
March 7th, 2015
The Mysterious Death of the Prosecutor, the Missing Car Bombs and the Truth.
The mysterious death of Argentine prosecutor Alberto Nisman of a gunshot wound on January 18th, 2015 has been the source of much controversy. In order to understand the death of Alberto Nisman it is necessary to understand the case he was working on at the time of his death relating to the massive bombing attacks against the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires in 1992 and the AMIA Jewish community centre in 1994.

The attacks of 1992 and 1994.
Narrative 1.
The attack is blamed on a suicide car (or van) bomber ramming his vehicle into the target on both occasions. Hezbollah backed by Iran and Syria supposedly the guilty parties. The problem with this narrative is very simple and fundamental,
There is no evidence that the sites were attacked with any car bomb, indeed multiple witnesses attest to the building exploding from within, no one saw the supposed Renault van used in the AMIA attack, on the street, blowing up, driving up or anything. The Argentine Academy of Engineers Certified that the Israel Embassy was attacked from within.
The Truth.
Argentine Journalist Adrian Salbuchi has done high quality work looking at both attacks.
False Flag Attacks in Argentina: 1992 and 1994, by Adrian Salbuchi, James Fetzer
http://www.voltairenet.org/article162474.html
“Notably, in both cases, the government and the media immediately placed the blame squarely on alleged “Islamic Fundamentalist Terror Groups” who were supposed to have used car bombs to blow up both buildings. As the years went by, however, any “Islamic Terror Group” links became weaker and increasingly ambiguous. Neither of the alleged car-bomb vehicles were ever found.”
The Embassy Attack of March 17th, 1992 left 29 dead.
“The case for a car bomb melted away when the State Prosecutor and the Court hearing on this case invited technical specialist surveyors from the Argentine National Engineers Academy to determine what caused the Israeli Embassy building to collapse. Their conclusion was that the explosion took place from inside the building and was not caused by an alleged car-bomb. To make matters worse for Zionist pressure groups, a passer-by had filmed from several blocks away the mushroom cloud that rose from that explosion, a characteristic effect that also pointed to an internal explosion.”
“The embassy building was in a very densely populated part of Buenos Aires and, although the shock wave broke glass windows and plaster of practically all the buildings across the street from the Embassy – even blowing-in a vitreaux of a church across the street, which sadly fell on a priest and killed him – the only building structurally affected was the Embassy itself. Clearly, we either had a car bomb with an unrealistically selective shock wave or the explosion took place inside the building and there was no car bomb.”
“There are many other signs that point to this conclusion. Probably, for this reason, the case of the Embassy was mentioned less and less frequently by the media, especially after strong rumours surfaced that what actually blew up was an arsenal that the Israelis apparently had housed in the building’s basement. At the time of the explosion, a group of Israeli Labour Government officers were meeting to discuss matters pertaining to the recently initiated Madrid Peace Conference process, but “luckily” left the building just before the explosion. The same occurred with the Ambassador himself who, fortuitously, also happened to depart the premises before the blast.”

A Leader of the Israel Lobby in Argentina was allowed to pay US 400,000 to a Witness in the Frame up.
“For a number of years, the case was heard in the District Court presided by a Federal Judge by the name of Juan Galeano, who was so weak – if not downright stupid – that he allowed himself to be coaxed and pressured by local Zionist organizations – the AMIA and DAIA themselves – into authorizing payment of a 400,000 USD kickback to a shady used-car dealer by the name of Carlos Telleldín, who had sold the alleged car bomb van to alleged Hizbollah operatives in return for his formally accusing three Buenos Aires Police officers of being the “local connection” that would lead first to Syria, then to Hizbollah, and finally to Iran.”
“The money for that 400,000 USD kickback was provided by the then-president of the DAIA, Rubén Beraja through his (now defunct) bank Banco Mayo. Beraja recently spent several years in jail because of the fraudulent collapse of that bank.”
It can be stated with a high degree of confidence that the Embassy was attacked from within and that the attack logically must have been conducted by the enemies of Iran and Hezbollah. Friends after all are not in the habit of framing one another for sectarian mass murder.

The AMIA Bombing of July 14th, 1994 killed 86.
Gareth Porter has also investigated the AMIA attack and his conclusions mirror those of Salbuchi, although when it comes to identifying the perpetrators of the attack his work seems rather weak by comparison. Porter suggests that fascist elements of the Argentine police may have been responsible. On the actual attacks, his work is very strong.
