A remarkable and very important video emerged on the internet this week. The video is a 39 minute long interview of a man named Ronald Bernard conducted by a journalist named Irma Schiffer.
There are large gaps in the story Ronald Bernard tells and there is no way to corroborate the claims he makes,, the story Bernard outlines is however broadly corroborated by many confirmed and substantiated facts established in recent decades such as the story told by Belgian woman Regina Louf who claimed to have been abused at an elite party in Belgium at which a young girl was murdered.
The police initially regarded Regina Louf as a fantasist until she was able to direct them to the place where the young girls body had been buried and in addition to that the body still bore evidence of the torture the young girl had suffered prior t0 her death as Regina Louf had described.
More on Regina Louf and Belgium’s well documented problem of elite child abuse and murder:
There is nothing new here, and the interview offers no names of people or institutions and therefore does not fall into the category of “too good to be true” at all in my view.
The Ronald bernard account is just another layer of confirmation. One of many. The importance of the story Ronald Bernard tells lies in the fact that we are hearing the story from the other side, an exceptionally rare event.
If people want to believe that Ronald Bernard is making this stuff up, there is no way to disabuse them of that opinion, there is no way to prove that his story is the truth, but having watched the interview there is no doubt in my mind that the story Bernard tells is substantially true.
I urge readers simply to watch the interview and decide for themselves via this link to the video or scroll to the bottom of this page.
The story Bernard tells is that he was a smart young businessman, acting as a private financial broker when a senior figure notice his talent and invited him “in” telling him that if he chose this path he would have to learn to “put his conscience in the freezer”.
The insider introduced Bernard to his clients and essentially passed his business onto Bernard in exchange for 10% of the earnings.
The role turned out to be a kind of Mr. Fixit, a middle man laundering money and hiding transactions on behalf of elite bankers and intelligence agencies who require these financial instruments to process and launder the money from their drug, weapon and human trafficking operations.
Bernard learned that intelligence agencies are operating as above the law criminal corporations on behalf of their elite masters. Bernard also learned that senior figures within the financial institutions through which the money was passing knew what was happening.
All in all things were going swimmingly, the fact that he was helping these people to start wars, fund terrorism and launder funds obtained through human and drug trafficking was not a problem.
Ronald Bernard was an atheist at this time also so he was not overly troubled by the knowledge that the elites he was working for worshipped a “different” God than most people, they worship Lucifer.
It is worth noting that some people profess themselves to be “light” or benign Luciferians, that may well be the case, or not, but the people who rule the world today are not of that variety, their Lucifer is the destroyer, the blackening force, the force that craves suffering and violent death, the more the better.
People want to debate the nature of Lucifer, that is fine, but the people who matter, those in power, believe in the evil version, an entity interchangeable with Satan, there should be no mistake about that.
One large gap in the story relates to Bernard’s progress within the cult itself, the story jumps wildly from Bernard being an amused witness to a “Church of Satan” ritual that he describes as involving “naked woman and liquor” to the climax of Bernard’s story and the event that precipitated his physical breakdown and fall from grace within the elite, when Bernard states that he was asked to murder a child within a ritual as a kind of “final binding” to the group.
There must be many steps that take place between being an “amused observer” and that request but the story jumps straight from the observer to the potential murderer, hopefully further interviews will flesh the story out in more detail. .
Downfall and Redemption.
After Bernard’s refusal to murder a child and bind himself to the group irreversibly, Bernard appears to have begun to completely break down, his work performance dramatically declined and at some point the group he had been affiliated with abducted and tortured him to in his words “make sure that I didn’t expose them”
At some point after that Bernard completely collapsed physically, suffered multiple organ failure and woke up in the Intensive Care Ward, he later realised that he must have almost died as when he had been taken to the hospital he had observed himself from above, he had looked down and watched the doctors working on his body.
Bernard interpreted that experience to mean that he was something more than simply his body. That he was more than an intelligent lump of meat and that his essence in some form would survive his physical death.
The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.
The remainder of the interview is Bernard offering his post breakdown view of the world, one standout moment was perhaps when Bernard baldly states that “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” is an accurate depiction of the world today. Which is true but a rather shocking statement from a modern European.
People who have not read the Protocols completely misunderstand them, they believe that this work is an anti -Jew hate tract, a “warrant for genocide” as one professional liar described it, it is nothing of the sort.
Regardless of questions of authenticity this is the most important thing to understand.
The Protocols are written from the point of view of a Satanist or Luciferian who poses as a Jew. This is merely a front. The narrator is not a Jew and he does not like Jews, he sees them as he sees all other people, as a nuisance, an obstacle and a resource to be exploited, lied to and if necessary, destroyed.
The narrator is not describing a Jewish plot and the Protocols does not in the slightest suggest that all or most Jewish people are part of some evil plot, in fact it states precisely the opposite.
My understanding of the plotters is that they are a coalition of the blackened, so there are people from all backgrounds represented and in each case their job is to subvert the institutions and positions they inhabit for the benefit of the broader cult.
So you must have Christians, they are very important because you need them to destroy Christianity from within, to turn it into a travesty and we have seen this take place in all major Christian denominations and the same principle stands for all groups and institutions.
As far as authenticity goes, in my opinion the Protocols are a doctored document based on very good intelligence, almost all of the text appears to be authentic but some elements seem to have been added in an attempt to flatter and manipulate the Russian Czar to whom it was originally presented.
As many have stated, the authenticity of this document at this point is completely irrelevant, the document describes the world that is being built, how it is being built and the type of people who are doing it, if that is a consequence of a hoax document being embraced and implemented after release or the document was authentic when published in 1903 makes almost no difference at this juncture.
The Protocols describe the program in a very direct and powerful way. Many other (more respectable) works such as “Tragedy and Hope” and “Brave New World” provide similar insights to the Protocols, but both are far longer and far less direct.
It should be remembered that the elite want people to be prejudiced, to be ignorant, to lump individuals into massive groups and condemn them en masse.
It is the height of foolishness to allow yourself to be tricked or manipulated into thinking like that, while it is true that a demographically disproportionate number of the engineers and managers of evil come from a nominally Jewish background, that should never be used to smear anyone because of their family or religious background.
It is also the height of blindness to imagine that the numerous non-Jews who propagate evil and play key roles in the tyranny project are to be somehow swept aside and forgotten.
The final point Ronald Bernard makes is that people must overcome the divide and rule con if they are going to depose these evil forces who currently rule the world.
The interview is deeply moving and although it is conducted in Dutch, the language has so many words that are similar to or the same as English that it is very easy to follow what is being said rather than merely reading it on the screen as is the case with many more distant languages.
Please do yourself a favour and watch this video if you have not already done so. Whilst much on YouTube is ephemera and nonsense, this is the exact opposite
Hampstead Cover Up Similar Story From 1989 Satans Children
July 29th, 2015.
A Very Simple Choice.
It is deeply unwelcome information. It is knowledge that cannot possibly bring happiness or pleasure but to pretend that these things do not happen is to be complicit in the acts of evil. There is no choice. Not really.
I have never really been associated with Satanism, but assume that most Satanists or dark occultists do not engage in these practices. It is clear however that some, indeed apparently many do.
The fact that there was a fairly successful short term cover up of the Hampstead case should come as no surprise, nor should the complicity of the BBC in the cover up with their laughable, disgusting interview of the Hampstead “Dad”. The BBC is an organisation with long and intimate links with the “circle of evil.” in Britain and Jimmy Saville, the depraved child molester, satanist and murderer who doubled as a “beloved BBC personality” exemplifies the odious and despicable role of the BBC over decades, along with many other key British institutions.
The parallels between the allegations made in Hampstead and the claims made by Theresa in Satan’s children are absolutely spellbinding. The child sexual abuse, the rituals, the murders, the cannibalism, the murder of small children and babies. The amazing thing is that Theresa’s story is so similar but her experience is so much deeper and greater than that of the Hampstead children as she has remained as a child cult member and victim into puberty.
She claims that she gave birth at the age eleven. She claims to have been impregnated seven or eight times but she miscarried or was given cult abortions by cult doctors in the other cases. She claims they threatened to kill her baby if she didn’t co-operate. She claims that she witnessed several murders including one of vagrant she describes in excruciating detail. She describes cannibalism including being forced to eat part of her own aborted fetus. She claims that she thought the abuse happened to everyone.
At times Theresa is upset, at other times she is unaffected, almost in shock. She is one of the most compelling witnesses to these acts that I have encountered. Through no fault of their own, very small children do not make the best witnesses, Theresa is fifteen or sixteen and it is very clear that she is describing real events. It is stunning.
Theresa’s story is not confirmation of the Hampstead allegations, but it is powerful evidence that these claims are nowhere near as outlandish as they might have sounded at first.
It seems quite clear that there is a sub group of “transgressionist ultras” within dark occultism who believe that power is obtained through the interdimensional interactions they seek to achieve through acts of extreme moral transgression, with the more sick and wrong the better. These crimes are an attempt t please the gods of evil. The ancient ones, who are they believe some type of ethereal entities whom they believe have the ability to help them shape the world towards their desired conclusion.
This abuse, the ritual abuse is not recreation, although there must be recreationally motivated members, conventional pedophiles and garden variety sadists in need of an outlet amongst the flock.
But this is something else they are doing. They are seeking to carve out a niche for evil entities, to dream them into existence or nourish them through extravagant acts of transgression and evil and thus somehow harness the power of the entities that these acts unleash to achieve their earthly goals which if we take them at their word, vary between their ascension to power as new monarchs of a slave state to the destruction of this world entirely.
If these ideas sound insane, understand that according to highly respected occultist Kenneth Grant, a key Crowley student and acolyte in his work the Magical Revival Crowley believed that if his work “the Book of the Law” was published in the correct circumstances it would cause the world to end or similar complete cataclysm.
