MI or Mossad Execute London Cleric in False Flag Assassination?
The assassination, the unfortunate murder of the minor jihadist figure and former Imam Abdul Hadi Arwani who was shot to death in his car at around 11.15 am in Wembley, London on April 7th may have come at any number of hands.
The man was after all associated with violent jihadsts including those who have fought in Syria so any rational person would certainly have a falling out with jihadist comrades high on their list of possible motives just to cite one obvious example. Yet much of the media coverage is claiming the Syrian Government were responsible because….they said so. They decided to blame the Syrian Government who would have no conceivable motive to murder a marginal and distant figure such as Abdul Hadi Arwani.
That would be like calling this piece “Mossad Strikes London Again!” How on earth do the brutish and simple minded journalists of the Daily Mail know who killed the former Imam and why less than twenty four hours after the event?
They just make the banal claim that he was an “enemy” of the Syrian Government.
The Syrian Government in the real world has many many enemies and Abdul Hadi Anwani dead or alive would not be on their list of priorities it can be guaranteed. So what evidence did the Mail online find to support their astonishing claim within 24 hours that Syria did it?
We learn that Abdul Hadi Anwani was “a fierce critic of president Bashar al-Assad”. A very rare thing to find in the West. Rare indeed!
“Last night a police source told the Daily Mail that the killing had all the hallmarks of a ‘state-sponsored assassination’.
Detectives are now trying to establish whether his strong opposition to Assad was the motive.
He was involved in violent anti-Assad demonstrations outside the Syrian Embassy in London three years ago.” What the Police Really Said:
“Police were called by the London Ambulance Service at 11:15am today to reports of a man found suffering what is believed to be gunshot injuries to his chest.
‘The man, aged in his late 40s, was found sitting in a dark coloured Volkswagen Passat, in Wembley. The man was pronounced dead at the scene at 11.48am. At this very early stage detectives retain an open mind regarding the possible motive.’
The Daily Mail is a “Tasked” Organisation.
All of the Daily Mail’s coverage of the IS phenomenon has been beyond strange and highly suspect. In fact really quite a blatant psychological operation. They aren’t beating up every single grisly IS killing for fun, they are doing a job, trying desperately to revive the faltering War on Terror it appears.There are good stories in the Mail too, where they admit the beheadings were fake before moving on and acting as if nothing has happened.
When it emerged that the Turkish government were claiming that they had arrested a CSIS agent for helping ferry the teenagers into Syria, the Mail suddenly lost all interest in what had been one of their favourite soap opera until the CSIS story could be scrubbed and forgotten and they then resumed the soap opera as if NOTHING HAD EVER HAPPENED!
It is both maddening and amusing.
“Islamic” Extremism is a Long Term MI Project in Britain.
All of the most notorious supposed “Muslim” extremists in Britain, whether knowingly or not, work for MI. Some of the Clerics may have been sincere but people such as Anjem Choudry are transparent provocateurs and really little more than sell outs and the prostitutes of British Intelligence.
The Media Lies Point to the Deeper Truth.
In a case like this the media actually signal that it was a false flag from the same people who created all the previous false flags in order to induce the West to overthrow the Syrian government. Judging by the Daily Mail coverage, no matter who pulled the trigger on the poor, dead, Abdul Hadi Arwani the only realistic candidates would seem to be either, British or Israeli intelligence. These are the groups the Mail apparently services in their cheerful and relentless style.
The BBC Renews it’s Interest in Syria after being a notorious part of the media liars club trying to start a war on Syria.
The British Broadcasting Corporation ,serial liars and warmongers have been running a transparent pro war psy op on Syria for years have suddenly renewed their interest in Syria over the past few days offering extensive coverage of the fighting in the Yarmouk camp near Damascus. The BBC coverage of Syria has been outright criminal fabrication on many occasions. It is what they do. Tell enough of the truth to be able to get away with the big lies when they are required.
In Syria the BBC stooped to truly abysmal and shameful lows for the at face value still respected corporation. The BBC went to the unbelievably evil and outrageous lengths of shamelessly doctoring coverage of the Syrian war in order to fabricate evidence of chemical weapons use by the Syrian government and cause the West to declare war on it.
Startlingly Shoddy Fake News Report by the BBC!
What could possibly be a lower human enterprise than that?
The type of people who tell lies and manufacture the news in order to start wars are simply evil. There is no other way to describe what they are when you see the Iraq example, and all the lies from both media and politicians in support of that war. Acknowledged lies, uncontested lies.
The War Party are Evil.
The consequences of the war are quite clear. A million people are dead and Iraq has been destroyed.
They did it again with Libya and it too was destroyed and they want to come back and think they can still claim that we are going to make a “humanitarian intervention.” in Syria after manufacturing news stories to support the wat narrative.
Ina Pannell is a really obvious example but the BBC is really a rather base intelligence operation being run against the people of the West to their detriment and to the detriment of the world.
The Pattern is Clear They Lie and Get Rich While You Fight and Die
All of the members of the war party, are the naked enemies of humanity. They always are, they always were and they always will be.
Imagine the simple evil of conscripting young Australian and US males and sending them to go to South East Asia and fight an unwinnable war for a decade.
Imagine that 6,000 Australians died attacking Turkey on British orders in 1915 in a war that was completely irrelevant to Australia. A war that saw Australia lose 60,000 kia when the whole population was only 3 million.
The empire stole Australia on our behalf, that is undeniable, but in return they expected almost infinite fealty apparently. Typically the Australian leadership was at the forefront of the recruitment effort.
Imagine the fact that 58,000 US citizens died fighting in a war of choice that was completely irrelevant to the people of the US and based on paranoid and delusional lies?
How many more nations will the war party destroy before they fall?
How many millions more will perish on the back of controlled media propaganda from the likes of Ian Pannell and the BBC? The insulting and low, intelligence front for god knows whom other than that they must be evil..
I disagreed with the Imam;s views but it is sad that he is dead. The police assessment of a “state sponsored assassination ” is likely correct and if so there are three realistic possibilities Britain or Israel with the Saudis as rank outsiders..
BBC News Caught Staging FAKE Chemical Attack In Syria!
Hampstead Satanic Abuse Case: UK Column, 20 March, 2015.
Hampstead: Questions for Mrs Justice Pauffley
March 21st, 2015.
Brief Hampstead Update.
I am still reading the judgement and working on my analysis. I intend to examine both the case history of the Justice and this judgement in detail as I believe they deserve.
In the interim. I would state the obvious and suggest readers watch Brian Gerrish’s brilliant denunciation of the judgement and Deborah Mahmoudieh’s excellent video also. Enjoy Aangirfan and the Tap while they last as it seems that a massive establishment attack is about to begin against these heroic sites. You can see it coming from a mile away. The rulers are not amused and they want to “see something done” about those (please note quotation marks!) “awful little people” with their terribly truthful and indiscreet websites pointing out the bleeding obvious and undeniable fact that the British elite are collectively complicit in the cover up of Establishment child abuse in Britain and have been for decades and this is a sad, but known and proven fact.
It is Time for the Cover Up to End Right Now
On some profound level the British ruling class apparently do not the view the “commoners’ as fully human. I honestly do not see what other conclusion can be drawn from their behaviour. Their loyalty to their class seems to have destroyed their collective humanity long ago. They actually believe that they should have the right to rape and murder the children of “commoners” and expect the chaps from MI5 or Special Branch or whomever to step in and protect them if any honest police happen to come across one of their atrocities..As it happens, historically, the chaps from MI5 or Special Branch HAVE protected the abusers in order to “maintain the prestige of the British Establishment” which by some immaculate corruption they managed to conflate with the Security of the British State.
Key institutions of the British State appear to have been heavily involved in serious crimes against children with almost complete impunity for decades.
This is an intolerable situation clearly. If the institutions of the state are not reformed radically, logic dictates that eventually the mass of the people will understand what is happening and what they have been doing and seek to destroy the very institutions of the state.
As an outsider I would suggest that perhaps some type of “clear the decks” process is urgently required. Perhaps there should be an amnesty for certain people, Law Enforcement and Intelligence Officials perhaps, and other perpetrators of the cover up might be offered an amnesty. A more widespread amnesty may be a positive idea but that should be at the discretion of the victims rather than any outsider, obviously these are merely constructive suggestions. Perhaps a Truth and Reconciliation style process might be beneficial.
The idea that when the Establishment commit a crime, whether the Iraq war or the child rape at the Elm Guest House, they will just conduct an inquiry of whatever length and futility required to make the problem go away and expect people to be grateful and actually equate this process of obfuscation and delay with justice is no longer sustainable. The contempt of the rulers for the people is completely unmistakeable and nauseating.
The more I observe it almost seems like a “class” apartheid society, as hyperbolic as that must sound. The way the ruling class believe they have the right under some preposterous national security cover to get a free pass for crimes against children of a sexual and violent nature. Now they want to blame the internet. Pretend that some prurient interest is being served. Which truly shows how low they are.
In order to preserve the positive ideas and people within British institutions the cover up has to end now. The obfuscation and denial must end right now. The persecution of victims and whistle blowers and honest police must end right now.
It is time to admit the bleeding obvious. it is time to renovate the house in order to preserve the underlying structure. Historically we know that reform or revolution are the only options. Revolutions are destructive and disastrous and only lead to even worse people in power generally so I am urging a rethink. A restoration of the Rule of Law, hardly a subversive idea is it?
The world will not end. The walls will not fall down. People will not be hunted or strung up or any of that vile mob nonsense. Just tell the truth and apologise and hopefully the psyche of this deeply divided, wounded and utterly dysfunctional nation can return to balance and a semblance of normalcy and the rule of Law. The choice is yours.
Say it Isn’t So Sir Malcolm!
The British Establishment has been rocked by fresh allegations of Influence peddling after Channel 4 and the London Daily Telegraph conducted a sting operation where they posed as the representatives of a fictitious “Chinese business interest” and met two Senior figures former Labour Foreign Secretary and Iraq war accomplice Jack Straw and the formidable Tory former Foreign and Defence Secretary and current Chair of the Intelligence Committee, Sir Malcolm Rifkind.
Well, the pro forma denials have been issued. But it is hard to see how they tally with what is on film.
“Rifkind reportedly claimed to be able to gain “useful access” to every British ambassador in the world. Journalists recorded him describing himself as self-employed, even though he earns a salary of £67,000 for being MP for Kensington: “I am self-employed – so nobody pays me a salary. I have to earn my income.” He said his usual fee for half a day’s work was “somewhere in the region of £5,000 to £8,000″.
Politicians Jack Straw and Malcolm Rifkind stung by Channel 4 ‘cash for access’ investigation – v
Straw is about to leave politics but Rifkind is the Head of the Parliamentary Intelligence Committee that oversees British Intelligence Agencies.
Rifkind, astonishingly stated that he had no salary and no employer, apparently regarding his US $100 000 salary from the British taxpayer to represent the people of Kensington as both negligible and requiring no work for the constituents whatsoever on his part. Talk about an “entitlement mentality.”
“The salary entitlement of a Select Committee Chair is £81,936 (this figure comprises of MP’s salary of £67,060 and additional salary for Select Committee Chairs of £14,876) from 1 April 2014.”
Malcolm Rifkind – “Nobody Pays Me A Salary” | theneedleblog
Rifkind is undoubtedly a powerful individual and a formidable figure. Allegations have been made of his complicity in the cover up of the Westminster child abuse scandal, a reasonable assertion but not one for which it is clear that there is direct incontrovertible evidence.
Many perceive Rifkind to be the “grey eminence” of the British Intelligence Establishment. This description is from TruthNews (via the Coleman Experience.)
” Sir Malcolm Rifkind is chairman of the British parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC), which oversees MI5, MI6 and GCHQ – the most important position in the UK intelligence community. The ISC reports first to the prime minister, who retains – and uses – the right to censor material in ISC reports before parliament views them”. Rifkind is an arch Zionist, and a staunch advocate of the incipient police state. Rifkind was employed by the Military Contractor ArmorGroup who made millions of dollars in Iraq from British Government contracts. Rifkind’s cousin was the recently deceased protected child abuser Sir Leon Brittan. Sir Malcolm Rifkind is known to have lived at the Dolphin Square housing complex in Pimlico, London. Dolphin Square has very strong connections to British intelligence and is also understood to have been repeatedly used as a site for child abuse parties with elite guests apparently being entrapped and filmed by the intelligence agencies in order to “protect their future interests”.
This is a short description of Dolphin Square from the Daily Mail.
“The vast complex of 1,250 flats on a 7.5-acre plot close to the Thames was built in 1937 to provide homes for individuals its developers described as ‘notable in public life or society’.
Past tenants include the Far-Right political leader Oswald Mosley, Harold Wilson, Christine Keeler and Princess Anne, who (after moving out) allegedly claimed to be tired of ‘nosy neighbours, noisy traffic and the sight of hookers plying their trade nearby’.
By the late 1980s, it housed 51 MPs, 16 peers, 12 generals and six admirals. More recently, such noted Parliamentarians as William Hague, Alastair Darling, Malcolm Rifkind, Menzies Campbell and Mo Mowlam called it home.”
The abuse at Dolphin Square involved children trafficked from a children’s institution, Bryn Estyn in North Wales. This passage from the Coleman Experience details the evidence Scallywag magazine accumulated from speaking to a dozen witnesses/victims, ten of whom were prepared to make sworn statements. Leon Brittan, Nick Clegg, Malcolm Rifkind, William Hague, Dolphin Square, Missing Dossiers and the VIP Child-Abuse connection | thecolemanexperience
“A notorious boy-brothel was in operation at the sordid address (Dolphin Square) and vulnerable boys were trafficked from care homes to satisfy VIP filth.”
According to the brilliant Scallywag paper:
” In the early nineties, in the now defunct Scallywag magazine, which I founded, we interviewed in some depth twelve former inmates at Bryn Estyn who had all been involved in the Wrexham paedophile ring, which the tribunal acknowledges existed. Most of these interviews were extremely harrowing and disturbing, but were gently and sensitively conducted over pub lunches where the victim could relax. We subsequently persuaded ten of them to make sworn affidavits which we proposed to use as back up to half a dozen paedophile stories we later published.”
” Two of these young men, who had been 14-years-old at the time, swore they had been not only introduced to the paedophile ring operating in the Crest Hotel in Wrexham but had later been escorted on three or four occasions to an address in Pimlico where they were further abused.
We took them separately to Pimlico and asked them to point out the building where this had taken place. They were both positive in their identification. It turned out to be the private flat of a well known, and since highly discredited lobbyist who later went into obscurity in some disgrace because of his involvement with Mohammed al-Fayed and the ‘cash for questions’ scandal. At the time we ran a story entitled ‘Boys for Questions’ and named several prominent members of the then Thatcher government. These allegations went to the very top of the Tory party, yet there was a curious and almost ominous lack of writs.”
It is entirely possible that Sir Malcolm Rifkind has no links to or knowledge of either the crimes of Leon Brittan his cousin, nor the other VIP child abusers of Dolphin Square and all the other sites that were used for the same purpose. Others have not perceived it that way and time will presumably reveal all.
Because the approaches were made by a Chinese company, I would suggest that Sir Malcolm’s presence inside the intelligence committee, let alone as it’s leader, is now completely untenable.
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that this sting was a targeted attack directed specifically at Rifkind and his destruction. This is an intelligence operation with the media groups acting as cut outs on their behalf. There is an overwhelming likelihood in my opinion that this has been organised by an opposing faction within British intelligence.
There are presumably hundreds of MP’s who might prove “vulnerable” to such approaches.The media people didn’t just stumble upon this accidentally in my opinion.
Jack Straw is perhaps the “straw man” there to make it look less obvious. It is pretty clear that someone has chosen to at least withhold assistance to Rifkind because GCHQ and other “monitoring’ agencies would have known this sting was underway, this would be of intense interest to them, which means they presumably had the opportunity to warn Rifkind of what was happening, but chose not to do so.
The evidence to support that claim will in all likelihood never emerge, Commentators on the Guardian are suggesting that Rifkind will be stripped of his honours, the Knighthood etc. It is looking grim for Sir Malcolm Rifkind.
Post script. Sir Malcolm Rifkind has resigned from his position on the Intelligence and Security Committee and will leave the House of Commons at the next election which is in the next several months. This is Sir Malcolm Rifkind’s statement regarding his decision.
None one of the current controversy with which I am associated is relevant to my work as chairman of the intelligence and security committee of parliament.
However, I have today informed my colleagues that while I will remain a member of the committee, I will step down from the chairmanship.
The committee is due to be dissolved in little over a month with the prorogation of parliament for the forthcoming general election. The main substantive work which needs to be completed will be the publication of our privacy and security report during March.
I do not want the work of the committee and the publication of the report to be, in any way, distracted or affected by controversy as to my personal position. I have concluded, therefore, that it is better that this important work should be presided over by a new chairman. “
Malcolm Rifkind discusses ‘Intelligence Agencies in the Internet Age’
Malcolm Rifkind – “Nobody Pays Me A Salary” | theneedleblog