Bush’s Iran/Argentina Terror Frame-Up | The Nation
http://www.thenation.com/article/bushs-iranargentina-terror-frame?page=full
“ATF explosives expert Charles Hunter quickly identified major discrepancies between the car-bomb thesis and the blast pattern recorded in photos. He wrote a report two weeks later noting that in the wake of the bombing, merchandise in a store immediately to the right of the AMIA was tightly packed against its front windows and merchandise in another shop had been blown out onto the street–suggesting that the blast came from inside rather than outside. Hunter also said he did not understand how the building across the street could still be standing if the bomb had exploded in front of the AMIA, as suggested by the car-bomb thesis.”
“The lack of eyewitness evidence supporting the thesis was just as striking. Of some 200 witnesses on the scene, only one claimed to have seen a white Renault Trafic. Several testified they were looking at the spot where the Trafic should have been when the explosion occurred and saw nothing. Nicolasa Romero, the wife of a Buenos Aires policeman, was that lone witness. She said she saw a white Renault Trafic approach the corner where she was standing with her sister and her 4-year-old son. But Romero’s sister testified that the vehicle that passed them was not a white Trafic but rather a black-and-yellow taxi. Other witnesses reported seeing a black-and-yellow taxi seconds before the explosion.”
“Argentine prosecutors argued that pieces of a white Trafic imbedded in the flesh of many of the victims of the explosion proved their case for a suicide bomb. But that evidence was discredited by Gabriel Levinas, a researcher for AMIA’s own legal team. Levinas is a member of a leading Jewish family in Buenos Aires who had published a human rights magazine during the dictatorship (his uncle’s car was used to kidnap war criminal Adolf Eichmann and spirit him off to Israel for trial in 1961.)”
“He discovered that the manufacturer of the white Trafic had been sent fragments of the vehicle recovered by the police for analysis and had found that none of the pieces had ever been put under high temperature. That meant that these car fragments could not have come from the particular white Trafic that police had identified as the suicide bomb car–since that vehicle was known to have once caught fire before having been recycled and repaired.”
“Yet despite the lack of eyewitness testimony and the weakness of the forensic evidence, the State Department publicly embraced the suicide-bomb story in 1994 and 1995.”
False Flag Attacks in Argentina: 1992 and 1994, by Adrian Salbuchi, James Fetzer
http://www.voltairenet.org/article162474.html
“In the case of the AMIA, the Court asked a Border Police (Gendarmería) surveyor to give an “official opinion” about the alleged car-bomb van and this person, by the name of Commander Osvaldo Laborda, officially said that no more parts were found “because the explosion buried it deep under the entrance to the former AMIA building”.
How Nisman Became Involved and the Indiscreet Words of Rabbi Israel Singer.
“President Kirchner, Christina Kirchner (now president) and Foreign Minister (then and now) Jorge Taiana, held a secret meeting in the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel in New York City on 21 September 2006, with eight major Zionist pro-Israel organizations, including The American Jewish Congress, B’Nai B’Rith, ADL and others.”
“We don’t know what they discussed because, as I say, it was held in secret; but, one month later, the Kirchners dispatched special prosecutor Alberto Nisman to the US, where he met with CIA and Mossad agents and, upon his return, launched a formal accusation against the former Iranian government of Ali Rafsanjani. The judge hearing this case at the time, Dr. Rodolfo Canicoba Corral, immediately obliged by accepting it.”
“This was headline news and prompted Rabbi Israel Singer, the political director of the World Jewish Congress, to “congratulate the Argentine government” as Argentina’s accusation against Iran “confirmed the commitment the Kirchners undertook during that secret meeting”. Commitment? To do what? Why? In exchange for what? ”
Nisman Apparent Employee of the State of Israel and Participant in the Cover Up.
“Dr. Labaké (defence lawyer) recently asked Special State Prosecutor Alberto Nisman to dig four meters under the entrance to the former AMIA building in order to determine, once and for all, if the remains of that vehicle exist. Prosecutor Nisman refused to do so, which is not surprising when you consider that he tours the world spreading a fanatically pro-Israel and anti-Arab message regarding the AMIA attack.”
“At the end of 2007, for example, Mr. Nisman was a special guest at the Annual Meeting of the American Jewish Congress. In March 2009, he gave a presentation at the Queensborough Holocaust Library in New York City. At the end of 2008 he personally submitted a full report on the status of this case to the Supreme Court – not of Argentina, as you might expect, but of Israel in Tel Aviv. Clearly, Mr Nisman acts as Special Prosecutor not on behalf of Argentina but of the State of Israel!”
The Political Context in Israel in the Early 1990s and how it may relate to the Argentine attacks.
