Who is Chris Spivey?
Chris Spivey is a British online journalist responsible for most of the writing on the popular Chris Spivey the World Put Right website. An irreverent and coarse blast of truth in the face of the wicked British Establishment that has gathered a dedicated following since inception in 2012 and broken many important stories.
What has happened?
Chris Spivey was recently convicted in a British court of the crime of Harassment in relation to his investigation into the alleged killing of British soldier Lee Rigby in Woolwich, London in May 2013.
I have read all the mainstream media coverage on this case that I could find, and the Crown Prosecution Service media release yet in all honesty the specific nature of Spivey’s crime is completely unclear.
It is clear that part of the case against Chris Spivey relates to material posted on his website and the views he expressed about the Woolwich incident.
The CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) states that:
“The prosecution’s case was that the combination of the postings, containing a mixture of grossly offensive remarks about the Rigby family, upsetting assertions surrounding the murder, and the publication of details of two of the family’s homes, could not be justified under freedom of speech”
A Breach of Chris Spivey’s Human Rights?
Regardless of what happened in Woolwich there is no doubt that any prosecution that uses the fact that Spivey expressed contrary opinions as part of the evidence is appears to represent a breach Chris Spivey’s human rights as outlined in the UN Declaration of Human Rights and the EU Human Rights Charter as these unambiguously proclaim the right to freely express political views.
The EU Charter states in Article 10 that “Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion.”
Article 11 is more explicit
“Article 11 Freedom of expression and information
1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.
2. The freedom and pluralism of the media shall be respected.”
If Britain’s corrupt leadership do not support the central tenets of the EU Charter they should explain why this is the case and begin immediate steps to withdraw from the EU and the United Nations. The British legal system appears to be operating in a manner that is inconsistent with the fundamental tenets of human rights as stated in both the EU Charter and the UN Declaration.
A Flawed Process?
It is also worth noting that the alleged victims did not appear before the court, all the evidence tendered was provided by the police who were the only witnesses.
Spivey was thus convicted without his counsel having the opportunity to question the witnesses against him in another clear breach of all legal norms and traditions, and a denial of natural justice.
If the alleged victim was so upset by Spivey’s claims why did the alleged victim take no action to curtail Spivey’s actions or simply ignore Spivey’s posts which had no material impact on her whatsoever and no realistic prospect of doing so?
The fact that Spivey is right, undoubtedly correct in the broad claim that Woolwich was a stage-managed and fabricated bit of psychological warfare against the people of Britain does not even matter. Even if Spivey was completely wrong, the prosecution would still be malicious, politically motivated and illegitimate.
There is in fact no possibility whatsoever that the Woolwich incident was an authentic terrorist attack or anything of the sort. Analysis of the Woolwich event, even crude preliminary analysis makes it absolutely clear that there is no way known that this is anything more than a Benny Hill standard piece of street theater constructed and executed extremely poorly in full public view.
Woolwich was a made for TV faux event, with multiple cameras filming multiple takes, terrible special effects and a C grade cast of players.
The way to prove Woolwich manufactured is very simple. Watch it.
Woolwich killers being shot charging police,extended footage
Note that there is no blood present and that all the blood we see on the “killer” at all times has been digitally inserted. Something that is hard to miss because it also all disappears at certain stages of the event.
There is no good part of the story, none.
The bad actor delivering the silly speech with the digitally inserted blood on his hands.
The terrorist killer who throws down his knife as he runs at the police and leaps through the air theatrically and positions himself halfway across the road where he moves his legs to cover the spot cues the handlers have left at the spot.
Commonsense and empathy.
Imagine yourself on a street where a man has just been butchered by jihadist nutters who are standing in the street armed with knives and firearms. You are out shopping in your local area, you eave the supermarket and you are waking home and you notice a dead body lying in the street and two large men prancing about with weapons.
Do you walk down that street, past the dead body in the middle of the road, past the knife wielding “blood spattered” large men ranting in the street or do you think you might walk home down a different street?
That’s right, you walk home down a different street as you do not want to walk past a “blood spattered” maniac who just hacked someone to death.
Except in Woolwich, where numerous shoppers walk blithely past the “blood spattered” knife wielding man and the body in the road.
It is hokum. Pure hokum.
The British Establishment Press.
There were a number of pieces in the corporate media regarding this case. Not one of them contained a single word of truth. It was both predictable and shocking. There was not a word about the possible implications for free speech in the conviction. Not a word.
All I would say to the members of the British Press is that your souls are in great danger and I hope it was worth it.
But I suspect that you may come to regret the way you have sold your soul to the forces of darkness and evil.
The choices you have made will resonate forever and one day you will reap what you have sown. I hope you understand what you have done.
Links to the genuinely nauseating, mainstream articles on this case are at the very bottom of the page.
The legitimacy of a Government that has acted utterly cynically and made a further mockery of the rule of law in staging this event to frighten the people and cause them to hate and fear Muslims surely has to be questioned
Where does the public interest sit in staging these events?
What on earth gives the Government, or part of the Government the idea that they have the right to manipulate and deceive the people they are supposed to be serving.people and terrify them with lies?
This evil little stunt has genocidal implications when viewed in the light of Britain’s behavior over the preceding decade. This was an evil thing to do and it is truly so sad that we have been reduced to this pitiful state at any point in time let alone the present.For decades British Intelligence have been in the game of manufacturing terrorism in order to terrify and control the population. Whenever a villain has been required, they have obliged.
Staging this event was a very silly and wicked thing to do, but on the big scale of things, compared to some of the other things they have done, this is nothing. Quite literally.
The publication of addresses, while in no way or manner in my opinion constituting harassment, may be unwise in future. This appears to have been the element that enabled this dirty game of political prosecution to be played. It was the one fact that has been used to weave a grotesque lie around.