” “The Book of the Law” was published several times in Crowley’s lifetime and each publication was followed in a comparitively short time with international disasters. The Balkan War, the First World War, the Sino-Japanese War and World War II. It was Crowley’s belief that when the book is finally published in strict accordance with the instructions given by Aiwaz* it will effect the total destruction of civilization as we know it. So far, the instructions have been imperfectly executed and therefore the holocaust incomplete.”
(with many thanks to Evelyn for providing the main insight upon which this piece is founded.)
The Hampstead Judgement Contains Proven Falsehoods and Cannot Therefore be Valid.
As seasoned cover up merchants have long known, the best way to conduct a cover up is to get on the front foot, seize the initiative and present an essentially inverted narrative, where the perpetrators are the victims and the victims are perpetrators. As the Americans might put it, the best form of defense is offense. And so it was that Justice Pauffley announced grandly and unequivocally on the first page of her Judgement that:
“I am able to state with complete conviction that none of the allegations are true. I am entirely certain that everything Ms Draper, her partner Abraham Christie and the children said about those matters was fabricated. The claims are baseless. Those who have sought to perpetuate them are evil and / or foolish “ Justice Pauffley, Hampstead Judgement Page One.
These sentences quite simply cannot possibly be true.
A Profound and Simple Problem:
The Judgement is Not Factually Correct and Should Be Considered Invalid on this Basis.
The Judgement is not factually accurate. It makes claims that are provably false and must therefore surely be perceived to be entirely invalid because the foundational assumptions that underlie Justice Pauffley’s interpretation of events are not factual in basis and this can be simply and quickly proven.
The Factual Error that Proves the Judgement is Without Validity.
On page 21 of the Judgement, in reference to the police interviews Justice Pauffley writes that
” Fact No. “142. “As emerges from the interviews themselves, both P and Q did indeed withdraw their claims, all of them.”
The Justice states this without equivocation, yet when the recording of the police interviews are re-examined it emerges that Witness G in fact never did retract his claim to have been sexually abused in the disabled toilet of a local swimming pool. Please note that the Judgement is very specific and definitive, “withdraw their claims, all of them.”
The record of the police interview actually indicates that contrary to the Judgement’s claims, witness G never did retract his claim relating to the sexual abuse at the swimming pool. It did not happen, so the claim that the judgement makes and one of it’s underlying foundations is factually incorrect.
The exchange from the September 17th Police interview The context.
This is at the 9 minute 38 second mark of the September 17th interview of the male complainant/victim. Several retractions, important retractions have already been extracted from the child,
It is both a reasonable and inescapable conclusion that the police officer was “tasked” by persons unknown to deliver the retraction, due to the officer’s behaviour in the interview.
Regardless of those unproven allegations, if we imagine for the sake of argument that the Officer was tasked with extracting retractions, the Interviewing Officer would have felt that he had already succeeded at this point, because the witnesses were no longer going to be of any use in a courtroom. The witness has been discredited, because he has told two contradictory accounts of the same event on the record. So a retraction of the swimming pool allegations did not apparently assume the same priority as the achievement of the previously bullied retractions.
This is the final interview in a series that spanned over two hours of interviews with the male witness.
This portion and the fact that the subject was simply dropped apropos of nothing and never again raised, prove that the “Swimming pool “claims were never retracted. The clock shows 11.18 at the time this exchange begins. The Swimming Poll Affirmations.
Interviewing Officer”Tell me about the swimming pool, you told me lots of people in this disabled toilet ? (sexually abused you-unstated)”
Male witness starts nodding his head as the policeman is speaking despite the officers subtly mocking tone. He nods repeatedly. “Yeah Yeah Yeah” he says nodding vigorously and stammering “Yeah that that that..”before plainly stating “That’s true.” remember he is in”retraction mode” he has made several retractions so he is clearly not under the spell of the mother’s partner yet he is absolutely unequivocal.
“That’s true” Nodding vigorously repeatedly. Repeats it, “That is true yeah.”
I make it at five affirmations right there between the stammered yeahs and the “That’s true” repeated twice unequivocally, while nodding.
So the Officer, in line with his tactics throughout the interview of September 17th, tried to talk the victim out of the allegation for whatever reason, stating incredulously
”Even though you said you was (sic) only four and hadn’t been to that school (as a student-unstated)?”
“No” indicating his disagreement with the officer’s assertion, he is not saying it did not happen, this is another affirmation as the boy’s words indicate.
“No, they had like…they were friends”
It is a bit garbled, “Teacher I knew a (name garbled and excised) from my sister. Who was in the school when I was four years old.”
Meaning he was not there with the school but with his friends, including his older sister who it seems was at the school. He is clearly affirming the veracity of the claim even in “retraction mode”.
“Interviewing Officer. ”So alright what we’ll try and do is sort out what’s true and what’s not”
At which point the subject is simply dropped.
Six Affirmations and A Lone Victory for Witness G Over His Bullying Interviewer.
At this point, the child achieves a lone victory in this interview, he actually wins the argument, he has the final say, the Interviewing Officer is defeated and so returns simply to the safe ground of the previous retractions. The topic is dropped at this point, and never raised again. The claim was quite simply never retracted and there is no possible valid reason for the police officer completely dropping the subject upon his failure to elicit the quick retraction he was transparently seeking and for which there can not possibly be an innocent or honourable explanation. It is really that simple.
The Repeated Mantra of Intimidation.
Prior to the witness breaking and offering a non-specific blanket retraction. The Interviewing Officer repeated his mantra of intimidation.
“Look if you haven’t been telling the truth, if you have been telling lies, it is ok, everything will be all right as long as you just tell the truth now ok?”
The implication of this is unmissable. The message is quite simply, “change your story now or you are in big trouble.”So the child on numerous occasions accedes to the intimidation as is completely natural given the maturity and power difference between the protaganists. It is worth mentioning that the children had been living in Foster care for six days at this point, there was an intense vulnerability, the father was still allowed Skype contact which given the gravity of the allegations certainly seems extraordinary,
Blanket Retraction Coerced and Therefore Legally Worthless.
Although Witness G did allow himself to be bullied into a semi blanket retraction, “None of it was true.” after repeated bouts of obvious and inexplicable intimidation from the previously empathetic Interviewing Officer. The context in which the blanket retraction was made combined with the bizarre manner in which the Interviewing Officer simply dropped the subject of the “Swimming pool” sexual abuse entirely when he was unable to bully and coerce a retraction from Witness G (and it never resurfaced in the witness G interview, his final police interview) mean that the blanket retraction is meaningless. It was extracted through unethical and transparent intimidation and can be safely and completely discounted on that basis.
The only rational conclusion that can be drawn from this pattern of behaviour is that “person’s unknown” tasked the Interviewing Officer to achieve retractions from the witnesses. Nothing else can possibly account for the complete lack of interest in the “swimming pool” allegations once the quick and easy retraction. was not forthcoming from Witness G.
Anatomy of A Transparent Cover Up.
Attack a Straw Man-Justice Pauffley’s Transparent Tactic.
This is a classic obfuscation tactic. Problems with your story?
Mask all the evidence behind the “helpful parts” of the story you are promoting.
Speak Only the “Good Parts” of the Narrative and obscure the truth with sustained misdirection.
In order to avoid addressing or investigating the actual credible and professionally confirmed child abuse claims, and the police cover up that the Judgement is intended to augment and complete, the Justice chooses to place at the core of the narrative the more indiscreet aspects of the Internet coverage of this case and the unintended victims of that indiscretion replace the actual child abuse victims as the victims in the Justice’s utterly flawed and almost completely fictitious Judgement. A strange mixture of psychosis and naked cynicism.
The One Strong Part of the Establishment Narrative
The Justice chose well in the sense that the indiscretion of certain information released and the small number of unfortunate consequences of these indiscretions are actually the only parts of her judgement that bear even a passing resemblance to reality. So the “strong”; part of the Establishment narrative is deployed in order to mask the real story with an unfortunate sideshow that quite simply has no bearing on the veracity of the claims of abuse one way or the other.
This is an elementary fact that utterly eludes the apparently “beyond’ mediocre Judge in her pursuit of obfuscation, any obfuscation no matter how infantile. At the same time the actual sexual abuse claims and the multiple strands of evidence that support them are only even mentioned as an afterthought, whereupon they are subjected to an intense, inexplicable and completely irrational attack. The unavoidable conclusion that at the very least without doubt these children were interfered with in a disgusting manner and no-one has been prosecuted for it is simply not addressed.
The broad entirety of the claims are perhaps beyond my ken but the Medical Reports were unequivocal, there can be no other reading no matter how hard or how desperately Justice Pauffley grasps for one. It thus becomes clear that the Pauffley Judgement was just the Crowning touch to another rather typical and despicable British Establishment cover up. No-one should be surprised as the cover ups number in the dozens and continue in the present day, not just in this story but many others.
History Will Condemn the Purveyors of Brazen Injustice.
There is literally no doubt in my mind that in time the completely fallacious nature of Justice Pauffley’s Judgement will be thoroughly exposed and she will be subjected to the ignominy of history’s assessment if nothing else.
The Judge brazenly tries to obfuscate the truth by concentrating on certain outlandish sounding claims and the indiscreet nature of some of the information released, in order to avoid investigating what is truly at the core of this story which is the children’s allegations, the police investigation and the results of the Medical examinations.. A Completely One Sided and Dishonest Account.
The specific claims the children made are never addressed in their own right in the Judgement, all evidence that indicates that sexual abuse has taken place is simply dismissed. On the other hand, all information that leans the other way is eagerly embraced even if the claims were made simultaneously by the same witness. You can’t do that and expect to be viewed as an honest or impartial adjudicator. Very simple.
All in all this is a ridiculous judgement full of claims that are beneath contempt and which the adjectives despicable and worthless do not even begin to describe. The Judge chose to attempt to defame any and all who had the temerity to notice the fact that the claims had veracity claiming without one scintilla of evidence these people had some kind of prurient interest, a claim for which the learned Justice did not see fit to provide any evidence to support! I found it particularly amusing because it was the police interview and the Medical reports that made me realise that “hang on, there is a cover up taking place here.” and neither the police interviews nor the Medical reports could ever conceivably be of prurient interest to anyone. Not even in the depraved parallel universe Justice Pauffley apparently inhabits
Cover Ups Are Rather Obvious and Easy to Spot.
Cover ups, logically only occur when there is a core of truth to the allegations being covered up.
Allegations without foundation do not by definition require a cover up, only the true allegations require that so there is no other rational interpretation, based on the content of the September 17th Police interview with the male child that this is a cover up.
The Original Medical Reports, upon which Justice Pauffley launches a sustained and fallacious attack, for no known reason all speak to the same horrific truth. Many of the claims must have been true. Because nothing else can rationally explain either the nature of that September 17th interview, during which the witness is openly hounded into retractions, on one occasion having made seven successive affirmations of the claim, nor the wounds and symptoms found by Dr. Hodes during her two Medical examinations, nor this appalling Judgement..Justice Pauffley’s openly biased and fallacious Judgement is grounded in basic and key errors of fact. The Judgement will not stand the test of time because it’s aims were neither in intent or outcome the dissemination of truth, quite the opposite.
The core underlying assumptions Justice Pauffley brought to the case were based upon falsehoods. The Justice has clearly not achieved an adequate grasp of the case upon which to base her claims among which nclude the unmistakeable untruth at Fact No. 142 that ” “As emerges from the interviews themselves, both P and Q did indeed withdraw their claims, all of them.” as proven by the partial transcript provided earlier.. The Interview continues for approximately another ten minutes, there was ample opportunity, but the Interviewing Officer chose never to raise the claims again. They were never retracted.
A Credible Legal Definition of Error and the Possible Consequences.
“The nature of the error dictates the availability of a legal remedy. Generally speaking, mistaken or erroneous application of law will void or reverse a judgment in the matter. Conversely, errors or mistakes in facts, upon which a judge or jury relied in rendering a judgment or verdict, may or may not warrant reversal, depending upon other factors involved in the error. However, appellate decisions make a distinction—not so much between fact and law, but rather, between harmless error and reversible error—in deciding whether to let stand or vitiate a judgment or verdict.”
Despite the grandiloquent title, a High Court Justice such as Dame Pauffley is actually at the third tier of the English Judiciary. According to Wikipedia “A Justice of the High Court, commonly known as a ‘High Court judge’, is a judge of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, and represents the third highest level of judge in the courts of England and Wales. High Court judges are referred to as puisne (pronounced puny) judges. High Court Judges wear red and black robes.”
It is not uncommon for the senior Courts of Appeal to overturn in part or whole the flawed findings of High Court Judgements such as Justice Pauffley’s Family Court Hampstead Judgement.There are still multiple avenues of appeal in this case, and the words of a Veteran former British Detective Sergeant recently prove that there are presumably many similar individuals, quality individuals with courage, decency and intelligence, who work inside British Law Enforcement and know that this is wrong.
The Rule Of Evil.
The aggressive and even belligerent cover up is par for the course. We have seen the work of the likes of Justice Pauffley many times before. In Nebraska, in Washington DC, in Belgium the Netherlands and of course in Westminster. The cover up has achieved huge successes in the Hampstead case, but the facts are still there, staring any in the face who dare to look. It is really a shameful and distressing situation all around and it has certainly been nauseating to see alleged perpetrators prancing around in the controlled media proclaiming their victim-hood. Britain is sadly a grotesque and wicked parody of what it perceives itself to be .
According to the highly credible source the UK Column, members of the London Metropolitan Police were threatened to stay away from the Hampstead matter. I cannot prove that this happened but it fits perfectly with everything else we have seen in this case, it comes from a credible source and it speaks to what is really at the heart of the engineered social and moral breakdown of Western societies so that the “iconoclasts” may rebuild the world in their evil image.The infiltration and even subversion of the institutions of the British state by what appears to be a satanic death cult, as extreme as that sounds is apparently highly advanced. What other conclusion can be drawn from all this?
The rule of evil can either be accepted or opposed, but it cannot credibly be denied. The power and aggression and success of the Hampstead cover up all bellow the same unspeakable truth.
Former Detective Sergeant Speaks Out On SRA Christ Church, Hampstead, London
Whistleblower Kid G witness statement
High Court Judgment Template – gareeva-dearman-2015.pdf
High Court judge (England and Wales) – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Crimes of Empire meets Dr. Barrett on Truth Jihad Radio
I was able to chat briefly with Dr. Kevin Barrett during his recent radio show of March 20th. I was extremely pleased and shocked to receive an invitation to chat because I am a huge fan of the show and I have listened to hundreds of hours of the show.
Dr. Barrett’s work has had a huge influence upon me since late 2011 when I first understood rather late that September 11th was a false flag attack. Dr. Barrett made me realise for the first time that we, being the West are not “good guys who go wrong”, but rather we are the Evil ones at the institutional level and in the world.,
It was also a big deal to me because although I have been lucky enough to have received a high degree of support from day one from the highly respected and influential Aangirfan site, a British site, I had never received any acknowledgement from any member of the American community in the slightest.
Not that I had even necessarily deserved it but to get some acknowledgement that someone within the US thinks my work is at least not complete garbage is obviously pleasing. I think it went ok.
My only previous media experience was conducting fairly cliched and pointless interviews with the rock acts Babes in Toyland and Carcass for Melbourne Community Television. I was not confident enough to put the subject onto the Hampstead matter or any of those things. The good part covered a short recent false flag history, speaking about Oklahoma City, Bali and 911.
Leaked Medical Reports End All Doubt About Sexual Abuse Claims.
The medical reports end any debate regarding the fact that children A and G were the victims of child sexual abuse in Hampstead and underline the criminal nature of the police interviews of September 17th, 2014. The question now is who is being protected? Who has the influence and power to cause the British police such an obvious and inexplicable mid investigation rethink? Clearly there is much more than a Z grade actor and the reputation of a school at stake here. Neither would logically merit the police choice to destroy this investigation and cover up these heinous crimes.
September 5th 2014.
“A referral was made to the Barnet CAIF by (mother’s partner’s) brother in law who is a special constable. Following a disclosure by A and G that they had been sexually abused by their father and “teachers” and were part of a cult. This disclosure had been made when they were in Morocco over the summer. And the parents stated they were unsure who to inform as many people seemed to be involved, (including allegedly police and social workers.)
Initial police interviews conducted.
8/9/14. Initial strategy meeting held.
10/9/14. Visit to family home ahead of ABE interview.
11/9/14. Emergency Police Protection Order issued after the ABE yesterday evening during which witness A, witness G and witness E (mother) were interviewed separately.
Allegations of physical abuse from the mother’s partner towards both children and sexual abuse against both children by their father and “teachers”. They are now in Emergency Foster Placement.”
Police conduct the retraction interviews in transparent attempt to bury the truth and vandalise justice.
Interviewing officers clearly bully false retractions from the children for unknown reasons that can only be sinister.
22/9/14. Police inform the mother E that they have found that the crimes against the children cannot be confirmed. The investigation is over.
22/9/14. Dr. Hodes writes the second medical report affirming the veracity of the sexual abuse allegations despite the retractions. Dr. Hodes cites a specific research finding that found that 16% of victims will retract the allegations and affirming therefore that the physical evidence of abuse should outweigh the retractions.
Lindsay C Malloy, MA Thomas D Lyon JD, and Joia A Quas
Fillal Dependency and recantation of Child Sex Abuse Allegations.
J.Am Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 46:2, 2007.
These statements were made without reference to the disgraceful performance of the interviewing officer in the retraction interviews, which only strengthen Dr. Hodes’ assertions.
The Medical Reports. Who wrote them and are they authentic?
There are two Medical Reports, one dated September 15th, 2014, the other September 22nd. Written on the stationary of the University College of London in a way that leaves no doubt as to their authenticity. Background checks on the names of the people who signed the documents end any doubt . To illustrate this I will cite the best known of the Doctors who have signed these reports Dr. Deborah Hodes (FRCPCH) Consultant Community Paediatrician. A cursory internet search indicates that Dr. Hodes is employed in that role at the University College London and is an expert in the field of child abuse having more than twenty years experience.
The first report dated September 15th appears to have been written by Dr Harriett Gunn (SHO Senior House Officer)* but is also signed by Dr. Hodes, The second Report of September 22nd appears to have been written entirely by Dr. Hodes, as she is the sole signatory.
The Medical Examiners are highly experienced and well qualified.
This does not mean that they are infallible, of course, but these medical reports have been signed by medical practitioners considered to be authorities in the field with decades of experience.
Dr, Deborah Hodes, part of the examination and assessment team that physically examined the children on several occasions is absolutely unequivocal, even after the retraction interviews that the children have physical injuries, that substantiate their claims of physical abuse at the hands of the mother’s partner and more importantly the sexual abuse at the hands of the father and cohorts.
A Brief Overview of the Facts that Emerge from the Medical Reports.
The counter narrative states that the children’s stories were coached and fed to them by their mother’s partner who was himself guilty of minor physical abuse of the children.
The police retraction interviews tried to construct a narrative that the children had been denying the actions of the mother’s partner whilst making the claims against the father and school, yet the Medical Reports show that the children made the claims concurrently and were concurrently examined for both the injuries related to the minor physical abuse at the hands of the mother’s partner and the extremely serious sexual abuse at the hands of the father and staff at the school.
The male has one scar on his anus consistent with blunt force trauma, the female has several and has actually been physically damaged by the abuse in ways that really do not bear mentioning suffice to say that she has multiple injuries “consistent with the application of a blunt instrument.”
They could not be clearer. Someone has been doing deeply unpleasant things to these children, the more lurid claims relating to this case may be exaggerated, but there is a very simple and unmistakeable truth expressed in those medical reports.
After they were taken into Foster care, the children were heard to discuss the use of Vaseline as a lubricant their abusers used on them. They are no longer in the presence of the mother’s partner, there is no need for any story to be told, yet they were speaking about it in a matter of fact way.
The children independently told their story on multiple occasions to numerous Doctors and other disinterested parties and were consistent in their claims against both parties. There was medical evidence to support the claims that were made against both parties.
Both children were observed to be suffering the symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Both children complained at their treatment at the hands of the mothers partner, yet it was absolutely clear to the examiners that it was the father they feared. Each child independently expressed the fear that their father would kill them, one had nightmares about it. Expressions of fear do not get more profound than that.
The details outlined in these reports are deeply unpleasant. Unfortunately it is necessary to do this and I will ensure that only the completely necessary information is included. There is a duty to attempt to spread the truth in a matter of gross injustice such as this case represents and I have sought not to identify anyone by name other than the Doctors whose role appears to have been an honourable one.
Key Excerpts from the Two Medical Reports.
September 15th, 2014.
“Witness G “does not report any history of constipation or diarrhoea . However he does report that it does often hurt and he has often bled when opening his bowels although this had decreased significantly in the past two months which his sister says is because it is two months since they have seen their father. (the children were also removed from the school). He opens his bowels everyday and reports that his stool is soft. “( a detail that is unfortunately necessary due to later events) Physical Abuse.
“Both G and A report that they have been hit multiple times with a metal spoon by mother’s partner over the head and the legs. They also report they have been pushed into walls. They also allege that mother’s partner holds his hand over their mouth till they “can’t breathe.” On a recent visit to Morocco over the summer witness G explains that he was hit on the ear by the mother’s partner in the left ear which caused his ear to bleed and his left eye to be swollen and bruised. G and A said that G was then not allowed to leave the holiday home until the bruises had disappeared.”
(Note: the details contained here completely destroy the notion that these allegations were made as the result of coaching. Did the mother’s partner also coach the children to make all these detailed and specific allegations against him? Of course he didn’t. The fact that these allegations against the mother’s partner were made at the same time as the allegations of sexual abuse is clearly overwhelming evidence that these children spoke the truth to the best of their ability about both issues and were not under external control of either party to a custody dispute as they made the allegations.)
Sexual abuse allegations.
“ A has explained that at school a teacher named Mr. H calls children over and makes them take off their underwear. A explained that she and other children including G are made to bend over and a “plastic willy” is inserted into the anus. Whilst Mr. H holds onto their hips. A also stated that Mr.H “makes noises” while this is done.
Of note, she says that he gives them a refresher bar to eat as a reward and to chew on while this is happening so they “can’t scream or make a noise” and they are asked to face forwards and not look backwards. G has said that the same thing has happened to him. G says that after this has happened he has bleeding from the anus and subsequently. it is very painful when he opens his bowels.”
Victim G Physical injuries described.
His (G) anus was examined in the left lateral position using gentle buttock separation for 30 seconds. He had one anal fissure scar at 9 o’clock on examination of the anus. There was no reflex anal dilation.”
“In both the general physical examination and the genital examination of G today. There are physical signs consistent with the allegations given by G and A. The scar in the anus is from a healed fissure, secondary to the application of a blunt penetrating force that he (G) has alleged.
In summary, G has physical signs consistent with his allegations of both physical abuse and sexual abuse. “
Dr. Harriett Gunn (SHO) to
Dr. Deborah Hodes. Medical Report Dated September the 22nd 2014.
The report begins with Dr, Hodes outlining her extensive experience in the field. Twenty four years worth.
Dr.Hodes states that she was present at two strategy meetings and two physical examinations relating to this case. In addition Dr. Hodes has spoken to Camden area social workers and also reviewed the photographic evidence pertaining to the children’s injuries.
Summary of Relevant Evidence Victim A..
“She alleged that lubrication was used prior to the insertion of the penis or plastic penis and identified and discussed this with her foster carer.. She also told me about having had an injection. She alleged that bleeding occurred after the event and then had pain on opening her bowels.”
“She told me that she has difficulty getting to sleep and she has bad dreams including dreaming of her father killing her ” Physical Findings.
“Below is a list of injuries found in a physical examination of A shown in body maps and the police photographs.”
1.“3 x 4mm abrasion to the pinna of her left ear and 3mm laceration posterior to her left ear overlying the mastoid, A alleged she was pinched and picked up by her ear on Morocco.”
2. “7mm longtitudinal abrasion (excoriated) on the right lateral aspect of her right ankle. A alleged she had been pushed against an outside wall and “had picked it” when she was in Morocco.”
3. “2.0cm x 0.5cm healing abrasion on the left side of the chin. A alleged that she was hit across the face with a metal spoon while in Morocco.“
Below is a list of injuries found on ano-genital examination of A recorded in the DVDs.
(Warning Note: This is deeply unpleasant and awful and a quick summary is that there are multiple and in my opinion horrific injuries to A’s nether regions)
“1. In the left lateral position with gentle buttock separation there was anal laxity and a brief view of the rectum. In the knee chest position with gentle buttock separation, there was reflex anal dilation (RAD) after 5-10 seconds. The reflex anal dilation continued and there was a view into the rectal ampulla and there was no stool present.
2. There was a healed scar in the ruggae at the 10 -11 o’clock position extending from the anal orifice to the anal verge. It was seen in both the left lateral position and the knee to chest position. The abnormalities in the ruggae at the 4 0′ c;ock and 5 o’clock positions may represent healed scar tissue or variation in the ruggae.configuration.”
There are between two and four injuries, with two undoubted and two speculative. Conclusions regarding the allegations.
“The physical injuries found on her skin are consistent with the physical abuse she described.
In the absence of a history of constipation, medical illness or accidental trauma according to the GP’s notes, the anogenital findings of the scar and the RAD are consistent with her allegations of the application of a blunt penetrating force to her anus (2); sexual abuse.”
She has described symptoms of post traumatic stress.”
Summary of A and G by Dr. Hodes.
“In my opinion A and G are suffering significant harm as evidenced by the following:-
1.Both children have physical signs of physical abuse that support their allegations.
2.Both children have physical signs of sexual abuse that support their allegations.
3.They have symptoms of post traumatic stress.
4. It is now understood from a 2007 substantiated study of child sexual abuse that retraction occurs far more commonly (16% in this series) than previously thought.
5. In my opinion, the extensive and detailed accounts given by both children that were repeated to different professionals contain details of sexual acts that such young children would need to have direct experience of.” (Note: in order to be able to describe them is the unwritten implication.)
To put it simply, Dr. Hodes is stating that there is physical evidence in support of both sets of allegations which really highlights how farcical the entire “they were coached” counter-narrative really is. Because children who have been coached to make false allegations in order to influence a custody battle we are told, were not even coached to lie about the minor physical injuries they suffered at the hands allegedly of the mother’s partner. What kind of coaching is that?
It really shows the desperation to protect that this preposterous and absurd notion was even floated as the counter-narrative. It is pathetic and insulting. Truly laughable.
Ethical and Legal Issues.
The leaking of these documents may constitute a criminal offense, I honestly do not know, but it is obvious that these records have been released in the broader public interest in order to oppose and expose a clear and outrageous injustice. These are exceptional circumstances in which otherwise unethical or even unlawful actions are necessary and just in my opinion.
Why is this happening?
It beggars belief that this investigation was curtailed and destroyed in order to protect a Z grade actor or even the Staff and Institutional reputation of the school and church involved. Something far more important is being protected here, but it is completely unclear whom or what have managed to engineer the stunning travesty that led to the Investigating Police coaching and bullying retractions from the child victims, Witnesses and Victims A and G.
The real mystery at this point is who is protecting this and why?
The way it is being covered up you would almost get the on it’s face ludicrous idea that this was some type of mad, satanic leadership induction program. The people involved may believe they are doing what is right for their children in some sick parallel universe sense.
We Are Living in a Twilight Zone of Serial Denial.
It is completely possible that elements of the stories the children tell that do not relate to events they actually witnessed may be embellished or even incorrect. There is sadly no doubt that whatever the veracity of the claims the police made a decision, a bizarre and inexplicable decision to destroy the case and conduct a cover up. Unless and until the police have a rethink as is inevitable but may take decades, there is little that can be done to even begin to seek justice for the Hampstead victims beyond trying to expose this to enough people that it causes an uproar that requires an immediate police rethink.
We seem to exist in a bizarre twilight zone where anyone with any connection to power can apparently do what they like to children and expect to suffer only the infamy of the grave. As long as you are not fussed about your reputation when deceased and you are connected you do not even have to be discreet. Once you die it will all emerge of course and your name and reputation will be destroyed but other than that there is no penalty.
While it has become clear again and again that the unthinkable has actually been rather routine, that these unbelievably evil crimes have been happening for decades and yet when confronted with a genuine contemporary cover up, the entire “official” British media have literally not a word to say.
The real story is instantly dismissed thus “The claims, which the mainstream media is barred by court order from reporting on, are said to have been investigated by police and found to be baseless.” Which I think can be fairly claimed to be a downright lie. Perhaps gratitude is the right response to the total lack of mainstream news coverage. Please note the brazen hypocrisy of the Hampstead and Highgate Express stating that “ which the mainstream media is barred by court order from reporting on” before continuing “are said to have been investigated by police and found to be baseless.” Clearly reporting (and indeed completely mendaciously and inaccurately) without naming or even alluding to a source, let alone any evidence to back up their dishonest claim. I hope they are proud of their work at the Hampstead and Highgate Express. Their efforts in support of evil will be rewarded in the deserved manner eventually I am sure, one way or another. It’s only a matter of time.
Return #WhistleblowerKids and #AbuseSurvivors to their Russian Family!
FORWARD UK on Twitter: “FORWARD Trustee, Dr Deborah Hodes, announces opening of the first specialist #FGM clinic in London
ZeeklyTV – Anonymous’s Channel http://zeeklytv.com/user/Anonymous
Dr Hodes Sources.
Lindsay C Malloy, MA Thomas D Lyon JD, and Joia A Quas
Fillal Dependency and recantation of Child Sex Abuse Allegations.
J.Am Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 46:2, 2007.
Bradley Ar, Wood, JM, How Do Children Tell?
The disclosure process in child sexual abuse.
Negl. 20 881-891. 1996
The British Medical Association Confidentiality Guide for Staff.(called the confidentiality toolkit)
Excerpts Relevant to this Case.
1. The duty of confidentiality
Confidentiality is an essential requirement for the preservation of trust between patients and health professionals and is subject to legal and ethical safeguards. Patients should be able to expect that information about their health which they give in confidence will be kept confidential unless there is a compelling reason why it should not. There is also a strong public interest in maintaining confidentiality so that individuals will be encouraged to seek appropriate treatment and share information relevant to it.
Using and disclosing information
3. data should be anonymised wherever possible .
occasionally, when it is not practicable to obtain consent, information may be disclosed where the law requires or where there is an overriding public interest, eg where child abuse is suspected
• disclosures should be kept to the minimum necessary to achieve the purpose
Information may be used more freely if the subject of the information is not identifiable in any way.
Usually, data can be considered to be anonymous where clinical or administrative information is separated from details that may permit the individual to be identified such as name, date of birth and postcode. Even where such obvious identifiers are missing, rare diseases, drug treatments or statistical analyses which have very small numbers within a small population may allow individuals to be identified. A combination of items increases the chances of patient identification.
When anonymised data will serve the purpose, health professionals must anonymise data to this
extent and, if necessary, take technical advice about anonymisation before releasing data. Whilst it is not ethically necessary to seek consent for the use of anonymised data, general information about when their data will be anonymised should be available to patients.
*S.H.O Senior House Officer A junior doctor in the pre Modernising Medical Careers era (pre-2007) of training in the UK, in the 2nd post-graduate year–i.e., immediately after the PRHO–pre-registration house officer year, which is now designated Foundation Year 1–FY1. SHOs are now called FY-2. Some SHO posts still exist and are taken as a prelude to certain specialities–e.g., surgery, but are no longer a standard year in training schemes for junior doctors in the UK.
This work will claim that a Police cover up is completely exposed by examination of the way the interviewing officer repeatedly intimidated the witness during the September 17th “retraction” interview and that the conduct of the interview indicates that the police investigative goal was to protect the abusers from criminal prosecution and destroy the future credibility of the witness/victim G rather than to discover the truth.
The interview of September the 17th was the third interview of witness G. Witness G and his sister A had been taken into the care of the state following the previous interview of September 11th, 2014. The children are in the care of the state and the child is unaccompanied in the interview, a fact that seems extraordinary given the adversarial nature of the interview.
The taped portion of the September 17th interview lasts for 24 minutes. The first five minutes do not involve any actual questioning as the police officer seeks to explain the “ground rules” of the interview to the witness. It is absolutely clear throughout that the interviewing officer is working his way through a checklist and his sole intent is to achieve retractions from the witness with absolutely no intent to discern the truth. Zero.
The Retractions and How They Were Produced.
Right at the start of the questioning, the interviewing officer makes it completely clear, albeit in a dishonest and disingenuous fashion, that he has been discussing witness G’s statement with witness G in the car on the way to the interview.
This is couched by the interviewing officer in a transparent manner that is typical of the entire interview as “There was something you desperately wanted to tell me on the car on the way over, do you remember?”
This is after wasting five minutes on waffle apparently to ensure that witness G is bored and impatient by the time the actual interview begins and will be more pliant, that he will be easier to “direct” as he will just say whatever is required in order to end the ordeal and be able to leave.
The counter-story is actually two mutually exclusive and incoherent sub-stories, they try to claim that the original claims were fictions coaxed by the mother’s partner whilst also claiming that the children’s claims were fantasies based on their having viewed the movie Zorro.itself a completely ludicrous claim that does not explain the claims the children made nor their physical injuries.
If we entertain the police counter-story regarding the mother’s partner coaching the children, the only plausible counter-story given that the whole Zorro thread is pure nonsense not even worthy of consideration. Why on earth would the mother’s partner coach them to say so many detailed things that go so far beyond the father? The school, the intimate details of the head-teacher’s anatomy. Ponder that, we are actually supposed to believe that someone got these children to concoct a story so detailed and at the same time irrelevant to a custody battle that it includes details of the birthmarks on the head teacher? That is pure madness. It is absolutely obvious which version of events is correct.
Interviewing Officer: (topics and content of conversation clearly predetermined prior to interview)
“So when we was (sic) in the car there was something you desperately wanted to tell me but I asked you to wait until the interview, what is it you really wanted to tell me?”
Initially witness G is on message and states that the mother’s partner told him to say that Dad hurt him really bad but he didn’t.
IO “We talked in two other interviews didn’t we?”
Witness G “Yeah”
IO “Was what you told me the truth?”
Witness G “Yeah” Affirmation 1.
IO “So all that stuff about the babies….”
Witness G “Yeah.” Affirmation 2.
IO “and the Church and all that?”
Witness G “No the babies, well the babies, there is some of the babies killed yeah.” Affirmation 3.
He is looking the interviewer directly in the eye as he states that “Yes” I was telling the truth. Witness G has affirmed it is true three times now, but the Interviewing officer is undeterred.
IO “OK, are you sure?”
Witness G Starts to bend. “Yes, but not much, not every single day, not every single day killed no. Not like that.” Affirmation 4.
What is happening at this point is very easy to read and very telling. The child is trying to tell the truth and please the adult, he can tell that the Interviewing Officer is not happy at what he is hearing, so he tries to do both. He sticks to his honest story but he tries to minimise it over and over stating things such as, “not every day” and “not all the time” and” not that much.” before the penny drops and he realises that a retraction is required, truth be damned.
Witness G has repeated his earlier allegations of murder from the previous interviews and affirmed them now four times in this interview, Anyone who truly believed the child was daydreaming would simply ask the child for the details of the story and if it came from the imagination that would be immediately clear.
The Zorro meme is nonsense, pure nonsense. Was the school head teacher appearing naked with her birth marks in the movie Zorro? Were young children raped onscreen in the movie Zorro? It is genuinely pitiful.
At this point the Interviewing officer abandons all pretense of conducting a witness interview and straight out verbals the witness with the Zorro nonsense.
IO “Cos I heard you watched a film Zorro, is that right?”
Witness G “Yeah.”
“and there was someone kill…. killed there someone was killed there.weren’t there?”
Witness G appears confused at this point and seems to react very strangely at the time the IO says “kill, killed”..
IO “Because it sounded to me like, what it sounded to me was similar to the story you told about the babies. And that’s why I was a bit (sic) wondering wondering. are babies actually killed?”
Witness G “Yeah”. Fifth affirmation. Ignored.
IO “or is that something you’ve been made to say?”
Witness G ”Yeah it is something I was made to say.” Verballed 100%.
IO “Are babies being killed?”
Witness G.”No, not much but there is yeah.” Sixth affirmation.
IO “By who?”
Witness G “By my dad. Not much” Seventh affirmation.
The interviewing officer inexplicably completely refuses to pursue the obvious line of questioning here.He has been told that the father specifically killed babies, neither pertain to the movie Zorro, so any reasonable interviewer would solicit further details, When did it happen? Where did it happen? Who else was there? What time of the day did it happen? What day of the week? How many times? etc and if the story was not true it would obviously collapse under scrutiny once all those details were provided.
IO “Are you sure? It’s ok If it hasn’t happened it’s ok as long as we talk about it now.”
This is a disgrace and should be grounds for immediate dismissal alone. Seven affirmations, details provided and he is now implicitly threatening the witness.”It will be ok as long as we talk about it now.” Clearly implies that if we don’t “talk about it now” that is if you do not retract things will not be ok, it could not be clearer.
In the face of barely veiled threats, having reaffirmed seven times even upon prolonged badgering, Witness G finally understands what he is supposed to say and now debunks the “dead babies” claim obeying the obvious instructions of the Interviewing Officer. The Retraction follows.
IO. “What about the secret rooms? Are there any secret rooms?”
Witness G. “Not much. Well there is but not much.” The pattern from retraction one is repeated, only this time the process begins at the stage where Witness G is minimising but affirming, it was only after four affirmations of the dead babies claim that he began to minimise.
IO “What do you mean? Have you ever been in a secret room in one of those places.?”
Witness G.”It”s not a kind of secret room.”
IO “Shall we start with the church, you told me there was sort of a secret room,”
Witness G. “Yeah there is there” at this point the child receives a non verbal signal that he is saying the wrong thing, becomes confused and starts shaking his head and immediately contradicts what he has just said. “No there isn’t there isn’t.” He was about to describe it before he realised that he was saying the wrong thing.. What follows is quite simply a bullied retraction.
3 The Abuse in the Disabled Changing Room at the Swimming Pool.
The interviewing officer asks Witness G about an allegation previously made regarding being abused in the disabled toilets of a local swimming pool.
Witness G.”That was true, that happened.”
IO. “But you were only four years old you weren’t in the school?”
Witness G. “My sister was in the school.”
When Witness G does not fold upon being challenged, the Interviewing Officer drops the entire subject and returns to safe ground asking Witness G to restate the retractions he has already made. It really sticks out that the officer does not even bother to coach a retraction of this allegation nor does the Interviewing Officer show any interest in investigating the claims. Once it becomes clear that a quick easy retraction will not be forthcoming the subject is simply dropped. It is quite simply impossible for an honest or sincere investigator to drop all interest in an allegation without reason and return to previous retractions as the Interviewing Officer does at this point.
This conversation points to the truth about this entire interview and makes the purpose of the interview crystal clear. The point of the retraction interviews was partially to achieve retractions but the core goal of the Interviewing Officer was clearly to destroy the witnesses. Once the witnesses are coerced into giving two completely varying accounts of the event all their accounts become virtually worthless legally . Even if this pathetic excuse for a police officer were to face the criminal and disciplinary charges that he deserves to face and is punished, the witnesses have been destroyed. It will be impossible to achieve a criminal conviction with the evidence of these witnesses at the core of the case.
That is why the policeman did not even bother to force a retraction on the abuse in the disabled toilet claims, it was no longer necessary, the required damage had already been done. The job of protecting the criminals against prosecution had been done. The claims about the abuse sessions in the disabled toilets were no longer in need of a retraction.
This is truly a putrid and despicable performance from the police officer involved. His faux attempts at showing empathy are one of the most nauseating things I have ever seen.
4. The Bruises
During the “retraction” section of the interview Witness G is asked about the bruises on his bottom and states he has no idea how they occurred, there is a gap in the coaching here and the child has no answer. If there were an innocent explanation for the injuries 100% the child would know, when a little child hurts themselves, they make a massive deal out of it and remember it, if he fell off a swing or off a skateboard he would 100% remember it and boast about it “I was going really fast downhill on my bike and I lost control it hurt really badly.” These type of incidents are the highlights of the young child’s life and boasting about their minor accidents and injuries is one of the favourite topics of conversation for a child, It is therefore telling that witness G cannot say how he got the bruising.
5. Plastic willies.
Interviewing Officer” How did you find out about plastic willies? Who told you bout plastic willies?
Witness G. “Nobody, that’s true.”
At which point the same routine of intimidation and retraction is repeated.
Io.”Because I’ve been told something different.”
Witness G. “By (sister)?”
IO. “Yes. Look honestly, you can just be truthful..”
It is sickening. It is obvious and it is criminal.
A Repeating Pattern
The pattern of the Police Interview is very clear, Repeatedly during the interview witness G affirms the allegations he has previously made, the interviewing officer has clearly predetermined that the allegations are to be quashed at any cost and the tool that is used is intimidation.
The interviewing officer succeeded in his goal of intimidating the witness into retracting the claims and has probably destroyed the accounts of witness G as evidence. It is very easy to intimidate a child but the officer has made it absolutely obvious his intent, and it is not directed towards the discovery of the truth in the slightest. Quite the opposite.
Scrutiny of the counter story that the interviewing officer and his comrades in the cover up conducted reveal that they have created a story that is completely ludicrous and incoherent in a blatant attempt to obfuscate the truth and protect the abusers.
It is worth remembering that if there is no crime, there is no need for a cover up, no need to badger witnesses, to concoct a story that makes absolutely no sense, no need to intimidate, no need for any of this nonsense and the conduct of the September 17th interview is in itself powerful prima facie evidence that the claims made by the children G and A are based in the truth. It is inescapable, that the police involved in this interview believed there was truth to the claims and sought to debunk them in any way possible and that all ethical considerations were entirely abandoned by the Officers involved in this case.
The Interviewing officer deserves to be professionally destroyed for his conduct of this interview .The destruction of this Officer’s career would not begin to compensate for the wanton vandalism of truth and justice this minor league factotum for organised crime has conducted. All the Police Involved in this investigation should face instant dismissal if not Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice Charges. I have no idea how they are able to live with themselves. It is very rare that we get to see “Criminal police’ in action in the present and yet here they are in the flesh. The same police force that would not prosecute Saville,Smith, Hayman and so many others are still at it aren’t they? As the Coleman Experience would put it “they are up to their neck in filth” there is no other possible explanation.
”Return #WhistleblowerKids and #AbuseSurvivors to their Russian Family!
The Hampstead situation described by the Coleman Experience, several months before the story emerged. It was not prescience, the Coleman Experience simply knew what was happening.
“Filthy Britain’s Satanic Secrets | thecolemanexperience”
Children who’ve been abused at school and reported their injuries to parents have been ignored by the police when evidence was presented to them.
More disturbingly, there are reports that the remains of thousands of children are buried right across Britain.Children who lost their lives at the hands of satanic filth.
You see dear reader, a massive wide-scale cover-up has long been in place to prevent the British public from discovering the extent and horror of the satanic debauchery which has been carried out by the very crème de la crème of society.
When any report about satanic abuse has materialised ‘liberal’ journalists and ‘child-protection’ experts step forward to claim the children were imaging it or are the victims of ‘false-memory-syndrome’.
Well they would say that wouldn’t they?
Unfortunately for these depraved animals though, their sickening secret is finally being exposed.
A light is being shone into the darkest and most disturbing corners of their secretive world.
Their devil-worshipping days are numbered.”
Hampstead, the Finders, Belgium and the Franklin Scandal: the Pattern of Child Abuse Cover Ups.
Hampstead is an apparently very wealthy area of Inner London. The Wikipedia entry reads:
”Part of the London Borough of Camden in Inner London, it is known for its intellectual, liberal, artistic, musical and literary associations It has some of the most expensive housing in the London area. The village of Hampstead has more millionaires within its boundaries than any other area of the United Kingdom “ So there is a lot of extreme wealth in the area.
Several weeks ago a series of gut wrenching videos emerged of two young children describing in detail their sexual abuse, by a number of individuals including their father and staff at the school they attended, including the head teacher.
The videos also detail their involvement in Satanic rituals that on a number of occasions involved the murder of infants. The title of this piece may be slightly hyperbolic given the suppression of the evidence, but all the signs are of a cover up, none are of a hoax and to claim so is to show a terrible ignorance of recent Western history.
If the allegations are properly investigated and turn out not to be true I will be pleased but I know that it is impossible. We have seen this happen too many times before the pattern is clear and there are unmistakeable signs of a cover up of the Hampstead allegations.
Once you get past the troubling initial shock of the extremity of the claims and the fact that the interviews were conducted by an “interested party” in a custody dispute the allegations made in the footage appear to be sincerely believed by the children of their own volition.
I hope these matters are dealt with by the Courts and would not seek to offer pre-judgement. However, after reading the documents, reading excerpts of the police interview with the children that supposedly “resolved” a “misunderstanding”, having read about these cases and the cover-ups from several places in the West in recent decades. I have no doubt that the original horrendous allegations the children made before the September 17th “debunk” interview are based in fact.
The stories the children tell of satanic blood orgies in churches that included murdered babies, are sadly familiar. These cults of evil are actually rather predominant in certain Western societies, it seems.
Given that many people seem to be having trouble coming to terms with these claims of cover up it seemed a good idea to recount some of the more famous and well documented cover ups of similar behaviour in recent times against the Hampstead story and to see whether these new allegations fit into a well established pattern of cover up, not just of child abuse, but more specifically these apparently elite satanic networks of procurers, abusers and blackmailers (influence peddlers may be a more accurate term). For some reason these type of groups have the ability to achieve very aggressive and complete cover-ups for their crimes.
Obvious Cover Ups that Show the Same pattern as Hampstead.
No.1. The “Finders” group members arrested in Tallahasee on February 4th, 1987.
Right at the start of the “Franklin Scandal” by Nick Bryant is a sub-story about a Cult called the “Finders” who were caught with a van-load of very young and severely abused children in Tallahassee during February 1987. Six children aged 3 to 6 were noticed behaving strangely by a concerned citizen who called the police. The children were malnourished and showed clear signs of sexual abuse. It turned out that the children were also not allowed to live inside and only fed as a reward. The group of eight people were living in a white 1979 Dodge van with Virginia plates.
Two well dressed men were arrested and charged with Felony child abuse. Special Agent Ramon Martinez of the US Customs Service was an investigator assigned to the case. Initially he and a Washington DC Police officer James Bradley made strong progress, receiving a tip off that referred specifically to ” ”blood rituals” sexual orgies involving children and an as yet unsolved murder in which the Finders may be involved.” (Franklin Scandal, Bryant Page 22) and also to two Washington DC warehouses the Finders used.
The warehouses were raided by the police and it seemed that the police had stumbled upon an industrial scale child kidnapping, abuse and trafficking operation. The Finders collected intelligence on babysitters from the local papers. They collected intelligence on child care centres. Photos showed the children and adults together dressed in sheets. The photos depicted the slaughter, disembowelment, skinning and dismemberment of a goat by the children. Police also found jars where human waste was stored, both kinds, it seems they saved it to use in their “ceremonies”.
Special Agent Martinez was set to meet his DC colleague Bradley about one month into the investigation. Upon arrival at the meeting he was told it was cancelled, not the meeting, but the entire investigation! Martinez was “further advised… of circumstances that indicated that the Investigation into the activities of the Finders had become an internal CIA matter.”
Meanwhile in Tallahassee an identical scenario unfolded. “The Tallahassee Police dropped the case like a hot rock!” complained one Tallahassee Officer with knowledge of the case.The media coverage reveals an identical pattern to that seen in Hampstead and so many other places. The first wave of Law enforcement are honest, they take the claims seriously and begin to gather evidence, then magically days or weeks later a new policeman will take charge of the case and will completely backtrack, downplay and sabotage the investigation. On other occasions the same police will have an inexplicable mid-investigation “change of mind.”
In the case of the Finders, initial reports from the Tallahassee Police made mention of “clear signs of sexual abuse”, and “apparent satanism” connected to the abuse, a recurring combination. Six days after the original arrests, a new policeman arrived and now described the child kidnapping and rape cult as a “communal” group. There are “no signs” of sexual abuse suddenly nor of Satanism. Initially the felony charges were downgraded to misdemeanors. The men were released and all charges were quietly dropped six weeks later and incredibly the original six tiny, obviously abused children were returned to their tormentors!
The Finders was a protected CIA front and the whole thing became a total no go area immediately. This was a group acting with the approval of a US intelligence agency. They had approval for what they were doing, which was kidnapping and raping children…at best!! The allegations get much worse than mere child abduction and rape.
All these elements of satanism, child abuse and intelligence agency and media protection are recurring across nations and continents over decades.
Obvious and proven child abuse cover up No.2. Belgium in the 1990’s. The so called Dutroux affair.
The same type of thing was discovered in Belgium during the 1990’s. The child rapist and sadistic murderer Marc Dutroux, was apparently supported by and consorting with “Secret state” elements in Belgian society and strenuous effort was made by the Belgian authorities to protect the paragon of evil Dutroux and the procurement operations he was running so that unnamed agencies could maintain their “leverage” over various “senior figures.”
When protecting Dutroux was no longer possible, he was hung out to dry and all the efforts, extremely intense efforts were made to protect the men who ran Dutroux, his employers, men like Michel Nihoul who once boasted that,”my influence is as long as the Danube” implying that he was protected by very senior figures within the Belgian power structure.
This passage from Richard Cottrell’s “Gladio NATO’s Dagger at the Heart of Europe” explains how the limited hangout is used to mask these operations when all else fails and someone must be punished. Often the procurer is punished while the broad network remains protected.
“When he (Dutroux) was in trouble once again in 1996, it transpired key police officers knew he was snatching young female victims to order, who were then subjected to sadistic horrors practised in the dungeons of his slum dwellings scattered around Charleroi, or dragged around the vice circuit. But no one moved against him. As many later reports clearly established, his largely accidental exposure tipped the Belgian establishment into a tailspin. At all costs it was essential to divert the public gaze away from the paedophile network organised around Nihoul, the ringmaster, and beam the spotlight instead on Dutroux, who would act the sacrificial scapegoat. This much became blatantly obvious as the glacial Belgian
legal system dragged its heels ever more slowly. The trial was a grotesque charade. Vital evidence, especially any that pointed to Nihoul, was lost or stifled before it came to court. The initial investigating magistrate, Jean-Marc Connerotte, was feted as a national hero when he personally rescued two more kidnapped victims from Dutroux’s cellars. Then, on the specious grounds of taking an informal meal with some of the victims’ families, he was dismissed from the case as ‘biased.’ When the trial finally began and Connerotte was summoned as a material witness, he railed against the bullet-proof cars required to protect him from the vengeance of the secret state.” (Gladio,Cottrell Page 320).
Of special relevance to the Hampstead matter is the story of Regina Louf, a young Belgian abuse victim who the authorities desperately tried to debunk after she made claims of being witness to horrendous acts during elite child abuse parties. Regina Louf was written off as a fantasist but was proven to be telling the truth after the body of a murder victim was found in identical circumstances to her description of the place and manner of death.
The account of the case from “Gladio-NATO’s Dagger at the Heart of Europe” (page 320) is also worth quoting:
“Regina Louf who came forward to testify she had seen her closest girlfriend murdered at one of Nihoul’s wretched parties, was traduced by official spinners and investigating magistrates as an insane liar. The police interrogating team was sacked and replaced by another, which tossed out all her charges. Another side of the same force raided a decrepit mushroom farm specified by Louf and found the dead girl’s remains in exactly the circumstances she described, roped and tied so that she asphyxiated herself during excruciating torture for the amusement of onlookers. It is hard to credit a political system with the slightest perception of civilisation when it refuses to bring the perpetrators of such a horror to justice, particularly when they are known to the authorities”
The account of the investigation of the Regina Louf claims mirrors the Hampstead and Finders pattern almost identically, It is eerie. When the first group of police do their job and get the “wrong answers’ new police must be brought in to get the “right answers”. Whenever these type of allegations are unveiled, they are absolutely “red hot” and every attempt is always made to at least get a “limited hang’ if worst comes to worst and the cover up can no longer proceed.
Belgium’s X-Files – An Olenka Frenkiel Investigation
Example No.3 of the obvious Cover up of Elite Child Abuse
The Franklin Scandal, the USA in the 1980s. Covered up into the 1990s.
Witness testimonies and Blanket denials standard tactics. Evidence and witnesses are destroyed.
If we look to the very well documented Franklin Scandal, one of the truly striking things is the extent to which the Nebraska and Federal Law Enforcement authorities went to intimidate the victims. Several victims were actually imprisoned for making allegations that were complete and proven truth and corroborated by more than a dozen other victims and witnesses.
Shamelessness, along with evil is a key characteristic of these people. When caught red handed for totally heinous crimes, most people would fold, would be ashamed, these people are completely the opposite. No matter how obvious their crimes, they deny and deny and deny and use their agents inside Law enforcement to meld reality to their lies. Alisha Owen was sexually abused as a minor by several prominent citizens of Franklin, Nebraska. Alisha Owen served almost half a decade in prison having received a 25 year sentence for perjury for refusing to retract her allegations of having been trafficked by Lawrence E. King and abused by prominent members of the Franklin community, including the local Chief of Police.
Gary Caradori was a prominent investigator employed by the Nebraska Legislature to investigate the claims. He conducted a series of detailed, lengthy and formal interviews with a series of victims. Caradori was former Law Enforcement, a trained Investigator and interviewer with such a high degree of credibility that he was employed by the Nebraska legislature. He was a prominent successful and respected member of the community. The interviews were rock solid, he never coached a witness ever, he was an honest former cop doing an interview cop style. Gary Caradori did such a good job interviewing all the victims of the elite pedophile ring that dark elements in US Law Enforcement apparently chose to assassinate him, sabotaging his plane in Chicago was allegedly a task delegated to the Chicago FBI by their Nebraska brethren. Caradori’s young son also died in the “engineered” mid-air accident.
It was a very obvious assassination. Complete with the obligatory “disappearing briefcase” full of “knock out photographic evidence” according to Nick Bryant who is extremely meticulous. After they killed Gary Caradori the media went to work on his character, tried to paint the man as a “crank” who “badgered witnesses” towards a “predestined conclusion”. GQ magazine wrote a story after he was dead that described him as a “delusional investigator.” a claim of extraordinary mendacity even from the routinely evil commercial Western media.
The interviews Caradori conducted survived and it is absolutely clear that Caradori was the total opposite. He had never heard of this type of thing before and was astonished at what he discovered. Caradori’s interviews with Alisha Owen, Troy Boner and Paul Bonacci are embedded here. Even a brief look at any one of the interviews will make it absolutely clear that the man was completely down to earth and the nonsense spouted by (do they even still exist?) GQ was a deliberate attempt to discredit the overwhelming evidence Caradori accumulated.
Gary Caradori’s Interview with Alisha Owen
Gary Caradori’s Interview with Troy Boner
The destroy Caradori routine really did give new meaning to wickedness. But it worked, or at least delayed justice other than in history. The head pimp to the elite in Nebraska at that time was a fellow named Lawrence E King Jr. he procured children for the other local notables essentially and was also prolific in his personal abuse of young boys. He spent almost a decade in prison for embezzling money from the local Credit Union he ran. King was never prosecuted for his many well documented sex crimes against children.
King was kind of a big deal, supplying children to child abusers in several different areas in the United States. Singing the National Anthem at the yearly Republican party convention. Some of the children he pimped serviced clients in California, Colorado and Washington DC among other spots. King had connections in the prestigious Nebraska boys institution called “Boys-town” he recruited many boys from there and when complaints were made to the Boys-town counselor, he not only covered them up but also proceeded to abuse the victims himself.
Paul Bonacci won against Lawrence King in a Civil Court.
Paul Bonacci was one of the younger children that Larry King trafficked and abused, he was only eight years old when it started and was therefore a more highly sought after “product “ than the fourteen and fifteen years olds who were the majority of King’s stable of child prostitutes. This saw Bonacci for example as the only Franklin victim trafficked in Washington DC. Bonacci thus saw more of the network and a more extreme end than the other Franklin victims.
Only Bonacci of the major Franklin witnesses/victims actually managed to achieve a legal victory in a US court when in 1999 a Civil Court found that King had trafficked and abused him, he was a truthful witness and awarded Bonacci a million dollars in damages, none of which he actually received. Lawrence King was a depraved abuser of young boys and girls himself in addition to his procurement role. (There are “beyond credible’ allegations from the 100% no doubt murdered witness and victim Troy Boner, that King violently raped a boy of around ten who was seen to be bleeding afterwards)
Paul Bonacci: THE MURDER -- GRAPHIC!–!WARNING![![p.4 -subtitled]
Investigator Gary Caradori’s Interview of Child Sex Slave Victim Paul Bonacci
Paul Bonacci has told the story of the time he was present at a child sex abuse party where a young boy was murdered. The video depicts a clearly honest and severely traumatised young man and is very upsetting. It’s almost like you have to harden your heart to even be able to look upon these crimes, to hear the stories. This is not uncommon. Because the major media are either in denial or complicit in the cover up of these operations and often sensationalise the claims when they air them, people have no idea it is actually true.
Hampstead Allegations Sound All Too Familiar.
History Shows a Clear Pattern of Outright Lies.
The History of the Dutroux affair and of Franklin,Tallahassee, Washington DC, Westminster, Portugal; and many other places tells us that every possible attempt will be made to deny and cover up these crimes. A small industry of people exist in order to tell people that “these sort of things don’t happen, it was a false memory” etc. Yet when you look at the known facts in Belgium, in Franklin, in Westminster, it is perfectly clear that there has been a consistent pattern of cover up and massive attempts to discredit honest victims for decades.
If you read the Pedocracy by Dave McGowan, he painstakingly goes through these cases and looks at the evidence, in the Presidio case, in cases where the cover up supposedly succeeded. It is perfectly clear that there is no pattern of fabricated claims on this matter, entirely the opposite. The cover-up is the rule. At certain times people will be convicted of their crimes in relation to these incidents, such as Dutroux, but the existence of the network is never, ever admitted.
If we look at the dark history of the West, in Dolphin Square, in Washington DC, in Belgium with the studied disinterest in Law enforcement in Dutroux for years as he murdered and tortured minors. If the recent history of the West is examined, the Hampstead allegations do not sound outlandish at all, in fact these cases are sadly familiar to even a relative novice in this area such as myself.
The Gulf speaks the silent truth.
One of the ways to try and understand whether a cover up is taking place is to examine the investigation that has taken place and then compare that with what a sincere investigation would look like and the gap between the two, in this case a vast yawning gulf, speaks the truth.
If the children’s video interviews were troubling somewhat due to their being conducted by a party to a custody battle, all doubt was erased by the way the police interview of September 17th proceeded. The police officer conducting the interview appeared to find the allegations so unbelievable that he set out to debunk them as quickly as possible. That is the innocent explanation.
The problem with the interview is very profound and revealing. The police officer showed no intent whatsoever to discover the truth, quite the opposite. The interviewing officer behaved identically to a man sent out to ‘end it and make it all go away, get them to retract”. He actually coached them that they were coached, in an awesome display of hypocrisy and dishonesty.This was quite outrageous in my opinion. It ended all doubt for me. Here is a short excerpt from
“When asked by Steve “we talked in two other interviews…was what you told me the truth?” Gabriel responds “yeah” Steve replies “so all that stuff about the babies, and the church and all that” Gabriel replies “no, well the babies, the babies…there is some of the babies killed yeah” are you sure “yeah, but not much, not every single day…”
This passage is completely transparent. The interviewing officer asks the child if the allegations previously made were correct. The child answers yes, so instead of further questioning to elicit corroborating details, the police officer straight out badgers the child, and being a child he half relents at the first attempt to badger him, stating, “well not every day.” sticking to his story but attempting to please the police officer. So when the badgering continues and the child folds it is completely predictable and has no bearing on the truth of the allegations. It is evidence of a cover-up, pure and simple.
A person seeking the truth would question in a completely different manner.You don’t even ask them about the allegations. They should be asked a series of very easy open questions at the start and not pushed to even talk about the allegations at all.
Once the abuse is mentioned, then you have to ask specific questions. about the details of the event.
This is how you get people to tell you what they know and then test how much of their story fits with the known and corroborated facts.
If these allegations were properly investigated there is a strong likelihood that further forensic evidence can be collected that would corroborate the children’s claims.
The obvious example of this relates to the allegations of murder. Where did these crimes take place? It has to be in London, if this happened it happened inside a room in London and it should be possible to identify the room. It should be possible to search the scene for microscopic blood remnants and other indications of violence at the scene. If the area has been subjected to an inexplicable industrial cleaning recently, the evidence may have been destroyed but there would still be a degree of corroboration there.
There are multiple investigative streams that have not been pursued and after all the known and proven cover ups of these matters in Britain and elsewhere, that is really unforgivable.
You don’t get a young child in the room and then immediately start suggesting the story they previously told was made up. It is simply not how it’s done, unless you are conducting a cover up.
My understanding is that there is abundant physical evidence that proves that the children have been abused by someone, so the whole line of questioning and approach appear to be fraudulent. I also considered that there would be no need or purpose to make such extreme allegations in order to win a custody battle. These allegations do not help win a custody battle, quite the opposite. More importantly, you would not coach someone to tell a story like that to win a custody battle, serious criminal allegations such as murder only complicate things. The same goes for all the allegations about the school. There are too many details that can be checked that appear not to have been checked.
One of the things people may find the most unbelievable are the stories of the murders. I would not comment specifically other than to say they have a high degree of veracity in my opinion and this deserves a serious large scale police investigation right now. A Major Task Force, dozens of Detectives working thousands of hours if necessary. If these stories turn out to be somehow confused or incorrect, let the world know, show the world the exonerating evidence, not some “instant debunk” travesty as we appear to have seen in the Police interview of September 17th. 2014.
We know that horrendous crimes committed against children in the past, in the fairly recent past in the UK, have been covered up. This is the whole point of the Investigation that was set up by the British Home Secretary that has reached it’s third incarnation and gone nowhere in more than a year. It is worth remembering that the police unit investigating the historical Westminster claims are investigating at least three homicides related to protected child abusers during the 1980s. Not that the two very different cases should be conflated.
Therefore, given the gravity and apparent credibility of the allegations one troubling police interview is simply not going to suffice. The specific allegations need to be investigated in detail and prosecuted if they (as seems almost completely certain) turn out to be true.
The effort to expose the crimes in Hampstead has been an heroic one and the personal cost to several people involved in this case has already been immense.
The interviews Caradori conducted in a completely professional manner were alleged to have been entirely coached. This is a common place tactic in these cases, no matter how ridiculous. It was a complete lie but they said it. This points to the problem with the Hampstead videos, they appear to convey and contain the truth but because of the relatively informal nature of the interviews, and more importantly the personal connection of the interviewer to the case, from a legal standpoint they are going to be very easily discounted.
These interviews, regardless of the truth of the allegations therein are not going to be particularly helpful in a criminal prosecution.This is not intended to criticise the interviewer but merely as a statement of fact. The perpetrators will deny to the last so the accounts need to be recorded by a neutral third party who cannot be accused of bias or coaching as soon as possible.
Ideally there should be fresh police interviews of the victims in order to get as detailed an account as possible to check against the known facts. If the police are unwilling to conduct fresh interviews, another neutral party should have the opportunity to ask the children what has happened in detail so that the allegations can be detailed in a neutral environment to an independent third party and corroborative background facts can be properly checked.
Someone needs to get these children on tape at length telling their stories and checking that against the known facts such as the medical reports and action must be taken. Someone has committed a crime here and the police are not going to be able to simply walk away from these allegations on the basis of the inexplicably unprofessional approach taken in the September 17th interview. The days of the simple one step “fob off” cover up are well and truly over.
Conspiracy Of Silence (Banned Discovery Channel Documentary)
Jeb Bush and the Murder of CIA Drug Smuggler Barry Seal in 1986: Wayne Madsen: the FBI murdered Franklin pedophile ring investigator Gary Caradori on July 11, 1990 by putting a Bomb on Caradori’s plane
Google translation of the French Michel Nihoul Wikipedia page.
:Michel Nihoul (Verviers, April 23, 1941) is a Belgian businessman and swindler from Brussels. In 2004 he has been tried as an alleged member of the gang of Marc Dutroux.
In the seventies and eighties is Nihoul in Brussels known as a frequent visitor to sex parties. He seems to know many senior figures in politics and business. He is also active as a radio producer, DJ and presenter at the free radio “Radio Activités”. In between, he was sentenced several times in fraud cases.
About his part in the activities of Dutroux is far from clear. Initially, he is seen as a gang leader. Later, his role minimized by both researchers and media. It also will not change as Regina Louf makes incriminating statements against him.
At the start of the Dutroux trial is whether Nihoul only a swindler and drug trafficker who “accidentally” did with Dutroux affairs, or that he was the central figure in a pedophile network. He is on trial for conspiracy, kidnapping and drug trafficking. He always boasted that “his arm was as long as the Danube”, referring to its relations to the highest circles of the country.
Nihoul denies any involvement in the kidnappings. He would indeed have sold drugs to Dutroux and Michel Lelievre, but would have done on behalf of the state police to infiltrate the gang – something he denied earlier though.
Nihoul was eventually acquitted of involvement in the kidnapping and only convicted of drug offenses and conspiracy. It earned him five years of imprisonment. In the spring of 2006, he was released early. He settled in Zeebrugge, where he still resides. Three years after the process creates a stir when he is playing in the reconstruction of scenes from the Dutroux case in the TV program Dossier noir of February 18, 2007 at the French-speaking channel RTBF. 
Nihoul was on May 20, 2010 from prosecution stated in the by-file of the Dutroux case, after which he immediately 250,000 compensation demanded by Marc Verwilghen, the chairman of the parliamentary inquiry Dutroux.   The final judgment on this claim was in December 2011, with the requirement of Nihoul was rejected. 
Nihoul’s ex-partner and second wife, Annie Bouty, also long been suspected of involvement in criminal activities. Nihoul and Bouty met each other in 1975. She had a private law firm and was co-founder of Cadreco, a firm legal assistance granted to an arms dealer who supplied the Iranian ayatollahs for $ 83 million missiles. [Source?] She also gave false passports to illegal Nigerian prostitutes in Belgium. [Source ?] Bouty was also suspected of involvement in the Dutroux case, but was eventually acquitted.”