False Flag Attacks in Argentina: 1992 and 1994, by Adrian Salbuchi, James Fetzer
http://www.voltairenet.org/article162474.html
“Look at the timeline: on 14 July 1994, right smack in the middle of the unfolding of this insidious internal fighting amongst Zionists and inside Israel, the AMIA building was blown up. AMIA’s leadership at that time was pro-Labour, so it was clearly a “warning shot” from the ultra-right Nazi-Zionist wing for Rabin and his Labour government to stop negotiating “Land for Peace” with the Palestinians. It now appears that prime minister Rabin, who was a tough guy, did not “get the message”. So, when does this whole sequence come to a head? On 4 November 1995 – just 16 months after the AMIA attack – Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin was gunned down, JFK-like, on the streets of Tel-Aviv, not by a Neo-Nazi nor by an Islamic Fundamentalist, but by one Ygal Amir, a young ultra-right-wing student member of the settler’s movement linked to the internal security service Shin Beth, which was being vigorously reshuffled by Rabin. he in-fighting among Zionists had as one of its bloody episodes the bombing of the Israeli Embassy and later the AMIA building in Argentina, which was perceived by the Zionist Nazis at the time as a symbol of Labour’s stronghold. Why Buenos Aires, you might ask? Simple – because Argentine public security has always been, and still is, very weak, thus making both terror operations relatively easy with Argentine targets.”
The Familiar Trademarks.
“Nevertheless, and similar to 9/11, although they have shown the technical capability to carry out false flag attacks with (almost) technical perfection – using bombs, controlled demolitions, and all – they still are extremely sloppy in that they have left their fingerprints all over the place when perpetrating these attacks which have been revealed by inconsistencies that have proven impossible to explain away.”
The Argentine Government Had Nothing to Fear from the NIsman Affidavit and No Motive to Kill Nisman.
A Rush to Judgment in Argentine Bomb Case? | Consortiumnews
https://consortiumnews.com/2015/02/07/a-rush-to-judgment-in-argentine-bomb-case/
Gareth Porter again.
“The central accusation in his affidavit, made 96 times, according to press accounts, was that Kirchner and Timerman had sought to revoke the Interpol arrest warrants against the former Iranian officials.
“But Ronald K. Noble, the secretary general of Interpol for 15 years until last November, denied Nisman’s accusation. Noble declared, “I can say with 100 percent certainty, not a scintilla of doubt, that Foreign Minister Timerman and the Argentine government have been steadfast, persistent and unwavering that the Interpol’s red notices be issued, remain in effect and not be suspend or removed.”
“Noble’s denial raises an obvious question: Why would the Kirchner government, knowing that Nisman’s main claim could be easily refuted, have any reason to kill him on the eve of the presentation of his case? Why give those seeking to discredit the government’s policy on the AMIA bombing the opportunity to shift the issue from the facts of the case to the presumption of officially sponsored assassination?”
“Nisman’s suggestion that former Iranian president Abolhassen Banisadr had “direct knowledge” related to the AMIA bombings was a stunningly brazen falsehood. Banisadr had been impeached by the Iranian legislature in June 1981 and had fled to Paris the following month – 13 years before the bombing.”
“Nisman also cited the testimony of Abolghassem Mesbahi, who called himself a “defector” from the Iranian intelligence service, that Iranian officials had made such a decision sometime in August 1993. But Mesbahi was known by U.S. intelligence analysts as a “serial fabricator”, who had also told an obviously false story about Iranian involvement in the 9/11 attacks.”
The Recurring Cabal Modus Operandi
When Cornered Lash Out. When Caught in a Lie Tell another Bigger Lie.
Nisman was on holiday in Europe when he was directed to return home after a meeting in Amsterdam, a notorious stronghold of Israeli intelligence in Europe. Nisman had been given a thankless and impossible task. The framing of Iran and Hezbollah for an horrific attack they cannot possibly have conducted due to the central lie about there being a car bombing.
The lack of the car bombing was an impossible hurdle for Nisman to clear and when this became completely obvious, Nisman’s handlers decided that he was worth more to them dead than alive. In the wake of his murder there have been many shenanigans but in time the truth will out and the Argentine massacres will be seen in their true context as the beginning of a series of spectacular and deadly attacks conducted by the same group, using captured members of Law enforcement, and murdering police who don’t cooperate with the frame up or cover up that False Flag terror always requires.
There is little doubt that the same broad group used the same techniques in Oklahoma city in 1995, in the Khobar Towers attack of 1997, in New York City in September 2001 and in Bali one year, one month and one day later, on October 12th, 2002, Crowley’s birthday.
