- The imagery of the 100% fake killing of the French policeman was THE classic reverse psychology pixelation example where the liars try and tell the children not to watch the fake footage as it would be “too upsetting.”
March 28th, 2016.
Terror Psyops are a Proven Fact
“As reflected in a recent NATO conference in Latvia and in the Pentagon’s new “Law of War” manual, the U.S. government has come to view the control and manipulation of information as a “soft power” weapon, merging psychological operations, propaganda and public affairs under the catch phrase “strategic communications.”
“This attitude has led to treating psy-ops manipulative techniques for influencing a target population’s state of mind and surreptitiously shaping people’s perceptions as just a normal part of U.S. and NATO’s information policy.” Consortium News, September 2015.
It was stunning to listen to a public conversation between two highly respected individuals responsible for a lot of excellent work and be informed that there have never been any terror psyops or staged events and anyone who thinks there have been is an absolute fool.
This is a brief flavor.
“it makes me angry…. this crazy hypothesis….. they are doing so much damage to the truth movement…. we are being placed in the same bucket as people who are really taking it to some outside, non-existent level, (stating for example that) Sandy Hook didn’t happen.”
Charlie Hebdo -the Fake Killing of Ahmed Merabat.
On January 7th, 2015 a fake shooting was staged in the streets of Paris as part of the Charlie Hebdo “terror attack” and this is a proven fact. The video and stills are clear.evidence of fake terror.
When the masked gunman ran down the Paris street towards Ahmed Marabat the policeman inexplicably lying on the ground, he only pretended to shoot the policeman.
The video shows that the shooter actually fired a blank round and that the blank round struck the pavement away from the policeman.
The impact is visible, only one shot was fired and so there can be no doubt about the fact that the killing of the policeman was a psyop rather than a terror attack.
There is no other possible explanation for the filmed feigned shooting of the policeman in the Paris street and to suggest otherwise is to deny reality.
Ak47 Experiment Underlines the fraudulent nature of the Ahmed Merabat murder.
The video below was made to test the comparative power of the AK47 and AR15 assault rifles. In this video an AK47 is fired at close range at a concrete building block. A single round from the rifle breaks the front of the concrete block completely and penetrates through to the second layer.The bullet is fired from a distance of approximately 25 feet, a close range but a longer distance than between the “terrorist” and Ahmed Merabat in Paris.
This represents a valid experiment to determine the effects of AK47 rounds on concrete and proves that no such round was fired either into the concrete nor into Ahmed Merabat.
Here are some of the key stills form the test. Showing the weapon, ammunition and their effect on the target.
AR-15 vs AK-47 Masonary concrete Block Penetration Power Tet
Charlie Hebdo- a staged event?
If the event outside the Charlie Hebdo offices, the only part of the event the audience were shown, is proven to be fake then the assumption must be that the events inside were also fake, that the whole thing was simply a story because if a real massacre had taken place inside why bother to construct a faux killing in the street outside?
It would make no sense whatsoever to fake a terrorist attack in the midst of or immediate aftermath of a real terror attack in order to convince people of the reality of the first real attack.
It is the most ludicrous idea imaginable.
Or, are we supposed to believe that the French police made a deal with the terrorists that after they murdered a large segment of the Charlie Hebdo staff they would go outside, switch to blank ammunition and stage the fake killing of a French policeman in the street for the cameras and then pick up the obvious marker shoe as they left?
(Both gunman were wearing two shoes at all times, the shoe that was picked up had not been lost by the gunman, it was a stage marker placed there for them to coordinate the actions of the gunman with the view of the cameraman)
Logically there is an overwhelming likelihood that given the shooting of Ahmed Merabat was inauthentic, the whole event is almost certainly a fraud.
Whereas the fake killing of Ahmed Merabat on January 7th last year is a hard proven fact it cannot be stated with the same confidence that the shooting that purportedly took place inside the Charlie Hebdo offices was also fake but it is the only logical conclusion.
The suggestion that the idea of terror events being psyops is beyond the pale is a joke at this stage and those who make this suggestion are merely humiliating themselves and proving their own ignorance.
On this matter they are identical to the “leftist” drones like those of Democracy Now, who refuse to even consider the wide open evidence contradicting the official story of 911 such as the measured and proven free-fall collapse of World Trade Centre Building 7.
I remain an admirer of the work these individuals have done and would urge them to simply examine the evidence.
Charlie Hebdo shooting police officer uncensored video GRAPHIC CONTENT!
CHARLIE HEBDO SHOOTING – FAKE
Charlie Hebdo -Police Shooting Hoax
During the course of this excellent interview Steve Pieczenik explains the purpose of these shenanigans.
“Real Politik” with Dr. James Tracy – Interview 82: Dr. Steve Pieczenik 03-28-2016