If this is the ploy that is being used to implement Cameron’s oft stated ambition of tyranny it might be counterproductive to publish personal details of alleged crisis actors and other perceived accomplices to the hoaxes and/or false flag events in future in order to prevent the corrupt Establishment from using this technique as a means to persecute and criminalise truth-tellers.
The Precedent is Clear.
If Spivey is imprisoned, as is at least possible (unthinkable but apparently possible) his case will become a very big cause very quickly and one consequence of that will be a major increase in public interest in alternate theories and a massive upsurge of interest in the Woolwich incident.
Do not think for a second that any of the things that have been done to Spivey cannot be done to you.
If Chris Spivey can be prosecuted for voicing a controversial opinion on the internet, anyone can be prosecuted for expressing any view on the internet or anywhere else.
Truth will clearly be no defense.
Therefore every possible political and legal effort must be made to overturn these convictions and to establish a precedent that ensures that such vindictive political prosecutions are never allowed to happen again.
I would encourage anyone with the ability to be in Essex on the morning of August 27th to attend the Essex District court and offer support to Chris Spivey. If not, make a phone call, write a letter. Be polite and firm. Do not let these people destroy your hard won liberty. DO SOMETHING! Enough is enough.
This is a test. This is a moment that cannot be allowed limply to pass. People need to make their feelings known (in a civilised and dignified way) and more importantly, a whole series of legal actions need to be undertaken against the British Government in every possible jurisdiction, from Europe, to the UN, to the local British courts until justice and human rights have been restored.
Full Woolwich Terrorist Attack (Was Censored By British Government)
UK Woolwich eyewitness describes attack by Muslims on Help for Heroes TShirt wearing man
HUMANITY vs INSANITY – #48 : STFU … or we’ll take your kids! Ian R Crane Chris Spivey
The British Prime Minister has repeatedly stated the intent to criminalise the very mention of the Big lies that define our age. This should be viewed as no less than a proxy claim of responsibility. Cameron’s handlers are especially concerned about London 7/7 and 911. I wonder why?
DAVID CAMERON in UN Speech Says ANYONE QUESTIONING the 9/11 Official Story Is a TERROR EXTREMIST
“Mohammed Sidique Khan: Are you really a terrorist eh?
Omar Khyam: They’re working with us.
Mohammed Sidique Khan: You’re serious, you are basically…
Omar Khyam: No I’m not a terrorist but they are working through us.”
An Historical Context – Within the War on Terror.
On July 7th , 2005 the public transport system in London was struck by a number of explosions that killed 56 people and wounded hundreds more causing the largest single loss of life in Britain since World War 2.
The July 7th bombings formed and continue to form a key part of the War on Terror narrative. Of the dozens, indeed hundreds of mass casualty attacks attributed to the “al Qaeda” synthetic terror outfit in the first decade of the 21st century the London attacks along with the 911 events, the Bali bombings, the Madrid attacks of 2004 and the Mumbai massacre of 2008 stand out as the “iconic” attacks that are still utilised to promote the War on Terror narrative of foreign wars and the domestic police state whilst many other massacres such as the attack in Djerba, Tunisia in March 2002, and the series of blasts that struck Istanbul in late 2003 have been largely forgotten.
Historian Webster Tarpley in his 2004 work “911 Synthetic Terror Made in the USA”” provides an analysis of the phenomenon of modern terrorism that explains why all events of world changing political violence should be subjected to intense scrutiny.
“We start from the strong presumption that terrorism is therefore an activity which is controlled by a faction of government, probably acting under the influence of financier factions which are generally the ultimate source of authority in the globalized universe after 1991. Terrorism cannot be described as a spontaneous sociological phenomenon, as the old saying goes – it must rather be seen as a phenomenon developed by sociologists, along with psychologists, profilers, psychiatrists, case officers, handlers, and cut-outs. For every terrorist and terrorist group in the field, an extensive bureaucratic support system is necessary. Spontaneous combustion is the last thing that should be expected.”
How reassuring to open the ISC account and be greeted with news about the weather
“2. “7 July began unsettled, with heavy showers in places. The early morning rush in London started as normal.”
The reader continues to find that the report provides no specific details about the actual attacks. The timing, placement, composition of the bombs. Nothing beyond the broad speculative claim and the circular argument that the designated offenders must have conducted the attack because it happened and we said so.
The high degree of success achieved by the British Establishment appears to have rendered them so acutely out of touch and completely unable to tell quality lies due to their complete lack of respect for their intended audience.whom they clearly regard with unvarnished contempt.
Context- Within Modern British History.
There is an obvious connection between the July 7th attacks and the other al Qaeda “spectaculars” the attack is also part of a pattern of manufactured terror in the UK that has been underway for at least half a centur.
While there are many parallels between the London attacks and the 911, Madrid and other attacks, there are also close parallels with previous major atrocities in Britain including the Birmingham Pub bombings of 1974 and the Omagh blast in Ireland in 1998.
An uncomfortable truth lurks in the background of all these events. The Security Services are naturally enough self interested. They want a big budget and large staff the same as any other Government agency. The only difference is that their institutional wellbeing depends on the preponderance of fear. They are quite simply in the business of fear.
The budget for MI5, GCHQ and MI6 combined stands at just under 2 billion pounds per annum. The Guardian estimates that MI5 share f the 1.92 billion pound combined intelligence budget at 900 million pounds. The budget had been expected to decline after the 2012 Olympics but happily Jihad John and the other synthetic IS monsters sorted that out nicely and anticipated budget cuts were averted.
The Official Story of 7/7.
The official story of the 7/7 bombings comprises the Home Office narrative, two Intelligence and Security Committee reports and the Coroner’s Inquest. These accounts differ on many details but there is a consensus amongst them that 3 British Muslims collected bombs from a Leeds flat, drove to Luton where they met their Jamaican British comrade and caught a train to London where they dispersed and conducted suicide bomb attacks against four civilian targets on the morning of July 7th, 2005.
The attacks we are told targeted 3 trains almost simultaneously at around 8.50am followed by an attack on a Double Decker bus almost an hour later at 9.47am.
Because the witness and media accounts of the event are deeply contradictory and incoherent and the event took place outside the public view and the evidence has been tightly controlled by the British Government the 7/7 case is a complex and difficult and although there are several facts that logically render the account of the event provided by the British Government null and void, this case does not provide the simple seven second smoking gun that the destruction of WTC 7 provides in the 911 case.
It is necessary therefore to expose the truth by interrogating the Official story and analysing it critically rather than pointing at any one piece of visual evidence such as the WTCdemolitions.
The best way to describe the Home Office narrative and the reports of the ISC is insulting. These narratives quite simply fail to present evidence in support of numerous key assertions. It is not a serious attempt to investigate the incident at all.
The ISC Reports based on information provided to the Intelligence and Security Committee from MI5 contain numerous untruths regarding knowledge of the identity of Mohammed Sidique Khan with MI5 having delivered three different, contradictory and provably untrue accounts of their knowledge of Khan.
Along with a whole host of “Keystone Cops” explanations for their failure t identify Khan when he had been on their radar and under surveillance sporadically for several years. The West Yorkshire Police field the brunt of the blame predictably.
The very terms of the Coroner’s Inquest speak volumes. Despite the clear stipulation that the Coroner should investigate the cause of death in all cases of sudden and violent death in Britain, the cause of death of the four bombers was outside the Coroner’s purview for unknown reasons.
In addition, none of the victims were subjected to an internal post mortem examination to help determine the exact cause of death despite this being standard procedure.
Lifting the veil.
It remains unclear how many bombs were detonated, the composition of the devices, the means of detonation, the nature of the events remains a startling mystery in many ways with many strange indications such as that there may have been incidents on more than four trains and the extremely strange multiple eyewitness accounts that described a sensation they described as electrocution at the time of the detonations.
“You know that kind of pppvvvvvv type of sound, but a
million times more powerful.’8 He also told the Cambridge Evening
News that, ‘It was like a huge electricity surge which knocked us out and
burst our eardrums. I can still hear that sound now.’9 For her part,
Crystal Main told the Mirror that, ‘all of a sudden I felt as if I was having
a fit and couldn’t control myself. I slipped to the side. It was as if I had
been electrocuted and thousands of volts were going through me.”
There are two lines of inquiry that make it clear that there is no possibility that the British Government account of these events was honest and complete.
The first is the background of the members of the alleged terror cell and their connections.
The second is the Official narrative of the day of the attacks.
Mohammed Sidique Khan- Protected British Intel Asset Surrounded by Agents..
The alleged ringleader of the group was a well liked 30-year-old man from Leeds named Mohammed Sidique Khan, (whose identity cards were remarkably found at three separate attack sites in the aftermath of the July 7th attacks) Mohammed Sidique Khan had been involved with militants in the UK and Pakistan for years. He was captured on surveillance attending a half-baked training camp in rural Britain in 2001, travelled twice to Pakistan and was observed in contact with numerous targeted militants between 2001 and 2005.
All of his key contacts, his mentors and trainers appear to have been operating on behalf of Western Intelligence Agencies with one US agent in a prominent role among a host of British assets and agents.
The milieu that Khan existed within for several years was littered with agents, informers and provocateurs.
There was the fellow named Martin McDaid, he was a supposed Muslim convert who claimed to be a former member of the elite British Special Forces unit the SBS and ran a militant bookshop in Leeds.. McDaid was the organiser and trainer at the British training camp. McDaid acted as a provocateur, a radicaliser. McDaid was never arrested or prosecuted or otherwise detained and has now disappeared. It is worth noting that a very senior IRA militant and British double agent named John Joe Magee was also a former SBS member. McDaid’s apparent role as”protected provocateur” was repeated with other key militants in the area at the time including a man named Mohammed Quayyum Khan.
If McDaid, Q and Babar were spies acting as part of a complex
covert operation or set of operations then it would be important to
obscure their connections to the four people who were designated to
become ‘suicide bombers’. Every time the alleged bombers did
something that could later be used to make them look like suicide
bombers, they did it through or via one of the probable spies. Every
time, the connections between the four and the probable spy or spies
was obscured by security service intelligence failures
Mohammed Junaid Babar US Government Agent and the Trainer..
Mohammed Junaid Babar was a US citizen from a Pakistani background who travelled to Pakistan soon after 911 and began mouthing off about wanting to kill Americans. It seems clear that Babar was sent to Pakistan by a US agency in order to deliver war propaganda to the American people and was later deployed as an informant.
“By November 2001 he had arrived in Pakistan and he gave two interviews
to Western journalists proclaiming that, ‘When the American troops
enter, we will kill them in Afghanistan. There is no negotiation… I will kill
every American that I see in Afghanistan and while I am in Pakistan, if I
see them in Pakistan, I will kill every American soldier I can in
Babar ran a supposed terrorist training camp in the Pakistan town of Malakand. This was the camp that alleged leader of the 7/7 cell Mohammed Siddique Khan attended during his 2003 visit to Pakistan.
In 2004 Mohammed Junaid Babar “came in from the cold” returned to the US where he was taken into custody and debriefed. The US government has stated that Babar was an US intelligence asset prior to his arrest but not the specific date he began working for them.
Babar’s sentencing hearing was told that Babar “worked for the US Government prior to his arrest.”
In custody in the US Babar described all his militant contacts and the US government tried to match the names Babar described with specific individuals.
Babar told the Americans about the young British men he encountered in the Malakand camp. He described Mohammed Sidique Khan, as a man he knew as “Sidique” so the US contacted British Intelligence to see if they could help Babar identify Mohammed Sidique Khan.
The manner of the response from British Intelligence to this request represents one of the single most damning facts in this case and proves unmistakably that MI5 colluded in order to protect Khan’s identity from the US.
MI5 Concealed Khan and Tanweer from the US Government in March 2005.
It can be stated with a high degree of confidence that Mohammed Sidique Khan was some type of British Intelligence operative on the basis of multiple pieces of evidence but the most damning fact in relation to Khan’s status is probably the time in March 2005 when British Intelligence responded to an FBI request for information about the men who had been in the Malakand camp including a man named “Sidique” and MI5 CROPPED KHAN’S FACE from a photo they sent to the F.B.I along with butchering the image of Shehzad Tanweer also.
British intelligence had taken quite a good photograph featuring two members of the alleged 77 cell, Khan and Shehzhad Tanweer, covertly taken of the two at a roadside service centre in 2003.
So in March 2005, in the months prior to the London attacks, the US was interested in discovering “Sidique’s” specific identity, and asked the Brits for help in this matter and the people at MI5 sent the Americans a cropped black and white version of the original photograph.
This is a story from the mainstream media, the Mail and the Guardian. These facts only emerged many years after the events, as part of the Coroner’s Inquest into the deaths of the 52 “non bomber” victims of the attacks released in 2011..
The cropped image of Khan, was so poor that it
was not even shown to Babar by the FBI. The image of Tanweer was
almost as bad, and it is unsurprising that Babar did not know who he
was. Witness G was confronted during the inquests with this
comparison, with Hugo Keith QC commenting that, ‘G, I am bound to
observe, if you will forgive me, I think one of my children could have done a better job of cropping out that photograph.’
MI5’s excuse for such a horrendous editing job was that, ‘the cropping is all to do with not revealing the techniques by which the photograph was collected.’ The ability of security services to covertly
film and photograph people is not a secret, so this makes no sense
whatsoever. Witness G also referred to the need for speed in sending
the pictures to be seen by Babar, but this is also highly dubious. If the
purpose was to have the men in the picture identified then quickly
sending a poorly-cropped image to Babar that he did not identify should
have resulted in sending a better version to make sure.
This fact alone destroys the 7/7 “intelligence failure/ lack of resources” narrative as an insipid cover story.
Both photographs are in the public arena and their authenticity is undisputed and we are asked to believe that in the year 2005 MI5 did not possess a working printer, or a computer nor the ability to scan a photograph and Email it to the USA?
.British Intelligence try to claim that while they were aware of Khan they did not consider him a significant risk, This is a naked lie. Khan was their man and he was a man they sought to protect and there is simply no doubt about it.
This is one of the many classic signs of a false flag attack and recurs across many different attacks because as Webster Tarpley wrote “the patsies must be protected” if they are imprisoned they are no longer able to perform their role as the designated offender.
The fact that the British press expect their readers to buy the idea that MI5 were running around the office in the year 2005 cropping photos with SCISSORS speaks of their profound contempt for their readers Th
This attempt to prevent the US identifying Khan came less than a year prior to the London attack and on its own, even if the official story were legitimate proves outright the complicity of British Intelligence in the attack. The man they claim was the cell leader was the man they deliberately shielded from the US Government in the months before the attack.
This means that all of the circumstantial evidence presented against Khan can just as easily be explained by his attempting to establish his identity or “legend” as a “legitimate” jihadist volunteer in Malakand. It is entirely possible that Babar coerced Tanweer and Khan into making the video and they complied fearing exposure or ridicule. Khan’s status is only the front half of the story and Khan’s status as an agent does not preclude him from having gone rogue and conducted a genuine terror attack, but critical analysis of the evidence presented within the British Government narrative indicates that this is not the case.
Germaine Lindsay and Hasib Hussein.
It can be established that Khan was some type of Intelligence asset and Tanweer is assumed to have also been an asset and his identity was also obscured deliberately by MI5. It is possible that Tanweer was a dupe but the weight of evidence indicates otherwise.
Far less is known about the other two alleged perpetrators, Hasib Husain and Germaine Lindsay. Lindsay was married to Samantha Lewthwaite, a woman widelyalleged to be an intelligence asset, but even if this is the case this does not necessarily mean that Lindsay was not a sincere extremist. It is worth remembering that in order to infiltrate semi- militant environmental organisations British Intelligence allowed their agents to have children under their fake cover identities and this happened in several cases. So the fact that Lindsay was married to Lewthwaite could be read either way.
One strange detail about the attack attributed to Lindsay, the Piccadilly line attack was that it was so devastating by comparison with the others with the 26 victims representing half the total deaths from four attacks. Lindsay’s train bomb for some reason also killed double the other two train attacks combined.
Hasib Husain’s actions when he was recorded prior to his own 20 minute disappearance make no sense. The supposed fanatical mass killer dined at McDonald’s, he also tried to telephone the other alleged cell members repeatedly. If he knew what they were doing and that involved blowing themselves up why did he call them after the bombs had gone off?
If he really was an attacker and he somehow could not manage to get on a train, he would simply get in a crowded area and do the evil business. As if you are going to wander round waiting to find a bus to attack and risk capture or death and failure.
The Magical Disappearances.
Another among a number of devastating facts that are not contested and which destroy the British Government account of the July atrocities is the astonishing fact that none of the four designated offenders was filmed either boarding nor travelling on nor within 200 yards of the vehicle he was alleged to have attacked.
In addition all four men inexplicably disappeared from all CCTV footage 20 minutes prior to “conducting the attack” clearly marking this as the “moment of magic”, the time at which the sleight of hand that the real perpetrators used was undertaken.
The men appeared on CCTV as they drove from Leeds towards Luton. When Tanweer stopped at a service centre,and when the men arrived at Luton station, they were filmed each and every step of the way. At around 8.25am the men are seen walking through the Kings Cross station. At this point all three” 8.50 bombers” disappear.
The problem with the train CCTV was explained by the claim that for that period of time all the cameras in the CCTV system were set on only one camera view so the view from only one camera was seen.
This may have been plausible were it not for the fact that the alleged Bus bomber Hasib Husein who was filmed after the initial wave of attacks and attacked a different wing of the public transport system with a completely different CCTV system also miraculously disappeared for a full twenty minutes prior to the attack he is claimed to have conducted.
All of the cameras that showed the men travelling mundanely to London worked perfectly well but as soon as the men were required to take the actions that comprise the actual attack they disappear.
The simple fact that the Inquest into the event did not consider within its terms of reference the cause of death of the four alleged perpetrators, contrary to all British legal norms is another straightforward destroyer of the very notion that these events were conducted by the designated offenders, whose very bodies were apparently not even present at the scene on the day of the event and who, when apparently dumped at the bombing scene some 24 hours later were accompanied by the traditional false flag totem of the id card left helpfully on the ground.
Incredibly in the case of Mohammed Sidique Khan identifying documents were found at three separate bomb sites.
The entire story of the home-made bombs is an almighty mess that is extremely short of evidence of any credibility.
Most of the supposed “bomb making” material at the “bomb factory” in Alexandra Grove was not explosive.
The details of the attack are terribly confused. There are however numerous accounts from eyewitnesses, including public officials that support the claim that the explosions took place underneath the carriages rather than within them.
There are accounts from several of the bomb sites that credibly describe holes in the floor blowing the floor of the train upwards and outwards.
Bruce Lait says he saw a hole in the floor. In an interview with Cambridge
Evening News only days after the bombing he spoke of how they were
being helped off the bombed train by a policeman, ‘The policeman said
‘mind that hole, that’s where the bomb was’. The metal was pushed
upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think
the bomb was left in a bag, but I don’t remember anybody being where
the bomb was, or any bag.’
“Years later, when Lait was interviewed for the BBC’s Conspiracy
Files show on 7/7 he reiterated all of this and pointed to the same area
where the MPS diagram says the explosion happened. Lait is number
18 in the diagram, one of the closest survivors, and therefore a
consistent and important witness. It appears the police took him
seriously when he said that’s where the explosion was, but not when he
said he doesn’t remember anyone, let alone Tanweer, standing there.”
Other eyewitness accounts conform to the Official account.
The fact that so many of the basic details of the attacks. The composition of the bombs, the detonation method remain submerged beneath the studied inertia of what appears to be a classic cover up.
Peter Power is a former Metropolitan Police officer in London and in 2005 he ran a “crisis management” firm named Visor Consultants. Power has many sinister historical connections and acts as an unofficial spokesman for the British National Security State. In 2011 Power appeared on the BBC commenting n the security procedures surrounding the funeral of the recently deceased former British PM Margaret Thatcher. Power also participated in the Panorama episode of 2004 that closely anticipated the 7/7 events with identical train attacks but a different attack, a chlorine truck bomb- on the road.
The Panorama episode is certainly interesting as were Power’s interviews on the day of the events.
Ultimately, Power is a minor person of interest in this case, along with Reed Elsevier, the company who employed him on the day.but the simulation is not necessarily damning or even relevant because there was no real on the ground drill as far as we know.
If you listen closely to the Power interviews, the infamous interviews,it is perfectly clear that Power is describing a simulated event in a room not an actual training drill involving operatives on the ground.
The whole point of a “false flag” drill is that it gives the plotters an opportunity to move the elements of the attack into place under the cover of the drill and use the drill as an excuse if they are caught.
British Intelligence- A Pattern of Behaviour.
In all probability the explosives were from the British “Gladio” stocks or similar clandestine cache and one of the surprising things that looking at this case has taught me is that British Intelligence have been deeply enmeshed in most, indeed possibly all of the major terror attacks and terror groups that have operated in the UK in the post World War II era.
The IRA themselves were a synthetic terror outfit and it appears that atrocities were committed by Government agencies during the years of the troubles and the attacks were blamed on Irish people living in Britain who were innocent of the crimes.
Fake confessions were produced by torture and beatings, often the innocent patsies were later released from prison and exonerated but the true perpetrators of many of the worst attacks of the “Troubles” were never prosecuted. The crimes remain unsolved in many cases for reasons that are obvious.
In 1974 MI5 had one agent among the four man “rogue IRA” cell who conducted the attacks which left 21 people dead. MI5 had information from their informant regarding the attacks, the date and the targets but chose not to share the information with local police for unknown reasons.
At this point it is clear that despite the sincerity of many of their volunteers, the IRA were a vehicle for British Intelligence under their control to a greater or lesser extent throughout the Troubles and beyond. It is also worth remembering that British Intelligence were effectively infiltrating both sides of the Northern Irish conflict and directing both sides towards self discrediting atrocities in order to maintain British power in Northern Ireland in a classic example of the “Strategy of Tension.”
In one memorable case, British Intelligence directed a Protestant death squad in the murder of Patrick Finucane a Lawyer with no militant involvement in front of his family as they sat down to eat their evening meal. Such tactics were clearly designed to cause the people to reject both the Protestant paramilitary groups and the IRA and presumably embrace the Government of Britain.
The Synthetic nature of Irish republican and Loyalist terror did not end when the troubles wound down following the Good Friday peace agreement of the early 1990s.
When a tiny IRA splinter group chose to continue with the atrocities after the peace deal and detonated a devastating device in Omagh in August 1998 it later emerged that British Intelligence had known of the plot months in advance but had chosen not to share the information about the cell and the impending attack with the police because they did not want to expose their assets working within the tiny terror group.
“Should we be denied truth and justice because other people don’t want it?” he told Sky News. “The reality is that Aiden need not have died. Both the British and Irish governments failed to protect the human rights of those people.” Some of the bereaved families have handed the government an independent report which they claim shows alleged intelligence failings by the authorities in the run-up to the attack.”
Surely if MI5 were engaged in a sincere counter-terrorism effort they would realise that the entire reason to infiltrate these groups should be to prevent such atrocities and these are exactly the times you would conduct a sting and end the entire operation if you were sincere. But time and again it clear that the intent is to manage the group, never to actually destroy it or prevent bad things happening. Quite the opposite,
Kincora Boys Home- MI5’s Bellast Boy Brothel for Blackmail.
Anyone in any doubt as to just how cynical and wicked are the operations of the apparently innocuous British internal intelligence agency, need only look at the story of the Kincora Boys Home in Belfast, a site from which MI5 facilitated the trafficking and abuse of numerous children by the local and British elite using the most unscrupulous imaginable means to leverage and manipulate all parties to the conflict in Northern Ireland and any other senior figures with unfortunate predilections t be harnessed and exploited.
Kincora served the elite of the British military and Northern Ireland and politics alike, the place functioned as a boy brothel designed to facilitate black mail, the child rape was simply a means to an end this was merely one of many techniques used to control all parties during the Troubles.
These operations were by no means confined to Northern Ireland and the Elm Guest House in London played a similar role as Kincora in London in the early 1980’s and it appears that the Dolphin Square flats near Westminster were used for similar purposes more recently
One of many Rogue Agencies.
In fairness it should be noted that the F.B. I have played a similarly sinister and wicked role in post war life in the United States. It is no exaggeration to describe the F.B.I. As the predominant terrorist group operating in the United States over the past several decades, their role mirrors that of MI5 and if anything the evidence of their involvement in events such as the 1993 World Trade Centre Bombings, Oklahoma City and many other atrocities is even more damning than the case against MI5.
All Roads Lead to MI5.
It can be stated with confidence that the attacks of July 7th were not conducted by suicide bombers, witting or otherwise although it remains possible that one or more of the individuals blamed for the attacks were sincere terrorists.
It is clear that the four men had been for years enmeshed in a web of Islamic Militants that appeared to be under the control and direction of British Intelligence.
The truth can be discerned by reading the inexplicable missing pieces of evidence that can only be explained by deception and the concealment of criminality.
It appears as though Mohammed Sidique Khan is a sincere individual sent to infiltrate potential terror cells. It would be unfair to describe him as an agent, he seems more like a well meaning volunteer.
Khan was a respected member of the community who helped sort out gang disputes. Infiltrating potential terror cells in order to prevent an attack and protect the name of British Muslims appears to fit Khan’s character far more than the supposed suicidal terrorist.
That Khan was some type of asset, a protected species is beyond dispute. This does not preclude him from “going rogue” and conducting an attack. There is at least one recent seemingly authentic example of this in the Pakistani Taliban/Jordanian Intelligence and CIA asset Humam Khalil Abu-Mulal al-Balawi blew up a bunch of CIA people in a suicide attack, so it is possible.
This is where the complete lack of CCTV footage, the inexplicable disappearances of all four men twenty minutes prior to the attack fro which they are blamed becomes truly powerful and helpful as it fills in the gap in the story. If Khan had truly gone rogue and the attacks were authentic suicide bombings we would not have the magical CCTV disappearances.
On their own, these do not really prove anything but when you combine the cropped photograph, the sabotaged identification with the CCTV disappearances, the infiltrated character of the Leeds milieu, the history of the IRA and Protestant miltants being manipulated, the pattern of bomb damage and the complete lack of credible witnesses who described seeing any of the men on any of the targets, the only logical conclusion is that the men were abducted and the bombs were remotely detonated. It seems fairly clear that both Tanweer and Khan were some type of intelligence assets as Shehzad Tanweer’s identification by Babar was also sabotaged by MI5, albeit less obviously than in the case of Khan.
A Very Tentative Hypothesis.
I do not know precisely what happened in London on Uly the 7th 2005. I am not claiming that this scenario is accurate, it is simply the best explanation with the available evidence at this time in my opinion.
It is entirely possible that evidence will emerge that proves this hypothesis incorrect, but this is the best explanation hypothesis.
So it almost seems as though the two agents, Khan and Tanweer perhaps recruited one or two willing and/or semi-willing extremists in one or both of Germaine Lindsay and Hasib Husain as part of a sting operation.
In order to make the sting operation as dramatic as possible, the men were to go through the motions of conducting a real attack but the bombs would be detonators without any actual explosives, like the 21/7 operation. A work of true brilliance that cemented the suicide bombers narrative in the public mind and served as wonderful protection for the rather brazen 7/7 deception.
Unlike 21/7 the men were all to be arrested upon arrival in London and for their own protection, Khan and Tanweer were in this scenario arrested alongside Lindsay so that Lindsay will not know they set him up.. It is unclear why Hasib Husein was apparently arrested around 40 minutes after the other three designated offenders.
At the point the men are arrested the sting morphed into a black operation. The men are murdered in custody and their bodies are later dumped at the bomb site. The bombs were presumably military explosives detonated remotely after being hidden within the train carriages.
This scenario is based only on informed speculation and until MI5 are made accountable for their actions the truth will never emerge because while it remains entirely unclear who conducted the London atrocities of 2005, there is simply no doubt that MI5 have not been honest in this matter, they know the truth behind these attacks and all logic and available evidence indicate that these were not authentic Islamist terror attacks or suicide bombings as they and the rest of the British Government dogmatically assert..
It is also clear that whomever may have been responsible, all roads lead to MI5, and there can be little doubt that they know who was really responsible for these heinous atrocities whomever they may be.
Almost all of the evidence presented here is a distilled version of Tom Secker’s authoritative work Secrets, Spies and 7/7 the most comprehensive account of these events that was available and for which I am immensely grateful and heavily indebted. None of that is to suggest that Mr. Secker endorses one word of this piece. (other than the extensive Secker quotes obviously! )
.Ludicrous Diversion,7/7 London Bombings,full length
ANZAC Day 2015 100th “Anniversary” of the Dardanelles Fiasco.
Tomorrow, April 25th will mark the 100th anniversary of the failed British, Australian and New Zealand attack on Gallipoli, Turkey. This is an extremely big deal in Australia because the First World War was the first major war for the Australian military, Australia having become an independent nation at the beginning of 1901 and Gallipoli was the first battle of that war.
The Gallipoli campaign involved an eight month attack on a remote region of Turkey for unknown reasons that left more than 6,000 Australians dead and achieved absolutely nothing positive, other than for the Turks, whose Commander at Gallipoli Kamal Attaturk rose to lead the post Ottoman Turkish nation who justifiably celebrate their great victory at Gallipoli.
World War 1 for Australia- a Human Catastrophe Borne of Blind Loyalty to the British Empire.
To Remember the soldiers who died in our name is a very good thing, to do otherwise would be unthinkable, but we do the sacrifice they made a disservice if we neglect to mention the context in which the wars were fought. The reasons or lack thereof for the sacrifice that we commemorate.
World War I was completely unnecessary, achieved absolutely nothing and ultimately was little more than an elite organised mass human blood sacrifice. Neither Australia nor even Britain were under any real threat. The lesson we have only half learned is that Australia should never become involved in Imperial wars that have no bearing on Australia and take place in distant continents ever again.
More than 420,000 Australians participated in World War 1, more than 60,000 died and 137,000 more were wounded.
In 1915, the Australian population was recorded at fewer than 5 million, Translated into today’s Australia with a population of around 23 million people, that would be the equivalent of more than 270,000 killed and 630,000 wounded and a deployment of 2 million. The scale of the deployment was clearly pure madness.
A Very Brief History of the Australian Military.
Like all forces that are not great powers, the history of the Australian Military is of little interest to outsiders. To put it in the simplest terms, by and large the history of the Australian military is a very respectable one, albeit almost always in the capacity of the imperial Janissary. This overall relatively positive history is marred by two major calamities. The calamities were the World War 1 involvement and the consequences of the fall of Singapore in early 1942 that saw thousands of Australian forces trapped and captured by the Japanese Army.
Each of these calamities was caused by blind faith in Britain and the naive, indeed idiotic belief that Britain would act loyally towards Australia.
The Birth of a Nation?
It seems mad that the single most disastrous decision ever made by an Australian government should be celebrated in any way. Did anyone actually think to ask the Australian Prime Minister Billy Hughes at the end of the war,what Australia had achieved for the loss of 60,000 dead men (and women)?
The answer for decades was that it was worth it because the valor of our troops proved to the British that Austral ans were no longer convicts, but honorable and worthy of respect. That seems to be why the catastrophe occurred, the desperate desire for the approval of the British establishment mobilised the Australian politicians and people alike it seems.
It appears that Australians were intensely brainwashed to respect the British establishment despite their transparently criminal and vile nature and to take seriously the whole “island of reprobates” myth.
The Meaning of Independence.
Even when the war is portrayed critically we are delivered simple minded trash about it all being the fault of the British aristocrats who led the British army at that time.
Yet it was Australian politicians that wasted hundreds of millions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of young Australian lives on the basis of the pathetic fantasy of winning the respect of the British.
The story of Gallipoli only goes to show that in 1915 Australia was independent in name only and that the mindset of the Australian political leadership was no more than obedience and fealty to the British.
The Convict Stain is a Joke.
The real crime, the real stain we bear as Australians is that of the destruction and displacement of the indigenous Australian civilisation that we displaced and largely destroyed.It is obvious to anyone with any sense that the whole convict story was a bunch of self serving tosh the British used to mask the real crime, the theft of the continent and the declaration that the existing inhabitants were flora and fauna!.
The British had recently abolished slavery, but the slave owner mindset persisted The British wanted to steal Australia and there was a lack of volunteers,so the convict transportations were simply a means by which to press gang sufficient numbers of the British underclass to leave and at the same time also provide a slave labor work force to help induce the free settlers to join the colony. Settlers and workers were required in order to populate the continent. and thus extend their Empire to the southern island continent, the convicts were two birds with one stone. Many of the people they sent were criminals, but many were not. People were transported for belonging to Trade Unions and the rule of Law was an absolute joke in Britain as remains the case to this very day.The truly wicked British criminals rule and live behind a veil of legal impunity and do not hesitate to frame any who threaten their position.
Today a man named Michael Shrimpton sits in a British jail because he offered intelligence about a terror threat in good faith to the British government. The corruption is truly breathtaking and was presumably even more pronounced in the 18th century. All the findings of British courts both then and now can thus be treated with skepticism if not outright contempt
The British System is Completely Corrupt, Hypocritical and Morally Bankrupt.
High status individuals still enjoy immunity from prosecution. The nauseating case of the pathetic worm Greville Janner makes it absolutely clear that this persists to this very day. So of course the people transported were almost all members of the underclass, the upper echelon criminals enjoyed immunity in Britain in the 18th century as they do today.
A week before the DPP Alison Saunders adjudged Janner unfit for trial on dozens of cases of child rape Janner had written and signed a letter to the House of Lords stating that he would like to extend his leave from the House, this fact surely makes the position of the DPP completely untenable. How is that possibly tolerable? Not only is it tolerable but this is the British way, this is the tradition.
So the whole idea that Australia was a “nation of miscreants” in need of redemption from the “convict stain” was pure nonsense, a farce that the British managed to inculcate in Australians and this was a root cause of the catastrophe of Australia in World War 1.
It is astonishing the way the Australian leadership and people were never able to see Britain for what it was, a criminal Empire run by feudalist crime lords with sick predilections and no legitimate claim to the throne under the supposed bloodline system.
The real British monarch is some anonymous bloke who lives in country New South Wales. Not that it matters.
Transportation for whatever reason was thus a rescue, the Australians were at least physically, beyond the clutches of the venal and wicked British establishment. They deserve gratitude for that if nothing else.
Head Office Moves to Washington DC.
It made perfect sense for Australia to transfer loyalties to the new head office of the empire, Washington DC during World War 2 and all in all, coup aside, the Americans were a far better ally than the UK for the obvious reason that the American leadership did not share the neuroses and class obsessions of the British establishment.
Australian forces participated in the Korean and Vietnam wars, suffering around 500 deaths in each, lost forty soldiers in the Afghan war,(the US remains but the Australians have departed) and also participated in the criminal attack on iraq,This means that the former Australian PM John Howard is an unprosecuted war criminal along with Bush, Blair and the rest.Howar deserves condemnation as for the =decision to join the criminal coalition of the willing.
From a purely Australian viewpoint Howard deserves immense credit for not subjecting the Australian military to the nightmare occupation of Iraq. As a result Australia suffered zero combat fatalities in the Iraq war in contrast to the 150 plus British troops and 4800 Americans that died there.
In Vietnam, Korea in Afghanistan and most of all in Iraq, the US took more than their fair share of the casualties.
The US population is 15 times Australia, between these three wars the US has taken almost 70,00 kia whereas Austrlai suffered around 550, rounding up. These casualties are only 10% of the US based on population. The Australian casualties were very low proportionally, unlike World War 1 when Australian casualties were among the highest for any participant.
Other than World War 2 All Australian wars were Wars of Choice Acting as Imperial Auxiliaries.
Beyond the many wars for the sake of the alliance, there have been Australian military operations in East Timor and the Solomon Islands, I categorise East Timor as a peace keeping operation that was not aggressive in intent. War like incidents took place, If you call that a War it was an exception to the rule. It was not an act of aggression, they didn’t attack East Timor anymore than Russia attacked Crimea in March 2014. It was a show of force operation that was sanctioned by the UN and it did not lead to major violence. That is not to understate the risks to the soldiers stationed there, it just wasn’t a war in the negative sense and did not lead to a bloodbath but rather reduced the violence. If an operation reduces the violence in an area as that operation did, it is not a war in my opinion .
The Same Old Rhetoric but the Lesson Was Learned.
A century and many wars later, Australia’s World War 1 casualties still comprise well over 50^ of the total Australian military death toll. Australia remains a Janissary nation but the politicians who followed Hughes never showed the same callous indifference towards Australian lives, nothing like it. That is one thing that deserves gratitude, but it also shows what a maniac Hughes must have been to send ALMOST 10 PERCENT OF THE ENTIRE POPULATION (8.4%) in a war no one can explain even a century later that had no bearing on Australia’s vital interests. Billy Hughes, the British born Australian politician who sent all those men to die for nothing deserves to be remembered as quite simply the worst “Australian” politician who ever lived. Funnily enough he was British.
The fact that this man is greeted with the same reverence attended any other dead politician merely shows how supine and asleep we apparently remain.
Still the 40 soldiers killed in Afghanistan in an unwinnable war with ridiculous aims incited by an obvious and proven false flag attack that really had nothing to do with Afghanistan even by the Official story. The proponents of the war tried to say that terrorists trained in Afghanistan. It was true that MI and CIA maintained training bases for jihadists there, Osama bin Laden helped run some of their camps. But much of the training for 911 according to the Official story , took place in the USA, this is where the pilots trained, others supposedly took martial arts, so you might just as well invade America as Afghanistan, it was that silly. And as for the idea that a progressive social order can be imposed upon people by the force of arms and military occupation. It is pure stupidity. No one surely really believes that sending heavily armed men to occupy a nation and bombing it extensively from the air will have a moderating influence? No one could possibly be so silly to believe that could they?
As if you need to occupy a country for more than a decade in order to wipe out a couple of training camps that the US air force could destroy completely in around two minutes. I feel terrible for the soldiers that had to go through the ordeal, they are the real victims in this matter, not the people who sit at home. There is no point trying to lie and pretend that the war was a good idea or for a just cause, no matter how well intentioned the participants, when it wasn’t. It just wasn’t.
The Hard Lesson.
A security policy that is anchored in one alliance with one very powerful nation has many shortcomings and problems. It is not the fault of the American people that their nation has been seized and is under the control of a psychopathic crime syndicate, but it has happened, the success of the September 11th false flag massacre makes this fact inescapable. Until the US is liberated from these sinister forces, the alliance , which has overall been relatively cost free for Australia could become a poisonous thing. If the Washington warmongers decide to do something really mad like a major war with Russia or China, or even Iran, Australia must be a voice of moderation and sanity and we must never again throw our people away in the Empire’s Wars of choice.
The Bottom Line.
Although the casualties at least are minute compared to the World War 1 nightmare, the truth is the Australian military should only be used to defend the Australian nation and should only ever be deployed overseas on peace keeping operations such as East Timor and the Solomon Islands. If the Australian nation is to mature we must recognise that the only true security comes from independent means of defence that do not presume the assistance of any ally.