Results of the Group’s Later Projects.

Oklahoma City 1995




Salbuchi – False Flag Attacks in Argentina: AMIA and Israeli Embassy Bldgs – Part 1 of 3
Salbuchi – False Flag Attacks in Argentina: AMIA and Israeli Embassy Bldgs – Part 2 of 3
Salbuchi – False Flag Attacks in Argentina: AMIA and Israeli Embassy Bldgs – Part 3 of 3
Israel staged false flag 1994 terror attack to blame Iran’
This is in Spanish but is understandable since you know what they are talking about.
AMIA REPETITA
Sources.
Bush’s Iran/Argentina Terror Frame-Up | The Nation
http://www.thenation.com/article/bushs-iranargentina-terror-frame?page=full
False Indicators From Buenos Aires Bombing » CounterPunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/07/23/false-indicators-from-buenos-aires-bombing/
The Terror Bombing, the Prosecutor, the Spy and Mossad
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/29209-the-terror-bombing-the-prosecutor-the-spy-and-mossad#
The Vineyard of the Saker: Hezbollah Didn’t Do Argentine Bombing (updated)
http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.com.au/2008/01/hezbollah-didnt-do-argentine-bombing.html
A Rush to Judgment in Argentine Bomb Case? | Consortiumnews
https://consortiumnews.com/2015/02/07/a-rush-to-judgment-in-argentine-bomb-case/
Argentine prosecutor shot point blank in forehead: official – Yahoo News
http://news.yahoo.com/colleague-slain-prosecutor-barred-leaving-argentina-215640674.html
The Death of Israeli Agent and “Argentine” Prosecutor Alberto Nisman – henrymakow.com
http://henrymakow.com/2015/01/the-death-of-alberto-nisman.html
Argentina, Iran and the strange death of Alberto Nisman | Gabriel Bracesco | Comment is free | The Guardian
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/20/argentina-iran-alberto-nisman-prosecutor-death
Argentina approves deal with Iran to investigate deadly 1994 bombing – CNN.com
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/02/28/world/americas/argentina-iran-agreement/
Argentina Seeks Renewed Deal With Iran to Investigate 1994 Bombing / Sputnik International
http://sputniknews.com/news/20150305/1019078745.html
Cristina Fernández de Kirchner – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cristina_Fern%C3%A1ndez_de_Kirchner
Néstor Kirchner – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N%C3%A9stor_Kirchner
Alberto Nisman – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Nisman
False Flag Attacks in Argentina: 1992 and 1994, by Adrian Salbuchi, James Fetzer
http://www.voltairenet.org/article162474.html
The Vineyard of the Saker: False flags and how to start a ‘colour revolution’ in Argentina
http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/false-flags-and-how-to-start-colour.html
Jewish Lobby: From AMIA to White Widow | Rehmat’s World
http://rehmat1.com/2015/02/01/jewish-lobby-from-amia-to-white-widow/
Argentina: WikiLeaks reveals US interference in bombing case | Green Left Weekly
https://www.greenleft.org.au/node/46996
aangirfan: BALI BOMB – inside job.
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com.au/2006/07/bali-bomb-inside-job.html
Mapping 9/11: The Fort Lee Mystery | Veterans Today
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/12/mapping-911-fort-lee/
Oklahoma City Bombing April 19 1995 Part1 | Veterans Today
US Officials Leaked False Story Blaming Iran for Khobar Attack by Gareth Porter — Antiwar.com
Dead Police Officer And OKC Bombing Coverup
http://www.rense.com/general10/kc.htm
Asociación Mutual Israelita Argentina – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asociaci%C3%B3n_Mutual_Israelita_Argentina
AMIA bombing – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMIA_Bombing
Carlos Menem – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Menem
Se acusa a los musulmanes de los ataques a AMIA y la embajada de Israel sin pruebas, por Juan Gabriel Labaké
http://www.voltairenet.org/article141386.html
Washington veut réécrire les attentats de Buenos-Aires, par Thierry Meyssan
http://www.voltairenet.org/article141896.html
¿Musulmanes o pista israelí?, por José Petrosino, Oscar Abudara Bini
http://www.voltairenet.org/article141382.html
Buenos Aires bombing in 1994 allegedly instigated by former Interior Minister
http://www.voltairenet.org/article179257.html
Iran and the AMIA Bombing in Argentina , by Belén Fernández
http://www.voltairenet.org/article161258.html
Timerman’s letter September 30, 2009 – Timerman_s_letter.pdf
Click to access Timerman_s_letter.pdf
Aleister Crowley – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia