular object wrapped in a sheet.with a purse placed beside it. No body and no blood presented as a dead body makes it perfectly clear the event was completely staged. A real attack would not require blue circular objects wrapped in sheets to be presented as one of the victims.
This is supposed to be a dead body. This is a blue circular object wrapped in a sheet.with a purse placed beside it. No body and no blood presented as a dead body makes it perfectly clear the event was completely staged. A real attack would not require blue circular objects wrapped in sheets to be presented as one of the victims.
Again here we have what is simply detritus placed on the ground.
Again here we have what is simply detritus placed on the ground.
People have pet pigs. SO someone took their pet pig to the bastille Day fireworks and the poor thing was among the victims of the maniac terror truck driver. Right?
People have pet pigs. So I guess  someone took their pet pig to the Bastille Day fireworks and the poor thing was among the victims of the maniac terror truck driver. Right? How it got there is a mystery but there is no doubt that here we have a dead pig on the Promenade des Anglais on July the 14th. The dead pig is next to the breastless female dummy with the blue pants who must have been it’s owner! Presumably the pig is there to provide an authentic source of blood in the absence of dead humans.
Dead pig with apparent owner, the breastless woman in the blue pants. She was a REAL DUMMY taking a pet pig to the Bastille Day fireworks celebrations and it ended in tragedy for both of them.
The presumed owner of the dead pig,  the breastless woman in the blue pants. She was a REAL DUMMY taking a pet pig to the Bastille Day fireworks celebrations and it ended in tragedy for both of them.
CnW4No_W8AAylHM
Here we have a large group of faux victims farcically placed on the ground in a line. These people or whatever they are have not been hit by any truck. The impact of the truck will throw the people it impacts out over a wide area. Again we have around a dozen corpses and not a drop of blood. No wonder they pixelate this- it is complete rubbish. An inferior update of the similarly fake and ridiculous picture taken inside the Bataclan Theater last November after another fake massacre in France.

Forgotten Funerals?

What shows up in an internet search engine is of course only a tiny glimpse of reality. It does seem more than a little odd that when we type the search term “Nice attack victims funerals” into the search engine there is no mention whatsoever of any funerals having taken place for any of the victims!

A public memorial was held in Nice. The paragon of authenticity who is the singer of U2 was in attendance, but no funerals, not on page one, two or three of the search results.

By page three most of the results do not even relate to Nice, there are references to funerals for the Beslan massacre victims, even of Philando Castile but not a word of any funerals for any of the Nice attack victims.

How could that possibly be? I guess we just have to admire the respect the normally vulture- like press have shown for the privacy of the victims families in their time of grieving!

Conclusion.

A very interesting article appeared on the French language website Le Contre Revolution in January 2016.

Liste de francs-maçons du Parti Socialiste | La contre-révolution

The article listed members of the ruling Socialist party who are also members of the Grand Orient Lodge, a branch of Masonry that has been an agent of internationalist and Jacobin plots in France dating back to the 18th century French revolution and an outgrowth of the Bavarian Illuminati .

The Bavarian Illuminati and their allies were engaged in a plot against the French and other European states at this time and the plot was uncovered when the Bavarian Illuminati messenger was struck by lightning and killed. Despite sounding apocryphal that story is historical fact. (Source)

The B’nai B’rith, essentially a Zionist offshoot of Masonry, was formed in New York in 1843.

“Modeled on Masonic organizations, it was founded in New York, October 13, 1843 by twelve people, including Henry Jones and two brothers, Jewish immigrants from Germany, which had belonged to the Society of Brothers (Brüder Bund) who played some role in the development of the First international (international workers Association.”(SourceEnglish)

The French branch of B’nai B’rith was formed in 1932.

“B’nai B’rith France exists since 1932 and is the most important section of the European District, numbering about sixty cells in five regions: Ile-de-France – Provence Midi Pyrénées – French Riviera – East – Rhone-Alpes. It is headquartered in Paris.” (Source)

These same people helped put the Bolsheviks in power in Russia, motivated by similar goals as those that drove the French revolution. They wanted to destroy these nations and then take ownership of them.

