1.15 am GMT the leave campaign appears poised for victory although it is far too early to be definitive.
The British pound is plunging on world markets as the bankers taste a devastating, generational defeat.
The leave campaign are now leading the remain campaign by 180 thousand votes of the 2 and a half million counted!
The trend is becoming clear.
The coverage from the ABC was like all that they do, utterly professional and completely impartial. On the back of a single exit poll predicting a 52-48 result in favor of remain the ABC began to move on, accepting the remain victory as a fait a compli!!
Several hours later and it is beginning to look somewhat grim for the ABC and all the other poodles.
The Doomed Factotum.
Cameron’s fate was sealed the day he caved and announced the referendum as this was an unthinkable act of weakness on the part of someone who knows perfectly well that his job is to con the people on behalf of the elite.
UKIP were experiencing a brief and rare bout of popularity and so for some mad reason Cameron made the completely unacceptable (to his owners) decision to hold the referendum and now events are spinning out of control, with a leave vote maintaining a consistent lead of tens of thousands for several hours.
The latest count has leave leading by 50,000 votes with a total of 612,000 votes to 561,000 with leave recording 52% of the vote but only around five percent of the constituencies have returned their results thus far.
I just refreshed the page and the count is now leave on 798 thousand 105 thousand ahead of remain at 693000
This is beginning to look like a trend and leave is now at 54% of the vote!!!
Over at the BBC things are even worse with leave being quoted at 1.;1 million votes against Remain’s 960,000.
This may be remembered as the day the New World order project reached began to crash.
3.00 GMT and it is too early to call but according to the Guardian, the Leave vote is leading 51/49 which at this stage of the count amounts to a lead of 440, 000 votes and only 144 of 382 stations still to report.
At the BBC the Leave campaign are leading 10,539 ooo to 10,066 000 with 123 left to declare. So 69% have been counted Remain may still prevail but it is becoming difficult and improbable and the despair is palpable.
There will probably be major tantrums from the banker media and the markets themselves in response to this setback. The Britihs currency will be punished for the transgression against the global order, it seems.
3.20 GMT. With 113 constituencies left to report the Leave lead is now at more than 600,000. The trend is clear with more than two thirds of the votes counted, Leave is scoring 51.5% of the vote. The margin is still slim enough for the result to change but with 269 of 382 reporting we are seeing a solid nationwide trend towards a victory for the Leave campaign.
3.30 GMT Leave is now surging to victory it is perfectly clear. The Leave lead has now reached 850,000 votes with only 107 of the 382 stations left to report. The count is almost at the 75% of stations stage and the trend is strong and solid now. Almost impossible to see the the Remain campaign winning now.
3.35 GMT the Leave lead has jumped to 850,000 with only 87 stations left to report. Almost 80% have now been counted. I can feel the crimson rage of the secret rulers. This ranks right up there with the Crimea operation and the entrance of the Russian Air Force in Syria as the most upsetting things to have happened to the Western elite in recent years.
The reaction is going to be absolutely priceless.
3.42 GMT Major British TV station ITV have declared that the Leave campaign has won the plebiscite. The Leave lead has shrunk to 820,000. The result is 52/48. More than 80% counted. Game over?
3.46 BBC called it! Leave has won. The scions of the New World order will be puce with rage. The political career of the British Prime Minister David Cameron will be counted in days and weeks.
3.53 GMT. It is done. The pound has fallen to it’s lowest level against the dollar since 1985! The pound also fell as much as 6.5% against the Euro. Astonishingly the Japanese index the Nikkei has suffered a 7% fall, it’s largest since the Fukushima disaster. (Source)
It is assumed that flamboyant former London Mayor and pro-Brexit campaigner Boris Johnson will succeed Cameron. The Home Secretary Theresa May has also been touted as Cameron’s successor, the Tory party will decide, Johnson seems the more likely option.
On the 23rd of June the citizens of the UK are going to vote in a plebiscite to determine whether Britain remains in the European Union.
While there are many complex and difficult questions in this world, this is not one of them.
The people who are calling for Britain to remain in the EU are either sell outs operating on behalf of the bankers, or the simple minded, enfeebled fools duped by these same bankers puppets.
If nothing else this process has served the purpose of accurately identifying a large proportion of the sell-outs and tools of globalism. Whatever happens do not forget who they are and if you value liberty and the truth never ever listen to anything they say on any issue of public policy. Ever.
The arguments in support of the remain campaign have plumbed the depths of depravity in their dishonesty and that is without bringing the Jo Cox psyop into consideration.
A realistic view of the UK would note that given that Britain is in possession of both nuclear weapons and a seat on the UN Security Council the idea that Britain’s security depends on the EU is akin to an April Fools joke.
The crap the remain people have tried to conjure up to scare people to stay in the EU has often been highly comedic. The letter 250 British celebrities signed and the Guardian published contained some real gems such as :
“From the smallest gallery to the biggest blockbuster, many of us have worked on projects that would never have happened without vital EU funding or by collaborating across borders.”
These dolts and con artists appear to be suggesting that British actors will suddenly be prevented form “collaborating across borders” if the UK leaves the EU. Another statement that would be more appropriate on April the 1st.
In a similar vein, as the BBC aired yesterday I noted one remain tweeter referred to leaving the EU as a “leap into the dark unknown” or words to that effect.
You would think that Britain had been a member for 400 rather than 40 something years judging from that utter tosh and this nonsense is all the remain camp have to offer.
These low tactics are largely a retread of the bankrupt tropes inflicted upon the people of Scotland two years ago but whereas Scotland’s small size made these scare tactics semi-credible, when transferred to Britain and the EU they are simply shite.
If the people vote to leave the EU the vote will not necessarily be binding upon the UK Parliament and given the history of the rejection of the will of the people when it becomes an obstacle to the EU project, with the Irish referendum a prime example, however a vote to leave the EU will make it extremely difficult for the politicians to ignore the will of the people.
In 2016 the European Union believes that it has the right to impose immigration quotas upon the member states.
Leading EU figures have promoted the trafficking of economic migrants into Europe, in August 2015 the German Chancellor stated that all economic migrants were welcome in Europe and the Brussels technocrats then sought to impose this decision upon all the member states without pausing for a second to consider the wishes or interests of their constituents. Just to make sure that everyone understood the seriousness of the project the EU even threatened to FINE NATIONS that refused to fulfill the EU dictated quota.
Certain elements have promoted an hysterical response to the economic migrants and hyped the threat they represent, which is negligible but that is not the point. The interest of the people the EU is supposed to serve were simply ignored showing that the EU Charter and the notion that the EU is a democratic institution is empty rhetoric that bears no relation to reality.
It is perfectly clear that the powers running the EU see the people they are supposed to serve as merely a means to an end, their will a nuisance that must be dealt with. The economic and cultural interests of the people are a complete irrelevance.
Behind the civilised veneer the EU project is an obvious and premeditated attack upon the sovereignty of the people of Europe. The Bankers in the City of London, Frankfurt and the other financial hubs simply decided that it would be in their interest to gradually phase out national governments and replace them with a centralised authority managed by technocrats.
But isn’t Westminster the same?
The fact that the government of Britain was and is banker controlled is somewhat besides the point, the bankers puppets in Westminster can be removed, the Brussels puppets rule will be permanent and untouchable. That is the whole point of the project. That is why Britain must Brexit.
This week Elizabeth Regina became Britain’s longest ruling monarch.
The controlled media celebrated this although Elizabeth Regina has never achieved anything nor even attempted to do so.
Elizabeth Regina has been the Queen of Australia for more than half of Australia’s history as an independent state. The Monarchy is an inherently unjust and immoral institution and the truth of this can be easily assessed by simply viewing the hideous and hate filled society that is modern Britain.
Elizabeth Regina is reaching the end of her feted life yet she has not achieved or contributed anything during her life and neither has her pitiful and well “beyond mediocre” son.
The idea that these people are to be admired is an absolute travesty.
The level of stupidity is equivalent to the worship of the badge that sits at the front of a car.
These people are simply nothings. To offer a single positive word about any of them for even a second is a powerful indication that the person involved is mentally dead.
Hampstead Cover Up Similar Story From 1989 Satans Children
July 29th, 2015.
A Very Simple Choice.
It is deeply unwelcome information. It is knowledge that cannot possibly bring happiness or pleasure but to pretend that these things do not happen is to be complicit in the acts of evil. There is no choice. Not really.
I have never really been associated with Satanism, but assume that most Satanists or dark occultists do not engage in these practices. It is clear however that some, indeed apparently many do.
The fact that there was a fairly successful short term cover up of the Hampstead case should come as no surprise, nor should the complicity of the BBC in the cover up with their laughable, disgusting interview of the Hampstead “Dad”. The BBC is an organisation with long and intimate links with the “circle of evil.” in Britain and Jimmy Saville, the depraved child molester, satanist and murderer who doubled as a “beloved BBC personality” exemplifies the odious and despicable role of the BBC over decades, along with many other key British institutions.
The parallels between the allegations made in Hampstead and the claims made by Theresa in Satan’s children are absolutely spellbinding. The child sexual abuse, the rituals, the murders, the cannibalism, the murder of small children and babies. The amazing thing is that Theresa’s story is so similar but her experience is so much deeper and greater than that of the Hampstead children as she has remained as a child cult member and victim into puberty.
She claims that she gave birth at the age eleven. She claims to have been impregnated seven or eight times but she miscarried or was given cult abortions by cult doctors in the other cases. She claims they threatened to kill her baby if she didn’t co-operate. She claims that she witnessed several murders including one of vagrant she describes in excruciating detail. She describes cannibalism including being forced to eat part of her own aborted fetus. She claims that she thought the abuse happened to everyone.
At times Theresa is upset, at other times she is unaffected, almost in shock. She is one of the most compelling witnesses to these acts that I have encountered. Through no fault of their own, very small children do not make the best witnesses, Theresa is fifteen or sixteen and it is very clear that she is describing real events. It is stunning.
Theresa’s story is not confirmation of the Hampstead allegations, but it is powerful evidence that these claims are nowhere near as outlandish as they might have sounded at first.
It seems quite clear that there is a sub group of “transgressionist ultras” within dark occultism who believe that power is obtained through the interdimensional interactions they seek to achieve through acts of extreme moral transgression, with the more sick and wrong the better. These crimes are an attempt t please the gods of evil. The ancient ones, who are they believe some type of ethereal entities whom they believe have the ability to help them shape the world towards their desired conclusion.
This abuse, the ritual abuse is not recreation, although there must be recreationally motivated members, conventional pedophiles and garden variety sadists in need of an outlet amongst the flock.
But this is something else they are doing. They are seeking to carve out a niche for evil entities, to dream them into existence or nourish them through extravagant acts of transgression and evil and thus somehow harness the power of the entities that these acts unleash to achieve their earthly goals which if we take them at their word, vary between their ascension to power as new monarchs of a slave state to the destruction of this world entirely.
If these ideas sound insane, understand that according to highly respected occultist Kenneth Grant, a key Crowley student and acolyte in his work the Magical Revival Crowley believed that if his work “the Book of the Law” was published in the correct circumstances it would cause the world to end or similar complete cataclysm.
” “The Book of the Law” was published several times in Crowley’s lifetime and each publication was followed in a comparitively short time with international disasters. The Balkan War, the First World War, the Sino-Japanese War and World War II. It was Crowley’s belief that when the book is finally published in strict accordance with the instructions given by Aiwaz* it will effect the total destruction of civilization as we know it. So far, the instructions have been imperfectly executed and therefore the holocaust incomplete.”
The UK Column reports that Senior British Civil and Military officials are warning of the intent to take the next step towards open “Oligarchical Collectivist Fascism” in Britain.The intent has been so clear for so long and so many of the necessary preparatory steps have clearly been taken, that this may be correct.
I am still reading the judgement and working on my analysis. I intend to examine both the case history of the Justice and this judgement in detail as I believe they deserve.
In the interim. I would state the obvious and suggest readers watch Brian Gerrish’s brilliant denunciation of the judgement and Deborah Mahmoudieh’s excellent video also. Enjoy Aangirfan and the Tap while they last as it seems that a massive establishment attack is about to begin against these heroic sites. You can see it coming from a mile away. The rulers are not amused and they want to “see something done” about those (please note quotation marks!) “awful little people” with their terribly truthful and indiscreet websites pointing out the bleeding obvious and undeniable fact that the British elite are collectively complicit in the cover up of Establishment child abuse in Britain and have been for decades and this is a sad, but known and proven fact.
It is Time for the Cover Up to End Right Now
On some profound level the British ruling class apparently do not the view the “commoners’ as fully human. I honestly do not see what other conclusion can be drawn from their behaviour. Their loyalty to their class seems to have destroyed their collective humanity long ago. They actually believe that they should have the right to rape and murder the children of “commoners” and expect the chaps from MI5 or Special Branch or whomever to step in and protect them if any honest police happen to come across one of their atrocities..As it happens, historically, the chaps from MI5 or Special Branch HAVE protected the abusers in order to “maintain the prestige of the British Establishment” which by some immaculate corruption they managed to conflate with the Security of the British State.
Key institutions of the British State appear to have been heavily involved in serious crimes against children with almost complete impunity for decades.
This is an intolerable situation clearly. If the institutions of the state are not reformed radically, logic dictates that eventually the mass of the people will understand what is happening and what they have been doing and seek to destroy the very institutions of the state.
As an outsider I would suggest that perhaps some type of “clear the decks” process is urgently required. Perhaps there should be an amnesty for certain people, Law Enforcement and Intelligence Officials perhaps, and other perpetrators of the cover up might be offered an amnesty. A more widespread amnesty may be a positive idea but that should be at the discretion of the victims rather than any outsider, obviously these are merely constructive suggestions. Perhaps a Truth and Reconciliation style process might be beneficial.
The idea that when the Establishment commit a crime, whether the Iraq war or the child rape at the Elm Guest House, they will just conduct an inquiry of whatever length and futility required to make the problem go away and expect people to be grateful and actually equate this process of obfuscation and delay with justice is no longer sustainable. The contempt of the rulers for the people is completely unmistakeable and nauseating.
The more I observe it almost seems like a “class” apartheid society, as hyperbolic as that must sound. The way the ruling class believe they have the right under some preposterous national security cover to get a free pass for crimes against children of a sexual and violent nature. Now they want to blame the internet. Pretend that some prurient interest is being served. Which truly shows how low they are.
In order to preserve the positive ideas and people within British institutions the cover up has to end now. The obfuscation and denial must end right now. The persecution of victims and whistle blowers and honest police must end right now.
It is time to admit the bleeding obvious. it is time to renovate the house in order to preserve the underlying structure. Historically we know that reform or revolution are the only options. Revolutions are destructive and disastrous and only lead to even worse people in power generally so I am urging a rethink. A restoration of the Rule of Law, hardly a subversive idea is it?
The world will not end. The walls will not fall down. People will not be hunted or strung up or any of that vile mob nonsense. Just tell the truth and apologise and hopefully the psyche of this deeply divided, wounded and utterly dysfunctional nation can return to balance and a semblance of normalcy and the rule of Law. The choice is yours.
Leaked Medical Reports End All Doubt About Sexual Abuse Claims.
The medical reports end any debate regarding the fact that children A and G were the victims of child sexual abuse in Hampstead and underline the criminal nature of the police interviews of September 17th, 2014. The question now is who is being protected? Who has the influence and power to cause the British police such an obvious and inexplicable mid investigation rethink? Clearly there is much more than a Z grade actor and the reputation of a school at stake here. Neither would logically merit the police choice to destroy this investigation and cover up these heinous crimes.
September 5th 2014.
“A referral was made to the Barnet CAIF by (mother’s partner’s) brother in law who is a special constable. Following a disclosure by A and G that they had been sexually abused by their father and “teachers” and were part of a cult. This disclosure had been made when they were in Morocco over the summer. And the parents stated they were unsure who to inform as many people seemed to be involved, (including allegedly police and social workers.)
Initial police interviews conducted.
8/9/14. Initial strategy meeting held.
10/9/14. Visit to family home ahead of ABE interview.
11/9/14. Emergency Police Protection Order issued after the ABE yesterday evening during which witness A, witness G and witness E (mother) were interviewed separately.
Allegations of physical abuse from the mother’s partner towards both children and sexual abuse against both children by their father and “teachers”. They are now in Emergency Foster Placement.”
Police conduct the retraction interviews in transparent attempt to bury the truth and vandalise justice.
Interviewing officers clearly bully false retractions from the children for unknown reasons that can only be sinister.
22/9/14. Police inform the mother E that they have found that the crimes against the children cannot be confirmed. The investigation is over.
22/9/14. Dr. Hodes writes the second medical report affirming the veracity of the sexual abuse allegations despite the retractions. Dr. Hodes cites a specific research finding that found that 16% of victims will retract the allegations and affirming therefore that the physical evidence of abuse should outweigh the retractions.
Lindsay C Malloy, MA Thomas D Lyon JD, and Joia A Quas
Fillal Dependency and recantation of Child Sex Abuse Allegations.
J.Am Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 46:2, 2007.
These statements were made without reference to the disgraceful performance of the interviewing officer in the retraction interviews, which only strengthen Dr. Hodes’ assertions.
The Medical Reports. Who wrote them and are they authentic?
There are two Medical Reports, one dated September 15th, 2014, the other September 22nd. Written on the stationary of the University College of London in a way that leaves no doubt as to their authenticity. Background checks on the names of the people who signed the documents end any doubt . To illustrate this I will cite the best known of the Doctors who have signed these reports Dr. Deborah Hodes (FRCPCH) Consultant Community Paediatrician. A cursory internet search indicates that Dr. Hodes is employed in that role at the University College London and is an expert in the field of child abuse having more than twenty years experience.
The first report dated September 15th appears to have been written by Dr Harriett Gunn (SHO Senior House Officer)* but is also signed by Dr. Hodes, The second Report of September 22nd appears to have been written entirely by Dr. Hodes, as she is the sole signatory.
The Medical Examiners are highly experienced and well qualified.
This does not mean that they are infallible, of course, but these medical reports have been signed by medical practitioners considered to be authorities in the field with decades of experience.
Dr, Deborah Hodes, part of the examination and assessment team that physically examined the children on several occasions is absolutely unequivocal, even after the retraction interviews that the children have physical injuries, that substantiate their claims of physical abuse at the hands of the mother’s partner and more importantly the sexual abuse at the hands of the father and cohorts.
A Brief Overview of the Facts that Emerge from the Medical Reports.
The counter narrative states that the children’s stories were coached and fed to them by their mother’s partner who was himself guilty of minor physical abuse of the children.
The police retraction interviews tried to construct a narrative that the children had been denying the actions of the mother’s partner whilst making the claims against the father and school, yet the Medical Reports show that the children made the claims concurrently and were concurrently examined for both the injuries related to the minor physical abuse at the hands of the mother’s partner and the extremely serious sexual abuse at the hands of the father and staff at the school.
The male has one scar on his anus consistent with blunt force trauma, the female has several and has actually been physically damaged by the abuse in ways that really do not bear mentioning suffice to say that she has multiple injuries “consistent with the application of a blunt instrument.”
They could not be clearer. Someone has been doing deeply unpleasant things to these children, the more lurid claims relating to this case may be exaggerated, but there is a very simple and unmistakeable truth expressed in those medical reports.
After they were taken into Foster care, the children were heard to discuss the use of Vaseline as a lubricant their abusers used on them. They are no longer in the presence of the mother’s partner, there is no need for any story to be told, yet they were speaking about it in a matter of fact way.
The children independently told their story on multiple occasions to numerous Doctors and other disinterested parties and were consistent in their claims against both parties. There was medical evidence to support the claims that were made against both parties.
Both children were observed to be suffering the symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Both children complained at their treatment at the hands of the mothers partner, yet it was absolutely clear to the examiners that it was the father they feared. Each child independently expressed the fear that their father would kill them, one had nightmares about it. Expressions of fear do not get more profound than that.
The details outlined in these reports are deeply unpleasant. Unfortunately it is necessary to do this and I will ensure that only the completely necessary information is included. There is a duty to attempt to spread the truth in a matter of gross injustice such as this case represents and I have sought not to identify anyone by name other than the Doctors whose role appears to have been an honourable one.
Key Excerpts from the Two Medical Reports.
September 15th, 2014.
“Witness G “does not report any history of constipation or diarrhoea . However he does report that it does often hurt and he has often bled when opening his bowels although this had decreased significantly in the past two months which his sister says is because it is two months since they have seen their father. (the children were also removed from the school). He opens his bowels everyday and reports that his stool is soft. “( a detail that is unfortunately necessary due to later events) Physical Abuse.
“Both G and A report that they have been hit multiple times with a metal spoon by mother’s partner over the head and the legs. They also report they have been pushed into walls. They also allege that mother’s partner holds his hand over their mouth till they “can’t breathe.” On a recent visit to Morocco over the summer witness G explains that he was hit on the ear by the mother’s partner in the left ear which caused his ear to bleed and his left eye to be swollen and bruised. G and A said that G was then not allowed to leave the holiday home until the bruises had disappeared.”
(Note: the details contained here completely destroy the notion that these allegations were made as the result of coaching. Did the mother’s partner also coach the children to make all these detailed and specific allegations against him? Of course he didn’t. The fact that these allegations against the mother’s partner were made at the same time as the allegations of sexual abuse is clearly overwhelming evidence that these children spoke the truth to the best of their ability about both issues and were not under external control of either party to a custody dispute as they made the allegations.)
Sexual abuse allegations.
“ A has explained that at school a teacher named Mr. H calls children over and makes them take off their underwear. A explained that she and other children including G are made to bend over and a “plastic willy” is inserted into the anus. Whilst Mr. H holds onto their hips. A also stated that Mr.H “makes noises” while this is done.
Of note, she says that he gives them a refresher bar to eat as a reward and to chew on while this is happening so they “can’t scream or make a noise” and they are asked to face forwards and not look backwards. G has said that the same thing has happened to him. G says that after this has happened he has bleeding from the anus and subsequently. it is very painful when he opens his bowels.”
Victim G Physical injuries described.
His (G) anus was examined in the left lateral position using gentle buttock separation for 30 seconds. He had one anal fissure scar at 9 o’clock on examination of the anus. There was no reflex anal dilation.”
“In both the general physical examination and the genital examination of G today. There are physical signs consistent with the allegations given by G and A. The scar in the anus is from a healed fissure, secondary to the application of a blunt penetrating force that he (G) has alleged.
In summary, G has physical signs consistent with his allegations of both physical abuse and sexual abuse. “
Dr. Harriett Gunn (SHO) to
Dr. Deborah Hodes. Medical Report Dated September the 22nd 2014.
The report begins with Dr, Hodes outlining her extensive experience in the field. Twenty four years worth.
Dr.Hodes states that she was present at two strategy meetings and two physical examinations relating to this case. In addition Dr. Hodes has spoken to Camden area social workers and also reviewed the photographic evidence pertaining to the children’s injuries.
Summary of Relevant Evidence Victim A..
“She alleged that lubrication was used prior to the insertion of the penis or plastic penis and identified and discussed this with her foster carer.. She also told me about having had an injection. She alleged that bleeding occurred after the event and then had pain on opening her bowels.”
“She told me that she has difficulty getting to sleep and she has bad dreams including dreaming of her father killing her ” Physical Findings.
“Below is a list of injuries found in a physical examination of A shown in body maps and the police photographs.”
1.“3 x 4mm abrasion to the pinna of her left ear and 3mm laceration posterior to her left ear overlying the mastoid, A alleged she was pinched and picked up by her ear on Morocco.”
2. “7mm longtitudinal abrasion (excoriated) on the right lateral aspect of her right ankle. A alleged she had been pushed against an outside wall and “had picked it” when she was in Morocco.”
3. “2.0cm x 0.5cm healing abrasion on the left side of the chin. A alleged that she was hit across the face with a metal spoon while in Morocco.“
Below is a list of injuries found on ano-genital examination of A recorded in the DVDs.
(Warning Note: This is deeply unpleasant and awful and a quick summary is that there are multiple and in my opinion horrific injuries to A’s nether regions)
“1. In the left lateral position with gentle buttock separation there was anal laxity and a brief view of the rectum. In the knee chest position with gentle buttock separation, there was reflex anal dilation (RAD) after 5-10 seconds. The reflex anal dilation continued and there was a view into the rectal ampulla and there was no stool present.
2. There was a healed scar in the ruggae at the 10 -11 o’clock position extending from the anal orifice to the anal verge. It was seen in both the left lateral position and the knee to chest position. The abnormalities in the ruggae at the 4 0′ c;ock and 5 o’clock positions may represent healed scar tissue or variation in the ruggae.configuration.”
There are between two and four injuries, with two undoubted and two speculative. Conclusions regarding the allegations.
“The physical injuries found on her skin are consistent with the physical abuse she described.
In the absence of a history of constipation, medical illness or accidental trauma according to the GP’s notes, the anogenital findings of the scar and the RAD are consistent with her allegations of the application of a blunt penetrating force to her anus (2); sexual abuse.”
She has described symptoms of post traumatic stress.”
Summary of A and G by Dr. Hodes.
“In my opinion A and G are suffering significant harm as evidenced by the following:-
1.Both children have physical signs of physical abuse that support their allegations.
2.Both children have physical signs of sexual abuse that support their allegations.
3.They have symptoms of post traumatic stress.
4. It is now understood from a 2007 substantiated study of child sexual abuse that retraction occurs far more commonly (16% in this series) than previously thought.
5. In my opinion, the extensive and detailed accounts given by both children that were repeated to different professionals contain details of sexual acts that such young children would need to have direct experience of.” (Note: in order to be able to describe them is the unwritten implication.)
To put it simply, Dr. Hodes is stating that there is physical evidence in support of both sets of allegations which really highlights how farcical the entire “they were coached” counter-narrative really is. Because children who have been coached to make false allegations in order to influence a custody battle we are told, were not even coached to lie about the minor physical injuries they suffered at the hands allegedly of the mother’s partner. What kind of coaching is that?
It really shows the desperation to protect that this preposterous and absurd notion was even floated as the counter-narrative. It is pathetic and insulting. Truly laughable.
Ethical and Legal Issues.
The leaking of these documents may constitute a criminal offense, I honestly do not know, but it is obvious that these records have been released in the broader public interest in order to oppose and expose a clear and outrageous injustice. These are exceptional circumstances in which otherwise unethical or even unlawful actions are necessary and just in my opinion.
Why is this happening?
It beggars belief that this investigation was curtailed and destroyed in order to protect a Z grade actor or even the Staff and Institutional reputation of the school and church involved. Something far more important is being protected here, but it is completely unclear whom or what have managed to engineer the stunning travesty that led to the Investigating Police coaching and bullying retractions from the child victims, Witnesses and Victims A and G.
The real mystery at this point is who is protecting this and why?
The way it is being covered up you would almost get the on it’s face ludicrous idea that this was some type of mad, satanic leadership induction program. The people involved may believe they are doing what is right for their children in some sick parallel universe sense.
We Are Living in a Twilight Zone of Serial Denial.
It is completely possible that elements of the stories the children tell that do not relate to events they actually witnessed may be embellished or even incorrect. There is sadly no doubt that whatever the veracity of the claims the police made a decision, a bizarre and inexplicable decision to destroy the case and conduct a cover up. Unless and until the police have a rethink as is inevitable but may take decades, there is little that can be done to even begin to seek justice for the Hampstead victims beyond trying to expose this to enough people that it causes an uproar that requires an immediate police rethink.
We seem to exist in a bizarre twilight zone where anyone with any connection to power can apparently do what they like to children and expect to suffer only the infamy of the grave. As long as you are not fussed about your reputation when deceased and you are connected you do not even have to be discreet. Once you die it will all emerge of course and your name and reputation will be destroyed but other than that there is no penalty.
While it has become clear again and again that the unthinkable has actually been rather routine, that these unbelievably evil crimes have been happening for decades and yet when confronted with a genuine contemporary cover up, the entire “official” British media have literally not a word to say.
The real story is instantly dismissed thus “The claims, which the mainstream media is barred by court order from reporting on, are said to have been investigated by police and found to be baseless.” Which I think can be fairly claimed to be a downright lie. Perhaps gratitude is the right response to the total lack of mainstream news coverage. Please note the brazen hypocrisy of the Hampstead and Highgate Express stating that “ which the mainstream media is barred by court order from reporting on” before continuing “are said to have been investigated by police and found to be baseless.” Clearly reporting (and indeed completely mendaciously and inaccurately) without naming or even alluding to a source, let alone any evidence to back up their dishonest claim. I hope they are proud of their work at the Hampstead and Highgate Express. Their efforts in support of evil will be rewarded in the deserved manner eventually I am sure, one way or another. It’s only a matter of time.
Return #WhistleblowerKids and #AbuseSurvivors to their Russian Family!
FORWARD UK on Twitter: “FORWARD Trustee, Dr Deborah Hodes, announces opening of the first specialist #FGM clinic in London
ZeeklyTV – Anonymous’s Channel http://zeeklytv.com/user/Anonymous
Dr Hodes Sources.
Lindsay C Malloy, MA Thomas D Lyon JD, and Joia A Quas
Fillal Dependency and recantation of Child Sex Abuse Allegations.
J.Am Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 46:2, 2007.
Bradley Ar, Wood, JM, How Do Children Tell?
The disclosure process in child sexual abuse.
Negl. 20 881-891. 1996
The British Medical Association Confidentiality Guide for Staff.(called the confidentiality toolkit)
Excerpts Relevant to this Case.
1. The duty of confidentiality
Confidentiality is an essential requirement for the preservation of trust between patients and health professionals and is subject to legal and ethical safeguards. Patients should be able to expect that information about their health which they give in confidence will be kept confidential unless there is a compelling reason why it should not. There is also a strong public interest in maintaining confidentiality so that individuals will be encouraged to seek appropriate treatment and share information relevant to it.
Using and disclosing information
3. data should be anonymised wherever possible .
occasionally, when it is not practicable to obtain consent, information may be disclosed where the law requires or where there is an overriding public interest, eg where child abuse is suspected
• disclosures should be kept to the minimum necessary to achieve the purpose
Information may be used more freely if the subject of the information is not identifiable in any way.
Usually, data can be considered to be anonymous where clinical or administrative information is separated from details that may permit the individual to be identified such as name, date of birth and postcode. Even where such obvious identifiers are missing, rare diseases, drug treatments or statistical analyses which have very small numbers within a small population may allow individuals to be identified. A combination of items increases the chances of patient identification.
When anonymised data will serve the purpose, health professionals must anonymise data to this
extent and, if necessary, take technical advice about anonymisation before releasing data. Whilst it is not ethically necessary to seek consent for the use of anonymised data, general information about when their data will be anonymised should be available to patients.
*S.H.O Senior House Officer A junior doctor in the pre Modernising Medical Careers era (pre-2007) of training in the UK, in the 2nd post-graduate year–i.e., immediately after the PRHO–pre-registration house officer year, which is now designated Foundation Year 1–FY1. SHOs are now called FY-2. Some SHO posts still exist and are taken as a prelude to certain specialities–e.g., surgery, but are no longer a standard year in training schemes for junior doctors in the UK.
Say it Isn’t So Sir Malcolm!
The British Establishment has been rocked by fresh allegations of Influence peddling after Channel 4 and the London Daily Telegraph conducted a sting operation where they posed as the representatives of a fictitious “Chinese business interest” and met two Senior figures former Labour Foreign Secretary and Iraq war accomplice Jack Straw and the formidable Tory former Foreign and Defence Secretary and current Chair of the Intelligence Committee, Sir Malcolm Rifkind.
Well, the pro forma denials have been issued. But it is hard to see how they tally with what is on film.
“Rifkind reportedly claimed to be able to gain “useful access” to every British ambassador in the world. Journalists recorded him describing himself as self-employed, even though he earns a salary of £67,000 for being MP for Kensington: “I am self-employed – so nobody pays me a salary. I have to earn my income.” He said his usual fee for half a day’s work was “somewhere in the region of £5,000 to £8,000″.
Politicians Jack Straw and Malcolm Rifkind stung by Channel 4 ‘cash for access’ investigation – v
Straw is about to leave politics but Rifkind is the Head of the Parliamentary Intelligence Committee that oversees British Intelligence Agencies.
Rifkind, astonishingly stated that he had no salary and no employer, apparently regarding his US $100 000 salary from the British taxpayer to represent the people of Kensington as both negligible and requiring no work for the constituents whatsoever on his part. Talk about an “entitlement mentality.”
“The salary entitlement of a Select Committee Chair is £81,936 (this figure comprises of MP’s salary of £67,060 and additional salary for Select Committee Chairs of £14,876) from 1 April 2014.”
Malcolm Rifkind – “Nobody Pays Me A Salary” | theneedleblog
Rifkind is undoubtedly a powerful individual and a formidable figure. Allegations have been made of his complicity in the cover up of the Westminster child abuse scandal, a reasonable assertion but not one for which it is clear that there is direct incontrovertible evidence.
Many perceive Rifkind to be the “grey eminence” of the British Intelligence Establishment. This description is from TruthNews (via the Coleman Experience.)
” Sir Malcolm Rifkind is chairman of the British parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC), which oversees MI5, MI6 and GCHQ – the most important position in the UK intelligence community. The ISC reports first to the prime minister, who retains – and uses – the right to censor material in ISC reports before parliament views them”. Rifkind is an arch Zionist, and a staunch advocate of the incipient police state. Rifkind was employed by the Military Contractor ArmorGroup who made millions of dollars in Iraq from British Government contracts. Rifkind’s cousin was the recently deceased protected child abuser Sir Leon Brittan. Sir Malcolm Rifkind is known to have lived at the Dolphin Square housing complex in Pimlico, London. Dolphin Square has very strong connections to British intelligence and is also understood to have been repeatedly used as a site for child abuse parties with elite guests apparently being entrapped and filmed by the intelligence agencies in order to “protect their future interests”.
This is a short description of Dolphin Square from the Daily Mail.
“The vast complex of 1,250 flats on a 7.5-acre plot close to the Thames was built in 1937 to provide homes for individuals its developers described as ‘notable in public life or society’.
Past tenants include the Far-Right political leader Oswald Mosley, Harold Wilson, Christine Keeler and Princess Anne, who (after moving out) allegedly claimed to be tired of ‘nosy neighbours, noisy traffic and the sight of hookers plying their trade nearby’.
By the late 1980s, it housed 51 MPs, 16 peers, 12 generals and six admirals. More recently, such noted Parliamentarians as William Hague, Alastair Darling, Malcolm Rifkind, Menzies Campbell and Mo Mowlam called it home.”
The abuse at Dolphin Square involved children trafficked from a children’s institution, Bryn Estyn in North Wales. This passage from the Coleman Experience details the evidence Scallywag magazine accumulated from speaking to a dozen witnesses/victims, ten of whom were prepared to make sworn statements. Leon Brittan, Nick Clegg, Malcolm Rifkind, William Hague, Dolphin Square, Missing Dossiers and the VIP Child-Abuse connection | thecolemanexperience
“A notorious boy-brothel was in operation at the sordid address (Dolphin Square) and vulnerable boys were trafficked from care homes to satisfy VIP filth.”
According to the brilliant Scallywag paper:
” In the early nineties, in the now defunct Scallywag magazine, which I founded, we interviewed in some depth twelve former inmates at Bryn Estyn who had all been involved in the Wrexham paedophile ring, which the tribunal acknowledges existed. Most of these interviews were extremely harrowing and disturbing, but were gently and sensitively conducted over pub lunches where the victim could relax. We subsequently persuaded ten of them to make sworn affidavits which we proposed to use as back up to half a dozen paedophile stories we later published.”
” Two of these young men, who had been 14-years-old at the time, swore they had been not only introduced to the paedophile ring operating in the Crest Hotel in Wrexham but had later been escorted on three or four occasions to an address in Pimlico where they were further abused.
We took them separately to Pimlico and asked them to point out the building where this had taken place. They were both positive in their identification. It turned out to be the private flat of a well known, and since highly discredited lobbyist who later went into obscurity in some disgrace because of his involvement with Mohammed al-Fayed and the ‘cash for questions’ scandal. At the time we ran a story entitled ‘Boys for Questions’ and named several prominent members of the then Thatcher government. These allegations went to the very top of the Tory party, yet there was a curious and almost ominous lack of writs.”
It is entirely possible that Sir Malcolm Rifkind has no links to or knowledge of either the crimes of Leon Brittan his cousin, nor the other VIP child abusers of Dolphin Square and all the other sites that were used for the same purpose. Others have not perceived it that way and time will presumably reveal all.
Because the approaches were made by a Chinese company, I would suggest that Sir Malcolm’s presence inside the intelligence committee, let alone as it’s leader, is now completely untenable.
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that this sting was a targeted attack directed specifically at Rifkind and his destruction. This is an intelligence operation with the media groups acting as cut outs on their behalf. There is an overwhelming likelihood in my opinion that this has been organised by an opposing faction within British intelligence.
There are presumably hundreds of MP’s who might prove “vulnerable” to such approaches.The media people didn’t just stumble upon this accidentally in my opinion.
Jack Straw is perhaps the “straw man” there to make it look less obvious. It is pretty clear that someone has chosen to at least withhold assistance to Rifkind because GCHQ and other “monitoring’ agencies would have known this sting was underway, this would be of intense interest to them, which means they presumably had the opportunity to warn Rifkind of what was happening, but chose not to do so.
The evidence to support that claim will in all likelihood never emerge, Commentators on the Guardian are suggesting that Rifkind will be stripped of his honours, the Knighthood etc. It is looking grim for Sir Malcolm Rifkind.
Post script. Sir Malcolm Rifkind has resigned from his position on the Intelligence and Security Committee and will leave the House of Commons at the next election which is in the next several months. This is Sir Malcolm Rifkind’s statement regarding his decision.
None one of the current controversy with which I am associated is relevant to my work as chairman of the intelligence and security committee of parliament.
However, I have today informed my colleagues that while I will remain a member of the committee, I will step down from the chairmanship.
The committee is due to be dissolved in little over a month with the prorogation of parliament for the forthcoming general election. The main substantive work which needs to be completed will be the publication of our privacy and security report during March.
I do not want the work of the committee and the publication of the report to be, in any way, distracted or affected by controversy as to my personal position. I have concluded, therefore, that it is better that this important work should be presided over by a new chairman. “
Malcolm Rifkind discusses ‘Intelligence Agencies in the Internet Age’
Malcolm Rifkind – “Nobody Pays Me A Salary” | theneedleblog