Their descendants are the French ruling class. They believe in deception as a core part of their operating methods. These groups are anxious to institute the tightest systems of social control that can be imagined and “Islamic terror” is the vehicle they are going to use to achieve the goal of complete control.

These clandestine networks, comprised of people who believe in the cause of control and oligarchical tyranny, are the mortar that is used to hold the structures of these grotesque deceptions together. In the case of the politicians a healthy dose of blackmail is often utilised to keep potentially honest politicians on “the right track.”

Seemingly credible allegations of membership of a large scale child abuse network have recently been leveled against the French President, I have no idea if there is any veracity in those charges but it would fit neatly with a long established pattern of corruption and blackmail seen over decades in both Europe and the United States if the allegations are proven correct.

Until people learn to defy the trauma these fiends impose upon them and engage their critical faculties, these lies will never end.

Revolutionary Terror

34 thoughts on “the Nice Attack: Anatomy of a Farce.

  1. No Associations! A Lone Wolf!

    I am naming each post so people can decide whether that is of interest to them or not. They’ll know each post is about. Turns out this driver has not real links to the Muslim faith and its practices in this post. So we could call this driver a long wolf. That is important because most false flags and psyops end up being carried out by “lone wolves.” Lee Harvey Oswald supposedly did it all by himself. But the truth is that 8 men in groups of 2’s were stationed throughout Dealy plaza. MLK by James Earle Ray who9 now denied he did it. RFK by Sirhan Sirhan. But that’s a lie, too. James Holmes did Aurora massacre, even though reports of eye witnesses saying there was more than one shooter. Holmes evidently had lots of knowledge of bombs by evidence recovered and lots of money to buy the stuff recovered, if you believe any of it.

    My own recent re-investigation of two events the blowing up of an abortion Clinic and shooting of an abortion doctor end up being 2 suspects who have no real ties to anyone or anything. You can not even say they were Christian. Lone Wolves, apparently. Oklahoma Bombing was initially reported as two John Does. But after a week or so, John Doe two is never mentioned again and Timothy McVeigh is blamed for the whole thing. Yet again a lone wold with no ties.

    So I always look for the suspects to be without association and acting alone. Its easier, much easier, to cover over a lone wolf and see that he does not live to tell tales. The more people you add, the harder it is to cover it up.

    The recent Orlando shooting? Yep! another lone wolf with no real verifiable ties to what is claimed. Supposedly Muslim yet not acting as such previously. We had several shills tell us how absurd we were and I said to them that I would predict what would turn out to be the case and that it would always be like that. the pattern was consistent. It was as I predicted, not because I am smart. Any dummy paying attention could have done the very same. Did the shills come back and say I was right? No! but I was!

    This was pattern shown in this article. The driver can not be solidly linked to anyone or anything. Wait! Let me guess. A lone wolf! No way. Really? Imagine that!

    Like

  2. OMG! Another phony Hollywood production.

    I have a gripe! I hate CGI Hollywood graphics! Why? Because CGI graphics are lousy by any measure. I am going to cite two horrible examples of CGI and why they were so bad. Deep Rising, which features some bogus sea monster in an abandoned cruise ship on the ocean. Treat Williams starred in it. The monster was so fake and cartoon looking and acting. The tentacles moved so ridiculously fast that no one could possibly see this as even slightly believable. If you have seen it, I assume you will know what I mean.

    2nd up! Aliens 3! Alien was enjoyable, but I thought the Aliens, the sequel that followed, was an absolute classic of suspence horror, among the best ever. Who was the star? If you said Sigourney Weaver, you were wrong. I loved her performance but there was a better one, It was the creators/designers and makers of those alien costumes. The ugliest and most repulsive and scary things to ever make it to the screen./scream. It was an instant classic. So I could not wait for Aliens 3 when it came out.

    OMG, what an absolute disappointment and ripoff. There are people who should have been executed for that atrocity. And what was it that ruined the greatest horror concept in Hollywood history. That #%$^&$ @#$%$!@ CGI puke. So pathetic and lacking any real glimpse at the supposed dog aliens. We did not really see anything at all. Hollywood is supposed to immerse us in rich visual stimuli that make it almost feel real. Well, we did not have to worry about that, this time. I am not even sure there were any aliens in that movie. I saw some supposed blood splattering but it was not even as good as a lousy 1964 Hanna and Barbera cartoon production.

    To explain, the 1930s cartoons were of exceptional quality. It was in the early 40s that cartoons were simplified and reduced in quality so as to save in production costs. I believe that cartoonoists who worked on MGM caartoons, ended up working for Hanna and Barbera. First Felix the cat 1958 had the cartoons style that would become Hanna and Barbera in 64. Yogi Bear, Hucklberry Hound, and numerous others came out at that time. In fact, 64 was a major roll out of a number shows designed to appeal to kids. But the plots were lame and boring unless you were 5 as I was. and the plots were the same for every cartoon. The sophisticated humor of Warner Bros was no where to be found withing the Hanna & Barbera stuff.

    Aliens 3 was the poor cartoon reproduction of a great legacy now destroyed forever. Hollywood has never been the same since CGI came along.

    This brings us to this article/post. James offers the video showing the truck coming at the camera, So we are supposed to believe. My immediate reaction was that it was obvious CGI and horribly done at that. Make mistake about it! I’d have to break it down by frame but this is CGI blended in and its lousy.

    Some other dirty tricks were used, too. The camera moving off the truck so that it did not have to be accounted for any more, reminded me of the fake Alien autopsy that was shown on the Fox Network I believe. They kept going out of focus on the camera when things were taken out of the fake alien. This was do that you could not see how absurd the fake stuff removed, was. We were probably being tested by Intelligence folks to see what America’s reactions would be. We might call it a live dress rehearsal.

    To me, the truck did not move like a real truck and was way too fast like the sea monster in deep rising. But it rocked left and right like it was dancing to music. I could not believe my eyes. I had never seen that video prior to this. James always has lots of good video footage. His analysis is right on.

    What do I make of this video? Are we being tested again? Or are we to be content with another nonexistent aliens 3 monster. I suspect that the producers of this video, like those that tampered with the Abraham Zapruder JFK murder film, are not worried about the few brains that might see thru this scam. They know that most are total idiots with no reason to doubt.And this will bring up my last post to follow.

    Like

    • Thanks for that truth1`, I have not seen deep rising and I never got into the Alien series so will have to take your word for it. I know almost nothing about CGI so it would be a big help if you wrote an article on that topic that would educate me and others. Many thanks for commenting.

      Like

  3. The Psychology of Trust

    I have written about this before but this is a little different. It is natural to trust, even if our parents were somewhat abusive. It is part of a nature progression toward gaining sophisticated analytical abilities and understanding. But if you dumb down a mind enough and deprive it of all intellectual stimulation, you can keep a human mind from ever going beyond a stage of perhaps 4 or 5 years of age. Attack them while they are young or deprive them while they are young and they will also end up stunted so that further intellectual development will not be possible. When the instinctive part of our minds is wounded, psychologically, It gets stuck and can not move forward, It wants the problem resolved but that is not possible with our poor understanding of who those traumas work and hinder us and how to fix them.

    But the bottom line is that most of society today is very under-developed and immature. Its worse now at 1st year college entry, than ever before. They are kids who can’t take any hear, or hurt or pain without running for shelter and needing to be babied and coddled, and reassured like we might do for a 2 or 3 year old. Such ones are not salvageable. They are a wasted generation. They can not begin to muster enough intellectual courage to fact up to a small horror, never mind a big one. They still believe in fairy tales and Mother Goose.

    This is what I call the point of no return. Many out there who are conspiracy theorists, still think they can get thru to people and stop this world wide plan of madness and destruction the elite are planning for one and all. It was like when Andrews, the engineering designer of the Titanic and among those on board in its first and last trip, went down to see the extent to damage done at the water line in the separate water containment compartments and saw a 3rd compartment filling, when the boat was only designed to stay afloat with only 2 flooded compartments, then he knew and reported to the Captain that the Titanic had perhaps just 2 hours left before she went under the waves.

    They would survive for 2 hours more and that was it. Their fate was sealed and there was nothing thee could do at that point. I am a self-professed student of psychology and I do believe there is a point of no return for humanity and that we have gone past that and once past, there is no recovery.

    Put yet another way, The genie is out of the bottle and he is damn well not going to go back in it. He is out to stay. Its not matter of saving the species. That is out of the question. Its now about how many have risen above the masses and managed to develop a reasonably sophisticated intellect that can dare to ponder any possibility. That is the type of intellect that will be required IF you want to be one of those how gets to ride in lifeboat for safety. God plans on offering either preservation thru the nightmare or being brought back to life after the temporary nightmare of death by execution of evil ones.

    If you are not religiously inclined, you leave yourself with no escape. But I do not believe logic supports something from nothing. What is here was here by the intention of an intelligent purposeful benevolent source. But that source was challenged as to His good intentions in reserving worship only for Himself. Nor worship as we think of it, but an understanding expressed that keeps foremost in our minds’ how we came to exist and how we remain existing by the will of God and our dependence on and obedience to Him and His ways.

    I Had to bring this up to the general public for it would be quite cruel to suggest that all is hopeless and not reveal the option to avoid this, not by changing a world that can not be changed, but by obeying the One who promises to change the world for us, according to how He wanted it to be in the firs place, had not one of His sons lusted after that which he was not entitled to, to be worshiped even as God was. as if that son had created us rather than God. Take you pick!

    But make no mistake about this! The world that can not recognize what is going on, is doomed, just as the Titanic was. FACT!

    I did want to add, that I was once a trusting soul to some degree. I accepted the world around me but I began to question a few things in my last year of two of school. But I was still largely naive and not understanding the world and human nature as they really were. I experienced some shock and bitter disappointment along the way. I know of now way to avoid that in order to grow. But I managed and developed an intellect, despite the odds. It can be done.

    But be warned, unless you can accept that the world is saturated with evil, there is little hope for anyone like that.

    Hence, James writes about many serious topics that reflect that pure evil. Many others do, too. So take a long look at this conspiracy. There is a lot there.

    Like

    • A brillaint point there truth1, I am in my mid 40s and it is stunning to look at the previous generation, people I know in their 80s and 70s, and to realise that many people are going to remain at a child like level their entire life. I actually tried to say this to a relative( a very bad idea) SWho will not even watch WTC 7 being blown up, she is aggressively ignorant I would say if that makes sense, and one day I was exasperated and I said to her”you are going to live and die and spend your entire life in a world of lies” It only made things worse, I am lousy at talking to people. Many thanks for commenting, The support you offer helps keeps this website going. Thank you.

      Like

  4. I caught a Richie Allen show interviewing James Fetzer and talking about Sandyhook a couple nights ago. A lot more was revealed and discussed. this was a recent interview that was just put up on Richie’s radio show. go to his youtube channel if interested. Fetzer made the point that Its easier to cover up a crisis when all the victims are fake and those surviving are in on the psyop so that none of them ask any serious questions as some victims of 911 do. Psyops allow total control of most leaks. They do not stop bad performance, however.

    But the elite like bad performances. They like having celebrities give all their hand signs showing that they worship the devil and belong to the conspiracy. they put thei3r symbols on our currency, advertisements, movies, and everywhere, openly bragging yet not so much that they can not deny it if they need to. They want to brag. and to make a lousy psyop that would never fool a smart person, is their way of bragging that there is nothing we smart people can do to stop this now. OK, that is true, We are surrounded. But God is not. Satan does not want anyone to know about that escape option. Do not hesitate to seek out that option. Its worth it!

    Like

    • Thanks truth1, I subscribe to Richie Allen and I listened to that interview and I think Fetzer was right, it is far cheaper and easier to pay a few people to lie about their dead family member than having to pay off people who really did lose someone they love. There does seem to be an evil satisfaction in piling on the humiliation of the audience and mocking their simple mindedness.
      It may also be a ploy to appear invincible. Many thanks for commenting.

      Like

    • Thanks Carol, I agree with you but I believe that deception is a human trait that extends to all human groups but there is a small group of people within that community who are extremely dedicated liars although I would not seek to tar all Jewish people that way, Thanks for commenting.

      Like

  5. Well, when the spirit moves you (or it could be the TV and caffeine) then you have to act. So here we go.

    Entertainment as a Pysop

    I was putting together my monthly separate daily portions of various supplement capsules and had the TV on watching NBC’s “America’ Got Talent. In the show a supposed 12 year old girl, who looked more like 15 or 16 to me, came on to play an acoustic guitar and sing. This is not the first time that contestants have claimed ages that I found doubtful. And whether I am right or not, who can say. So it is just my suspicion.

    But then it dawned on me that I knew of way too many fake things about TV. On this very night, 2 kids carried on in very scripted comedy lines as they performed magic tricks (illusions). They were well coached and trained, but the kids did not really sound natural. It sounded rehearsed as it should for kids their ages. I would say that neither one look anymore than 12.

    As kid in the 60s, I heard lots of canned laughter machines in sitcoms and comedies. Watching some of those old shows made me realize ho w bad scripted dialog was and how phony it all seemed. Many were not even naturally witty. So it sounded fake and un-natural.

    No tonight, there were 2 interesting magic acts by two men. One changed rubix cubes in ways that were not possible and not hidden. They were real demonic magic. The Xendrius channel features many of these types of magicians who do impossible acts with the help of spirits, which Christians call demons.

    The other did mind reading and making answers appear on paper already hidden away. It could have been scripted and phony. It could have easily been authentic as well. Which one it was, is hard to say. It is possible they scripted it so that they could later say it was fake if some started to suggest demons behind it.

    What I can tell you is that Xendrius gets tons of trolls to his videos exposing magicians as receiving aid from demons. They are very upset that he suggests as he does. Why? Cause Satan wants us all to believe that we are really spirits inside bodies and that we have hidden or dormant powers within us. Powers of the supernatural- paranormal type.

    This was part of the lie Satan started in the Garden of Eden. “You will not die for you will be like God, knowing good from bad.” He was implying that they would become spirits at death and have the same powers as God and could judge right and wrong for themselves.

    I recommend a serious analysis on my site: “the Soul Page http://truth1.org/2-soul_page.htm,” as it deals with the soul, the spirit, the body, living souls and dead souls, the supposed afterlife vs the real afterlife and resurrection, too.

    As well, Satan’s Lies 101: http://truth1.org/sat-lies.htm

    But now I ask, how much of TV that purports to be real or real competition, but is really very contrived, scripted, planned, orchestrated, manipulated and faked throughout? How would we know or tell? Is it common or rare? How long has it been going on if it is phony?

    I believe this deserves a good long article using many real examples. I will say that if one can show lots of lies or false appearances and the like, then the case is well made for suggesting that most TV and newspapers and documentaries are loaded with falsehoods and lies.

    Are sports scripted and rigged? You better believe it. Its just “professional wrestling” that does it. The NFL does it. Baseball does it. The Olympics do it. And its is not always just men rigging things. The sports (a form of entertainment and betting) and entertainment industries are very much under the influence of the spirit world who does have an interest in who is favored in the human realm for rank and dedication and reward. Demons also influence wars, perhaps fixing weather or earthquakes, etc.

    And I have got to recommend this link of a blog that has articles on the Beatles, the likes of which I have never ever come across in my travels, not even close. Read the 1st four articles on the Beatles and be shocked. Its all worse than you thought. I will be adding some of it to my site. I have done an article on Paul’s looks before and after the supposed death. This girl has done her homework. Paul did not die and she has interesting pictures, too, but as well, she shows how details from another famous car crash were lifted and grafted onto Paul’s supposed death. This buries the Paul is Dead theory forever. My extreme compliments to this Blog’s author: https://spidercatweb.wordpress.com/?s=Beatles

    Oh, and how about a bunch of faked Moon Landings?

    Atheists maintain its just us down here and I wish that were so. But its not. God does not care about sports or entertainment, but He does have national interests.
    So psyops are not new and they are very much a part of mankinds’ affairs. They are an integral part of why things have happened as they do. God, too, reserves certain rights to interefere to make sure a proper fair fight takes place, rather that a one-sided affair. He wants a fair trial of humans. Satan’s ego would never otherwise allow any choice or options. He would be an absolute tyrant as he is with his own now anyway.

    So I recommend people give it some thought and I’ll have more to say when my article is done.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Many thanks for an epic comment truth1, I suspect you are right about sport but that is one illusion I am yet to shrug off. Obviously I understand that gambling interests fix key results at certain times. Your thesis that the devil wants to convince us we have paranormal powers etc. Yet I cannot help but feel that we do have a greater potential than is generally exhibited. I watch all the Xendrius magic videos, there does seem to be a hidden hand acting on behalf of some of them, and there is also something very sinister (pun intended) about many of them. If you watch Derren Brown’s town hall shows he does not seek to disguise the fact that he is interacting with and harnessing the power of spirit entities, thanks again for that comment and I will look forward to updates.

      Like

      • Well, I will make on comment. You are going to see a lot more of the paranormal as things progress and I think that will be 3 years or less. The sports will be interesting. I think some of what seems paranormal is what I would call sensitivity. Some people can read body language quite well, while others hardly at all. And some read and react to body language and other non-verbal stuff with without even being aware of it. and this could feel very much like it was coming from somewhere else and being a bit clairvoyant. The problem is that our subconscious instinct part of our brain is often kept from us. Some of that is needed and some of it is no so good. We need more connection with what goes on in that department. But as I see it, the devil’s deceptions are subtle and sophisticated enough that they need special attention. And TV started it all off. And they say TV is bad. But it was likely building in my subconscious anyway.. It will be fun.

        Like

      • Thanks truth1,that is exactly what I was getting at, we are aware of far more than what is in our conscious mind. If that makes any sense. You may find this youtube channel interesting, you may find it completely mad, but the Industrial Surrealism channel has for many years been posting footage of what are purported to be cloaked objects in the sky. Various explanations are provided for the phenomena, none of them are satisfactory but it is a topic that I find interesting. I have no idea what the timeline is on this, but it seems to me that when the veil is lifted whether it is fake disclosure, fake invasion or whatever, the sky is going to be where the story begins.
        Industrial Surrealism.
        https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDCFzPnrVk1Cpj1r3NWy-wQ
        Many thanks for commenting/replying.

        Like

      • I believe in the cloaking. Joseph Farrel wrote a book that covered that as part of the Philadelphia experiment explanation. But imagine the WOW factor that UFO vehicles could have on people who are not aware of this technology! That is why Satan would not let it get developed until he could get it ready for the ultimate unveiling to fool us all. I say that its a combo of demonic apparitions, along with man-made ones and they are working together. But they may put on a show of two opposing “alien” forces with the good ones wining and “saving” us. Or they just show up to help us out of WW3. I have no idea for the details,but that UFO tech will be used, without question. Its solid science.

        Also I got a couple books by the same author on using the subconscious mind.by John K. Williams, “The knack of using your subconscious mind” and “The wisdom of your subconscious mind.” I use it and it also works for me even when I don’t focus on it. Its just natural stuff that often happens without doing anything.

        But the way things just pop into your head, like waking up in the morning with something you were trying to remember, is or would be no different from having a spirit put something into your head. You would have no way of knowing which it was. So we often get impulses or understandings that come to us seemingly out of the blue. I will be putting those two books in this article I will work on, too. But the subconscious can be enlisted and I have had it work without asking it. My most memorable moment was back in like about 1983, while pondering psychology and personality profiles. I was trying to understand it better. then came this dream early in the morning that showed me pictures and diagrams and I was coming into waking up and I wanted to sum it up and half groggy, I found a paper bag and a pen or pencil and wrote it down. What I had written was the the small things people do, you can can tell what they are. But that was without all those images and animations. It took me 20 years nearly, to be able to repeat and understand fully those diagrams and pictures with the conscious intellect and the underlying principles as well.

        Now it could have been from God. But I have been able to get the mind to do most things for me and I have no right to assume God, because there was no identification to it. But if you want something bad enough, you subconscious will go to work to solve it. It has great processing power to deduce. You just have to aim it. But if voices start talking, you will need to ask them who they are. And if they say God, they have to harmonize with the Bible.

        Like

      • James, the Joseph Farrell book is “Secrets of the Unified Field” It is an excellent book. not all Farrell books are good. His not so great on philosophy and money origins. but the Unified Field book is superb!!!

        Like

      • Mentioning the Unified Field, Henry Stevens also did a book on “Hitler’s suppressed and still secret” various technologies. I read so many I can’t remember them all at the same time. Farrells is better for understand the technology, but Stevens reveals of lot of secret weapons, including those UFOs that will soon be visiting us all with supposed aliens and even a returning messiah. why who could ask for more? 😉

        Like

      • Thanks truth1, I will add that to my try and read list,there are some interesting theories about those type of weapons and that Space X rocket explosion. Many thanks for commenting/responding.

        Like

      • I believe the Space X explosion was an attack/sabotage. dont remember if i said that or not. My brain ain’t what it used to be.

        Like

      • That was a great link. I am delighted that they recognize how advanced secret technology is. UFOs are stone age now. But for the ignorant, It will seem amazing. The psyop shills was interesting, too. Kev Baker? There are so many. And they will all speak with one accord when the day comes. Its their funeral.

        Like

    • WOW that’s a compliment & a half. Thank you SO MUCH. U’ve just made my day!

      Stupidly enough, I don’t even like the Beatles! It was Tara Browne I originally started researching & it just grew from there.

      Only my opinion, but I don’t think Tara died, I think real Paul died & Tara took his place & is now the man we know as Sir Paul. But I could be wrong!

      There is a couple other pics I haven’t added yet, Sir Paul’s family.. They are near as damn it IDENTICAL to Tara’s family. So much so, it’s a wee bit freaky! Gonna go add the couple o pics as soon as I have read this blog as it looks really good!.

      Thanks again for the incredible compliment. Please feel free to compliment me whenever u like!! Cat xx

      Like

      • Well, ya know, WildCat, it as not just the car crash stuff. that Jimmy Saville was connected to them early and often, along with other creepy characters. You could have knocked me over with feather. I have read so much on the Beatles, but it was always mainstream media and books. With everything that I have read, I never come across what you dished.

        I’m fussy about my conspiracy researchers. But you seem to have a real knack and the hunger for doing it. We’ll call it tenacity. And you got lots of stuff on SRA and other child savagery. Its going to take time to go over it all. I have encountered a Dave Alexander in the UK who has had his 2 grand daughters, both toddlers or babies, taken away from his daughter. So I am going to lend him and hand and really go after this child stealing stuff. I have had it with it. Its is the worst evil on earth to separate kids from their parents. With Alis and Gabriel, they were sort of connected to the cult all along so it was hard to avoid what happened. but it was monstrous. Were it not for restoring my house (from my parents), I’d be able to do much more in quicker time. There another great blog in Australia I got bookmarked. They got loads of problems, too.

        I want some blood! (only metaphorically speaking). But I also want some time to do more. I’ll be in touch.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Awww… Thank u so much!
        (Damn ur gonna make me cry!!!)

        I just want it ALL to stop.

        I HATE IT.

        I cant stand the horror & the pain & destruction.

        So if i can ever do ANYTHIN 2 help, plz dont hesitate, jst gimme a shout!

        Im jst doin my bit. Nowt special. Im fortunate in that I have the time 2 spend doin research & bloggin.
        So i blog wot i find. I try my hardest 2 b objective (I very often fail miserably!)

        I would never claim everythin i blog 2b 100% correct. But i can guarantee i have never & will never blog anything deceitfully.
        If u ever see any bits that r wrong PLEASE TELL ME.
        I’d hate 2 spread disinfo.

        Ok.. Im gonna go cause I really am on verge o cryin!!! (Im such a soft touch!!)

        You look after ursel eh? Stay safe. We need u fightin fit & kickin arse!!

        B I G L O V E
        frm a very damp Scotland 💋

        Liked by 1 person

      • Well, with me, you will not be held to harsh standards for speaking what seems to be the truth to you. times are urgent and I would like others to give me fair room for small screw ups so I give it to others. I am sure you would correct anything you discovered to be wrong. BTW, I am mostly Scottish by descent. At some point some relatives moved to Belfast N. Ireland and then to Nova Scotia. Canada of all places in 1847 or 1849. Memory won’t cooperate for which one. The my father came to Maine USA.

        Here is my work on Paul done over 2 or 3 nights a while back:
        http://www.truth1.org/paul.htm
        You have extra pictures and info I’d like to add as well. But I am still inclined toward a no death theory, but its not the sort of thing to get hung up on. I will be addressing doppelgangers (look-a-likes) in this new article I am going to undertake. I can show a real replacement put over on the public using the Sherlock quotation James hunted up. If I can show a clear difference of substantial and undeniable change, then we have a real replacement psyop. I can not say much either way for claimed clones or “replacements” in general. BUt I got one for real and one establishes that it can happen.

        But anyway, Just keep on doing the fine work you have. I want to get into this child stealing by the governments, especially the YOU-Kay. Those SOBs. Lack of time is my biggest enemy right now. And we are sending a storm your way, A hurricane had hit eh south but died out near Maine. Its coming your way now. Give a week or near that. Just what you need, right. Damn glad to have found you blog. It might have been Sabine, but I can’t remember.

        Liked by 1 person

  6. I have an interesting theory about the Bastille Day attack. It is somehow related to the Philando Castile incident in MPLS, MN on 7/7/2016. I think the name Philando Castile references the name Bastille. If you take the P from Philando and substitute it for the C in Castile it spells Pastille. In Danish, the English letter P becomes a B, thus, Pastille becomes Bastille. I.E. Copenhagen is Kobenhaun in Danish. I think it may have been a signal that gave the go-ahead for the Bastille Day event on 7/14/2016.

    Like

    • Many thanks for those very interesting thoughts Jenny. The research was somewhat superficial but as far as I can tell the Philando Castile killing was also a hoax, covwered briefly here:https://crimesofempire.com/2016/07/09/the-dallas-police-shooting/
      The notion that one event acts as a cue for another is not new and there is some evidence to support the idea, albeit of the circumstantial type. So the Bataclan Massacre of November 13th “took place” at an Eagles of death Metal show, one song by the EODM is called “San Berdoo Sunburn” that has lyrics such as “We make plans and then we head out to San Bernardino”.
      Only weeks after the fake terror in Paris, San Bernadino was also struck by a very obvious fake terror attack. I won’t go on, Ole Dammegard has done a lot of research on this and he connected the “heart drawn in blood” at the Bataclan to the Bruseels attack and the Brussels attack according to him displayed cues for a future attack (the destruction of) the Eiffel tower.
      http://lightonconspiracies.com/newsite/
      The above link is Ole’s website, probably far better reading about it at the source rather than second hand.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s